Training Collections
Library Memberships
On-demand course library with video lectures, expert case reviews, and more
Fellowship Certificate™ Programs
Practice-focused training programs designed to help you gain experience in a specific subspecialty area.
Ultimate Learning Pass
Unlock access to our full Course Library and all self-paced Fellowships.
Continuing Medical Education (State CME)
Complete all of your state CME requirements in one convenient place.
Noon Conference (Free)
Get access to free live lectures, every week, from top radiologists.
Case of the Week (Free)
Get a free weekly case delivered right to your inbox.
Case Crunch: Rapid Case Review (Free)
Register for free live board reviews.
Dr. Resnick's MSK Conference
Learn directly from the MSK Master himself.
Lower Extremities MRI Conference
Musculoskeletal Imaging
PET Imaging
Pediatric Imaging
For Training Programs
Supplement your training program with case-based learning for residents, registrars, fellows, and more.
For Private Practices
Upskill in high growth, advanced imaging areas.
Compliance
NewTrack, fulfill, and report on all your radiologists' credentialing and licensing requirements.
Emergency Call Prep
Prepare trainees to be on call for the emergency department with this specialized training series.
Training Collections
Library Memberships
On-demand course library with video lectures, expert case reviews, and more
Fellowship Certificate™ Programs
Practice-focused training programs designed to help you gain experience in a specific subspecialty area.
Ultimate Learning Pass
Unlock access to our full Course Library and all self-paced Fellowships.
Continuing Medical Education (State CME)
Complete all of your state CME requirements in one convenient place.
Noon Conference (Free)
Get access to free live lectures, every week, from top radiologists.
Case of the Week (Free)
Get a free weekly case delivered right to your inbox.
Case Crunch: Rapid Case Review (Free)
Register for free live board reviews.
Dr. Resnick's MSK Conference
Learn directly from the MSK Master himself.
Lower Extremities MRI Conference
Musculoskeletal Imaging
PET Imaging
Pediatric Imaging
For Training Programs
Supplement your training program with case-based learning for residents, registrars, fellows, and more.
For Private Practices
Upskill in high growth, advanced imaging areas.
Compliance
NewTrack, fulfill, and report on all your radiologists' credentialing and licensing requirements.
Emergency Call Prep
Prepare trainees to be on call for the emergency department with this specialized training series.
1 topic, 2 min.
11 topics, 34 min.
Introduction to Understanding Lawsuits
3 m.Definition of Duty
2 m.Definition of Breach
4 m.Definition of Causation
2 m.Definition of Damages
5 m.Degree of Proof Requirements
4 m.Informed Consent and Res Ipsa Loquitur
6 m.Case Example: Negligence
2 m.Liability Regarding Curbside Consult and Tumor Boards
8 m.Key Considerations for Plantiff Lawyers to Take a Case
3 m.Summarizing the Elements of a Lawsuit
1 m.6 topics, 22 min.
10 topics, 29 min.
Introduction to Communicating With Families
2 m.Factors Contributing to Adverse Events in Radiology
2 m.Overview of Errors and Optimal Communication with Families
6 m.Determining When an Apology is Appropriate
2 m.Barriers to Communicating With Patients and Families About Errors
3 m.State Apology Laws
3 m.Communication and Resolution Programs (CRPs)
6 m.Steps to Address Adverse Events
6 m.Implications of CRPs for Radiologists
3 m.Summary on Communicating With Families
2 m.3 topics, 13 min.
6 topics, 19 min.
1 topic, 3 min.
0:00
So in conclusion, uh, what I'd like
0:03
to impress upon you is it's a pretty rigorous process
0:06
that I go through in deciding whether or not to take a case.
0:10
So in things that I look at is how definitive,
0:13
how clear is the negligence?
0:15
If it's pretty clear, uh, then we can kind of move on.
0:19
If it's in a gray zone, uh, we have
0:21
to do a little more digging to see, you know, what
0:24
that's going to involve.
0:25
If it's in a gray zone
0:27
and we're looking at minimal damages,
0:29
it's not something I'm really going
0:30
to be interested in taking.
0:32
If it's clear negligence, um, that again, I,
0:36
I'm gonna wanna see reasonable damages moving forward.
0:39
So it is a, a significant factor
0:41
that we look at in determining whether or not to take a case
0:45
and basically do the risks
0:49
versus the benefits justify moving forward,
0:54
uh, in this process.
0:56
And is there a substantial harm
1:01
that's created long-term damage
1:03
and substantial damage for a patient?
1:06
It's important for you to understand
1:07
that these cases are incredibly expensive.
1:10
Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars is going
1:13
to be spent in, not only out-of-pocket costs,
1:16
but attorney's time in moving forward.
1:19
So the damages really do have
1:20
to justify making that decision.
1:24
Uh, another very important element for me
1:28
as the plaintiff's attorney is how does my client present?
1:33
Is this going to be a likable person that the jury is going
1:36
to say, yeah, we've got some harm here
1:38
that this person needs to be compensated for.
1:41
Um, and that's a big factor.
1:43
I've seen cases and done cases where
1:46
I've got clear negligence, large damages,
1:50
and a very unlikable, um, nasty plaintiff.
1:55
And the juries do not like that at all.
1:57
You can have the clearest damage and, uh, or negligence and,
2:01
and large damages.
2:03
And if they don't like the person,
2:05
they're not gonna award them.
2:07
That, that's where you get the situation.
2:08
Yeah, okay, there was negligence and here's a dollar.
2:11
Um, so as an attorney,
2:13
I'm not interested in being in that situation.
2:16
So I'm looking at the overall case.
2:18
Do I meet all four elements?
2:20
Do I have a likable, presentable client that's reasonable
2:24
to move forward with that suffered real harm
2:26
because of a physician's negligence?
Interactive Transcript
0:00
So in conclusion, uh, what I'd like
0:03
to impress upon you is it's a pretty rigorous process
0:06
that I go through in deciding whether or not to take a case.
0:10
So in things that I look at is how definitive,
0:13
how clear is the negligence?
0:15
If it's pretty clear, uh, then we can kind of move on.
0:19
If it's in a gray zone, uh, we have
0:21
to do a little more digging to see, you know, what
0:24
that's going to involve.
0:25
If it's in a gray zone
0:27
and we're looking at minimal damages,
0:29
it's not something I'm really going
0:30
to be interested in taking.
0:32
If it's clear negligence, um, that again, I,
0:36
I'm gonna wanna see reasonable damages moving forward.
0:39
So it is a, a significant factor
0:41
that we look at in determining whether or not to take a case
0:45
and basically do the risks
0:49
versus the benefits justify moving forward,
0:54
uh, in this process.
0:56
And is there a substantial harm
1:01
that's created long-term damage
1:03
and substantial damage for a patient?
1:06
It's important for you to understand
1:07
that these cases are incredibly expensive.
1:10
Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars is going
1:13
to be spent in, not only out-of-pocket costs,
1:16
but attorney's time in moving forward.
1:19
So the damages really do have
1:20
to justify making that decision.
1:24
Uh, another very important element for me
1:28
as the plaintiff's attorney is how does my client present?
1:33
Is this going to be a likable person that the jury is going
1:36
to say, yeah, we've got some harm here
1:38
that this person needs to be compensated for.
1:41
Um, and that's a big factor.
1:43
I've seen cases and done cases where
1:46
I've got clear negligence, large damages,
1:50
and a very unlikable, um, nasty plaintiff.
1:55
And the juries do not like that at all.
1:57
You can have the clearest damage and, uh, or negligence and,
2:01
and large damages.
2:03
And if they don't like the person,
2:05
they're not gonna award them.
2:07
That, that's where you get the situation.
2:08
Yeah, okay, there was negligence and here's a dollar.
2:11
Um, so as an attorney,
2:13
I'm not interested in being in that situation.
2:16
So I'm looking at the overall case.
2:18
Do I meet all four elements?
2:20
Do I have a likable, presentable client that's reasonable
2:24
to move forward with that suffered real harm
2:26
because of a physician's negligence?
Report
Faculty
David M Yousem, MD, MBA
Professor of Radiology, Vice Chairman and Associate Dean
Johns Hopkins University
Kelly P. Yousem, JD
Plaintiff’s Attorney
Stephen D. Brown, MD, FACR, HEC-C
Associate Professor of Radiology (Part-time)
Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School
Tags
Non-Clinical
© 2026 Medality. All Rights Reserved.