Interactive Transcript
0:01
So that's ACL reconstructions.
0:04
We'll move on to the medial side of the knee,
0:07
and I won't talk about medial collateral ligament
0:10
reconstructions, but I'll spend a little bit
0:11
of time talking about medial patella femoral
0:14
ligament reconstructions.
0:15
The reason why is there's not a lot of literature on this
0:18
and I looked around and found this one paper, uh,
0:22
not too long ago looking at MPFL reconstructions.
0:25
And the unfortunate thing is
0:27
that the reconstructed MPL fell can basically
0:29
look like anything.
0:31
In this one paper, they found that the average, uh,
0:34
thickness was six millimeters.
0:36
About a quarter of the graft were hypot hyperintense.
0:39
That means the other 75% were, you know, intermediate
0:43
or hyperintense on appearance.
0:45
And furthermore, intact grafts can appear lax.
0:50
So they found that when comparing to like clinical outcomes,
0:53
and that is, you know, patients with tele femoral laxity
0:56
and needing a second reconstruction,
0:59
that the graft appearance was not associated
1:01
with any postoperative pain,
1:02
patella femoral arthritis or graft failure.
1:06
They did find that NPFL revisions were more likely in non
1:11
anatomic placement of femoral tunnels.
1:13
So here is, uh,
1:15
what they looked at when they studied these MPFL
1:19
reconstructions and RES Dr.
1:21
Resnick gory talked about this.
1:23
There are kind of three bony landmarks at the
1:25
medial aspect of the knee.
1:26
In front you have the medial epicondyle
1:29
at the top you have the adductor tubercle,
1:32
and behind you have the medial gastroc anemia, tubercle,
1:35
or origin of the medial gastroc muscle and tending.
1:39
So your reconstructed MPFL ideally should
1:42
live in this triangle.
1:44
And when they overlaid the failures here highlighted in red
1:48
ones needing revision NPFL reconstruction, they found
1:52
that they lived outside of this triangle designated
1:55
by those three vertices.
1:59
Here's just a couple examples
2:01
of different NPFL reconstructions and complications.
2:05
Here's a patient, uh,
2:06
who had ongoing patello femoral instability
2:09
after reconstruction.
2:11
And here we can see this is approximately the location
2:15
of the medial epicon.
2:17
So ideally this tunnel should have been placed behind this.
2:20
So this was a little bit too far anterior.
2:23
Remember, the reconstructed ligament can look like anything.
2:27
Um, this one happens to be low cytal intensity,
2:29
but looks attenuated in its mid portion.
2:32
We move. This patient unfortunately had
2:34
to ongo undergo a second procedure, which was a tuber,
2:37
typical tibial tuberosity transfer.
2:41
Here's an example of a medial patella femoral
2:44
ligament reconstruction.
2:45
Patient felt a pop standing up.
2:47
Um, you can see the reconstructed ligament.
2:50
Actually it looks pretty good. The interference screw
2:53
and the patella looks pretty good,
2:54
but there's a lot of bone marrow edema.
2:56
And if we look on the corresponding, uh, CHO
2:58
Image, the pop was
3:00
that this patient suffered a fracture probably as a result
3:03
of the tibial interval screw creating a stress
3:06
riser in that patella.
3:08
And finally, in this last case, here's just an example
3:10
of a patient with infection
3:12
of their reconstructed medial patella femoral ligament.
3:15
Here you can see it's clearly failed at the patella
3:18
attachment has a redundant appearance elsewhere
3:21
and the screw has basically construed out
3:23
and everything had to remove.
3:25
Patient had to undergo a washout and long-term antibiotics.