Interactive Transcript
0:01
This video we are going
0:02
to briefly discuss FDG PET CT in lymphoma staging.
0:07
And in a subsequent video we'll discuss follow up.
0:12
We're gonna give some background content for you to refresh,
0:17
um, some um, aspects of lymphoma.
0:22
Its classification based on either Hodgkin's
0:24
or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma or low grade
0:27
and high grade, as well as some clinical features.
0:30
And then we are going to discuss the initial staging
0:36
classification, both clinically
0:37
and also how we do it with PET ct.
0:40
So just briefly, there's many types of lymphoma
0:45
and commonly they are divided into either Hodgkin's
0:50
cell type or non-Hodgkin's uh, lymphoma.
0:54
Within the non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,
0:57
we can find a B cell which are the most common
1:00
and less common T-cell lymphoma.
1:03
I have listed many of them under each cell type
1:08
and I have added an asterisk next to those
1:11
that are considered low grade lymphomas.
1:13
The others are considered high grade lymphomas.
1:17
The reason why this is important is
1:20
because the appearance with FDG PET will differ
1:24
depending on the grade.
1:27
High grade lymphomas will be more aggressive,
1:29
the cells are poorly differentiated
1:31
or undifferentiated fast growing.
1:34
And so we will see a higher degree of tracer uptake
1:40
while low grade lymphomas are of indolent nature.
1:44
And so the FDG uptake will be lower.
1:48
This can transform to high grade lymphoma.
1:51
So this is something to always keep in mind when we're
1:54
reading cases and we'll discuss that as we go
1:57
through examples.
1:59
So for initial evaluation of lymphoma,
2:02
clinicians will biopsy the adenopathy of concern
2:07
and will run different studies including
2:11
pathologic morphology, immunohistochemistry
2:14
and flow cytometry.
2:16
And sometimes uh, farther molecular studies are needed.
2:19
Sometimes the samples are inadequate and
2:22
therefore they would move to excisional biopsy
2:25
in which they would remove the entire lymph node.
2:29
The classification clinically will follow the
2:34
Lugano classification,
2:36
which is essentially a modernized an arbor
2:39
that we all studied back in the day
2:42
and essentially is the same in which you divide the
2:47
adenopathy into
2:49
how many different nodal groups are involved if they are
2:52
ipsilateral or contralateral, and if they are above
2:56
or below the diaphragm, as well
2:59
as if there is extra no analysis.
3:02
It has been reported that FDG PET TT can lead
3:06
to a change in a stage in 10
3:09
to 30% of patients.
3:11
And more often than not we upstage rather than under stage.
3:16
So our role as imagers is crucial in lymphoma.
3:21
Just a note, when
3:23
to define bulky disease is in Hodgkin lymphoma,
3:27
particularly if the disease
3:30
or no mass is greater than 10 centimeters
3:32
or occupies a third of the thoracic diameter on the ct.
3:36
For instance, in follicular lymphoma,
3:39
we would use a six centimeter cutoff
3:41
and in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,
3:43
we would also use a 10 centimeter cutoff.
3:45
And these are things that if you see in the report
3:47
would be worth mentioning.
3:49
So the clinician knows how to better manage this patient.
3:54
So how can we help?
3:56
So first we have to determine the extent
4:00
of the metabolic disease.
4:02
We also can identify areas that are occult
4:06
to the clinician or occult on another morphologic study.
4:11
We can also identify areas of biopsy
4:15
and we would be selecting those based on accessibility,
4:18
but also those that have a higher degree of uptake
4:22
to be representative of the most aggressive disease.
4:26
We can also look at bone marrow involvement
4:29
in a single study.
4:31
And then obviously we also have a CT portion, right?
4:35
So we can discuss morphologic changes,
4:39
but these are limited to size
4:41
and so obviously the CT alone would be limited.
4:45
Adding the metabolic information
4:47
is crucial in these patients.
4:49
So how to approach a report for a baseline PET ct.
4:55
What I do is I essentially classify
4:59
my impression, but when I read the study, I want to answer
5:04
the question of how many categories are involved.
5:07
Is there not a disease? Where is it?
5:10
So I'm gonna say if novelis is above and
5:14
or below the diaphragm, essentially
5:16
how many novel groups are.
5:18
I will address that in the body of my report.
5:21
I don't have to give measurements
5:24
for every single lymph node that is involved,
5:27
but I will mention those
5:29
that are representative in different areas.
5:32
For instance, above the diaphragm
5:35
or below the diaphragm, I'm going
5:37
to mention if there is extra nodal disease.
5:40
And then whenever I discuss the degree of uptake, I'm going
5:44
to compare it to blood pool or mediastinum
5:50
and liver 'cause those are our
5:54
standard of uptake. That
5:56
Would give us an idea of aggressiveness of disease.
6:01
If there is no diagnosis yet, I will say that if the tissue
6:06
is needed, consider this area or this other area.
6:10
This is very helpful for the clinicians
6:12
and it also helps our colleagues when they receive a request
6:17
for a biopsy, if we can tell them
6:19
where we think would be a representative
6:21
sample, it's better for them.
6:23
They can focus more on the approach.