Interactive Transcript
0:00
<v ->Okay, we've come to the exciting part
0:03
of this particular lecture,
0:05
because you know as you look back today
0:08
over the lectures that I've given,
0:09
we started with transient osteoporosis.
0:13
We moved on to show frequent
0:15
associated transient painful marrow edema.
0:19
We went on to osteonecrosis,
0:22
and then we showed you a cases
0:24
where maybe it wasn't osteonecrosis,
0:26
perhaps we were dealing with insufficiency fractures.
0:31
We then covered some of the insufficiency fractures
0:34
and indicated how similar they might be to osteonecrosis.
0:39
So what I'm gonna try to do in the next 10 minutes or so,
0:44
is I'm going to try to tie these together,
0:49
show you how perhaps we can tie together
0:52
these three entities,
0:54
transient osteoporosis/marrow edema,
0:57
osteonecrosis, and subchondral insufficiency fracture.
1:02
And I'm gonna introduce you
1:04
to a term you may not have heard,
1:06
but if you go ahead and query it on the internet,
1:10
you'll be amazed how many hits that you will see.
1:14
So let's start with this.
1:17
The pathogenesis of transient migratory
1:20
or non-migratory osteopenia/marrow edema is not clear.
1:26
And in the second paragraph here,
1:28
I'm indicating all the possible entities
1:32
that might explain why in fact we deal with this condition
1:37
of osteopenia knee or a joint
1:41
associated with marrow edema on MR.
1:45
There is increasing evidence that this particular phenomenon
1:50
relates to some sort of stimulus
1:53
that produces a cascade of events,
1:56
and I'm gonna show you that cascade in a minute,
1:59
that results in transient osteopenia, okay?
2:03
And that this particular pathway includes something
2:07
that as of about four or five years ago,
2:11
I had never heard of,
2:13
it's called Regional Acceleratory Phenomenon,
2:17
and I'm gonna abbreviate it, RAP.
2:19
Easy to say, it'll shorten this talk by about five minutes.
2:24
Well, at the time I began to hear about it, I did a search.
2:28
And when I did this search,
2:29
and this is a number of years ago,
2:32
there were almost 4,000 results of this RAP phenomenon.
2:38
And it was of interest to me that a many of those results
2:42
were in the dental literature explaining changes
2:46
that occur in the mandible and maxilla
2:48
after for example, a tooth is pulled,
2:52
what is the reparative response that occurs.
2:55
So kind of to let you know at the beginning,
2:59
just a general idea of what RAP is,
3:02
think of it as an SOS response.
3:06
It's a reaction of a tissue to a noxious stimulus
3:11
that then increases the healing capacity
3:15
of that tissue, okay?
3:18
And there's insult to that tissue could be trauma,
3:21
it could be infection, it could be tumor.
3:24
So it is RAP that leads to the callus formation
3:29
and the proper bone union,
3:32
rather than a non-union following a fracture.
3:37
It's this particular phenomenon, okay?
3:40
And what it relates to is something that affects
3:44
what is known as the basic multicellular unit (BMU).
3:49
You learned about this in medical school.
3:51
You may not have thought about it very much,
3:53
but that BMU, that unit,
3:57
is a team, a wandering team,
4:00
composed of osteoblasts, which as you know produce bone
4:04
and osteoclasts which resorb bone.
4:08
And the process they produce at the site of injury
4:11
is osseous remodeling, right?
4:14
It is a balance pattern of bone formation
4:19
and bone resorption.
4:21
There is strong evidence that the stimulus
4:24
that activates RAP
4:27
is repetitive loading and unloading a bone.
4:32
When you think of the transient marrow edema
4:36
that migrates or is stationary,
4:38
is generally in the lower extremity
4:41
that we are talking about.
4:43
Most of the stress fractures that we see
4:46
are in the lower extremity.
4:49
There is in fact repetitive loading
4:52
and unloading a bone within that lower extremity.
4:56
So some noxious stimulus likely loading
5:00
and unloading a bone activates RAP.
5:03
Now there may be other stimuli as well.
5:06
I just don't know what they are.
5:08
So let's follow the sequence of events.
5:11
Repetitive loading or unloading a bone leads to microdamage,
5:16
the degree of which has been well shown
5:19
is dependent upon a lot of things,
5:21
the magnitude of the load, the number, rate,
5:25
frequency, duration, distribution,
5:28
and polarity, direction of the loading cycles
5:32
and the quality and quantity of the bone
5:35
at the site that the load is being applied.
5:40
Prolonged or exaggerated RAP levels
5:45
leads to an inflammatory response in the bone.
5:50
This increases the permeability of the capillary bed,
5:53
producing hyperemia, which we've now added to our equation.
5:58
This leads to increased bone turnover
6:02
and marrow edema-like changes,
6:05
elevating marrow pressure.
6:07
So, so far, we've gotten this far.
6:12
Hyperemia leads to loss of bone
6:15
in the form of various patterns of regional osteopenia,
6:19
which are closely associated
6:22
with marrow edema-like abnormalities.
6:25
And I think the edema occurs
6:27
prior to the regional osteopenia.
6:32
RAP and other unknown stimuli
6:34
may also trigger complex regional pain syndrome.
6:39
So we're gonna add that to our equation, okay?
6:45
And it's accompanied by hyperemia
6:48
and has been likened to other forms of regional osteopenia.
6:52
And in addition, there is data that support
6:55
the association of generalized and regional osteopenia.
7:02
Up to this point, all of what we have talked about
7:07
lead to findings that are reversible.
7:10
But then, in some persons,
7:13
additional irreversible abnormalities
7:16
may subsequently appear.
7:19
The next step is, is that the generalized
7:21
or regional osteopenia can predispose
7:25
to subchondral insufficiency fractures.
7:28
These are invariably accompanied by marrow edema.
7:34
Subchondral insufficiency fractures shown here
7:39
can lead to bone collapse
7:41
as well as focal regions of osteonecrosis,
7:45
although there are a lot of other causes
7:47
of focal or widespread osteonecrosis as well.
7:52
These last findings may be,
7:55
but are not invariably irreversible.
7:59
Think back to one of the articles I showed you from Belgium,
8:03
where they tried to figure out
8:05
when they were looking at cases of osteonecrosis
8:08
or something else,
8:09
remember in the knee,
8:11
whether or not they were dealing
8:12
with irreversible or reversible findings
8:16
that something else was likely
8:18
to subchondral insufficiency fractures
8:21
which may not be irreversible,
8:24
long as there is not collapse
8:26
of the subchondral bone plate.