Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Wk 4, Case 4 - Review

HIDE
PrevNext

0:01

So this was an example of a case of a soft tissue mass

0:05

involving the left middle ear cavity.

0:10

And there's a soft tissue mass right here that's involved in the middle ear

0:13

cavity.

0:15

And one of the things that we see here is that we do not see the

0:19

normal appearance, uh, of the ossicles.

0:23

So when we start, sorry about that. Let's get this about, uh, there.

0:28

Yeah. So when we see this area, this is the classic ice cream cone,

0:33

which is ahead of the malus and the short process of the Incas.

0:37

And you can see the soft tissue thickening here involving the epit temp of them.

0:41

You can also see soft tissue thickening here involving the mastoid aero cells.

0:45

Now what I want you to do is keep your eye on this because this is the famous

0:49

ice cream cone. And then on the, on the right hand screen,

0:52

hopefully this OBRA link will, will work, um, is,

0:56

I'm gonna mag that up and then you should be able to landmark it on the,

1:00

on the left side you can see which way we're going.

1:03

And as we come more inferiorly, we can see the two dot appearance here.

1:08

So this is part of the malus and this is part of the inus.

1:11

But what I want you to do is keep your eye on those dots. And as we get lower,

1:14

notice how we just see the malus here, the manu of the mal is here,

1:18

but we're losing the long process of the Incas.

1:22

So instead of having two dots, we're only seeing one dot.

1:25

And then once we get down to the level of the oval window,

1:29

we can see that there's soft tissue thickening here,

1:32

and we don't see the normal stape superstructure.

1:36

So what I'm gonna do now is I'm going to juxtapose this on

1:41

this image. This is the patient's opposite side.

1:45

And then when we look at the opposite side,

1:50

what we can see is,

1:55

okay, do you see, uh, the, the mally short process, the incus?

1:59

And as we come down, we can see the two dots here. See, I see the two dots here.

2:04

And then what we actually see is this horseshoe right here,

2:08

see the inverted horseshoe. And this is the staes foot plate,

2:12

and this is what you should normally see.

2:15

So the way to make this diagnosis is that anytime that you have a focal soft

2:18

tissue mass involving the middle ear cavity, that's associated with,

2:23

um, ossicular erosion that we make the diagnosis of cholesteatoma.

2:28

So let me stop there for this case before I go on and show a couple slides. So,

2:33

um,

2:34

cholesteatomas were actually first described in 1683 by

2:39

Joseph Char Duverney. Okay, that tells you, again, a boring life.

2:43

I went and found these people and this was an anatomist.

2:46

He was actually a French anatomist.

2:48

And the term keitt was actually coined in 1838.

2:53

And that was created by Johan Muer, who's an anatomist.

2:57

So koma is actually a, um,

3:00

misnomer because choli means fat, and oma means tumors.

3:05

So the actual or origin is actually fatty tumor, and that's not correct.

3:10

So what cholesteatoma is,

3:12

is izing debris that arises from the desquamation of the epithelial lining.

3:16

And that's corn of like the, the classic, the uh, classic definition.

3:22

But in actuality, chot just means skin growing in the wrong place.

3:27

And there's different types of cholesteatoma. There's a, uh,

3:30

congenital versus acquired.

3:33

So this is one way we classify congenital versus acquired,

3:37

but it's also classified based on the relationship with the membrane.

3:41

So there's the attic cholesteatomas, there's a middle ear cholesteatomas,

3:45

there's cholesteatomas involved in the external auditory canal,

3:48

and then there's mi cholesteatomas.

3:51

So a congenital cholesteatoma is an embryonic rest of

3:56

epithelial tissue that does not have any history of a typa membrane perforation.

4:01

And when the surgeons look in,

4:03

what they see is this purley white mass that's located behind the typa membrane.

4:07

So that's classic. To make the diagnosis of a genital cholesteatoma,

4:12

you have to have a focal mass that's located behind the membrane

4:17

and you shouldn't have any history of chronic otitis media.

4:20

Notice how these air cells are very well aerated. Okay?

4:24

So this is a small little epithelial, uh, soft tissue. Excuse me.

4:28

This is the small classic cholesteatoma that's located in the middle ear cavity.

4:35

Now what about acquired cholesteatomas?

4:38

So acquired cholesteatomas have different ways that you,

4:41

they can arise and there are different ways of that's been attributed

4:46

to cholesteatomas. So first is this invagination theory,

4:50

and this was this, and this is always associated with Alexander Prussack.

4:55

So what happens in Cholesteatomas is that you end up having eustachian tube

4:59

dysfunction.

5:00

And remember the eustachian tube provides air to the middle ear cavity.

5:04

So it allows aeration of that middle ear.

5:07

Now what ends up happening is that if you have chronic ear disease,

5:11

this eustachian tube becomes dysfunctional.

5:14

So instead of the air coming in and kind of having positive vectors and trying

5:18

to move this stuff out, the the debris outside,

5:22

you end up having negative vectors. And that ends up, uh,

5:25

sucking up to the typa membrane.

5:28

So the typa membrane has this tense part here and it has a flacid part up here.

5:34

So what ends up happening is as these vectors switch,

5:36

you end up having this earliest little retraction here and that's

5:41

what's referred to as retraction pocket.

5:44

And as you end up having debris in the retraction pocket,

5:47

then you end up having a klut that's located within the attic.

5:51

And this is sometimes called an attic koma.

5:55

And this is what's associated with prosac space.

6:00

Now, if you can, this is just an example of a traction pocket.

6:03

This is an attic cholesteatoma.

6:05

So this was actually path proven and this is that classic attic cholesteatoma.

6:11

Now another type of uh, cholesteatoma is the pars tena cholesteatoma.

6:16

And this is felt to be due to the migration theory in which you have small

6:20

little perforations involved within typa membrane.

6:24

So what you end up having is this little epithelial debris that extend up

6:27

transgressing the typa membrane at the level of the meso tum.

6:32

So in unlike attic cholesteatomas,

6:35

which are located more superiorly in the middle ear cavity,

6:39

these tend to be more in the mid portion of the middle ear cavity.

6:43

And here we can see erosion of the long process of the inus.

6:48

And this is an example of a mural cholesteatoma.

6:51

So a mural cholesteatoma really is a more descriptive cholesteatoma.

6:55

So these are large cholesteatomas that have extensive erosion that eventually

7:00

evacuate.

7:01

And it gives you this term that's referred to as an auto mastoidectomy.

7:06

So this was a case that was given to me by one of my colleagues.

7:08

This was back in 2014 on a head ct.

7:11

There was a small little soft tissue mass that, you know,

7:14

wasn't commented on 'cause it was part of a head ct.

7:17

And then about seven years later, this thing expanded and completely ero uh,

7:22

extended into the middle ear cavity and the mastoid air cells and actually

7:26

resulted in a fistula right here of the lateral semicircle canal. But over time,

7:31

that cholesteatoma actually underwent evacuation. And um,

7:36

central, I don't don't wanna necessarily want to use the term necrosis,

7:39

but e evacuation.

7:41

And notice how now you have this appearance that the patient appears to have

7:45

undergone a mastoidectomy. They really haven't.

7:47

This was just the extent of bone erosion of the chot and then it's centrally

7:52

evacuated.

7:53

So this is what's referred to as a neuro cholesteatoma giving you the auto

7:57

mastoidectomy appearance. One last comment is,

8:01

at least the surgeons that I work with, that I talk to,

8:03

they tend not to separate between parse, tensor, chot and parse.

8:07

They just call 'em all cholesteatomas.

8:09

And so really our job is to define the extent of it.

8:12

So let me stop there and take any questions.

8:15

Um, Dr. Suez,

8:16

I have seen the masking answer you mentioned about the cholesteatoma can

8:21

extend into the mask for acls. Mm-hmm. And sometimes people,

8:26

some people with resection or the media oma,

8:29

they have residual in the mastoid air cells.

8:33

Yes. Um, and that's a really, really good point. Um,

8:37

what I have seen is that I have seen a run of cholesteatomas

8:43

that are actually in the mastoid air cells. So they've undergone a,

8:46

a total irregular resection, but um, they end years later,

8:51

they end up having cytomas involved in the distal portion of the mastoid air

8:54

cells. From a radiological standpoint,

8:56

the only way we can make that differentiation is that if you just see mucosal

9:01

thickening involved in the mastoid air cells and the little bony structures are

9:06

intact,

9:07

then all you can say is that there's either a fusion or just mucosal thickening.

9:12

But if you see, uh,

9:14

a soft tissue mass that actually is associated with the bone erosion,

9:18

then you can suggest cholesteatoma. Now in this particular case,

9:22

this patient was febrile and had clinical symptoms of a mastoiditis.

9:26

So in this case this was coalescent mastoiditis.

9:29

But let's say the patient had no clinical symptoms,

9:32

they had a conductive hearing loss, they didn't have a fever,

9:35

and then you see all of this stuff here with the bone erosion,

9:39

then you can suggest that this is actually colome involving the mastoid air

9:43

cells.

9:44

So, uh, when, when can, uh, when can uh,

9:47

confidently say that there is a step is erosion or,

9:52

or it it just covered by the soft tissue?

9:55

Yeah, that's a great question. Um, so I'll put it this way, Ashish,

9:59

is that if you have mucosal thickening involve the middle ear cav and the middle

10:03

ear cavities will pacify,

10:05

you lose the ability to normally see the normal staes.

10:09

So what I've learned over the years is that if I just have, um,

10:13

a soft tissue in the middle ear cavity and I see the malus and the,

10:18

and all the parts of the malice and all the parts of the incus and I'm,

10:23

I just don't see the stape as well compared to the opposite side,

10:26

I'm a little bit more reluctant to call cholesteatoma,

10:29

especially if the middle ear C is completely opacified.

10:34

But if I do see a focal mass, um,

10:38

and there is absence of the staes, if, if it's focal,

10:42

then I'm more apt to call it cholesteatoma. Now one thing that I do as well too,

10:46

and this is something I learned, you know, back when I was a fellow,

10:50

is that in my report,

10:52

komas that erode the obstacles are typically associated with a 30 decibel

10:56

hearing loss.

10:57

So I would typically say that if I am considering a ctet,

11:02

especially on the ones that I'm not as sure of,

11:05

I'll just go and say that these findings should be correlated with a 30 decibel

11:08

conductive hearing loss.

Report

Patient History
Left conductive hearing loss.

Findings
Noncontrast CT was performed of the temporal bones.

Right Temporal Bone: The external auditory canal is normally developed and normally formed. The mastoid air cell is well aerated. The middle ear cavity is well developed and well aerated. The ossicles are intact. The oval window is normally formed. The cochlear appears to have 2 1/2 turns with a normal appearing modiolus. The vestibule appears normal. The posterior, superior and lateral semicircular canals are intact. No evidence of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. No evidence of enlarged vestibular aqueduct. No definite evidence of fenestral or retrofenestral otosclerosis. No evidence of labyrinthitis ossificans. The internal auditory canal appears normal.

Left Temporal Bone: There is a focal soft tissue mass involving the left middle ear cavity which erodes the long process of the incus. The mass also extends to the region of the oval window and erodes suprastructure of the stapes including the anterior and posterior crus. The lesion extends anteriorly to involve a portion of the protympanum. The mass has minimal involvement of the sinus tympani. The mass extends superiorly into the anterior portion of the epitympanum and appears to slightly laterally displace the incudomalleolar joint and may demonstrate early erosion. There is also diffuse mucosal thickening involving the left mastoid air cells.

Overall, the left mastoid air cells appear to be underpneumatized compared to the right with signs of chronic osteitis. The mucosal thickening extends into the aditus ad antrum and extends to the tegmen mastoideum. MR would be helpful to determine whether or not there is extension into the inferior portion of the middle cranial fossa. Inferiorly, this mucosal thickening extends into the distal aspect of the mastoid air cells. There does appear to be some erosion of the septa of the mastoid air cells. Thus, this abnormality could also represent either diffuse chronic mucosal thickening or possibly large cholesteatoma. These findings can be further evaluated with MR of the temporal bone with diffusion if clinically indicated.

Conclusions
1. Focal soft tissue mass associated with ossicular erosion of the long process of the incus and stapes superstructure which is consistent with cholesteatoma and could result in a 30 decibel conductive hearing loss.
2. Diffuse mucosal thickening associated with likely erosion of the mastoid septa and underpneumatized left mastoid air cells. These findings could represent diffuse chronic mucosal thickening or large cholesteatoma involving the mastoid air cells.
3. MRI of the internal auditory canal could help further evaluate the superior extent of the mastoid disease to determine whether there is extension into the middle cranial fossa and could also help separate chronic mucosal thickening involving the mastoid air cells from cholesteatoma.

Case Discussion

Faculty

David M Yousem, MD, MBA

Professor of Radiology, Vice Chairman and Associate Dean

Johns Hopkins University

Suresh K Mukherji, MD, FACR, MBA

Clinical Professor, University of Illinois & Rutgers University. Faculty, Michigan State University. Director Head & Neck Radiology, ProScan Imaging

Tags

Neuroradiology

Head and Neck

CT