Interactive Transcript
0:00
<v ->I here, I show you a short list
0:03
of some of the causes of neuropathic disease.
0:08
I like to call this neuropathic osteoarthropathy
0:12
but in some of the early books that we wrote
0:15
there's a chapter entitled neuropathic arthropathy
0:19
and I should never have used that term
0:21
because neuropathic changes often begin
0:24
in the subchondral bone and not in the joint.
0:28
So a better term for this is neuropathic osteoarthropathy.
0:33
With regard to diabetes, we recognize it most commonly
0:37
about the foot, less commonly the ankle
0:40
the need that is lower extremity, rarely upper extremity.
0:45
And also it may involve the spine.
0:48
I show you an example here
0:49
of neuropathic osteoarthropathy
0:52
I always think it looks a bit like OA with a vengeance.
0:56
So we see more extensive bone fragmentation, subluxations.
1:02
This is a classic location involving the LisFranc joint
1:06
involving intertarsal joints as well.
1:10
This is very, very characteristic you can see with MR.
1:13
In addition to the morphologic changes
1:16
low signal on T1, high signal on T2.
1:21
Neuropathic findings can progress rapidly.
1:25
So in this particular example,
1:27
early on the major findings are marrow edema
1:31
involving portions of the midfoot.
1:33
One year later
1:34
you can see the bone fragmentation that has occurred
1:37
in this particular disease.
1:40
A great finding, horrific finding
1:45
for neuropathic osteoarthropathy
1:48
unusual evulsion fractures of bone.
1:52
So if you see, for example, particularly without an episode
1:56
of severe trauma, an evulsion of the calcaneus
2:00
by the Achilles tendon, that is diabetes
2:04
until proven otherwise.
2:06
That is a very important finding.
2:09
And similarly unusual osteochondral fractures
2:14
of joint surfaces is a manifestation
2:17
of neuropathic osteoarthropathy.
2:20
Diabetes can involve the spine.
2:23
Here I show you in an example,
2:25
the arrow indicating what this looked like.
2:28
Initially, there were changes in the next disc space.
2:31
Here we are.
2:32
Three months later, no infection.
2:34
You can see the disorganization occurring
2:37
at that particular disco-vertebral junction.
2:41
It looks like infection,
2:42
and that can be a problem in differential diagnosis.
2:47
Well, because of the occurrence of either
2:50
neuropathic osteoarthropathy and infection,
2:55
the American College of Radiology tried to come up
2:57
with the scheme as to guide you
3:00
as to what imaging studies should be ordered.
3:03
And they came up with three variant scenarios.
3:07
So let's quickly look at those.
3:10
The first is a patient who comes in
3:12
with suspected osteomyelitis
3:14
of the foot based upon clinical findings.
3:19
The initial imaging study
3:22
in those patients should be radiography.
3:25
You don't go to a cross-sectional technique.
3:28
Now, if the radiographs reveals something significant
3:31
you may have to go further from there.
3:34
The second variant, variant two
3:36
and you can see the full description over here.
3:39
Is a patient who comes in with soft tissue swelling
3:42
without an ulcer,
3:44
the condition suspects osteomyelitis
3:47
or early neuropathic osteoarthropathy.
3:51
Additional imaging is generally employed.
3:53
And typically following conventional radiography
3:57
in variant two, it is MR are imaging
4:00
either without IV contrast or with, and without IV contrast.
4:06
And the third situation is the patient who comes
4:09
in with soft issues, swelling with an ulcer
4:13
and patient is suspected of osteomyelitis
4:16
with or without neuropathic disease.
4:19
Here again, you can start with conventional radiography
4:24
but you need additional imaging.
4:26
And most often we turn to MR
4:28
with or without intravenous gadolinium
4:31
in order to further evaluate it.
4:34
So let me show you one scenario, variant three
4:38
here's a patient who comes in soft tissue swelling,
4:41
and ulcer visible clinically
4:44
with clear neuropathic changes involving the foot.
4:48
But there is a clinical suspicion here
4:51
because of the ulcer for osteomyelitis.
4:55
MR is indicated, was done in this case
4:58
showing you in fact,
5:00
the soft tissues swelling,
5:02
the abscess, and ulcer, and involvement of bones.
5:06
So this patient had both neuropathic disease,
5:10
and osteomyelitis.
5:14
Now those people who have written about
5:16
the differentiation of neuropathic osteoarthropathy,
5:20
and osteomyelitis have emphasized a sign
5:24
seen on the T1 weighted images
5:27
known as the ghost sign.
5:30
Characteristic of infection,
5:33
and not of neuropathic osteoarthropathy.
5:38
So here's an example to show you how it works.
5:41
We're dealing with a diabetic patient
5:44
with extensive involvement of the midfoot.
5:46
It could be neuropathic alone.
5:49
All right.
5:50
It could be neuropathic with infection.
5:53
Let's get an MR.
5:54
That's what would be suggested.
5:57
The ghost sign indicates that when you look
5:59
at the T1 weighted image of that area
6:03
you don't see the subchondral bone plates
6:06
or the cortices of the bone,
6:09
the cortices of the bone very well.
6:12
The bones kind of look all together like a ghost.
6:15
And that is highly specific for infection.
6:19
The fluid sensitive sequence are not
6:22
where you will see the ghost sign,
6:24
it's on the T1 rated image.
6:26
So in this case, osteomyelitis with neuropathic involvement
6:30
here's a second case, both with osteomyelitis.
6:35
All right. And with a ghost sign.
6:38
Again, you can't see the outlines of these bones here.
6:42
All right?
6:43
And indeed, in this case, also, the MR
6:46
demonstrated a sinus tract.
6:49
So this was osteomyelitis combined with neuropathic disease.
6:54
And here's an example of neuropathic disease alone.
6:58
The T1 weighted image.
7:00
There is no ghost sign.
7:01
You can see the surfaces
7:03
although they're irregular of the bone
7:05
the subluxations, look at the plantar flexion
7:09
of the (indistinct).
7:09
So this would be absent ghost sign.
7:12
More characteristic of neuropathic disease.
7:16
I just wanted to show you again
7:18
an example of congenital insensitivity to pain syndromes.
7:22
I've already shown you one during this course
7:25
it's a variety of syndromes
7:27
differing in their patterns of inheritance.
7:31
And in my experience,
7:32
one of the findings we see are these
7:34
unusual osteochondral fractures.
7:39
So when I see that in the absence of a good history
7:42
of a significant injury,
7:43
I think of neuropathic disease.