Interactive Transcript
0:00
This is a display
0:02
that I personally like in which I have my NIP
0:06
projection, the maximum intensity projection,
0:09
and I start with Axis PET only CT infused.
0:14
Now remember that I mentioned that we have a
0:18
non attenuation corrected pit series
0:21
and then the attenuation corrected pit series.
0:25
In theory, you should have the attenuation corrected
0:29
images already pulled up in your display,
0:34
and sometimes you have to select that manually.
0:38
I want to briefly show you the differences between the two
0:42
of them so you can identify the differences
0:47
and use the non attenuation corrected series
0:50
to your advantage in certain scenarios
0:53
where these may be helpful.
0:55
So here I'm showing you two images of the same patient,
1:01
and you can appreciate that there's a little bit
1:03
of a difference in how things are displayed.
1:07
The organs that you're seeing
1:08
and the intensity, the non attenuation corrected the images
1:13
are the one that I'm showing you on the left side
1:18
of the screen, and the attenuation corrected image is the
1:22
one on the right side of the screen.
1:25
So notice at the periphery what the difference is,
1:30
you have higher count, higher intensity
1:35
along the periphery
1:36
of the body surface on the non attenuation corrected images,
1:41
and these decreases.
1:42
Once you have applied that CT attenuation map, this is one
1:46
of the things that may help you distinguish the tube.
1:49
This is because the photons from the periphery are barely
1:52
attenuated by the air on the original data.
1:57
And then once we have applied the ct,
2:00
they decrease in intensity.
2:02
The other organs that may present a difference is,
2:06
for instance, the liver.
2:08
We know that the liver has a moderate, uh,
2:12
diffuse uptake normally,
2:14
and in fact, we use the liver
2:16
as a point reference in the case of uh, FDG,
2:20
and look at the raw data
2:23
where you barely have activity within the liver.
2:26
The other thing would be to look at the lungs.
2:30
Lungs are showing in the raw data
2:32
or the non attenuation corrected pit as having some degree
2:36
of counts, but we, when we compare to the post correction,
2:41
you have a much lower degree of uptake in the lungs
2:45
because the majority of the photons have not been
2:49
greatly attenuated by the air within the lungs.
2:53
So these are the things to look at
2:55
to distinguish the two series.
2:59
When would you use the non attenuation corrected series?
3:04
Well, there's a couple of scenarios
3:06
that I think it's important to know.
3:07
One would be to evaluate cutaneous or superficial lesions
3:11
because they might show more prominent uptake
3:14
before you apply the attenuation correction.
3:17
And the other scenario would be to look into
3:22
artifacts, particularly metallic devices such as prosthesis
3:27
or corcas.
3:29
One of the common things is that
3:32
after applying the attenuation correction,
3:35
there is increased uptake surrounding
3:38
these metallic devices.
3:40
And to distinguish between
3:43
an artifact from the attenuation correction versus
3:46
real uptake, you would go to the raw data
3:50
and we will see a case of these shortly.
3:54
The attenuation correction of the data is necessary to
3:59
accurately quantify the standardized uptake volumes or SUV,
4:05
but also to qualitatively assess the study visually.
4:08
Right. When you place your ROI in each series,
4:13
you will notice that the non attenuation correction data
4:16
does not provide you with SUV values.
4:20
But once you've corrected the series, then you can have
4:23
the SUV values that are available for you to add
4:27
to their report.