Interactive Transcript
0:00
This first case is of a young child
0:02
who has a frontal radiograph.
0:05
You can see here that the patient is not
0:06
particularly rotated.
0:08
They're pretty well positioned,
0:09
but we can see that the mediastinal structures are shifted
0:12
into the right chest, that the right lung looks small
0:15
and a little bit opa.
0:17
Conversely, the left lung looks relatively hyper aerated
0:21
and expanded and is causing
0:23
that rightward mediastinal shift.
0:25
So in this patient, there was a concern
0:27
for an aspirated foreign body.
0:29
I do not have decubitus views on this particular patient,
0:32
but we can appreciate what looks like hyper
0:34
expansion of the left lung.
0:35
This patient went on to have a low dose CT scan,
0:40
as I mentioned before,
0:41
and we can see that
0:43
as we saw on the radiographs on this low dose ct,
0:47
that left lung looks hyper expanded
0:49
and enlarged compared to the right lung.
0:52
If you scroll through all the way top to bottom,
0:54
that is consistent throughout.
0:58
If we go to the coronal images, we can see quite nicely
1:03
the patent distal trachea, left bronchus,
1:06
and some sort of obstructive lesion in that left bronchus.
1:10
So if you scroll back and forth, you'll see this persistent
1:13
opacity in the distal left bronchus as opposed to the rest
1:16
of the airways such as the right bronchus and its branches
1:19
and the more proximal trachea.
1:20
All of those look patent. In that left bronchus.
1:23
We have some soft tissue density.
1:25
This turned out to be aspirated chicken pieces in a young
1:29
child who was eating chicken for dinner.
1:32
So this is a case where the radiographs did show air
1:36
trapping and the CT confirmed it.
1:38
Hopefully you can see that the CT
1:41
very nicely demonstrates not only the secondary effect
1:44
of the air trapping, but act the actual foreign body
1:47
in the airway as well.
1:50
When we look at the sagittal image,
1:52
we have further confirmation.
1:54
There's that left bronchus in cross-section,
1:57
and as we go peripherally, it abruptly
2:00
stops due to the obstruction.
2:03
This next case is to illustrate the differences of
2:07
radiographs in inspiration versus expiration.
2:10
This first image we see here of a child
2:14
who takes a good deep breath in For this first image,
2:17
we see all of our normal structures as we would expect.
2:19
We see a normal size heart.
2:22
We see well expanded lungs, normal mediastinal structures.
2:28
On the other image, however, we can zoom in a little bit,
2:31
same exact patient, same timeframe.
2:33
However, the lungs look much smaller
2:36
because they're in exhalation.
2:38
We can see the mediastinal structures are kind
2:40
of crowded with the heart.
2:41
The heart looks a little bit bigger relative
2:43
to the thoracic cavity,
2:45
and that's not because anything's wrong.
2:47
It's simply because there's less air in the air spaces
2:50
because this patient is in exhalation.
2:52
So it's important to remember,
2:54
depending on the patient's phase of respiration, your chest
2:58
Radiograph might look a little bit different
3:01
and to not confuse a mediastinal mass, for example,
3:05
with simply a normal mediastinum in exhalation.
3:10
This is another patient who had radiographs.
3:13
This patient had a clinical concern
3:15
for an aspirated foreign body,
3:18
and we can see on this frontal radiograph
3:21
that the lungs look fairly symmetric.
3:24
Perhaps there's a little bit
3:26
of hyper expansion of the left side.
3:29
This patient underwent decubitus views
3:31
and it's important to get bilateral decubitus views
3:34
in order to compare them.
3:35
So on the next view, this says right lateral decubitus.
3:39
That means this patient is lying on their right side
3:42
and then we've just turned the image right side up.
3:46
And so we have expected atelectasis of that right lung
3:50
because it's the downside lung
3:52
and the left lung looks hyper aerated compared to the right,
3:56
as we would expect in a decubitus view.
3:59
On the subsequent view,
4:00
this is the left lateral decubitus view,
4:03
so they're lying on their left side,
4:05
and we would expect that
4:06
that left side should look atelectatic just
4:09
as the right side did on the right side decubitus view.
4:12
However, in this patient, it still remains hyper aerated.
4:16
If anything, it still looks bigger than the right side even
4:19
though we're on the left side down.
4:22
So this would be supportive
4:23
of an aspirated foreign body into the left airway
4:26
with resultant air trapping.
4:29
This patient went on to have a CT scan as well,
4:32
and we can see just like with our prior patient,
4:35
that there is a soft tissue density lodged in the distal
4:39
left main bronchus,
4:41
and that turned out to be an aspirated peanut piece.
4:45
So again, this is a patient
4:46
for whom the radiographs were revealing
4:49
and the CT was confirmatory.
4:51
However, this is frequently not the case.
4:55
These are cases where these decubitus radiographs show
4:59
what turned out to be foreign body aspiration,
5:01
but very frequently they're not the case.
5:05
So the reason I'm showing these concurrently is just
5:07
to demonstrate that because we know the radiographs are
5:10
often not revealing, BCTs can be quite helpful
5:14
because they will confirm whether
5:16
or not there is a foreign body lodged into the
5:18
airway very easily.
5:21
This is an additional case where the opposite happened.
5:24
This is a patient for whom an aspirated foreign body
5:27
was concerning.
5:28
This frontal radiograph shows fairly symmetric lung volumes
5:32
when you compare the left and the right
5:35
and on the cubitus views.
5:36
We see here on the left side down to Cubitus view
5:39
that the left lung looks smaller than the right lung,
5:43
as we would expect due to ectasis of the downside,
5:48
and then on the right lateral, the cubitus view,
5:53
although the right side does look smaller than the left
5:56
Side, the interpreting radiologist at the time
5:59
of this radiograph was concerned
6:00
that it wasn't atelectatic enough.
6:03
Meaning although it does look smaller than the left side,
6:06
it seems still a bit bigger than we would expect
6:08
for the decubitus side.
6:10
And so therefore, a right aspirated foreign body
6:13
was suspected.
6:16
This patient went on to have a confirmatory ct,
6:20
which I'm not showing here,
6:21
but it did not show an aspirated foreign body.
6:24
It did not show air trapping on either side.
6:27
So this was a false positive,
6:29
and that's another thing to be aware of when
6:32
considering the sensitivity of these decubitus views.
6:35
You can also get false positives, not only false negatives.
6:39
The final case I will show you here is an aspirated foreign
6:43
body that is metallic.
6:45
So it's obvious on the radiographs we can see
6:48
that there's this unusual bar shaped metallic foreign body.
6:53
What's important about this case though is to illustrate
6:56
that a frontal is not sufficient to make this diagnosis
6:59
because on a frontal, you can't actually be certain
7:02
that this is in the airway versus the esophagus,
7:05
like I mentioned earlier.
7:06
Oftentimes toddlers swallow foreign bodies
7:09
in addition to aspirating them.
7:11
So you can't tell here where it is.
7:14
So therefore, the lateral is an important companion image
7:18
to have, and we can see here clearly now as we zoom in,
7:22
that abnormal folded metallic density is in fact lodged in
7:26
the subglottic airway
7:28
and not in the esophagus, which would be back here.
7:32
Similarly, if you have an esophageal foreign body,
7:35
you can get a lateral to confirm
7:36
that it's posterior to the airway.
7:38
But in this case, it was in fact in the airway
7:41
and hadn't made it all the way down into the bronchi
7:44
because it was so large.