Interactive Transcript
0:00
There are two types of acquisition in cardiac CT.
0:04
One is called the retrospective ECG gating, and this is
0:08
how we started when we started cardiac CT in the
0:11
beginning. The principle behind here is like,
0:15
the scanner will continuously acquire data around the heart
0:19
when the patient is transported through the heart while acquiring the data.
0:23
Imagine you are using a 64-slice scanner, which
0:27
means the maximum X-ray beam width is about 40
0:31
millimeters.
0:33
One rotation around the heart does not suffice to cover the
0:36
entire heart, so it has to rotate about three to five times
0:40
around the heart to cover the entire heart volume.
0:44
By doing so, in the retrospective ECG gating,
0:48
the scanner will automatically match with the ECG of the
0:52
patient, and when the scanner is started, the
0:56
patient is transported through the gantry while you're
1:00
continuously acquiring the data.
1:02
This yellow portion is called the patient radiation dose exposure
1:06
into the entire area.
1:09
Afterwards, we only reconstruct the image in the diastolic
1:12
area, not in the systolic area, because in the systolic
1:16
area, the perturbation is so fast you won't be able to get
1:20
any useful information. Therefore, you reconstruct
1:24
part of the image, which is required to reconstruct the image in this
1:28
portion, and throw everything else.
1:31
That's where this impact of retrospective ECG gating
1:35
resulting in a higher patient dose.
1:38
So the radiation dose is typically higher than prospective triggering.
1:43
When do we do that? For example, this is a 64-slice
1:47
scanner,
1:48
which is about 40-millimeter beam width.
1:50
You need to cover the entire heart through multiple rotations,
1:54
means multiple heartbeats at every time you are doing
1:58
it, and you're moving to the next position of the bed to acquire the next
2:02
image information as you continuously acquire.
2:05
You want to make sure the data available for reconstruction,
2:09
there's no gap between one adjacent to the next heartbeat.
2:14
That's why you tend to overlap the anatomy to make
2:18
sure there is redundant data for image reconstruction.
2:22
Because of the overlapping, that is what is called the very low
2:26
pitch, the radiation dose in the retrospective ECG gating can
2:30
be high.
2:31
So the way it works is cardiac CT, typically
2:35
with retrospective gating, uses a pitch value of 0.2 to
2:39
0.4,
2:41
which means from one heartbeat to another heartbeat, as you are
2:44
acquiring the data, the data you want is acquired in such a way
2:49
there is no gap between the data of the rotation.
2:52
So we always tend to overlap it. Because of that, the
2:56
radiation dose is inversely proportional to pitch.
2:59
Therefore, the lower the pitch value means the higher the
3:02
retrospective ECG-gated radiation dose to the patient.
3:06
Immediately after the development of retrospective ECG
3:10
gating, we started using what is called a prospective ECG triggering
3:14
method,
3:15
in which instead of acquiring throughout the heart cycle and through the
3:19
multiple heart cycles, the scanner was advised to
3:23
turn on at a predetermined position between
3:27
the R to R peak.
3:29
And then the table is moved to the next position, wait for a present
3:33
heartbeat, again acquire, and you keep doing it
3:37
until you cover the entire heart,
3:40
which is what's shown here. You can see here a couple of heartbeats were skipped,
3:45
but you are acquiring data such that the volume of the
3:49
data acquired does not have any gap from the past in the
3:53
previous position. You slightly tend to overlap, but not
3:56
as much as retrospective. Plus, you don't expose the heart
4:00
throughout the heart cycle, you only expose the heart only at a certain
4:04
point of the heart cycle.
4:06
This particular study basically demonstrates the difference between the
4:10
helical method, which is called the retrospective gated
4:13
technique,
4:15
versus prospective triggering method.
4:18
You can see here this is a prospective method where you
4:22
have the radiation dose to the patient almost
4:25
one-fourth of that of the retrospective gated.
4:28
But the scientist authors have shown that there is no difference in the image
4:32
quality between the two acquisitions, but the patient dose was
4:36
remarkably lower in the sequential method compared to the helical method,
4:40
and that's the prospective method.