Interactive Transcript
0:01
If we look at evidence on lung cancer screening in the
0:05
lung cancer screening registry,
0:06
we have over 5 million lung cancer screening events at the
0:10
American College of Radiology from nearly 4,000
0:13
participating facilities.
0:15
Participation in a registry was initially required
0:18
by the Medicare coverage decision,
0:21
but in having this information from radiology practices
0:24
that your practice may have been putting data into,
0:26
it gives us important information on the national rollout
0:29
of lung cancer screening in essentially a decentralized
0:33
health system implemented at the facility level.
0:36
I work with colleagues in countries in Europe, for example,
0:39
where their rollouts are happening both at local facilities
0:43
but through the oversight of a national health system.
0:46
So their rollout in terms of quality structure
0:49
and how lung cancer screening is done is using a centralized
0:54
healthcare system based approach
0:56
that sits at the national government level
0:58
through national health systems.
1:01
In looking at how we're doing, we have a lot
1:03
of information about who's being screened, whether it's age,
1:06
gender, race, ethnicity, education
1:08
or insurance status, and where there are gaps.
1:11
We know where people are being screened by geography
1:15
and how close people are
1:17
to lung cancer screening facilities.
1:19
We have good information that the evidence coming out
1:22
of the registry supports the early stage distribution
1:26
of cancers being diagnosed by screening, which is
1:29
after all what we're trying to do.
1:30
Early detection. It affirms the use
1:33
of lung RAs interpretation schema
1:36
and management of patients,
1:38
but sadly, it shows us information such as the lack
1:41
of adherence to annual screening in just over
1:44
one in five patients.
1:46
Some newer data since we looked at the first UH,
1:48
one plus million screens shows that this is getting better.
1:52
We're up to closer to 40% of people coming back
1:54
for annual screening, but we certainly need to do better.
1:58
The type of information out
1:59
of the registry informs provider community
2:02
and patient outreach and facility expansion.
2:05
We've developed some new educational tools
2:08
for your lung cancer screening program on the lung cancer
2:11
screening registry webpages.
2:14
When you log into your interactive dashboard
2:16
for lung cancer screening,
2:17
you can look at your data in an interactive way in many
2:20
different slices and dices as they say.
2:24
You can look at it by interpreting radiologist,
2:26
you can look at it by CT scanner, you can look at it
2:29
by facility within your healthcare system to see
2:32
how you're doing from a quality perspective.
2:35
The three key performance indicators that we chose
2:38
to develop some educational walkthrough templates using
2:42
A-P-D-S-A methodology are improving adherence
2:45
to annual screening, achieving appropriate radiation dose,
2:49
which is squarely in the house of radiology
2:51
and increasing non-smoking rates as a measure
2:54
of smoking cessation.
2:56
And what the team did in the ACRs quality improvement uh,
3:00
subcommittee of the registry is look to existing evidence
3:04
and best practices for
3:05
how you can do better on these three key performance
3:09
indicators, what you can put in place
3:11
and how you can use your own registry benchmarks from your
3:15
interactive dashboard to see improvements.
3:18
So we're trying to fast forward improvements in lung cancer
3:20
screening to making sure that we're doing it well.
3:23
And this largely sits in the squarely in the house
3:27
of radiology to perform.
3:29
Something that also radiology practices can take an active
3:33
interest in is by promoting lung cancer screening
3:37
amongst individuals who are coming
3:39
for screening mammography.
3:41
These women coming
3:42
for screening mammography are already demonstrating
3:45
screening behaviors.
3:46
They understand the importance
3:48
of screening in breast cancer,
3:50
and so it's easy to translate that information
3:53
to lung cancer and easy for them to understand, well,
3:57
if it works for breast cancer screening, it should work
4:00
for lung cancer screening too.
4:02
So the A CR has developed a customizable brochure
4:05
that sits on the ACRs lung cancer screening resource webpage
4:08
where you can put it information about your practice
4:11
and use it in your screening mammography program
4:14
to increase awareness about lung cancer screening.
4:17
It might be one of these women who comes
4:19
for screening mammography who is eligible for screening,
4:22
but it may also be somebody
4:24
that they know love work with or live with.
4:27
We know that just as women drive decisions about
4:31
what cars are purchased in family units,
4:33
they also drive decisions in how healthcare
4:37
and who comes for healthcare in their family units as well.
4:40
So this is an important way to increase the visibility
4:43
of lung cancer screening in your own radiology practice.
4:47
Importantly, we know by looking at the evidence
4:51
that eligibility for screening by guidelines
4:54
and insurance coverage
4:57
and access by being close enough
4:59
to reach a facility does not necessarily mean
5:01
that we're reaching the people at risk.
5:04
How much of a role does your radiology practice wanna take
5:07
in changing this in your own community?
5:10
When we look at the protected performance
5:13
of the U-S-P-S-T-F updated criteria for race
5:16
and ethnicity for lung cancer screening, we recognize
5:20
that we are increasing the number of preventable deaths
5:23
and life years gains extending into diverse populations.
5:28
It can be challenging,
5:29
however, to reach individuals who are at risk
5:32
for lung cancer screening, not because they're not eligible
5:35
and not because they don't have insurance coverage, but
5:38
because there are many things going on in the heads
5:40
of people who are at risk for lung cancer
5:43
and it's not always healthcare related.
5:46
When we explored the first million people screened
5:50
as reported to the ACRs registry,
5:52
we compared the screen eligible population
5:55
to the simulates general population.
5:58
We saw that individuals eligible
6:00
for screening are disproportionately poor, uninsured
6:04
and enrolled in Medicaid.
6:05
And I think we all recognize these are challenges
6:08
incoming for healthcare.
6:10
We talk about a high burden
6:12
of social determinants of health.
6:15
Individuals eligible for screening are more than twice
6:18
as likely to describe their health status as poor compared
6:21
to the rest of the population
6:23
who is not eligible for screening.
6:25
So this population is different than the average population
6:30
of the same age.
6:31
In the United States. Tactics
6:34
to reach this population are important to you
6:36
as a radiologist or radiology practice
6:38
to make sure the population in your community who's
6:41
eligible is screened.
6:43
When we looked at the first million people
6:46
with information in the a CR registry, we compared them
6:49
to the general population of the same age.
6:53
We know that more women are coming forward
6:55
for lung cancer screening than men.
6:58
We know that individuals who are 65 to 74 are more likely
7:02
to come in for screening than others.
7:05
And we know that people who currently smoke are more likely
7:07
to come in for lung cancer screening than
7:09
those who used to smoke.
7:11
So why might this be?
7:13
Well, females, as we've talked about,
7:15
demonstrate screening behaviors and screening mammography
7:18
and about 70% of women eligible
7:21
for breast cancer screening are getting
7:23
their screening mammograms.
7:25
65 to 74 makes sense
7:27
because this is when Medicare population
7:30
on coverage happens.
7:32
And so patients know they have no copays under Medicare
7:35
coverage where they may not be as aware about
7:38
that while they're getting private payer coverage
7:40
or perhaps don't have health insurance.
7:42
And then when we think about currently smoking versus those
7:45
who used to smoke, it's very common in our electronic health
7:48
records to know who currently smokes.
7:51
But when somebody no longer smokes
7:53
that information often disappears from medical notes
7:56
and problem lists, reaching people at risk for lung cancer
8:01
to bring them in
8:02
for lung cancer screening means understanding their
8:05
attitudes about screening and smoking and they're complex.
8:09
And so if you are going
8:10
to invite people in your practice area to come
8:13
for lung cancer screening, it's important to understand
8:16
what's in their minds and how you might better message them.
8:19
They tend to be supportive of screening and practice,
8:22
but doubtful about the ability of screenings
8:24
to deliver long-term benefit that this generation
8:27
of heavy smokers who have seen generations of people
8:31
die from advanced stage cancer.
8:34
That's what they've known and they've perceived lung cancer
8:37
as an uncontrollable disease.
8:39
There's fatalism and worry about the perceived risk.
8:42
It's high. They perceive blame
8:45
and stigma around lung cancer
8:47
as a self-inflicted smoker's disease
8:50
preventing them from coming in for screening.
8:53
And we know that the stigma an nihilism also prevents people
8:57
from sticking with lung cancer care when they're diagnosed.
9:00
There's even the belief that lungs are not a treatable organ
9:04
as a commonly explanation
9:06
for why people don't survive from lung cancer.
9:09
So we have a lot to do to help understand the population
9:13
and help overcome the misperceptions
9:16
that exist about lung cancer today
9:18
and the value of lung cancer screening.
9:21
This stigma around lung cancer
9:24
because of cigarette smoking is high across anywhere.
9:28
You look about the topic of lung cancer,
9:33
it's been perpetrated in the US by the CD C's super scary
9:37
anti-tobacco campaign with scary imagery
9:40
of deformed individuals
9:42
and how that as a scare technique used
9:44
to prevent people from smoking and it worked.
9:47
Fewer people have smoked
9:48
because of that campaign,
9:50
unfortunately has given a perception in the US
9:53
that we don't see across the world about what it means
9:57
to be somebody who smokes
9:58
and has led to this stigmatized population making it
10:03
difficult to get them in
10:04
for healthcare, including screening.
10:06
So we need to do a lot to overcome this
10:09
and using patient first language is something
10:12
that you can do and you can talk to your radiologist
10:15
and your radiology technologists
10:17
and your front desk staff about using terms like someone
10:21
who used to smoke as opposed to calling somebody a smoker
10:24
and labeling them by
10:27
a habit which has increased their lung cancer risk.
10:30
It seems so simple, but it's very meaningful to people
10:34
and there is new guidelines
10:36
and materials out there to help you understand this topic.
10:40
More from the International Association for the Study
10:42
of Lung Cancer with its language guide to asco,
10:45
the leading professional organization in the US
10:48
for oncology in the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
10:53
So smoker, a term that we really shouldn't be using anymore.
10:58
Try a person who smokes and a person who doesn't smoke
11:01
or a person with a history of smoking,
11:03
but don't label people as a behavior.
11:06
This simple change can make a difference in making people
11:10
feel comfortable at coming in for care.
11:13
It's a comment on radiologists
11:14
and radiology practices
11:16
to get engaged in accelerating lung cancer screening in your
11:19
community, both screening individuals
11:21
and bringing them back for needed follow-up.
11:25
Um, imaging care.
11:26
We know that there are many obstacles that make it difficult
11:30
to do lung cancer screening,
11:32
whether it's the way our electronic health records work
11:35
and identifying people who are eligible based on pack years,
11:38
something that is very hard to find the medical record
11:41
with over half of people not having this
11:44
information about papac years.
11:46
Fortunately, the NCQA is developing HEDIS measures
11:49
for lung cancer screening and not only adherence to
11:52
Lung cancer screening
11:53
among eligible individuals like they currently do
11:56
for breast cancer screening,
11:57
but they're also considering a tobacco history documentation
12:01
quality measure of PAC years,
12:04
which should help improve this
12:05
in our electronic health records.
12:07
There's a lot for us to do about increasing awareness
12:11
among our communities as well as our primary care physicians
12:15
and helping them understand how
12:17
to access your lung cancer screening program or practice.