Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Wk 10, Case 3 - Review

HIDE
PrevNext

0:05

So good. What did you think about this case? What did you put down for this one?

0:09

This one I put put, uh, wrong, wrong terminology. I put on, I,

0:14

I comment as a heman, which is the term that never used anymore.

0:19

Well, actually they use the term hemangioma.

0:23

Yeah. But

0:25

I just realize, um,

0:27

hemangiomas are different than low flow vascular malformation. So mm-hmm.

0:32

The one on the left right here demonstrates this mass.

0:37

And this mass is located within the muscle.

0:40

So if the mass is located within the muscle,

0:44

then you start thinking about neoplasms and so on and so forth.

0:47

But if it's soft and fluctuate,

0:49

then you have to think of it as could be some type of vascular malformation or

0:54

is it a hemangioma? So how do we then differentiate? Well,

0:57

the next thing we do is if I look at this and it's high T two signal,

1:01

then the next thing I do is I look at the contrast enhanced study. Now is this,

1:06

is this lesion avidly enhancing with contrast because most hemangiomas avidly

1:11

enhanced with contrast. So is this lesion avidly enhancing with contrast?

1:15

Yes or no?

1:17

No.

1:18

Good. So that tells you it's probably not a hemangioma. Okay? Mm-hmm.

1:23

So now I go back and look at this and I see the high T two signal,

1:27

and then if you look real closely, what do you see here?

1:34

Some hypo intense. Exactly,

1:37

Exactly. And does it look tubular or does it look punctate? Mm-hmm.

1:41

Punctate, we got this one. I thought this is a four point,

1:44

but it doesn't make sense with the post contrast study.

1:47

Exactly, exactly.

1:49

So now if you take a lesion that's in intramuscular

1:54

and then you have, um, multiple olis,

1:59

then what's the most likely vascular malformation that's going to give you that

2:04

combination?

2:06

Weakness malformation,

2:08

Right? Yeah. Now, the terminology that we don't use anymore is cavernoma.

2:12

We used to, we used to use cavernous malformations.

2:15

So maybe you've got hemangiomas and cavernous malformations mixed up,

2:18

but we don't use the term cavernous malformations anymore.

2:22

We use the term venous malformations. So I think you may have said hemangiomas.

2:27

In fact, when you look at these delayed imaging studies,

2:29

I think you can see sort of a,

2:31

this geographic enhancement seen out in the periphery.

2:34

Mm-hmm.

2:35

So the correct diagnosis here would be a venous malformation.

2:41

And here on the sagal, just here,

2:43

you can see the not a lot of avid enhancement there,

2:47

But can it be renal lymphatic malformation because the enhancement is not so

2:52

great?

2:53

Um, yeah, it could be ven lymphatic. I think that's, that's fine. Now,

2:58

the reason, reason why it, so the answer to your question is yes,

3:02

it could be venal lymphatic malformation,

3:04

because the characteristics are also suggest lymphatic malformation because

3:09

it's bright on T two. But I have to admit that if,

3:13

if something is purely intramuscular,

3:15

the characteristics for an intramuscular, if, lemme put it this way,

3:20

if you have a vascular malformation that is intramuscular

3:25

and contained FLTs,

3:27

then that really is very characteristic of a venous malformation.

3:32

Now, if I saw this and then it was extending into multiple spaces

3:38

and it was extending along the fascial planes

3:43

and I saw flits and there was also a muscular component,

3:48

then I would suggest that it's a venal lymphatic malformation. Okay, so let me,

3:53

let me do this. Okay. You know, there the he angios, um,

3:57

and this really is a much longer talk, but the, the he angios, um,

4:02

are two types. There's infantile and congenital.

4:05

And so they kind of start at birth and then they progress.

4:08

So you have the, um, the infantile he angios,

4:13

which begin, at begin at birth, they arise and then they shrink.

4:18

So that's the true infantile. He angios. And then you have congenital he angios,

4:23

which are already present at birth. And if they, um, don't involute,

4:28

they're called a niche non involuting congenital, he angios.

4:32

And if they do enlo, then they're called rapidly involuting, he angios.

4:37

And if they partially involute, then it's called pitch p i c H. Okay?

4:42

But what we're talking about is, um,

4:45

what we're talking about are the vascular malformation.

4:48

So I sort of use the Olympic rings approach. I dunno if you've seen this before,

4:52

but I talk about capillary lymphatic arterial and Venus. Okay?

4:58

So the capillary malformations are sort of the Sturge Weber, uh, types.

5:02

So this was, you probably are old enough to remember Gorbachev maybe,

5:05

but this was the famous,

5:06

most famous capillary malformation in the world for many, many years, right?

5:11

And this is really a clinical diagnosis. And if you do image these,

5:15

you don't really see too much. Basically,

5:18

you can get a little bit of enhancement right here in the subcutaneous tissues.

5:22

So when you actually look at these clinically, you can see that they're,

5:25

they are,

5:25

they are this birthmark and have a little bit of blood flow within them.

5:30

Now the next one is the lymphatic malformation.

5:32

So the lymphatic malformations are also known as cystic hydroma.

5:35

So they basically look like, um, just a water,

5:40

just a water containing structure. Okay?

5:43

Now the lymphatic malformations are felt to, uh,

5:45

felt to arise because the lymphatic and the venous structures arise together.

5:50

So they tend to involve multiple spaces.

5:53

So this is just an example of lymphatic malformation involved in this,

5:57

this submandibular space. And you can also see a little bit of, um,

6:00

some tations here, but notice the septations don't enhance,

6:04

or that's probably indicative of prior hemorrhage or maybe prior trauma or prior

6:08

infection. But notice when we give contrast that they don't enhance.

6:12

And this enhancement right here is just a submandibular gland.

6:16

Now the venous malformations is what I just showed.

6:20

So notice how these malformations are characteristically seen within the

6:24

muscles. And we can also see some flits. So these are the flits on ct,

6:29

and here we can see a lilith on mr.

6:31

And that's actually located within the muscle. And this is, uh,

6:35

just a delayed imaging of a,

6:38

a venous malformation demonstrating this delayed flow right here involving the

6:42

masser muscle. And then the last one is that our,

6:46

the arterial venous malformation of the av fistulas. In fact,

6:49

this is that case I just showed that you saw earlier.

6:52

This was the direct communication between the artery and the vein.

6:57

So my point is,

6:58

is that what we talked about was the characteristic appearance of each one.

7:03

Now, but in real life,

7:04

what ends up happening is that you typically have combinations of these two.

7:08

So if you have a combination of arter and venous and you have an arterial venous

7:12

malformation, but to get to your point, more specifically,

7:17

let's just say if you have lymphatic and venous coming together,

7:20

what would that look like? So this is a lympho venous malformation.

7:24

So what would that look like? Or venal, lymphatic malformation.

7:27

So this is what it would look like. So here we have,

7:29

this is predominantly located intramuscular, right?

7:34

And you can see these little FLTs, right?

7:37

But notice how this lesion is actually extending outside of the muscle.

7:41

So this would be a ven lymphatic malformation. Another example here.

7:46

So this is involving the bator muscle.

7:48

So this tells me there's probably a venal, uh, a um,

7:53

venous malformation component. You can also see the flits here.

7:57

Do you see the flits here, Han? Yes. So that tells you that that again,

8:01

goes along with the venous component, but on the other hand,

8:04

look how high signal it is and notice how it's actually extending into the

8:08

buccal space. And it's extending deeply into the, uh, tego maxillary fissure.

8:13

So because this is involving multiple spaces,

8:15

and that's that lymphatic component. So the fact that it's very, very bright,

8:19

it's fluid involves multiple spaces, and that's the lymphatic component.

8:23

So that's why we would call this Aveeno lymphatic malformation.

8:28

Does that make sense to you?

8:29

Yes.

8:30

Okay.

8:31

If it's just confined to the muscle, most likely it's a venous malformation.

8:36

Yeah. With the relet, yeah.

8:38

Yes.

8:38

And it has to be soft on palpation too, because realize you can have, you know,

8:42

rhabdo my sarcomas or other things that.

Report

Patient History
20-year-old male with fluctuating tongue mass.

Findings
Pre- and postcontrast-enhanced MR was performed of the maxillofacial region along with contrast-enhanced MR angiogram. The study demonstrates an approximately 2.4cm (AP) x 2.3cm (TRV) x 2.8cm (CC) mass involving the right half of the oral tongue. The coronal images demonstrate the mass to extend to the midline lingual septum and may slightly cross midline.

The lesion is high signal on T2, low signal on T1 and demonstrates delayed enhancement best appreciated on the sagittal time resolved angiography. The T2 weighted images demonstrate multiple areas of signal loss within the lesion which are suspicious for phleboliths.

The diffusion-weighted images demonstrate increased signal; however, the ADC map shows no evidence of restricted diffusion. This makes the diagnosis of epidermoid less likely.

The visualized portion the brain is grossly within normal limits. However, dedicated brain imaging is necessary for complete diagnostic evaluation.

Conclusions
Heterogeneous mass involving the right half of the oral tongue which is high signal on T2, contains multiple focal areas of decreased attenuation and demonstrates delayed enhancement on the time resolved angiography. The above findings are most consistent with a venous malformation involving the oral tongue.

Case Discussion

Faculty

David M Yousem, MD, MBA

Professor of Radiology, Vice Chairman and Associate Dean

Johns Hopkins University

Suresh K Mukherji, MD, FACR, MBA

Clinical Professor, University of Illinois & Rutgers University. Faculty, Michigan State University. Director Head & Neck Radiology, ProScan Imaging

Tags

Neuroradiology

MRI

Head and Neck