Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

MRI & Rheumatoid Arthritis

HIDE
PrevNext

0:00

<v ->Well rheumatologists became very interested in MR imaging,

0:04

although they always liked plain films,

0:06

and they still order plain films,

0:08

but they became interested in MR imaging quite a while ago.

0:13

And in fact, what I'm showing you at the bottom

0:15

of this slide is the search that I did in 2009,

0:20

MRI in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathy.

0:25

This being, what, 13 years ago,

0:27

there were 18,000 results at that time.

0:30

I'm showing you three of those results

0:32

to point out some of the early things

0:34

that were suggested with regard to the advantages

0:38

of MR over conventional radiography.

0:41

MR detects bone erosions in early RA

0:45

when conventional radiography is negative.

0:48

Number two, MRI in fact detects bone erosions

0:51

one year earlier than conventional radiography.

0:55

And number three, MR finding

0:59

of marrow edema is a strong predictor

1:02

of the subsequent development of bone erosions.

1:05

So look at the excitement that all of this,

1:07

I mean here you have a technique,

1:09

we don't have to wait for the bone erosions.

1:11

We're gonna see changes on MR.

1:14

We're gonna perhaps see marrow edema.

1:16

So after this, so many articles appeared,

1:19

I'm sure we're dealing with hundreds of thousands

1:22

of articles dealing with MRI and rheumatoid arthritis.

1:27

If I had to try to summarize what we currently know

1:30

about the role of MRI, generally accepted,

1:34

I've listed here five things.

1:37

MRI is more sensitive than the clinical examination

1:40

for identifying synovitis.

1:42

MRI can predict progression to RA when you're dealing

1:46

with an undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis.

1:50

Subclinical synovitis

1:52

detected by MRI predicts subsequent flare

1:56

even when clinical remission is present.

1:59

MRI may be used to predict treatment response.

2:03

All right, and I think that's a very important one.

2:06

And then the bottom one I've highlighted.

2:08

MRI can allow detection of bone marrow edema,

2:12

which is a strong predictor

2:14

of subsequent radiographic progression in early RA.

2:19

Edema before bone erosion.

2:22

Now ultrasonography can also be used

2:25

for many of these same factors.

2:27

And as you know, rheumatologists are very interested

2:30

in ultrasonography as well.

2:33

So we look at a typical example, and you know,

2:35

a lot of people believe the earliest target site

2:38

of rheumatoid is not the hand, it's not the wrist,

2:41

certainly not the knee or large joint.

2:44

It's the foot, and in the foot classically

2:47

it's the metatarsal heads

2:48

and the metatarsal phalangeal joints

2:51

that are involved early on.

2:52

And the earliest findings occur in the medial aspect

2:55

of those metatarsal heads as osteopenia

2:59

and a subtle dot-dash disruption

3:03

of the subchondral bone plate,

3:04

with the exception of the fifth metatarsal

3:07

where an erosion may occur here.

3:09

Well in this particular case, you could argue

3:11

whether or not you see anything

3:13

that tells you you're dealing with rheumatoid arthritis,

3:16

but when you deal with MR in the same pace,

3:19

you begin to see that it is clearly more sensitive.

3:24

Part of that relates to it's a tomographic technique.

3:27

We're looking at sections rather than a composite image.

3:31

But here we see the marrow edema,

3:33

and we can see areas of erosion,

3:35

again, typically on the medial aspect

3:38

of that metatarsal head.

3:41

Now not everything is golden

3:42

when we talk about MRI and rheumatoid arthritis.

3:45

There are diagnostic problems.

3:48

Early on when I first started to do studies

3:51

in patients with rheumatoid using MR,

3:54

we would have a time slot of four or five hours

3:58

because we didn't know what to do.

4:01

I mean, how many joints?

4:03

Both sides, perhaps?

4:04

Hands and wrists separately?

4:06

Throw in the feet?

4:07

Perhaps the hips and knees?

4:09

I mean then do we have to use gadolinium before and after?

4:14

Do we have to use all three imaging planes?

4:16

You add all that up, you can understand

4:18

why studies might take five or six hours.

4:22

Here one of our earlier studies

4:24

just showing you rheumatoid arthritis MR imaging,

4:28

including an IV gad, which we were using early on.

4:32

And you can see clearly changes of rheumatoid,

4:35

both in the right hand and left hand,

4:37

areas of erosion, synovitis, soft tissue involvement,

4:41

very, very dramatic.

4:43

Well of course, protocols were established

4:47

by some of the national organizations.

4:51

And basically what is considered

4:54

that if you're using MR for rheumatoid,

4:56

typically you image in two planes,

4:59

you use T1-weighted images

5:01

before and after intravenous gadolinium.

5:04

Whether or not you need fat suppressed images is not clear.

5:08

And then you need a T2-weighted fat suppressed

5:12

or a spin echo or STIR sequence.

5:16

So I show you an example here

5:18

of the T1-weighted fast spin echo image,

5:21

a T2 fat suppressed fast spin echo image,

5:25

and a gadolinium image.

5:26

And clearly we can see some signal,

5:29

this could be fluid or synovitis,

5:33

but with the gadolinium we can see

5:35

there's still some enhancement,

5:36

so presumably that is synovial inflammation.

5:41

But therein lies the second problem.

5:44

I mean isn't enhancement of synovium considered normal

5:47

up to a certain extent?

5:49

Synovium is vascular.

5:51

So how much enhancement, how thick the synovium,

5:54

how widespread the abnormality must it be to be certain?

5:59

And this is not clear, and it would vary

6:01

from one joint to another.

6:03

There are studies that have proven this,

6:05

for example this one

6:07

where they looked at contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings

6:10

of the knee in healthy children.

6:12

And look at the highlighting here,

6:15

following gadolinium.

6:18

Well is that too thick?

6:19

We don't have measurements.

6:21

And I don't think we can be certain.

6:23

And early on, we decided to do a study,

6:25

and our study was to look at what might be seen

6:29

about the odontoid process.

6:31

As I'll talk about later, rheumatoid targets this site.

6:34

So it's a good one to look at.

6:36

So we took those patients undergoing brain MR

6:39

who were getting contrast agents with no arthritis,

6:43

and we looked at their C1 C2 articulations,

6:46

and here arrows point out areas of synovial enhancement

6:51

about the odontoid.

6:52

So indeed synovium, normal synovium enhances.

6:57

How do you tell it's pathologic?

6:59

And then there's another diagnostic problem.

7:02

And that is it's easy to mistake surface irregularities

7:06

as erosions when normal contour alterations may be seen.

7:12

And this is a particular problem at the metacarpal heads

7:15

and the metatarsal heads, as shown here.

7:19

And these are areas of normal grooves

7:21

and flattened areas and irregularities that are normal.

7:25

Now you might say, gee, that doesn't look too bad.

7:28

They don't look like erosions.

7:29

But look at this example.

7:31

Here on the left, normal metatarsal head.

7:34

All right, well normal, but boy, oh, boy,

7:37

that kinda looks like an erosion.

7:39

On your right, a patient with rheumatoid.

7:42

Clearly different, but you can see

7:44

there might be diagnostic problems that arise

7:47

telling normal contour alterations

7:51

from areas of bone erosion.

7:53

What is clear in my view, however, is the role of MR

7:57

in following patients during treatment.

8:00

You start with an early image, here one before treatment.

8:04

You get a second image, identical parameters,

8:07

identical imaging technique.

8:10

You compare the two, there may still be abnormalities,

8:13

as in this case, but as you look at the two images,

8:16

certainly it looks like there has been some improvement

8:19

on the right 12 months during or after the treatment.

Report

Faculty

Donald Resnick, MD

Professor Emeritus, Department of Radiology

University of California, San Diego

Carlos H. Longo, MD

Head of Radiology

Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo

Abdalla Skaf, MD

Head of the Department of Diagnostic Imaging Hospital HCor / Medical director of ALTA diagnostics (DASA group)

HCOR / DASA / TELEIMAGEM

Rodrigo Aguiar, MD, PhD

Professor of Radiology

Federal University of Paraná - Brazil

Marcelo D’Abreu, MD

Head of Radiology

Hospital Mae de Deus

Tags

X-Ray (Plain Films)

Musculoskeletal (MSK)

MSK

MRI

Hand & Wrist

Foot & Ankle