Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Reporting Considerations: Structured Reports

HIDE
PrevNext

0:01

Let's talk about reporting considerations

0:03

for your lung cancer screening CT exams.

0:06

We're gonna talk about structured reports from the

0:08

radiologist's perspective, things that you can do

0:11

to ensure high quality reports with the right information

0:13

that's easily translatable to our referring physicians,

0:17

nurse coordinators and navigators as well as the patients.

0:21

We're gonna talk about the advantages of patient

0:24

specific letters in lay language

0:26

that is more translatable at the patient level

0:29

that can be performed in addition

0:31

to doing your structured reporting as well as the importance

0:34

of patient tracking tools, which use the information

0:37

that you create in your structured reports to help uh,

0:40

manage the downstream testing and follow the patients.

0:44

In the work I'm doing with the American Cancer Society's

0:47

National Lung Cancer Roundtable,

0:48

we're putting together a toolkit to help practices implement

0:53

and improve their early detection programs,

0:56

including lung cancer screening at incent pulmonary nodules.

1:00

And one of the elements that we put together has to do

1:03

with the radiology report, having the right information,

1:06

inconsistent structure in good format in a way

1:09

that is translatable

1:11

and usable to those who consume our product, which they see

1:14

as the radiology report.

1:16

We of course know there's so much behind the report,

1:18

including the quality

1:19

of the exams we performed in all the work, the radiologists,

1:22

the radiology technologists

1:24

and our medical physicists do to make that happen.

1:27

But it comes down in terms of translating what we're seeing

1:30

to our radiology report.

1:32

Whether you're using a structured template in a reporting

1:36

system, free text

1:37

or a hybrid for generating radiology report,

1:40

there are some standard elements that are important

1:42

to include in a lung cancer screening CT report.

1:46

Of course, we always want to make sure

1:48

that the exam has the correct header or name

1:50

and is clearly indicated to be a lung cancer screening CT

1:54

with the date that it was acquired.

1:56

And this makes it easy to recognize this

1:58

as a lung cancer screening CT as opposed to another type

2:02

of chest CT a patient might have had such

2:04

as a pulmonary embolism CT or a HR CT of the chest.

2:08

And it also is important to make the date very clear so

2:11

that people can compare

2:13

how long ago it was from the last screen.

2:16

In terms of tracking patients into the future.

2:19

By having elements in a structured template,

2:21

you can then put these into

2:23

and extract them into tracking tools

2:25

that can help manage your lung cancer screening patients.

2:27

So making sure they're coming back for annual exams

2:31

and short-term followup exams.

2:33

So structure can help you if you're in a system

2:36

where you can integrate

2:37

that information into patient tracking.

2:39

The reason for the exam lung cancer screening should be

2:43

specifically stated as lung cancer screening.

2:47

Uh, we often see people putting in other patient

2:50

diagnoses into the reason for exam

2:52

and that can create challenges with insurance coverage

2:56

and reimbursement with patients

2:57

and your staff often having to go back

3:00

and forth many times to clarify.

3:01

This is indeed a CT done specifically

3:04

for lung cancer screening.

3:06

Not done because the patient also has COPD

3:09

or also has heart disease

3:11

or also has a remote history

3:12

of another cancer like a melanoma that's under surveillance

3:16

but is irrelevant to the fact

3:17

that this patient is here today

3:19

for a lung cancer screening exam.

3:21

So I like to say keep it simple lung cancer screening

3:25

and don't add in all the other patient medical issues

3:28

that might be on their problem list.

3:30

This makes it very clear

3:31

for insurance companies if they're making you jump

3:34

through preauthorization, but importantly for reimbursement

3:37

after your report is completed, it's important to give uh,

3:41

information on whether there is a comparison exam

3:44

and how far back you're going to look at the exam.

3:47

We wanna know this to determine

3:49

how long nodules have been stable over time.

3:52

And so it's important for you as the radiologist not only

3:55

to look at the last CT

3:57

but look at other cts, the oldest cts if possible,

4:01

to determine how long a nodule has been there and stable.

4:04

The longer a nodule has been stable, the more likely it is

4:07

to be benign and don't just look for chest cts.

4:11

Sometimes our systems are automatically set up

4:14

to pull the comparison chest cts to the top

4:18

of your comparison list or the top of your reporting system.

4:22

But sometimes that might miss other important exams like an

4:26

abdomen CT or a neck CT or a shoulder ct.

4:29

Other CT exams that might include part

4:32

of the lungs can be a very important comparison.

4:35

So I always say don't just look at the comparison chest cts,

4:38

but there may be other exams,

4:40

particularly if you don't have a comparison chest ct.

4:43

That can be very important in looking at nodule stability.

4:46

And stability is our most important criteria

4:50

for benign nodules or benign behaving nodules.

4:53

So we always put at the top of our report,

4:55

so we've got exam name

4:56

and date, specify lung screening, CT with date, reason

4:59

for exam, keep it simple lung cancer screening

5:02

and comparison chest cts

5:05

and other cts that might include a portion of the lung.

5:07

Make it very clear

5:09

how far back you're able to go with comparison.

5:13

The third section really getting to the meat

5:15

of reporting is the findings

5:16

and the following element should be reported

5:19

for each nodule in long rads.

5:21

We recommend reporting up to the sixth largest

5:24

or most suspicious nodules by their morphology or growth.

5:28

And so we recommend having a section in your report

5:31

that is specifically for lung where you put these findings.

5:35

It's important to report the nodule size.

5:38

Uh, we usually do that in mean diameter in millimeters

5:41

as recommended by lung rats orally.

5:43

You can also report lung volume if you're using

5:46

volumetric software.

5:48

There's really no evidence that reporting

5:51

by volume versus reporting a managed

5:53

by millimeters changes patient outcome.

5:56

We know the volume can give us a more precise measurement,

6:00

but there's no evidence that that increase in precision

6:04

of nodule size measurement actually changes patient outcomes

6:07

long term in lung cancer screening.

6:09

And so there are some countries

6:11

where volume measurement is very common, such as in the uh,

6:15

region where the Dutch Belgian Nelson trial was performed.

6:18

But I would say in most of the world we're using millimeters

6:22

and mean diameter.

6:24

Following size is consistency.

6:26

Where is it on the solid part, solid nonsolid continuum

6:30

or is it cystic?

6:32

What lobe is it in?

6:33

You can spell it out in full like right upper lobe

6:36

or just use abbreviations.

6:39

Image number and series number on which the nodule is found

6:42

are gonna be very helpful to you.

6:44

Perhaps a little extra time

6:46

to document when you're reading the exam today,

6:48

but they'll be very happy

6:49

that you have it when next year's annual screening exam

6:52

comes around and you're trying to find those nodules

6:54

and compare them side by side.

6:57

And then comparison CT if you have comparisons,

7:00

comment if the nodule is unchanged, if it's increased

7:03

or decreased and give the prior size.

7:06

That way we know the directionality of the growth pattern.

7:09

If there are any unique features

7:11

that might be helpful in reading future exams,

7:14

you might wanna include that again to help you

7:16

and your, your fellow radiology practitioners

7:19

and physicians in your department and your program.

7:22

Being able to find the nodules if they wanna look at it

7:25

and do those comparisons.

7:26

Some of those unique features might be whether it's

7:29

central or peripheral.

7:31

The ones that are out along the lung edge are pretty easy

7:34

to see because there's not a lot of blood vessels out there.

7:37

But the further you get to the center of the lung,

7:39

the closer they get to vessels and vessels in cross-section.

7:42

And so sometimes your left scratch in your head,

7:44

which little.is it that my colleagues saw last time?

7:47

And if you put the series

7:49

and image number, it can be helpful.

7:51

I also help it find useful when reading the exams

7:54

to put a small arrow pointing to these small nodules so

7:58

that next time around it's very easy

8:00

and quick for uh, myself

8:02

or my radiology colleagues in our group

8:03

to quickly get to those nodules.

8:06

So we've got size, consistency, lobe

8:11

series and image number

8:12

and then growth for comparison,

8:15

increase, decrease or unchanged.

8:17

And lastly, those unique features which can help you find

8:20

noles a few comments.

8:22

I really recommend putting one nodule on

8:24

each row of the report.

8:26

That way you don't have a free text paragraph that kind of

8:29

mixes one nodule with a comma

8:31

to the next nodule to the next nodule.

8:33

So clarity, easy to see the information in the report.

8:36

So recommend one nodule per row.

8:38

With this information, I'll show you some examples.

8:41

If you have specifically benign nodules,

8:44

it's probably a good idea to call them out

8:46

so they're not confusing to others particularly uh,

8:49

non radiologists who might be looking at the report

8:52

and looking at the images.

8:53

We know there are parts of the country

8:55

that have endemic fungal infections.

8:57

So histoplasmosis in our Midwestern histoplasmosis belt in

9:01

the south, we have coccidia, mycosis, and cryptococcus.

9:04

So where you have endemic fungus, you're gonna see more

9:08

of these benign nodules and important to call them out.

9:10

Specifically there are specific benign features

9:13

of lesions like hematomas with fat or fat and calcium.

9:17

Again, calling them out and reporting them important

9:20

but not on your list of the noncalcified nodules

9:23

that you're going to follow over time.

9:25

And then lastly, if you have issues with exam quality

9:28

that impact interpretation, just be honest and mention them.

9:32

Did the patient take a great breath in

9:34

and out during the examination causing respiratory motion

9:37

artifact that maybe wasn't caught

9:39

by the imaging technologist at the time and repeated?

9:42

So if there are exam quality issues, put it in your report.

9:46

If it requires a callback, bring the patient back to repeat

9:50

that portion of the exam.

9:53

So let's look at a couple examples of

9:55

how this might look in your radiology reports.

9:57

Up top is an example for what might be a first time exam.

10:01

And on the bottom is if you have a comparison exam note

10:04

we've covered the series number.

10:06

There are the following noncalcified novel as described

10:08

below on series two and it applies to all the list below.

10:12

We have each nodule by load, its density solid

10:16

or ground glass and its image number.

10:19

So for each of the nodules we're providing the same detail.

10:22

And then I mentioned extra features like per fist

10:26

or juxta, plural.

10:27

These are nodules which are defined

10:29

as benign intra pulmonary lymph nodes.

10:32

And so adding these extra features can be helpful in both

10:35

conveying the significance of the nodules

10:37

as well as locating them.

10:39

And then if you have a comparison exam,

10:41

say if it's changed or not.

10:43

So for this first nodule solid 11 millimeters, the next time

10:47

around it was previously seven millimeters.

10:49

On that first report we looked at above the left lower lobe,

10:53

ground glass, eight millimeter nodule unchanged,

10:56

and the right middle lobe peri fist nodule.

10:59

You could say it's unchanged or not,

11:00

but either way it's a benign pulmonary lymph node.

11:03

So these are examples of

11:04

what your reports can look like consistent and clear.

11:08

Easy to find the information for you today

11:10

and easy to find it for you in the future.

11:13

When reporting examinations, sometimes you can use

11:17

external reporting tools or knowle detection

11:19

and management tools to help do this for you.

11:22

And we'll talk about that a little bit.

11:25

So if you're using some tool like PowerScribe

11:28

to do your reporting, you can create structured fields

11:32

to put that information with pick lists.

11:34

So here's an example that I built in our PowerScribe

11:38

reporting software where if you're not using any automatic

11:43

importing from a software tool that's detecting

11:45

and measuring your nodules for you, you have discrete fields

11:48

for each one diameter type in

11:51

or speech the nodule a size pick

11:54

for the low, but just a pick list.

11:56

Just click on the one and then pick.

11:58

And similarly a pick list for density

12:00

and enter the image number.

12:02

And you can do this for each of the up

12:04

to six total nodules that you have.

12:07

And then similarly, you can create standard

12:09

fields for your impression.

12:11

I highly recommend this instead of allowing the kind

12:14

of variability amongst different radiologists is about

12:17

how they want to report their lung reds

12:19

or what kind of sentence structure they use.

12:21

Again, it makes it very easy for the referring physicians

12:24

to always have the same structure.

12:25

And if you're doing uh, quality control

12:28

and quality improvement

12:29

and looking at your data makes the information easy to find

12:33

as well as to extract it if you're using any tools

12:36

to extract information outta your radiology reports.

12:39

So in our radiology impression it looks something like this

12:42

lung ran category.

12:44

It's a pick list where you pick your lung ran

12:46

category zero one up to four x.

12:49

You'll note each of them has a version with

12:52

and without the S modifier.

12:54

That is a specific category in lung rats

12:57

to add the S modifier.

12:58

And that will feed into the next uh, impression finding,

13:01

which is about those S modifiers for significant

13:04

or potentially significant findings.

13:06

And we simply have a pick list for those as well.

13:09

We can click none if there are none.

13:11

It makes it very clear that there aren't any.

13:14

But then we can also have our pick list for other findings

13:17

that may be significant.

13:19

So you can see here we have in our pick list moderate

13:21

coronary calcification, severe calcification, moderate

13:26

or severe emphysema, osteoporosis, uh,

13:29

mild fibrotic interstitial lung disease, important to detect

13:32

as it can progress over time.

13:35

Respiratory bronchitis.

13:36

A common finding in individuals who smoke cigarettes

13:39

with inflammation around their small airways.

13:41

Usually upper low predominant

13:43

as some fuzzy central lobular nodules or a dilated aorta.

13:47

Ascending dilatation is the one that we see the most.

13:50

You can build a pick list with the things

13:51

that you think are most important to your practice.

13:54

If there are several potential

13:56

or significant cental findings, we basically copy paste this

14:00

and add to the pick list findings represented

14:02

or we add additional ones if they're not on the list.

14:06

So we built this for convenience

14:08

and consistency of reporting.

14:10

We also include in reports,

14:12

and we recommend that you do this

14:13

to include a link to lung rads.

14:16

You might be familiar with it in your radiology practice,

14:19

but you're referring physicians

14:20

and your patients may have no idea

14:22

what this lung RADS radiology speak is that we're using.

14:26

We include a link to the Lung Rad resources,

14:29

which gets us right to the interpretation table if you're

14:33

referring physicians are interested in looking at it

14:35

or want to be reminded of it.

14:37

And then we have a definition of what each term is.

14:40

So if you're referring physician or a patient

14:43

or a nurse navigator coordinator in the program,

14:45

you can see what they mean.

14:47

So category one negative screen,

14:50

No nodules and

14:51

or definitely benign nodules continue

14:53

screening in 12 months.

14:55

And so on up the ladder.

14:57

Category four B positive, screen suspicious,

15:01

recommend multidisciplinary consultation

15:02

and additional imaging, which could be a CT chest

15:05

with contrast or a PET CT at the solid component is eight

15:09

millimeters or larger and or tissue sampling.

15:11

So it sets the stage for the result, whether it's positive

15:15

or negative, and what the next steps are very clearly.

15:18

And it's very clear for people to see in long reds

15:22

how it escalates with each finding category

15:24

and where they're finding fits in

15:26

for their particular patient.

15:28

Is it a three? Is it a one? Is it a four B? And so on.

Report

Faculty

Ella A. Kazerooni, MD, MS

Professor of Radiology, Cardiothoracic Division

University of Michigan

Tags

Oncologic Imaging

Neoplastic

Lungs

Chest