Interactive Transcript
0:00
<v ->Well rheumatologists became very interested in MR imaging,
0:04
although they always liked plain films,
0:06
and they still order plain films,
0:08
but they became interested in MR imaging quite a while ago.
0:13
And in fact, what I'm showing you at the bottom
0:15
of this slide is the search that I did in 2009,
0:20
MRI in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathy.
0:25
This being, what, 13 years ago,
0:27
there were 18,000 results at that time.
0:30
I'm showing you three of those results
0:32
to point out some of the early things
0:34
that were suggested with regard to the advantages
0:38
of MR over conventional radiography.
0:41
MR detects bone erosions in early RA
0:45
when conventional radiography is negative.
0:48
Number two, MRI in fact detects bone erosions
0:51
one year earlier than conventional radiography.
0:55
And number three, MR finding
0:59
of marrow edema is a strong predictor
1:02
of the subsequent development of bone erosions.
1:05
So look at the excitement that all of this,
1:07
I mean here you have a technique,
1:09
we don't have to wait for the bone erosions.
1:11
We're gonna see changes on MR.
1:14
We're gonna perhaps see marrow edema.
1:16
So after this, so many articles appeared,
1:19
I'm sure we're dealing with hundreds of thousands
1:22
of articles dealing with MRI and rheumatoid arthritis.
1:27
If I had to try to summarize what we currently know
1:30
about the role of MRI, generally accepted,
1:34
I've listed here five things.
1:37
MRI is more sensitive than the clinical examination
1:40
for identifying synovitis.
1:42
MRI can predict progression to RA when you're dealing
1:46
with an undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis.
1:50
Subclinical synovitis
1:52
detected by MRI predicts subsequent flare
1:56
even when clinical remission is present.
1:59
MRI may be used to predict treatment response.
2:03
All right, and I think that's a very important one.
2:06
And then the bottom one I've highlighted.
2:08
MRI can allow detection of bone marrow edema,
2:12
which is a strong predictor
2:14
of subsequent radiographic progression in early RA.
2:19
Edema before bone erosion.
2:22
Now ultrasonography can also be used
2:25
for many of these same factors.
2:27
And as you know, rheumatologists are very interested
2:30
in ultrasonography as well.
2:33
So we look at a typical example, and you know,
2:35
a lot of people believe the earliest target site
2:38
of rheumatoid is not the hand, it's not the wrist,
2:41
certainly not the knee or large joint.
2:44
It's the foot, and in the foot classically
2:47
it's the metatarsal heads
2:48
and the metatarsal phalangeal joints
2:51
that are involved early on.
2:52
And the earliest findings occur in the medial aspect
2:55
of those metatarsal heads as osteopenia
2:59
and a subtle dot-dash disruption
3:03
of the subchondral bone plate,
3:04
with the exception of the fifth metatarsal
3:07
where an erosion may occur here.
3:09
Well in this particular case, you could argue
3:11
whether or not you see anything
3:13
that tells you you're dealing with rheumatoid arthritis,
3:16
but when you deal with MR in the same pace,
3:19
you begin to see that it is clearly more sensitive.
3:24
Part of that relates to it's a tomographic technique.
3:27
We're looking at sections rather than a composite image.
3:31
But here we see the marrow edema,
3:33
and we can see areas of erosion,
3:35
again, typically on the medial aspect
3:38
of that metatarsal head.
3:41
Now not everything is golden
3:42
when we talk about MRI and rheumatoid arthritis.
3:45
There are diagnostic problems.
3:48
Early on when I first started to do studies
3:51
in patients with rheumatoid using MR,
3:54
we would have a time slot of four or five hours
3:58
because we didn't know what to do.
4:01
I mean, how many joints?
4:03
Both sides, perhaps?
4:04
Hands and wrists separately?
4:06
Throw in the feet?
4:07
Perhaps the hips and knees?
4:09
I mean then do we have to use gadolinium before and after?
4:14
Do we have to use all three imaging planes?
4:16
You add all that up, you can understand
4:18
why studies might take five or six hours.
4:22
Here one of our earlier studies
4:24
just showing you rheumatoid arthritis MR imaging,
4:28
including an IV gad, which we were using early on.
4:32
And you can see clearly changes of rheumatoid,
4:35
both in the right hand and left hand,
4:37
areas of erosion, synovitis, soft tissue involvement,
4:41
very, very dramatic.
4:43
Well of course, protocols were established
4:47
by some of the national organizations.
4:51
And basically what is considered
4:54
that if you're using MR for rheumatoid,
4:56
typically you image in two planes,
4:59
you use T1-weighted images
5:01
before and after intravenous gadolinium.
5:04
Whether or not you need fat suppressed images is not clear.
5:08
And then you need a T2-weighted fat suppressed
5:12
or a spin echo or STIR sequence.
5:16
So I show you an example here
5:18
of the T1-weighted fast spin echo image,
5:21
a T2 fat suppressed fast spin echo image,
5:25
and a gadolinium image.
5:26
And clearly we can see some signal,
5:29
this could be fluid or synovitis,
5:33
but with the gadolinium we can see
5:35
there's still some enhancement,
5:36
so presumably that is synovial inflammation.
5:41
But therein lies the second problem.
5:44
I mean isn't enhancement of synovium considered normal
5:47
up to a certain extent?
5:49
Synovium is vascular.
5:51
So how much enhancement, how thick the synovium,
5:54
how widespread the abnormality must it be to be certain?
5:59
And this is not clear, and it would vary
6:01
from one joint to another.
6:03
There are studies that have proven this,
6:05
for example this one
6:07
where they looked at contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings
6:10
of the knee in healthy children.
6:12
And look at the highlighting here,
6:15
following gadolinium.
6:18
Well is that too thick?
6:19
We don't have measurements.
6:21
And I don't think we can be certain.
6:23
And early on, we decided to do a study,
6:25
and our study was to look at what might be seen
6:29
about the odontoid process.
6:31
As I'll talk about later, rheumatoid targets this site.
6:34
So it's a good one to look at.
6:36
So we took those patients undergoing brain MR
6:39
who were getting contrast agents with no arthritis,
6:43
and we looked at their C1 C2 articulations,
6:46
and here arrows point out areas of synovial enhancement
6:51
about the odontoid.
6:52
So indeed synovium, normal synovium enhances.
6:57
How do you tell it's pathologic?
6:59
And then there's another diagnostic problem.
7:02
And that is it's easy to mistake surface irregularities
7:06
as erosions when normal contour alterations may be seen.
7:12
And this is a particular problem at the metacarpal heads
7:15
and the metatarsal heads, as shown here.
7:19
And these are areas of normal grooves
7:21
and flattened areas and irregularities that are normal.
7:25
Now you might say, gee, that doesn't look too bad.
7:28
They don't look like erosions.
7:29
But look at this example.
7:31
Here on the left, normal metatarsal head.
7:34
All right, well normal, but boy, oh, boy,
7:37
that kinda looks like an erosion.
7:39
On your right, a patient with rheumatoid.
7:42
Clearly different, but you can see
7:44
there might be diagnostic problems that arise
7:47
telling normal contour alterations
7:51
from areas of bone erosion.
7:53
What is clear in my view, however, is the role of MR
7:57
in following patients during treatment.
8:00
You start with an early image, here one before treatment.
8:04
You get a second image, identical parameters,
8:07
identical imaging technique.
8:10
You compare the two, there may still be abnormalities,
8:13
as in this case, but as you look at the two images,
8:16
certainly it looks like there has been some improvement
8:19
on the right 12 months during or after the treatment.