Interactive Transcript
0:01
Hello and welcome to Noon Conference hosted by MRI Online
0:05
Noon Conference connects the global radiology community
0:08
through free live educational webinars that are accessible
0:12
for all and is an opportunity
0:13
to learn alongside top radiologists from around the world.
0:16
You can access the recording of today's conference
0:19
and previous noon conferences
0:21
by creating a free MRI online account.
0:24
Today. We are honored to welcome Dr. Dennis Beki
0:27
for a lecture entitled Introduction to Arthritis.
0:30
Dr. Beki is an academic diagnostic radiologist
0:33
with over 30 years of experience in bone
0:35
and joint radiology.
0:37
He's a senior MSK specialist radiologist at King's College
0:42
Hospital and senior lecturer in imaging
0:44
sciences at King College.
0:47
Dr. Bki is also a member of the Arthritis Subcommittee
0:50
of the ESSA member of the Polish Medical Radiology Society,
0:54
an honorary member of the U Ukrainian Association
0:57
of Radiologists and the editor in chief of Radiology.
1:01
He has published over 50 papers
1:03
and educational exhibits in peer reviewed journals
1:06
and at major radio radiological meetings
1:09
and teaches radiology residents worldwide in the uk, Poland,
1:12
Ukraine, and Israel.
1:14
At the end of the lecture, please join Dr.
1:17
Bki in a q and a session
1:18
where he will address questions you may
1:20
have on today's topic.
1:21
Please remember to use the q
1:23
and a feature to submit your questions so we can get to
1:25
as many as we can before our time is up.
1:27
With that, we are ready to begin today's lecturer, Dr.
1:31
Bki, please take it from here.
1:33
Thank you very much. It's wonderful to be here again
1:37
and to do the last part of this introduction
1:42
to arthritis, which as she said, it can,
1:46
can be found on the website.
1:49
Today we will cover the final group
1:51
of diseases in this lecture series about
1:55
introduction to arthritis.
1:57
Later I will develop a 10 item quiz to help you check
2:01
and reinforce your knowledge.
2:03
Hopefully we'll be able to do
2:05
that sometime later in the year.
2:09
I started to say that uh, the images that I use our
2:14
for educational purposes
2:18
and may be reproduced for educational purposes.
2:21
Otherwise, with due credit given to radio pedia
2:24
and the radiology assistant,
2:28
we will begin today's lecture by discussing calcium
2:31
pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease,
2:35
which is my favorite disease.
2:37
The key findings in this disorder are fine chondrocalcinosis
2:42
located at the triangular fiber cartilage complex
2:46
or meniscal tissue in the knee
2:48
or synthesis pubis calcium
2:51
pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease is a long
2:55
name for an inflammatory joint disease caused by deposition
3:00
of this crystal in the synovial fluid, synovial lining
3:04
and articular cartilage.
3:07
This disorder is the second most common degenerative disease
3:11
seen in man following osteoarthrosis.
3:15
It causes characteristic degenerative changes in
3:19
specific locations.
3:22
There are several terms that you need to be familiar
3:24
with when talking about CPBD Crystal Deposition Disease
3:30
First Chondrocalcinosis is a descriptive term describing
3:35
fine calcifications in cartilage
3:38
most often used when CPPD is the cause.
3:42
However, CHONDROCALCINOSIS is not an exclusive feature
3:46
of CPPD Crystal Deposition disease
3:49
and can also be seen in severe osteoarthritis
3:54
when it is seen in severe osteoarthritis is a combination
3:58
disorder in in which both diseases exist together.
4:05
Pyrophosphate arthropathy is a distinctive arthropathy
4:08
of CPVD Crystal deposition disease, which is like
4:13
osteoarthritis but has an unusual
4:16
and specific distribution.
4:20
Pseudo gout on the other hand is an acute joint inflammation
4:24
secondary to CPPD crystals.
4:27
It is called pseudo gout
4:29
because clinically it can look like gout in some cases.
4:36
The radiographic findings
4:37
of this disorder using our mnemonic as
4:40
before are there are no erosions present in the
4:45
articular surfaces.
4:47
The bone demonstrates subc chondral cyst formation,
4:50
which is exceedingly common and numerous.
4:54
The cartilage demonstrates joint space narrowing,
4:58
particularly at the radiocarpal joint.
5:02
The distribution is symmetric affecting the radiocarpal
5:06
joint, the carpal metacarpal joints
5:09
and the metacarpophalangeal joint
5:11
of the index and long fingers.
5:15
CPBD arthropathy can also affect the elbow, the hip,
5:19
the synthesis pubis, the knee and the ankle.
5:23
There are no additional findings in this disorder.
5:27
The soft tissue findings
5:29
as we have discussed are chondro calcinosis,
5:32
which when found in hylan cartilage is linear
5:36
as seen in the hip,
5:37
but when found in the triangular fibrocartilage,
5:41
it may occur in patchy fine distribution.
5:45
Let's look at some patients with this disorder.
5:47
Here are two different patients demonstrating classic
5:50
findings of CPPD, crystal deposition disease
5:54
in the left radiograph.
5:56
We see cartilage loss in many joints
5:58
and chondro calcinosis in the carpal metacarpal joint
6:02
of the base of the thumb indicated by a white arrow,
6:06
the metacarpophalangeal joint of the index finger indicated
6:10
by the arrowhead
6:11
and the triangular fibrocartilage complex indicated
6:15
by the asterisk.
6:18
It is also important
6:19
to notice the radiocarpal joint face degenerative changes,
6:24
particularly that on the scaphoid side of the joint.
6:28
This is characteristic
6:30
for joint space narrowing in this disorder.
6:34
In the right radiograph,
6:36
we see chondrocalcinosis in the radiocarpal joint
6:40
and triangular fibrocartilage complex indicated
6:44
by the black arrow.
6:46
Scapholunate dissociation is also seen,
6:48
which is a common late finding in this disorder.
6:52
However, scapholunate dissociation may also be seen in
6:56
rheumatoid arthritis or after trauma.
7:02
Here we see two different AP radiographs of the knees.
7:06
Thin calcifications in the cartilage
7:09
and menisci are noted bilaterally on the right side
7:12
indicated by the white arrow as well
7:15
as on the left side indicated by the black arrow.
7:19
Many times this calcification is rather linear
7:23
or clumped as we see here, which is also characteristic
7:27
for CPPD crystal deposition disease.
7:31
These calcifications can be caused by other conditions
7:35
as well such as gout, but this is rarely seen in this case.
7:41
Also note the joint space narrowing
7:43
and mild osteophyte formation.
7:46
CPPD crystal deposition disease has many features like
7:50
osteoarthrosis, however, its
7:53
distribution is completely different
7:59
in these radiographs.
8:00
The right image is a magnification of the left image
8:05
we see well circumscribed coarse calcification adjacent
8:09
to the fourth distal interphalangeal joint.
8:13
This does not look like CPPD crystal deposition
8:16
and scleroderma would be the most likely possibility.
8:20
However, aspiration revealed typical CPPD crystal
8:24
depositions as in other arthropathies atypical
8:29
presentations of CPPD crystal are possible,
8:33
but fortunately are far less common in the future.
8:38
I will do a lecture completely covering CPPD Crystal
8:42
deposition disease.
8:44
Please learn the pattern of distribution which consists
8:47
of moderate to severe degenerative changes
8:50
at the radiocarpal joint.
8:53
Multiple subc chondral cysts in the wrists of usually
8:57
multiple sizes changes at the
9:01
metacarpophalangeal joints of the index
9:03
and long fingers consisting of metacarpal head enlargement
9:08
and beak formation on the thumb side of the metacarpals
9:14
distribution is only seen in two diseases.
9:18
CPPD Crystal deposition disease demonstrates this pathology
9:23
at the index and long finger
9:26
metacarpophalangeal joints while the disease
9:29
hemochromatosis affects all four digits
9:33
and hemochromatosis is more common in men.
9:40
Here we see two radiographic images of the hand
9:43
and wrist taken from radio pedia.
9:45
The beak like osteophytes are noted in both images at the
9:49
metacarpal heads of the index and long fingers.
9:54
Also findings compatible with CPPD include base
9:57
of the thumb degenerative changes,
10:01
mild degenerative changes at the radiocarpal joint
10:04
and scapholunate dissociation
10:07
chondro Calcinosis is not present in this in this case
10:12
and many times it does not have
10:14
to be present if all the other findings exist.
10:23
Now we move on to to a group of different diseases
10:27
that have bone and joint involvement.
10:29
The first disease that we're going
10:31
to discuss is scleroderma.
10:34
Scleroderma, also known as systemic sclerosis,
10:38
is an autoimmune connective tissue disease
10:41
and is characterized by microvascular obliteration
10:46
and sclerosis of the skin and internal organs.
10:50
The key findings radiographically are soft tissue
10:54
calcification and acro osteolysis.
11:01
Soft tissue calcifications in scleroderma are often
11:05
extensive in the distal phalanges.
11:08
Here we see an example of this.
11:10
Notice the calcifications next to the distal alma
11:16
demonstrated by the open arrow.
11:19
There are no signs of cartilage damage.
11:23
The pathophysiology of the calcium deposits,
11:26
it's not well understood in scleroderma.
11:30
It occurs in soft tissues that are under chronic stress such
11:34
as local trauma
11:36
or damage associated
11:38
with an underlying inflammatory process.
11:41
It is usually more abundant in the dominant hand.
11:46
When these findings are present,
11:47
the diagnosis is usually straightforward.
11:53
Here's another patient with scleroderma.
11:56
We see subtle but coarse soft tissue calcification
11:59
at the most distal part of the fingers.
12:03
No acro osteolysis or other signs are present.
12:06
In this case, severe acro
12:11
osteolysis of the fingertips is noted in this patient at the
12:15
distal aspects of the thumb index finger and long fingers.
12:20
Notice the lysis of the soft tissues distally.
12:24
Acro osteolysis is the radiographic finding which refers
12:28
to bone destruction of the distal phlange
12:31
and it occurs in up to 65% of patients
12:36
with scleroderma vascular alterations
12:40
and reduced capillary density.
12:43
Impaired tissue oxygenation
12:45
and the resulting hypoxia may contribute to osteoclast
12:50
ation which causes these changes.
12:55
There's a wide variety of diseases that can cause
12:59
acro osteolysis including psoriatic arthritis, infection,
13:05
reynard's disease and thermal trauma.
13:10
The image labeled A, we see subcutaneous
13:15
and perticular calcifications in the foot of a patient
13:19
with scleroderma.
13:21
There is also a Hal valgus deformity, which is not caused
13:25
by scleroderma in the image labeled B subcutaneous
13:30
calcifications near the elbow are noted in a patient
13:34
with scleroderma.
13:36
These subcutaneous calcifications often form
13:40
at pressure points.
13:44
Now we move on to another systemic disease
13:47
that demonstrates specific radiographic findings.
13:51
Systemic lupus erythema ptosis.
13:55
The key finding in SLE is abnormal joint alignment
14:00
without erosions and with a vascular necrosis.
14:05
Clinically systemic lupus
14:08
erythema ptosis is a generalized autoimmune
14:10
connective tissue disease.
14:13
Essentially, any organ system can be affected
14:16
with systemic findings including muscle weakness, malaise
14:21
and fever mucocutaneous findings demonstrated
14:25
by a typical butterfly rash on the face and renal
14:29
and neurologic symptoms.
14:32
The radiographic findings are that seen in the diagram.
14:37
No joint erosions are noted as the articular findings
14:43
per articular osteoporosis occurs in the bones,
14:48
the cartilage in the joints In a patient with s scleroderma
14:53
and systo, I'm sorry,
14:54
and sys systemic lupus AR erythema ptosis demonstrates
14:59
normal joint spaces.
15:01
The distribution in the hand is as seen in the diagram.
15:05
It affects the base of the thumb.
15:08
All metacarpophalangeal joints at all proximal
15:11
interphalangeal joints,
15:14
the distal interphalangeal joints are not affected.
15:18
The extra findings in this disease include
15:21
avascular necrosis.
15:24
Now, a specific
15:25
and unusual finding in scleroderma
15:29
is the soft tissue.
15:30
C is the, I'm sorry, in SLE,
15:32
I don't know why I'm saying scleroderma in SLE is the soft
15:36
tissue consists of reducible deformities like swan neck
15:41
and BNE deformities.
15:43
When the patient raises their hand,
15:45
the deformities are clearly seen.
15:48
However, when the hand is placed flat on the table,
15:52
the deformity spontaneously reduce soft tissue swelling
15:56
and calcifications in the subcutaneous
15:59
and deep soft tissues may also be seen most
16:03
around small joints.
16:09
In a patient with this disease, we see two AP views
16:12
of the hands Z like thumb deformities and swan.
16:17
Neck fingers are noted in this patient.
16:20
The deformities are thought to be a consequence
16:23
of low grade inflammation of the synovial membrane
16:26
and capsule resulting in ligamentous laxity
16:30
and muscular contracture.
16:32
However, no erosions are found.
16:37
Here's another patient.
16:39
We see another example of swan neck deformity.
16:43
No erosions or signs of cartilage damage are noted
16:49
and yet another patient.
16:51
Here we see swan neck deformities.
16:54
As I mentioned earlier,
16:56
these changes are usually reversible in the early stage
17:00
of the disease and characteristically when the patient
17:04
places their hand on the table or desk.
17:08
The deformity is correct.
17:12
Avascular necrosis is a frequent complication
17:16
and it is seen in up to 15% of patients.
17:20
The femoral head and tibial plateau are the most involved
17:24
sites, but other sites may be infected.
17:29
These patients have bone pain should be suspected
17:32
of having a vascular necrosis.
17:36
A vacu, a vascular necrosis in SLE can occur even in the
17:40
absence of steroid use.
17:42
Here we see subtle increased density in the distal femur in
17:47
a somewhat serpentine pattern
17:50
representing a vascular necrosis in a patient with SLE.
17:57
Moving on, we see radiographs of two different joints
18:01
in the image labeled A.
18:03
We see subluxation of the first
18:06
metacarpophalangeal joint without erosions.
18:09
In a patient with SLE, this is not typical for SLE
18:14
and can be seen in other forms of arthritis.
18:18
In image B, we see SLE of the shoulder.
18:22
This is demonstrated by collapse of the humeral head
18:27
with some loose bony fragments secondary
18:30
to a vascular necrosis.
18:33
Both steroid therapy
18:34
and SLE are associated with an increased risk
18:38
of a vascular necrosis.
18:42
Now we move on to our next disease,
18:44
which is a multisystem disorder of unknown etiology
18:49
characterized by the formation
18:51
of inflammatory non kating granulomas.
18:56
This is sarcoid.
18:59
The key findings in sarcoid are lace like granulomatous
19:03
lesions in the bone.
19:05
Clinically sarcoidosis is a multi-system disorder
19:09
of unknown etiology.
19:12
The musculoskeletal manifestations
19:14
of sarcoidosis occur in about 20% of patients
19:19
with sarcoidosis and include joint involvement, bone lesions
19:23
and muscular disease.
19:27
Primary skeletal involvement without other organ involvement
19:31
is extremely rare.
19:33
Usually arthritis is seen
19:36
early in the course of the disease.
19:39
Chronic disease is rare.
19:41
The most frequent musculoskeletal manifestation
19:45
of sarcoidosis is an acute arthritis that occurs as part
19:49
of lofgren syndrome characterized by the combination
19:54
of erythema nodosum, bilateral lar adenopathy,
19:59
polyarthritis, and constitutional symptoms.
20:04
If we apply our acronym
20:06
and discuss the radiographic findings, we find that
20:11
the articular changes consist of erosions, sarcoid.
20:16
Bone lesions can be perme or moth, lytic or sclerotic.
20:21
These lesions are very distinctive.
20:24
Joint space narrowing is unusual.
20:28
The distribution typically involves multiple joints
20:32
with symmetric distribution.
20:35
This is an unusual distribution
20:37
as seen in the diagram in the hand.
20:40
Sarcoidosis usually involves the index
20:43
and long finger joints in the skeleton.
20:47
The shoulder and the hip are frequent sites.
20:51
Otherwise, the skeleton, the knee, the ankle
20:54
and the hind foot all may be affected,
20:58
but to a lesser extent,
21:01
there are a wide range of manifestations
21:04
and thereby also many clinical
21:06
and radiographic manifestations.
21:09
The soft tissues demonstrate dactylitis and myopathy.
21:16
Lace like granulomas are associated with sarcoidosis.
21:20
These may be seen in multiple bones as we see here,
21:24
involving the proximal
21:25
and distal interphalangeal joints
21:27
of the index and long finger.
21:30
The osteolytic lesions are quite typical
21:33
and described as having a lace like or trabecular pattern.
21:39
This presence is somewhat of an ant mini
21:42
because once you have seen it,
21:45
you will recognize it when you see it.
21:47
Again, this image shows an
21:52
osteolytic lesion in the distal radius demonstrated
21:56
by the blue arrow with trabecular
21:59
and cortical bone destruction.
22:01
In a patient with sarcoid,
22:03
there is osseous destruction on both sides
22:06
of the interphalangeal joint of the first digit
22:09
with extra osseous extension of granulomatous tissue
22:14
noted by the black arrow.
22:19
Since neuropathic disease affects the joints,
22:22
especially in patients with severe diabetes,
22:25
this is an important topic for you to learn
22:28
and be able to recognize.
22:30
Neuropathic arthropathy, also known as charco arthropathy,
22:35
is a progressive destructive joint disorder in patients
22:39
with peripheral neuropathy with loss of pain, sensation
22:44
and proprioception in the foot, ankle
22:47
and hands seen commonly in diabetes.
22:52
Patients with this disorder may experience fractures
22:55
and dislocations of bones and joints with minimal
22:59
or known known trauma.
23:01
The most common cause, as I said, is diabetes mellitus,
23:06
which typically affects the tarsal
23:08
and tarsal metatarsal joints.
23:12
Arterial wall calcifications are commonly seen
23:16
in these patients.
23:18
Other causes are tertiary syphilis, also known as tbi,
23:23
dorsalis sar, Ringo, Mya leprosy,
23:27
and sometimes CPPD Crystal deposition disease.
23:33
The articulations in neuropathic arthropathy show no
23:37
evidence of erosions.
23:39
In the early phase of neuropathic arthropathy,
23:44
the bones demonstrate inflammation and osteopenia.
23:48
Finally, joint space destruction with presence
23:52
of loose bodies, fragmentation
23:55
and insufficiency fractures occur and are common.
24:00
When charco foot is treated
24:02
and becomes less active, the bone will coalesce
24:06
with formation of osteophytes and bony proliferation.
24:12
The cartilage demonstrates joint space narrowing
24:15
and ankylosis.
24:17
The distribution is primarily in the midfoot
24:20
as seen in the diagram.
24:24
The extra findings include neuropathy and vasculopathy,
24:29
and the soft tissue findings include soft tissue swelling,
24:33
severe joint malalignment leading
24:35
to rocker bottom deformity.
24:39
These radiographs are of two different patients with
24:43
diabetes and neuropathic arthropathy.
24:47
In image A, we see destruction
24:49
of the tarsal metatarsal joint with perticular lucencies
24:54
and soft tissue swelling.
24:56
In image B, we see typical radiologic changes in the foot
25:01
of a diabetic patient.
25:04
There is lateral subluxation
25:06
of the tarsal metatarsal joints, also known
25:10
as the Liz Frank joints.
25:12
The changes in bone
25:13
and joint may mimic severe osteoarthritis,
25:17
severe inflammation or septic arthritis.
25:21
The key in this case is the clinical history
25:25
with the presence of diabetes mellitus
25:28
and diabetic neuropathy.
25:32
Here we see a nice example of rocker bottom deformity.
25:36
This weight-bearing lateral view of the foot
25:39
demonstrates the dislocation in the tarsal metatarsal joints
25:44
and is better visible here than on the AP view.
25:51
Diabetic hand syndrome is another manifestation
25:54
of this disorder
25:56
and these are changes that occur in the hands in patients
25:59
with diabetic neuropathy.
26:02
The diabetic hand syndrome is the inability
26:05
to use the hand due to contractures and stiffness.
26:10
It can occur. It can affect the proximal
26:13
and distal interphalangeal joints
26:15
and metacarpophalangeal joints and is often painless.
26:21
Prolonged hypo hyperglycemia is thought
26:24
to result in the accumulation
26:26
of advanced glycation end products,
26:29
which cause these changes.
26:32
These glycation end products can break down collagen
26:36
and deposit abnormal amounts
26:38
of collagen in connective tissue
26:41
around the joints resulting in stiffening
26:44
and hardening of the joints in the skin.
26:48
If we look at the images, we see destruction
26:51
of the carpal metacarpal joint at the base of the thumb
26:55
and in all the distal interphalangeal joints.
26:58
We also see erosions
27:00
and bone destruction adjacent to the interphalangeal joint
27:04
of the index finger
27:06
and the distal interphalangeal joints of the long ring
27:10
and fifth fingers and the proximal interphalangeal joints
27:15
of the ring and fifth fingers.
27:18
Subluxations, as we see are also present.
27:22
Notice the extensive vascular calcification noted secondary
27:27
to diabetes mellitus.
27:28
Type two. The hand
27:33
of this patient with neuropathy shows the status
27:36
after removal of the trapezius bone indicated by the arrow.
27:42
Arrow. There is destruction
27:43
of all the distal interphalangeal joints
27:46
and erosions adjacent to the proximal interphalangeal joints
27:50
and metacarpophalangeal joints.
27:53
There are also erosions
27:54
and bone destruction adjacent to the interphalangeal joint
27:58
of the index finger and the distal interphalangeal joint
28:03
and proximal interphalangeal joints as well
28:06
as the metacarpophalangeal joints.
28:10
Subluxations and dislocation is also noted.
28:17
Moving on hemophilia can cause extensive changes
28:22
in the joints that resemble osteoarthrosis,
28:26
but the pattern is unusual.
28:29
Hemophilia is an inherited coa coagulation disorder,
28:34
which is mainly X-linked recessive and
28:38
therefore occurs almost exclusively in male children.
28:43
About 50%
28:44
of hemophilia patients develop hemophilic arthropathy.
28:49
This results from recurrent Hema HESIs,
28:53
which leads to synovial hyperplasia, chronic inflammation,
28:59
fibrosis and hemos.
29:03
It is frequently mono or or oligoarticular.
29:08
Early prophylaxis with coagulation factors
29:12
considerably reduces the musculoskeletal
29:15
complications in the joints.
29:18
In hemophilia, we see erosions
29:20
and eventually joint destruction.
29:24
The bones demonstrate subc chondral cyst formation,
29:28
osteoporosis, which is most peri per articular secondary
29:33
to the hyperemia that's occurring.
29:37
Ankylos may occur also in the late
29:40
stage joints.
29:42
Face narrowing is noted
29:44
and destruction in the late stage of the disease may occur.
29:49
He arthrosis affects the large joints and is frequently mono
29:53
or oligoarticular affecting the wrist, knee,
29:58
anco, and elbow joints less frequently.
30:02
It affects the glenohumeral joint,
30:05
sacroiliac joint and hips.
30:08
Because this is an inherited disorder,
30:10
growth abnormalities may be present as well.
30:14
Soft tissue swelling is also present
30:16
because of joint swelling or extra articular hemorrhage.
30:21
Please remember that when findings look like osteoarthritis
30:25
but are in an odd presentation
30:27
or distribution, think about hemophilia
30:31
especially in a younger patient.
30:36
Here we see radiographs of the knees.
30:38
In a patient with a history of hemophilia
30:41
and repetitive, he arthrosis distension
30:44
of the supra patella.
30:46
Recess of the right knee is noted secondary
30:49
to he arthrosis indicated by the black arrow.
30:53
There is narrowing of the medial joint space caused
30:56
by cartilage destruction
30:58
and secondary osteoarthrosis indicated by the white arrow
31:04
subcon bone cyst formation
31:06
below the intercondylar eminence is also noted
31:10
and no erosions are present.
31:13
As you can see, this picture is like osteoarthrosis,
31:16
so it is important to have clinical history.
31:19
In these cases. The Arnold
31:24
Hillgardner classification is a plain radiograph grading
31:28
system for hemophilia arthropathy of the knee.
31:33
In order to save time, I will not go
31:35
through this chart at this time.
31:39
Here we see AP views of both knees in a patient
31:43
with a history of repeated hemo arthrosis caused
31:46
by a vascular malformation, which is in the soft tissues
31:50
and not visible on this radiograph.
31:53
The image of the right knee shows joint space narrowing,
31:57
subc chondral cyst formation in erosions of the medial
32:01
and lateral tibial plateau.
32:04
A normal left knee joint for a comparison is noted.
32:10
Here's a more typical case in a patient
32:12
with long-term history of repetitive hemo arthrosis.
32:16
Because of hemophilia,
32:18
we see a slightly widened intercondylar notch
32:22
on the left side,
32:24
which can be also found in juvenile rheumatoid
32:27
and tuberculous arthropathy.
32:30
The femoral condyles are bolus
32:33
with flattened condylar surfaces.
32:36
The bone deformity on the left side can also be seen in
32:39
tuber tuber tuber tubercle, I'm sorry,
32:42
tubercle TB arthropathy.
32:44
There we go. As a note,
32:47
this is stage five Arnold Hilde Gartner classification
32:51
of hemophilic arthropathy.
32:53
This is demonstrates severe joint space narrowing,
32:58
subc chondral cyst formation and erosive destruction.
33:04
This image is of the shoulder in a patient with hemophilia
33:08
and re requirement he arthrosis of the shoulder joint.
33:12
It looks amazingly like osteoarthrosis.
33:16
There are features of secondary osteoarthritis
33:20
with subc chondral sclerosis
33:22
and osteophyte formation at both sides
33:25
of the glenohumeral joint superior and inferior.
33:30
In general, hemophilic arthropathy has similarities
33:33
with osteoarthritis.
33:35
As we stated earlier,
33:37
however, the presence of aver erosions,
33:41
extensive subc chondral bone cyst formation
33:44
and the history of recurrent hemo arthrosis
33:48
are distinguishing factors in favor of
33:51
hemophiliac arthropathy
33:56
in this radiograph of the ankle on the left
33:59
and a magnified view of the same ankle on the right
34:03
of a patient with hemophilia.
34:05
The findings include extensive symmetrical joint space
34:09
narrowing, subc chondral, bons formation,
34:13
and erosive changes.
34:18
Here's a nice representation
34:20
of end stage hemophilic arthropathy.
34:23
In this AP and lateral view of the elbow,
34:26
we see symmetric joint space narrowing, joint effusion,
34:31
subc chondral cyst formation,
34:33
and secondary osteoarthrosis with osteophyte formation.
34:39
Although the finding themselves are not that specific,
34:43
you can see the similarities in all the above cases
34:46
that I've shown you today.
34:50
Moving on to chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis
34:55
is an unusual condition which demonstrates multifocal areas
35:00
of sterile bone inflammation.
35:03
Clinically, this is an uncommon autoimmune inflammatory
35:08
disorder of the bones in children
35:10
and young adults that is characterized
35:13
by non bacterial osteomyelitis.
35:18
Patients present with episodic mul multifocal bone pain
35:23
secondary to sterile osseous inflammation.
35:27
The disease has a relapsing and remitting course.
35:31
The cause of this disorder is unclear.
35:35
The diagnosis is made by exclusion
35:38
and the main causes
35:40
to be excluded are neoplasms and infections.
35:45
It is sometimes diagnosed along
35:47
with inflammatory bowel disease or psoriasis
35:51
and there seems to be a genetic component.
35:56
If we look at the diagram, the findings are rather unusual.
36:00
The mandible and clavicle are frequently affected
36:04
as are the elbows, knees, and ankles.
36:08
The pisiform joint is affected in the wrist.
36:11
No other joints are affected in the hand
36:14
and there is no foot involvement.
36:17
There are no definitive articular findings in this disorder.
36:23
First, the bones demonstrate lytic lesions
36:26
and then bone edema later progressively sclerotic lesions
36:31
develop in the metaphysis along
36:34
with thick peros titis.
36:38
The cartilage demonstrates no abnormal findings.
36:42
The distribution is as seen in the illustration,
36:46
often symmetrical and multifocal.
36:49
Typically, the medial clavicles and the tibia are involved.
36:54
Other common sites are ribs, the mandible, the pelvis
36:59
and vertebrae bodies.
37:01
Extra findings occur in children
37:03
and adolescents with an average age of onset of seven
37:07
to 14 years and the female
37:09
to male ratio is approximately two to one.
37:14
Soft tissues demonstrate edema
37:16
around the regions of inflammation.
37:21
If you look carefully, we see here cortical thickening
37:26
sclerosis and bone enlargement of the diaphysis
37:29
and metaphysis of the right clavicle
37:34
and metaphysis of the left clavicle.
37:40
A spectacular SPECT CT
37:42
and bone scintigraphy in the same patient
37:46
demonstrate abnormal radionuclide uptake in the
37:49
corresponding areas reflecting increased bone turnover.
37:56
This patient demonstrated pain on the left side of the hip.
38:01
There is subc chondral osteolysis lateral
38:03
to the proximal femoral femur
38:06
demonstrated by the blue arrow.
38:08
The MRI study belows including axi
38:11
and coronal T one TSE FS sequences
38:17
with contrast shows a region of bone
38:20
and soft tissue enhancement about the left hip.
38:25
This was found to be due to non-infectious osteomyelitis
38:29
with extra osseous extension.
38:34
Our final disorder in this lecture series is SFO syndrome.
38:39
This is a syndrome that consists of synovitis, acne,
38:44
osis of the hands and soles of the feet, hyperos, ptosis
38:49
and osteo osteitis,
38:51
and it's an uncommon inflammatory disorder
38:55
of bone joints and skin.
38:58
The pathogenesis of SFO syndrome is not well understood.
39:02
It is sometimes described as an autoinflammatory disorder.
39:08
If we look at the radiographic findings
39:11
and apply our mnemonic,
39:13
the articular findings include joint, joint erosions
39:17
and erosion of the vertebral body contours.
39:21
The bones demonstrate osteitis, which is bone inflammation
39:25
and demonstrated as sclerosis of the medullary cavity
39:29
and bone marrow edema.
39:32
Hyper osis is also seen as cortical thickening formation
39:37
of osteophytes, paravertebral ossification
39:41
and ankylos osteo
39:44
osteolysis is also a common finding
39:47
and may lead to vertebral body collapse.
39:50
The cartilaginous changes include joint space narrowing.
39:55
This distribution is asymmetric including the anterior chest
40:00
wall, which is the most common site of involvement,
40:05
then the men mandible and spine
40:08
and less frequently the cer cervical spine
40:11
and sacroiliac joints.
40:15
The extra findings for this disorder is
40:17
that it is seen in an average age of 30 to 50 years of age
40:22
with a female predominance.
40:25
Soft tissue changes include acne
40:28
and pustulosis of the palms and soles of the feet.
40:33
Although skin and osteoarticular manifestations do not
40:37
necessarily coexist.
40:40
An important point in this disorder is that the degree
40:43
of inflammation determines the type of bone abnormalities.
40:48
Osteolysis will occur when there is extensive inflammation.
40:54
Increase of bone activity
40:55
and sclerosis will occur when there is less inflammation.
41:03
Here we see three different images of the same patient.
41:07
Notice on the sagittal CT on the left
41:10
that there is osteitis of the sternum indicated
41:14
by the yellow arrow
41:18
with sclerotic thoracic vertebral bodies
41:21
and some nplate erosions
41:23
and paravertebral CDEs fight formation indicated
41:26
by the blue arrow.
41:29
The middle image is a lateral view from a
41:32
nuclear medicine bone scan.
41:35
Increased activity can be seen in the sternum indicated
41:38
by the black arrow and then
41:41
and in the mid thoracic spine indicated
41:44
by the yellow arrow head.
41:47
The right image is an axial CT of this patient demonstrating
41:52
sclerosis in the manubrium stern eye.
41:58
Here is a good example of hyperos osteos in sfo.
42:03
This patient has extensive hyperos osteos of the medial side
42:07
of the CVIC clavicles bilaterally.
42:11
In the CT of the same patient,
42:14
we see extensive hyperos ptosis of the medial side
42:18
of the clavicle and the sternum ankylos
42:23
of the sternoclavicular joints and of the first
42:26
and second sternal costal joints is also noted.
42:32
We have come to the end of the arthritis lecture series.
42:36
On this slide, you will find comp a comprehensive table
42:40
demonstrating all the findings seen in all the diseases
42:44
we have discussed.
42:46
It might be helpful for you to photograph this
42:48
and keep it in your telephone for reference.
42:51
You'll be able to find it on the
42:55
modality website under noon conferences.
43:00
Virtually everything I talked about is in this table
43:04
and as I said, this lecture will be available on the
43:07
modality website along with the two
43:10
previous lectures under noon conference.
43:13
Thank you so much for your attention
43:15
and I hope you found this enjoyable.
43:19
Thank you so much Dr.
43:20
Beki, and at this time we will open the floor
43:23
for any questions from our audience.
43:25
You may submit your questions through the q
43:26
and a feature below.
43:29
Uh, it looks like we have a couple
43:31
of questions in here already that I'll read to you,
43:33
Dr. Beki, if you're ready.
43:36
I'm ready. Alright.
43:37
Uh, will dual energy CT show CPPD deposition
43:42
not seen on plane radiographs,
43:47
Dual energy CT Might,
43:49
but once again, I'm a playing film expert
43:52
and I don't work so much with sec sectional imaging,
43:55
so I can't tell you the answer to
43:57
that question definitively,
43:59
but it would make sense that it might do so.
44:03
All Right, and that's really all
44:05
I can say on that topic.
44:07
Excellent. Uh, this next question, uh,
44:10
I will AP apologize in advance, uh, to everyone
44:13
for my mispronunciation of words.
44:16
Uh, so how will you differentiate, differentiate between,
44:21
uh, this might be a typo actually, so arthritis
44:26
and neuropath and syndrome
44:30
PS psoriatic arthritis and neuropathic arthritis?
44:34
Yes, There's a big difference.
44:37
There's a big difference.
44:39
Neuropathic, as we talked about, is regional,
44:42
usually in the foot and sometimes in the hand.
44:48
It, it occurs
44:51
and involves all the joints of the midfoot
44:56
and all the joints of the hand when we see it.
44:59
Psoriatic has a rate like distribution.
45:04
It has discreet erosions which have
45:08
behind them bony proliferation.
45:13
This bony proliferation is not osteophytosis,
45:17
but rather the body's response to the erosive changes.
45:23
Psoriatic is a slower disease when compared
45:27
to rheumatoid arthritis,
45:30
which causes an ero which cause erosions with an
45:33
with a vengeance,
45:35
and the body doesn't have time to build up a repair response
45:39
as it does in psoriatic arthritis.
45:42
So they're really, they're really two different entities.
45:47
Okay, great.
45:50
Let's see if there are any in the chat for you.
45:56
Uh, any role of USG and arthritis?
46:01
Do they help in differentiation?
46:05
Everybody likes ultrasound. I am not an ultrasound doctor.
46:10
I read him when I was in training.
46:13
Remember, I'm American trained.
46:15
I work in Europe, but I'm American trained
46:18
and those scans are done by technologists in,
46:21
in the hospitals in the United States,
46:23
and they're most frequently interpreted
46:28
by technologists.
46:30
The me, the MSK
46:35
ultrasound examinations are done by specific physicians.
46:40
Not every one of us does ultrasound you.
46:43
I'll give you a reference.
46:44
John A. Jacobson, who is a brilliant, brilliant man,
46:49
writes a lot about it,
46:50
and he is, he's been doing that for 20 years
46:54
and he can tell you more about that.
46:56
You can actually search Google for him and for his works.
47:01
All right. Um, this looks like difference between
47:07
CPPD and hemochromatosis
47:12
for Tri mm-Hmm.
47:13
Angular fibro cartridge.
47:16
Okay. Once again, rarely do we see
47:21
chondrocalcinosis and hemochromatosis.
47:25
Hemochromatosis causes beaking of the heads of
47:30
the metacarpals.
47:32
All four of them save the thumb.
47:36
CPPD causes beaking of the first
47:40
and second metacarpal heads.
47:43
Also, hemochromatosis is a disease of men,
47:49
whereas CPPD is a disease of everybody
47:52
and we'll all probably get it as we get older
47:55
because it's quite ubiquitous
47:59
after probably 50 years of age
48:02
and it's presentation is seen in 100% of patients
48:07
by the time they reach 100 years of age.
48:12
Okay. Uh, is it always possible to distinguish
48:16
subc chondral cyst and erosion?
48:21
That's a difficult question. It's difficult.
48:25
It's very difficult sometimes
48:27
because if the cyst opens into the joint,
48:32
then it'll look like an erosion,
48:35
but the erosions that we see in rheumatoid tend to be
48:40
marginal no matter whether they're in the wrist
48:43
or in the digits.
48:45
Whereas the subc chondral cysts
48:50
seen in CPPD commonly are more centrally
48:54
located in the bone.
48:55
It's a very fine differentiation,
48:58
and if you look at a a lot of these cases,
49:00
you will see the difference.
49:02
Mm-Hmm.
49:04
Uh, then we have, uh,
49:08
I'm not sure if this is supposed to be disuse
49:10
or discuss osteopenia versus complex pain
49:14
regional syndrome on X-ray differences.
49:19
Oh, yo, yo, yo yo. That I can't do.
49:21
That's out of my, out of the scope
49:23
of this lecture at this point.
49:27
Uh, all right. We will, let's see, what's this one?
49:32
Uh, I'll just read this whole thing. Thank you very much.
49:35
Once again, Dr. Blei
49:36
and the moderator, please serve
49:38
for a resident going for exams.
49:40
A lot of these can be listed as differentials, differentials
49:44
of each other, not directly, but somehow.
49:46
So Dr. Beki, please.
49:48
Any tips on stratifying, orthopathy
49:52
and arthritis differentials something less extensive than
49:56
the table at the end of the presentation?
49:59
Okay. What you need to do is you need
50:03
to learn the target area approach,
50:05
which this lecture is based upon.
50:09
You can learn it through practice.
50:11
The best presentation of the target area approach
50:15
for the hand risk
50:17
and foot is in the new Resnick book
50:21
that just came out two months ago, the fourth edition
50:25
of Bone and Joint Imaging,
50:29
and that has a detailed explanation.
50:32
You basically have to just look at a lot of cases
50:36
and you have to put together the findings in your head
50:41
relative to the way the, the, the diagrams are,
50:45
because the diagrams are well known to be accurate
50:49
and using those, and over time you'll learn it
50:52
and then the differentials become very, very clear to you.
50:56
It's, there's not lists of them,
50:57
but the things that are different
50:59
and the things that are similar become clear.
51:04
I, I started using this uh, method many, many years ago
51:09
as a, after I did a fellowship with Dr.
51:12
Resnick and it really does work.
51:13
It takes time, but it really does work
51:17
and you become brilliant
51:18
and instantaneous at diagnosing these disorders.
51:22
You're really good at it after a while
51:25
because some of them actually have very specific findings
51:30
and these findings are, you know,
51:32
and the ones that have very specific findings,
51:34
many of them are common.
51:37
So it's the rarer disorders
51:38
that have the non-specific findings in General.
51:44
General. Alright, well that's, those are the questions Dr.
51:49
Bki. So thank you so much Super
51:51
For lecture
51:52
And then taking the time to answer everyone's questions.
51:56
No problem, no problem.
51:58
Yes. Thank you so much and thank you to everyone
52:00
for participating in our noon conference
52:02
and asking great questions Today.
52:04
You can access the recording of today's conference
52:06
and all our previous noon conferences
52:08
by creating a free MRI online account.
52:11
We'll also email out a link to the replay later today.
52:15
Be sure to join us next week on Thursday,
52:17
July 25th at 12:00 PM Eastern,
52:19
where Dr. Laura Avery will deliver a lecture entitled
52:22
Abdominal Trauma.
52:24
You can register for, uh, mri online.com
52:27
and follow us on social media
52:28
for updates on future noon conferences.
52:30
Thanks again and have a great day.