Interactive Transcript
0:00
So the first case, an 11 or 12 year old with medial knee pain,
0:06
no known injury. So here, uh,
0:09
I'll try a little bit different today and I'll, I'll hang up, uh, how I usually,
0:14
um, uh, set up my viewing protocols. Um, but typically,
0:19
and I was asked this by, by a, a student, um, and, um,
0:24
one of your classmates. So, so the way I like to hang it is, is just, uh,
0:29
coronals tip for knees, at least coronals on top. Sagal is on the bottom,
0:33
and then axials somewhere on the side. Um, I,
0:37
I obviously because of, uh, zoom's, uh,
0:40
limitations from Zoom to have at least one t one weighted sequence in one plane
0:44
just to, uh, uh, best evaluate the marrow. Um, and then,
0:49
and then I'll have, uh, a longitudinal, either two sagittals that,
0:53
or two Coronas, and then, and then one sagal, cornal, uh, uh, what have you.
0:58
And then obviously the axial. So dealing with this first case, uh,
1:02
just going right to the, uh,
1:05
the salient findings we see here that we have, uh, uh,
1:10
osteochondral, uh, irregularity or abnormality at the central,
1:15
sort of posterior aspect of the, uh, medial femoral condyle right here,
1:20
compatible with, uh, or in the spectrum of osteo meningitis. Dessicans,
1:25
okay. Um, thought to be an idiopathic, uh, uh,
1:29
cause some people say could be from, uh, trauma or, or, or, um,
1:34
activities, what have you. But typically gonna be in a,
1:37
in an adolescent or a young patient, as in our index case.
1:42
And what we see here are, uh, the, uh,
1:46
going from, um,
1:48
the articular surface or the cartilage we see here that, uh,
1:53
the cartilage is looking, uh, pretty good. Okay? Um,
1:57
next I'll,
1:58
I'll look at the subc chondral bone plate for any cracks or disruptions.
2:03
Okay? But, uh, most importantly, what you wanna look at is, uh,
2:08
the, um,
2:09
and depending on who you read or what terms you use for your practice, uh,
2:14
I've, I've ca I've heard the, this, uh, entity,
2:19
um, sometimes I get asked how to, how to, how what,
2:22
what source of terminology I use to describe OCDs or osteo neuritis test cans.
2:27
So some people will call this the lesion itself. That is the, um,
2:32
the, uh, the stable or unstable fragment.
2:36
I've also heard it called, uh, progeny. Okay?
2:40
And then deeper to that, uh, people will use, uh, the terms, you know,
2:44
fluid or cleft, what have you, or even lesion bed. And then,
2:49
and then, uh, the under, underneath, all of that. Um,
2:54
you know, people will, will some,
2:56
I've heard some authors or some people call it the, uh, the parent bone. Okay?
3:01
Um, so the big, the big thing with this case is, is to determine, um,
3:06
uh, stability or instability, okay? Um,
3:10
and depending on who you read, uh, but, but, uh, for those that are interested,
3:15
uh, you wanna look up, uh, dis met Deme, DE, uh,
3:19
DE capital SMET. He's, he's probably done, he's, uh,
3:24
done the most work on. And, uh, o out of Wisconsin, uh,
3:29
on o osteochondritis, deic hands in various locations, probably most,
3:33
mostly involving the, um, the knee and tailless. Okay?
3:38
But basically what you're gonna be looking for is disruption in between,
3:43
um,
3:44
the progeny or actual lesion and the parent bone or lesion bed.
3:49
And what do I mean by that? Basically,
3:51
you want to see disruption of the cartilage, okay?
3:54
Disruption of the subc choral bone plate fluid signal, okay?
3:59
Fluid signal,
4:00
undermining that lesion or progeny and interposed between
4:05
that and the parent bone, creating what some people have, uh,
4:09
liken to the Oreo cookie sign, okay? And be,
4:14
and it's called the Oreo cookie sign. Because typically, um, these, uh,
4:19
lesions, uh, are going to be,
4:21
or the bone actually is going to be typically, uh,
4:24
dark on your MR sequences surrounding the, uh,
4:29
the cream of the Oreo cookie, or that is the fluid centrally. Okay?
4:33
So let me blow this up. Okay. So just to highlight some of the, some of the,
4:38
uh, potential, uh, unstable features. Oh, and sorry,
4:42
the other criteria are, are going to be, besides the fluid you want to see, uh,
4:48
sclerosis at the lesion bed or the, the parent bone, okay?
4:53
Or basically dark, uh, dark T one and T two signal, or,
4:58
uh, dis met. And,
5:00
and others have also mentioned that you want to see multiple cysts, okay?
5:05
Or a single cyst that measures about five millimeters or more,
5:10
okay? When you, the more obviously features you have in such a case,
5:15
okay? Um, then you want to call, uh,
5:18
instability or at least suggest it. Okay? Why is that important?
5:22
Because if it's unstable, then it's gonna flip off eventually, uh, and,
5:27
um, you know,
5:29
displace and then obviously lead to early osteoporosis in these patients.
5:32
And that's what, that's the whole name, name of the game.
5:35
We're trying to prevent that early osteoporosis. Okay? Um,
5:40
so in this case, uh, you can see, we can see here that there is a cyst.
5:44
There's maybe, there's, there's, uh, arguably some T two, uh,
5:48
hypo intensity at the lesion bed or the parent bone, okay?
5:52
And then we have an incomplete fluid signal interposed between
5:57
the progeny and parent bone or lesion bed. Okay? And then obviously the,
6:02
the lesion or the progeny itself, the, the, um,
6:07
the epi seal cartilage or the overlying cartilage does look intact. So,
6:12
um, I would read this and, and the,
6:16
I think the master grading also said sheet says that this, uh,
6:20
should be read as potentially unstable or perhaps partially unstable.
6:25
And the importance of this is you wanna, uh,
6:27
at least monitor it closely and maybe even go in and, and, uh, and fix this,
6:31
or at least, uh, go in there with maybe a, a,
6:35
a drill and stimulate some healing. Okay?
6:38
Some authors will also recommend that, uh, you mention the, um,
6:44
how the fis, the, the nearby feys look, whether they're closed or open.
6:49
Okay. And why is that important? Because younger patients,
6:54
uh, depending on who you read, okay, um, uh,
7:00
13, um,
7:02
15 or younger thir 13 to 15 years old or younger,
7:06
when p when p patients still have open fes, okay?
7:11
MR is typically gonna be more sensitive. Why is that?
7:14
Because oftentimes what happens is in these younger patients, okay,
7:19
uh, the overlying, uh, epi steel cartilage looks intact.
7:24
So basically,
7:26
when the arthroscopy goes in and looks at the cartilage
7:31
or looks for this OCD, because the, the,
7:34
these patients that are younger with intact cartilage,
7:38
and typically too, you have to remember, um,
7:41
there's an inverse relationship between patient age and the thickness of this
7:46
epi, epi fial cartilage. So, as patients, as we all age,
7:49
we know that our cartilage thins out whatever, for whatever reasons, you know,
7:53
we lose lubricants, you know, the water and the, between the glyco,
7:58
amino glycans, the Gs, and what have you, me,
8:02
mucopolysaccharides this cartilage thins as we age. So as the, the,
8:07
the scope is, uh, placed in the knee, the,
8:11
the arthroscopist may,
8:13
may not see this potentially unstable lesion until
8:18
later when things, uh, when things thin out,
8:20
and they start to see cracks within the cartilage,
8:23
and thereby they can see underneath to the lesion itself.
8:28
So in younger patients, typically, you know, 13,
8:31
depending on who you read or younger,
8:34
you may want to mention that the feisty is still open. And you know, this, um,
8:38
lesion can be concealed, per se, okay? Under arthroscopy.
8:43
And it's actually been out in the literature literature too. Okay? Uh,
8:48
patients, uh, there's an article out in the literature, um, you know,
8:52
when patients are above 17, that's when we, uh, that's when art,
8:56
the arthroscopy will tend to be, uh, see these lesions better,
9:01
okay? And thereby, and, uh, thereby that'll affect or,
9:05
or be reflected also in the sensitivity or specificity. Specificity.
9:10
The specificity as patients get older for our mr uh,
9:15
imaging diagnoses will increase, okay? Because, uh,
9:19
you know, most articles will use, uh,
9:22
arthroscopy as the gold standard. But if you really think about it, MRI,
9:28
uh, will be,
9:29
will be able to diagnoses earlier in, um,
9:34
in younger patients where the FI cs are still open and the epi cartilage
9:39
is still thick. So the, uh, so in the younger patients, the,
9:43
the specificity is actually gonna be much lower. And some, in, in some articles,
9:47
it d it, uh,
9:48
states that the specificity in these young patients can be as low as 10%. Okay?
9:53
So this is an OCD lesion or osteo testic cans. The differential, uh,
9:58
to think about is gonna be, you know, uh,
10:00
distal femoral irregularity and the way to parse that out, um,
10:04
the sides imaging the patient over time. Um, you're typically not gonna see,
10:09
um, you know, the cystic change, edema, fluid cleft,
10:14
what have you in the, uh, normal ossification center development, uh,
10:19
which is the differential in this case. So with that, um, uh,
10:24
that is case number one, OCD. Any questions on this first case?
10:29
There was also a question on what is meant by shoulder and un shoulder
10:34
or contained and uncontained. So basically, um, I,
10:38
I believe that is extrapolated from, um, ankle arthroscopy.
10:43
Okay? And basically what the orthopedist means, uh,
10:47
by that to my understanding, is that when you have these, uh,
10:52
osteochondral injuries, lesions, OCDs,
10:56
whatever term you use, okay,
10:58
when it involves the curve or a curve of, uh,
11:02
of an articular surface, it can be more difficult for our, uh,
11:07
surgeons to treat. So that's, that's what's meant, what,
11:11
that's what's meant by shoulder, non shoulder or contain uncontained,
11:16
uh, OCDs to address your first question, yeah, for osteo tendinitis, tecans,
11:20
there's many classification systems. You know, uh, off the top of my head, if I,
11:25
if I remember, remember correctly,
11:27
I think there's like a hefty H-E-F-T-I that you can look up. There's also,
11:32
um, there's an author,
11:33
there's a group that it begins with the c char oscopy,
11:38
oscopy or something like that, maybe, I apologize. Um, but I can get that to,
11:42
to you all later or whoever's interested. But, but yeah, you can,
11:47
you can use classification systems. But an important thing is for me,
11:51
I just keep an open dialogue
11:52
With, uh, open communication line of communication with,
11:55
with my orthopedic surgeons. Um, they have my, uh, direct,
12:00
uh, cell number. So I basically read to,
12:05
to the clinician, um, if they use, if,
12:08
if I run into a classification, if I run into a clinician,
12:12
and we have a pretty, uh, robust teleradiology service. So, you know,
12:17
sometimes I'll get phone calls, um, from referers, um,
12:21
and they'll ask me to throw in a classification system,
12:23
in which case I'll ask them which classification you would like me to use,
12:27
and I will look it up and I will, uh, provide that. Um, but,
12:33
um, if you are going to grade it or give a classification, i I,
12:37
I would recommend, you know,
12:39
putting in parentheses somewhere in your impression or your findings,
12:42
at least you know, what classification you are using. Um, you know, because,
12:48
um, you know, uh, I think the Hep D or, or the, uh,
12:52
the other classification I was mentioning, you know, there's overlap. Um,
12:56
some people try to divide it into like five classifications.
13:00
Some people have come along later, like the Hep D group, um,
13:04
have tried to distill it down to three to try to make it simpler to decrease
13:08
that inter and intra observer variability. But, uh,
13:13
to answer your, your question, a long-winded way, I, I describe,
13:18
and, and the way I work it is, uh, kind of like what, what I was doing, uh,
13:23
trying to, uh, highlight earlier. Uh, and sorry if I didn't,
13:27
it didn't come across, but I basically work from,
13:30
from the articular surface towards the parent bone or
13:35
lesion bed. And I basically just describe,
13:39
and then I add a summary line,
13:41
whether I think this is unstable or stable. Okay?
13:45
And if I'm not sure, then I, then I say, I'm not sure, you know, I,
13:49
I'll say uncertain or potentially unstable, something like that.
13:53
But in this case, because of the fluid cleft or the,
13:56
at least the partial fluid cleft, that's, and, and the cyst right here,
14:00
I would read this at least, you know, concerning or,
14:03
or potentially unstable, you know, as the patient is flexing and extending,
14:08
you know, maybe the shearing injuries, what have you, from whatever activities,
14:12
it may eventually make this a fully unstable and, and hopefully not, but,
14:17
but, uh, that's how I would read this case. So, so in general, I describe,
14:22
but, uh, depending on the surgeon, um, you know, uh,
14:26
if they ask for a classification, then I, then I do provide it. But, uh,
14:30
oftentimes I'll have to look that up, um, because there's just, uh, quite a few.
14:35
Um, to your second question, if I remember, uh, format,
14:39
I'm flexible for our trainees here, uh,
14:42
especially the younger trainees first and second years,
14:44
who are starting to rotate through on, on M-S-K-M-R-I, uh,
14:48
they love to do templates. Me personally and,
14:52
and my colleagues and mentors, uh, including, um, Dr. Resnick,
14:57
for those of you who are familiar with the, uh, MSK radiology literature, Dr.
15:01
Re, we, we tend not to use templated reporting.
15:06
Uh,
15:06
we tend to just lead off with the main finding and answer the
15:11
clinician's questions. Um, I find it difficult for,
15:16
for myself to toggle through and try to fix reports,
15:20
to try to figure out what my trainees are trying to say sometimes.
15:25
And also too, the injuries can be so complex, you know, and,
15:29
and what we like to do is if we can tie the,
15:32
all the findings and use Occam's razor to come up with a
15:37
single diagnosis that ties together all the findings and summarize,
15:43
that's what how we'll tend to, um, dictate. So for instance,
15:48
you know, just, uh, going to, let's say one of our previous cases,
15:53
let's take this case for example. Okay? So this ACL injury. But, you know,
15:57
if I get a good history of, let's say, you know, it's,
15:59
it's still skiing season where, where, where we're at in California, um,
16:04
you know, early spring, but, you know, let's say I get the history of, you know,
16:09
skiing injury, pivot shift, mechanism of injury,
16:12
then I'll go through and I'll say, you know,
16:14
findings compatible with pivot shift mechanism of injury as characterized by,
16:19
and then I'll list all the pertinent findings. You know, in this case I'll say,
16:23
you know, uh, anterior complete anterior cruciate ligament tear,
16:27
comma bone contusions or osteochondral fractures,
16:31
let's say at the posterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau, comma,
16:36
you know, sometimes there's that subc chondral fracture at the condylar patella,
16:41
ssus comma,
16:43
and then any meniscal tears or medial and lateral supporting structures that,
16:47
uh, accompanying injuries that you may have. So I,
16:50
I will tend to lump and try to, you know,
16:54
use Occam's razor. And, and again, I, I, I shy away from format. So,
16:59
but that being said,
17:01
I'm flexible and it's fine if you wanna stick to the templated
17:06
format, especially, you know, uh, learning how to read MRI early on.
17:11
It's nice to have a checklist so you don't miss anything.
17:14
And as you get more facile and, and quicker with reading studies,
17:18
then feel free, I guess, to go away from templated reporting. And,
17:23
and that's what I tell my fellows and, and more senior residents.
17:26
So that's kind of how I approach it. But for grading wise, I'm very flexible.
17:31
It doesn't, it does not, uh, matter to me. Uh, i,
17:34
I just wanna make sure that you guys are making the most important
17:39
findings and, you know, the little ticky tack minutia findings,
17:43
I try not to dinging you guys on that. You know,
17:46
I just wanna make sure that we're putting out, uh, competent and, and, you know,
17:51
quality radiologists and, and keeping a standard to our field to, to this art.