Interactive Transcript
0:01
So there are several patient dose reduction
0:03
strategies.
0:06
One is to minimize the time of exposure.
0:09
If we are not examining, if we're not doing anything, we should
0:13
not unnecessarily expose the patient by keeping what is called as
0:17
lead foot syndrome. Because the fluoroscopy
0:20
systems are operated having a leg switch, a switch at the leg, and
0:24
if somebody stands on the switch, the fluoroscopy keep going.
0:27
It's very quiet, so nobody knows that.
0:30
And that's why we try to tell, like, we need to take the foot away
0:34
whenever there is no
0:36
need for viewing the patient or any so forth.
0:40
Collimation, use the pulse fluoroscopy is a very important one.
0:45
These days, the technology has improved, and it is
0:48
routinely done as 15 frame per second or
0:52
even seven and a half frame per second to minimize the patient
0:56
dose as such.
0:58
To minimize the use of magnification is another factor discussed
1:02
earlier regarding how the magnification can increase the
1:06
patient dose, and also maximize the distance between the
1:09
X-ray source and patient,
1:12
and minimize the distance between patient and image receptor.
1:15
These are some of the strategies anyone can need to
1:18
utilize to minimize the risk for patients.
1:22
Now, let's examine this particular slide.
1:26
I'd like to demonstrate this one is the main sources of
1:29
radiation exposure in any X-ray room, CT,
1:33
X-rays, or fluoroscopy. The three main sources are primary
1:37
radiation, scatter radiation, and leakage radiation.
1:42
The primary radiation is well collimated.
1:44
When you turn the X-rays on, the primary radiation cannot go
1:48
beyond the size of the image receptor.
1:51
They can go beyond about half an inch outside the receptor, but not
1:55
beyond that. So if you are in the X-ray
1:58
room working with a patient,
2:01
unless you are in the path of the primary beam, you can be
2:05
assured there is no exposure to primary radiation.
2:09
On the other hand, even though the X-ray tube is well collimated, there is
2:13
some leakage, minuscule leakage, and it is defined by the
2:17
FDA, how much, what's the maximum leakage it can give, and
2:21
that is also there.
2:23
But more importantly, the point which we are always concerned are the
2:26
scatter radiation. Scatter radiation comes
2:30
as the primary beam passes through the patient.
2:33
The primary radiation get absorbed
2:37
or scattered, and the scatter is distributed all around the patient.
2:41
It goes in all direction.
2:43
This is one of the reason why
2:45
we working in the fluoroscopy suite has to do all the
2:49
precautions to protect us from scatter radiation.
2:54
Any precautions taken to protect from scatter radiation will
2:57
automatically help to reduce or protect from the leakage
3:01
radiation.
3:03
This is a typical radiation pattern
3:06
in an interventional fluoroscopy system.
3:09
If it is a radiology department, if it is an under the table fluoroscopy
3:13
system, all this under the table will be blocked
3:17
by the table itself.
3:19
But in the interventional system, since it is a freewheeling
3:24
and the CRM can be rotated any direction, any plane,
3:28
and the patient is lying in the patient table, which is a translucent table,
3:32
has a much carbon fiber material, which has a minimal
3:36
X-ray absorption. And this X-rays, the blue one, is the
3:40
primary radiation based on the collimation exposing the patient,
3:44
and the physicians are working here to intervene with the interventional
3:48
procedures.
3:49
This is a typical scatter pattern coming out of the patient in all
3:53
direction.
3:55
Now,
3:56
the primary beam is like this.
3:59
The scatter beam is like this.
4:01
If this is a X-ray table covered completely, this is
4:05
completely protected to the staff working around.
4:08
However, in the interventional, this is not protected because of the free
4:12
table. Therefore, radiation protection principle becomes even more
4:16
important in this situation.
4:19
Just to show you an example of the amount of scatter coming out of the patient,
4:23
this particular graph is a view from the top down to the floor.
4:27
For an average size patient, and you're getting a decent image, that's the
4:31
understanding. The scatter radiation is every black dot.
4:36
The square block is half a meter block, 50 centimeter.
4:40
You can see here.
4:41
So basically, what it's showing is like further away,
4:45
far away from the patient here, less one gets scattered.
4:49
That is also utilized in radiation protection principle to use
4:53
distance to our advantage.
4:56
Now, I look this as more like a butterfly.
4:59
On the body of the butterfly, the patient, and the wings as the
5:03
scatter radiation distribution.
5:05
The wings are thicker at the edge, at the connecting point of the body,
5:09
and becomes thin at the edge. The same thing, analogy can be thought of for
5:13
the scatter radiation here.
5:16
What is the effect of field size? Means the collimation to the
5:20
patient.
5:21
In these three scenario,
5:23
there are dual advantage of collimating to the field.
5:28
As discussed earlier, if you collimate to the field of interest, the image
5:31
quality also improves in fluoroscopy.
5:34
However, in addition, the scatter radiation is also
5:38
minimized, and the patient dose is also
5:41
reduced. So in these instances, for example, this is
5:45
an average size patient. The field size is 30 centimeter by 30
5:49
centimeter, and here is a scatter pattern, quite intense,
5:53
surrounding the patient.
5:55
If the field size is decreased to 50%, means you're only
5:58
collimating more closer to the lumbar spine where you're doing a
6:02
procedure. Automatically, the patient dose is decreased by
6:06
50%,
6:08
and the scatter radiation goes down quite dramatically.
6:12
If the collimation is able to collimate even further,
6:16
and here looks the patient scatter radiation.
6:19
So the take-home message is field size has a direct
6:23
impact on the patient dose and also on the
6:26
radiation to the people working around in the fluoroscopy.
6:31
In this one, demonstrating what is the impact of patient
6:35
dose on the patient size on scatter
6:39
radiation. So there is a three panel shown here.
6:42
What I'm trying to show here is, on an average size patient,
6:46
the entrance skin dose is about 11 milligray per minute,
6:50
let's say.
6:52
And because of that, and again, fluoroscopy has the principle of
6:56
automatic exposure control. Because of that, you can
7:00
see here if the patient size increases, the system
7:04
automatically drives up more radiation.
7:08
So from 11 milligray, it drives up to 33 milligray per minute
7:12
when the patient size is higher. And even for more obese
7:16
patient, the primary radiation is almost eight times
7:20
than the earlier one.
7:22
What does that have an impact on the personal working around, that is
7:26
the scatter radiation? So in an average size patient here,
7:30
when the
7:32
entrance skin dose or the patient is giving 11 milligray
7:36
per minute, the operator collar level is getting about
7:40
0.44 milligray per hour,
7:42
and the
7:44
waist is getting about one milligray per hour.
7:47
And that will jump out to two and four or
7:51
eight depending on the patient size.
7:54
So basically, the scatter radiation increases
7:57
significantly as patient size increases.
8:02
What about the effect of geometric magnification?
8:05
This is very important, and we use it a lot in our teaching
8:09
our new residents and fellows.
8:11
Where to position the patient with respect to X-ray tube.
8:15
First of all, they need to understand where is X-ray tube and where is the image
8:19
receptor. Shown here is the image receptor, which is the
8:23
I.I. Let's say in this scenario,
8:26
the patient is quite far away from the X-ray tube,
8:31
most closer to the image receptor.
8:33
By having this way, the skin dose, let's say we keep it as
8:37
one dose unit,
8:40
and the magnification factor of the anatomy is about 1.25,
8:44
because of the distance.
8:46
Now, if the patient is more closer to the X-ray tube,
8:51
and there's lot more gap here, this will result in the
8:55
entrance skin dose to increase from one unit to
8:58
1.8 dose unit, 80% more dose to the patient.
9:02
And then the anatomy is also exposed, so you have
9:06
lesser area to view on the image.
9:10
This should not be done. In this case, the patient is
9:14
very close to the X-ray tube.
9:17
There is lot more magnification, and the skin dose
9:20
now is higher by about four dose unit.
9:24
So understanding the geometry of the system and where
9:28
you place the patient is critical in minimizing the
9:32
patient dose.
9:34
This technique is recommended in interventional fluoroscopy only,
9:38
not for routine fluoroscopy. Because in interventional fluoroscopy, let's say
9:42
cardiac cath, when you're doing a cardiac stent or EP procedure,
9:47
the system will remain in the same location for a long time because you're
9:50
utilizing the same area where you're trying to thread a needle through the vessels.
9:55
In that case, allowing all the radiation dose to entry to the one point,
10:00
if we slightly change the angulation, that will
10:04
change the location of the skin receiving the peak distribution
10:08
slightly where it is, and we call it as dose
10:11
spreading or dose painting phenomena.
10:15
We are not stopping the total dose to the patient, but the total dose is not
10:19
delivered to the same skin point, but it can be delivered around the
10:22
patient so that it minimizes the radiation risk to the
10:26
patient.