Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Wk 2, Case 1, Knee MR - Review

HIDE
PrevNext

0:00

So the first case, an 11 or 12 year old with medial knee pain,

0:06

no known injury. So here, uh,

0:09

I'll try a little bit different today and I'll, I'll hang up, uh, how I usually,

0:14

um, uh, set up my viewing protocols. Um, but typically,

0:19

and I was asked this by, by a, a student, um, and, um,

0:24

one of your classmates. So, so the way I like to hang it is, is just, uh,

0:29

coronals tip for knees, at least coronals on top. Sagal is on the bottom,

0:33

and then axials somewhere on the side. Um, I,

0:37

I obviously because of, uh, zoom's, uh,

0:40

limitations from Zoom to have at least one t one weighted sequence in one plane

0:44

just to, uh, uh, best evaluate the marrow. Um, and then,

0:49

and then I'll have, uh, a longitudinal, either two sagittals that,

0:53

or two Coronas, and then, and then one sagal, cornal, uh, uh, what have you.

0:58

And then obviously the axial. So dealing with this first case, uh,

1:02

just going right to the, uh,

1:05

the salient findings we see here that we have, uh, uh,

1:10

osteochondral, uh, irregularity or abnormality at the central,

1:15

sort of posterior aspect of the, uh, medial femoral condyle right here,

1:20

compatible with, uh, or in the spectrum of osteo meningitis. Dessicans,

1:25

okay. Um, thought to be an idiopathic, uh, uh,

1:29

cause some people say could be from, uh, trauma or, or, or, um,

1:34

activities, what have you. But typically gonna be in a,

1:37

in an adolescent or a young patient, as in our index case.

1:42

And what we see here are, uh, the, uh,

1:46

going from, um,

1:48

the articular surface or the cartilage we see here that, uh,

1:53

the cartilage is looking, uh, pretty good. Okay? Um,

1:57

next I'll,

1:58

I'll look at the subc chondral bone plate for any cracks or disruptions.

2:03

Okay? But, uh, most importantly, what you wanna look at is, uh,

2:08

the, um,

2:09

and depending on who you read or what terms you use for your practice, uh,

2:14

I've, I've ca I've heard the, this, uh, entity,

2:19

um, sometimes I get asked how to, how to, how what,

2:22

what source of terminology I use to describe OCDs or osteo neuritis test cans.

2:27

So some people will call this the lesion itself. That is the, um,

2:32

the, uh, the stable or unstable fragment.

2:36

I've also heard it called, uh, progeny. Okay?

2:40

And then deeper to that, uh, people will use, uh, the terms, you know,

2:44

fluid or cleft, what have you, or even lesion bed. And then,

2:49

and then, uh, the under, underneath, all of that. Um,

2:54

you know, people will, will some,

2:56

I've heard some authors or some people call it the, uh, the parent bone. Okay?

3:01

Um, so the big, the big thing with this case is, is to determine, um,

3:06

uh, stability or instability, okay? Um,

3:10

and depending on who you read, uh, but, but, uh, for those that are interested,

3:15

uh, you wanna look up, uh, dis met Deme, DE, uh,

3:19

DE capital SMET. He's, he's probably done, he's, uh,

3:24

done the most work on. And, uh, o out of Wisconsin, uh,

3:29

on o osteochondritis, deic hands in various locations, probably most,

3:33

mostly involving the, um, the knee and tailless. Okay?

3:38

But basically what you're gonna be looking for is disruption in between,

3:43

um,

3:44

the progeny or actual lesion and the parent bone or lesion bed.

3:49

And what do I mean by that? Basically,

3:51

you want to see disruption of the cartilage, okay?

3:54

Disruption of the subc choral bone plate fluid signal, okay?

3:59

Fluid signal,

4:00

undermining that lesion or progeny and interposed between

4:05

that and the parent bone, creating what some people have, uh,

4:09

liken to the Oreo cookie sign, okay? And be,

4:14

and it's called the Oreo cookie sign. Because typically, um, these, uh,

4:19

lesions, uh, are going to be,

4:21

or the bone actually is going to be typically, uh,

4:24

dark on your MR sequences surrounding the, uh,

4:29

the cream of the Oreo cookie, or that is the fluid centrally. Okay?

4:33

So let me blow this up. Okay. So just to highlight some of the, some of the,

4:38

uh, potential, uh, unstable features. Oh, and sorry,

4:42

the other criteria are, are going to be, besides the fluid you want to see, uh,

4:48

sclerosis at the lesion bed or the, the parent bone, okay?

4:53

Or basically dark, uh, dark T one and T two signal, or,

4:58

uh, dis met. And,

5:00

and others have also mentioned that you want to see multiple cysts, okay?

5:05

Or a single cyst that measures about five millimeters or more,

5:10

okay? When you, the more obviously features you have in such a case,

5:15

okay? Um, then you want to call, uh,

5:18

instability or at least suggest it. Okay? Why is that important?

5:22

Because if it's unstable, then it's gonna flip off eventually, uh, and,

5:27

um, you know,

5:29

displace and then obviously lead to early osteoporosis in these patients.

5:32

And that's what, that's the whole name, name of the game.

5:35

We're trying to prevent that early osteoporosis. Okay? Um,

5:40

so in this case, uh, you can see, we can see here that there is a cyst.

5:44

There's maybe, there's, there's, uh, arguably some T two, uh,

5:48

hypo intensity at the lesion bed or the parent bone, okay?

5:52

And then we have an incomplete fluid signal interposed between

5:57

the progeny and parent bone or lesion bed. Okay? And then obviously the,

6:02

the lesion or the progeny itself, the, the, um,

6:07

the epi seal cartilage or the overlying cartilage does look intact. So,

6:12

um, I would read this and, and the,

6:16

I think the master grading also said sheet says that this, uh,

6:20

should be read as potentially unstable or perhaps partially unstable.

6:25

And the importance of this is you wanna, uh,

6:27

at least monitor it closely and maybe even go in and, and, uh, and fix this,

6:31

or at least, uh, go in there with maybe a, a,

6:35

a drill and stimulate some healing. Okay?

6:38

Some authors will also recommend that, uh, you mention the, um,

6:44

how the fis, the, the nearby feys look, whether they're closed or open.

6:49

Okay. And why is that important? Because younger patients,

6:54

uh, depending on who you read, okay, um, uh,

7:00

13, um,

7:02

15 or younger thir 13 to 15 years old or younger,

7:06

when p when p patients still have open fes, okay?

7:11

MR is typically gonna be more sensitive. Why is that?

7:14

Because oftentimes what happens is in these younger patients, okay,

7:19

uh, the overlying, uh, epi steel cartilage looks intact.

7:24

So basically,

7:26

when the arthroscopy goes in and looks at the cartilage

7:31

or looks for this OCD, because the, the,

7:34

these patients that are younger with intact cartilage,

7:38

and typically too, you have to remember, um,

7:41

there's an inverse relationship between patient age and the thickness of this

7:46

epi, epi fial cartilage. So, as patients, as we all age,

7:49

we know that our cartilage thins out whatever, for whatever reasons, you know,

7:53

we lose lubricants, you know, the water and the, between the glyco,

7:58

amino glycans, the Gs, and what have you, me,

8:02

mucopolysaccharides this cartilage thins as we age. So as the, the,

8:07

the scope is, uh, placed in the knee, the,

8:11

the arthroscopist may,

8:13

may not see this potentially unstable lesion until

8:18

later when things, uh, when things thin out,

8:20

and they start to see cracks within the cartilage,

8:23

and thereby they can see underneath to the lesion itself.

8:28

So in younger patients, typically, you know, 13,

8:31

depending on who you read or younger,

8:34

you may want to mention that the feisty is still open. And you know, this, um,

8:38

lesion can be concealed, per se, okay? Under arthroscopy.

8:43

And it's actually been out in the literature literature too. Okay? Uh,

8:48

patients, uh, there's an article out in the literature, um, you know,

8:52

when patients are above 17, that's when we, uh, that's when art,

8:56

the arthroscopy will tend to be, uh, see these lesions better,

9:01

okay? And thereby, and, uh, thereby that'll affect or,

9:05

or be reflected also in the sensitivity or specificity. Specificity.

9:10

The specificity as patients get older for our mr uh,

9:15

imaging diagnoses will increase, okay? Because, uh,

9:19

you know, most articles will use, uh,

9:22

arthroscopy as the gold standard. But if you really think about it, MRI,

9:28

uh, will be,

9:29

will be able to diagnoses earlier in, um,

9:34

in younger patients where the FI cs are still open and the epi cartilage

9:39

is still thick. So the, uh, so in the younger patients, the,

9:43

the specificity is actually gonna be much lower. And some, in, in some articles,

9:47

it d it, uh,

9:48

states that the specificity in these young patients can be as low as 10%. Okay?

9:53

So this is an OCD lesion or osteo testic cans. The differential, uh,

9:58

to think about is gonna be, you know, uh,

10:00

distal femoral irregularity and the way to parse that out, um,

10:04

the sides imaging the patient over time. Um, you're typically not gonna see,

10:09

um, you know, the cystic change, edema, fluid cleft,

10:14

what have you in the, uh, normal ossification center development, uh,

10:19

which is the differential in this case. So with that, um, uh,

10:24

that is case number one, OCD. Any questions on this first case?

10:29

There was also a question on what is meant by shoulder and un shoulder

10:34

or contained and uncontained. So basically, um, I,

10:38

I believe that is extrapolated from, um, ankle arthroscopy.

10:43

Okay? And basically what the orthopedist means, uh,

10:47

by that to my understanding, is that when you have these, uh,

10:52

osteochondral injuries, lesions, OCDs,

10:56

whatever term you use, okay,

10:58

when it involves the curve or a curve of, uh,

11:02

of an articular surface, it can be more difficult for our, uh,

11:07

surgeons to treat. So that's, that's what's meant, what,

11:11

that's what's meant by shoulder, non shoulder or contain uncontained,

11:16

uh, OCDs to address your first question, yeah, for osteo tendinitis, tecans,

11:20

there's many classification systems. You know, uh, off the top of my head, if I,

11:25

if I remember, remember correctly,

11:27

I think there's like a hefty H-E-F-T-I that you can look up. There's also,

11:32

um, there's an author,

11:33

there's a group that it begins with the c char oscopy,

11:38

oscopy or something like that, maybe, I apologize. Um, but I can get that to,

11:42

to you all later or whoever's interested. But, but yeah, you can,

11:47

you can use classification systems. But an important thing is for me,

11:51

I just keep an open dialogue

11:52

With, uh, open communication line of communication with,

11:55

with my orthopedic surgeons. Um, they have my, uh, direct,

12:00

uh, cell number. So I basically read to,

12:05

to the clinician, um, if they use, if,

12:08

if I run into a classification, if I run into a clinician,

12:12

and we have a pretty, uh, robust teleradiology service. So, you know,

12:17

sometimes I'll get phone calls, um, from referers, um,

12:21

and they'll ask me to throw in a classification system,

12:23

in which case I'll ask them which classification you would like me to use,

12:27

and I will look it up and I will, uh, provide that. Um, but,

12:33

um, if you are going to grade it or give a classification, i I,

12:37

I would recommend, you know,

12:39

putting in parentheses somewhere in your impression or your findings,

12:42

at least you know, what classification you are using. Um, you know, because,

12:48

um, you know, uh, I think the Hep D or, or the, uh,

12:52

the other classification I was mentioning, you know, there's overlap. Um,

12:56

some people try to divide it into like five classifications.

13:00

Some people have come along later, like the Hep D group, um,

13:04

have tried to distill it down to three to try to make it simpler to decrease

13:08

that inter and intra observer variability. But, uh,

13:13

to answer your, your question, a long-winded way, I, I describe,

13:18

and, and the way I work it is, uh, kind of like what, what I was doing, uh,

13:23

trying to, uh, highlight earlier. Uh, and sorry if I didn't,

13:27

it didn't come across, but I basically work from,

13:30

from the articular surface towards the parent bone or

13:35

lesion bed. And I basically just describe,

13:39

and then I add a summary line,

13:41

whether I think this is unstable or stable. Okay?

13:45

And if I'm not sure, then I, then I say, I'm not sure, you know, I,

13:49

I'll say uncertain or potentially unstable, something like that.

13:53

But in this case, because of the fluid cleft or the,

13:56

at least the partial fluid cleft, that's, and, and the cyst right here,

14:00

I would read this at least, you know, concerning or,

14:03

or potentially unstable, you know, as the patient is flexing and extending,

14:08

you know, maybe the shearing injuries, what have you, from whatever activities,

14:12

it may eventually make this a fully unstable and, and hopefully not, but,

14:17

but, uh, that's how I would read this case. So, so in general, I describe,

14:22

but, uh, depending on the surgeon, um, you know, uh,

14:26

if they ask for a classification, then I, then I do provide it. But, uh,

14:30

oftentimes I'll have to look that up, um, because there's just, uh, quite a few.

14:35

Um, to your second question, if I remember, uh, format,

14:39

I'm flexible for our trainees here, uh,

14:42

especially the younger trainees first and second years,

14:44

who are starting to rotate through on, on M-S-K-M-R-I, uh,

14:48

they love to do templates. Me personally and,

14:52

and my colleagues and mentors, uh, including, um, Dr. Resnick,

14:57

for those of you who are familiar with the, uh, MSK radiology literature, Dr.

15:01

Re, we, we tend not to use templated reporting.

15:06

Uh,

15:06

we tend to just lead off with the main finding and answer the

15:11

clinician's questions. Um, I find it difficult for,

15:16

for myself to toggle through and try to fix reports,

15:20

to try to figure out what my trainees are trying to say sometimes.

15:25

And also too, the injuries can be so complex, you know, and,

15:29

and what we like to do is if we can tie the,

15:32

all the findings and use Occam's razor to come up with a

15:37

single diagnosis that ties together all the findings and summarize,

15:43

that's what how we'll tend to, um, dictate. So for instance,

15:48

you know, just, uh, going to, let's say one of our previous cases,

15:53

let's take this case for example. Okay? So this ACL injury. But, you know,

15:57

if I get a good history of, let's say, you know, it's,

15:59

it's still skiing season where, where, where we're at in California, um,

16:04

you know, early spring, but, you know, let's say I get the history of, you know,

16:09

skiing injury, pivot shift, mechanism of injury,

16:12

then I'll go through and I'll say, you know,

16:14

findings compatible with pivot shift mechanism of injury as characterized by,

16:19

and then I'll list all the pertinent findings. You know, in this case I'll say,

16:23

you know, uh, anterior complete anterior cruciate ligament tear,

16:27

comma bone contusions or osteochondral fractures,

16:31

let's say at the posterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau, comma,

16:36

you know, sometimes there's that subc chondral fracture at the condylar patella,

16:41

ssus comma,

16:43

and then any meniscal tears or medial and lateral supporting structures that,

16:47

uh, accompanying injuries that you may have. So I,

16:50

I will tend to lump and try to, you know,

16:54

use Occam's razor. And, and again, I, I, I shy away from format. So,

16:59

but that being said,

17:01

I'm flexible and it's fine if you wanna stick to the templated

17:06

format, especially, you know, uh, learning how to read MRI early on.

17:11

It's nice to have a checklist so you don't miss anything.

17:14

And as you get more facile and, and quicker with reading studies,

17:18

then feel free, I guess, to go away from templated reporting. And,

17:23

and that's what I tell my fellows and, and more senior residents.

17:26

So that's kind of how I approach it. But for grading wise, I'm very flexible.

17:31

It doesn't, it does not, uh, matter to me. Uh, i,

17:34

I just wanna make sure that you guys are making the most important

17:39

findings and, you know, the little ticky tack minutia findings,

17:43

I try not to dinging you guys on that. You know,

17:46

I just wanna make sure that we're putting out, uh, competent and, and, you know,

17:51

quality radiologists and, and keeping a standard to our field to, to this art.

Report

Patient History

11-year-old male with complaint of medial pain in the right knee. No known injury.

Findings

The ACL and PCL are intact.

Medial compartment: Partially displaced, nondepressed and nonshouldered acute osteochondral defects surrounded by arthropathic cysts and osteoedema located at the posterolateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle nonweightbearing surface adjacent to the central compartment measuring 0.6 cm in depth, 1.4 cm in width and 2.3 cm in anteroposterior dimension. Although potentially unstable, the osteochondral lesion is lodged within its defect.

No meniscal tears. No osteoarthrosis. No cortical erosions. The medial collateral ligament is intact.

Lateral compartment: No osteochondral defects, chondromalacia or osteoarthrosis. No cortical erosions. No meniscal tears. Lateral collateral ligament complex is intact.

Anterior compartment. No patellofemoral dysplasia. No osteochondral defects. No osteoarthrosis or chondromalacia. The medial patellofemoral ligament and lateral patellar retinaculum are intact.

Proximal tibiofibular joint is unremarkable.

Quadriceps and patellar tendons are normal.

Borderline patella alta with an Insall-Salvati ratio of 1.5 cm. Induration of the infrapatellar plica with linear edema in the Hoffa's fat pad.

The flexor compartment and neurovascular bundle are noncontributory.

Trace joint effusion without internal debris or free bodies.

Impressions

1. A 0.6 cm non shouldered acute osteochondral lesion located at the posterolateral aspect of the medial femoral condyle non weight bearing surface adjacent to the central compartment. Although potentially unstable, the osteochondral lesion is lodged within its defect. Findings compatible with active osteochondritis dissecans.

2. Medial femoral condylar dysplasia/hypoplasia.

3. Patella alta with maltracking.

4. Trace joint effusion without internal debris or free bodies.

Case Discussion

Faculty

Stephen J Pomeranz, MD

Chief Medical Officer, ProScan Imaging. Founder, MRI Online

ProScan Imaging

Gitanjali Bajaj, MD

Assistant Professor

University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Edward Smitaman, MD

Clinical Associate Professor

University of California San Diego

Brian Y. Chan, MD

Assistant Professor of Musculoskeletal Radiology

University of Utah

Todd D. Greenberg, MD

Radiologist

ProScan

Tags

Musculoskeletal (MSK)

MRI

Knee