Interactive Transcript
0:00
I think we'll stop here and answer any questions.
0:02
Do you have any comments on this case? Yeah,
0:04
Well let, let me uh, start
0:05
with the acromial curricular, uh, case.
0:08
'cause we, we haven't discussed that.
0:11
One of the interesting things that I've learned about that,
0:13
that the, the classic teaching in these cases is
0:17
that the clavicle moves up.
0:19
But if you ever get large chest radiographs
0:23
where you compare the two sides, in many cases,
0:26
the clavicle doesn't move up.
0:28
And in fact, it is the scapula that moves down.
0:32
And so I, I think we've simplified this, uh, in, in,
0:37
I know I did for years thinking always
0:40
that the cla the clavicle would, uh, move up.
0:43
The other thing that's puzzling is the nomenclature.
0:46
You know, for most dislocations we talk about proximal
0:51
to distal sternal clavicular.
0:53
So why is this the acromial clavicular
0:56
and not the acromial dislocation?
0:59
I have no idea. Yeah. And I think,
1:01
I think the French probably described it.
1:03
It could be, uh, you know, I'm not, uh, I'm not sure,
1:05
but I always wondered about that
1:07
because the terminology's, uh, not the, uh, not the same.
1:11
I wanted to ask you about also, how often do you do
1:16
the, do you include the measurements in your dictation
1:19
or do you indicate on track, off track,
1:21
just as the general term?
1:23
And do, do you use that for every case
1:26
or is it certain orthopedic surgeons
1:28
Sure. Who request that?
1:29
So if I'm, you know, linguistic harmony,
1:34
um, breeds friendship.
1:35
So I, I like to speak the language of the doctor that I'm,
1:39
I'm, I'm giving my report to.
1:41
So if it's a shoulder surgeon,
1:43
I'm gonna give them more detail.
1:45
I am gonna give them the measurements.
1:46
I'm gonna give them on track, off track.
1:48
I'm gonna use the term bipolar and,
1:51
and I will give them the actual measurements in millimeters.
1:54
Whereas if it's a general orthopedic
1:57
surgeon, you'd be shocked.
1:58
Most of them don't even know what bipolar or unipolar is.
2:03
And, um, so I, I won't actually give them the measurements,
2:05
but I will say that there's a risk of engagement.
2:08
And I'll describe for them what engagement actually means.
2:11
I'll describe for them what actually bipolar means in a
2:14
non condescending way.
2:16
So would you say, just as an estimate,
2:18
how much longer does it take, uh, you, I mean, I'm impressed
2:22
how fast you move here as I look at, at the workstation,
2:25
but how much does it add to your exam time when you
2:28
Yeah, that particular
2:29
measurement takes me about two minutes.
2:31
Okay. Well, the people listening, I, they're probably,
2:34
they're not familiar with, they ought
2:36
to probably put aside 10
2:38
or 15 minutes initially to figure out,
2:41
but I think they should in fact, uh, you know, consult
2:44
with their orthopedic surgeons because it is a hot topic
2:49
and it may well be
2:50
that you'll get more referrals if you start including,
2:54
uh, that information. So I think it's important.
2:56
I think that's, that's a, uh, a valuable comment.
2:59
And, and, and I will say that, you know, I'm able to do this
3:02
with speed after 40 years.
3:04
When I started out, I certainly
3:06
didn't have that kind of screen. Right,
3:07
Right.
3:09
Okay. IgE, do we have any questions? We do.
3:12
How frequent is it to see resorption
3:14
of the bone fried menu in the latter J
3:17
and what clinical relevance does it have?
3:20
Um, I have not seen resorption.
3:23
If there is not failure of the fusion between,
3:27
and I think you mean the transferred bone, if
3:30
that stays solid, I have not seen resorption
3:32
of it over time, but if in fact it becomes loose
3:35
or displaced, I have seen at that point, resorption
3:39
and, uh, recurrent
3:41
and a second surgical procedure is generally required, uh,
3:45
because, you know, that is one of the important aspects
3:48
of increasing stability to the, uh,
3:51
to the glen joint.
3:54
The other question here is kind of, uh, interesting.
3:57
I understand the different types of anterior labral lesions.
4:01
Um, and, uh, why is it so important to differentiate them?
4:06
It probably isn't important in certain cases,
4:10
but some people believe
4:11
that if the orthopedic surgeon knows ahead of time,
4:15
for example, they are dealing with a SSA
4:19
or with a, uh, perthes lesion, they sometimes have
4:23
to convert them into soft tissue bank art
4:26
lesions to repair them.
4:28
I'm not exactly sure why that is important
4:31
or how that is done,
4:33
but I've heard several orthopedic surgeons tell me that.
4:36
So maybe that's one point of, uh,
4:38
differentiating between them.
4:40
I think it also is that, you know,
4:42
the soft tissue bank art lesions that have no
4:46
intact scapular periosteum,
4:49
their repair may be more complex
4:51
because they can be displaced,
4:53
as I've indicated at the top of the joint.
4:56
You gotta bring them down reattachment.
4:58
So I think the time of surgery will also be influenced
5:02
by the, by the pathology.
5:04
But I think more important is differentiation of failure
5:08
at the glenoid from failure at the humeral site,
5:11
or failure at multiple sites,
5:12
because particularly the humeral failure,
5:16
that hagel lesion is often missed
5:17
by the orthopedic surgeon. I dunno if you have any comments.
5:20
No, as Don pointed out earlier, you know, it's easy
5:23
to blow by these, these capsular injuries when you're
5:25
so focused on these big banker lesions.
5:28
It's also easy, easy to forget
5:30
to look at the subscapularis when you have
5:32
a, a hagel or a bagel.
5:33
And I, I see that happen with,
5:35
with young radiologists, not infrequently.
5:37
And one other comment, when you have ansa
5:40
and there's extreme medialization of the labrum
5:42
where it's just crept underneath the periosteum
5:45
and really wedged in there, the clinicians like to know that
5:49
What volume do I use in an arthrogram, I guess is okay.
5:54
Um, generally, uh, 10 to 12 to 13.
5:59
If you go beyond that and go to 15
6:02
or beyond, there's a higher likelihood that, uh,
6:06
you will get extravasation
6:08
and run into the problem that I show, particularly
6:10
with lesions of the, uh, capsule.
6:13
Uh, the other thing that we do with our arthrograms, uh, is
6:17
that we don't move the shoulder after we've injected
6:22
because that will increase the likelihood of extravasation.
6:25
Uh, we do the, a bear rejection where you have
6:28
to move the shoulder.
6:30
We do it as the last, uh, sequence just
6:34
because they, you will get in some cases extravasation.
6:38
But, um, but those are the general rules that,
6:41
that we, uh, use.
6:43
You use a posterior approach or
6:45
That's interesting.
6:46
Uh, you know, what approach to, to use, I can tell you
6:48
that most of our fellows now who do the arthrograms like
6:53
to use the rotator interval approach.
6:55
But the general rule,
6:56
and it's something to remember, wherever you put the needle,
7:00
you're gonna run into diagnostic difficulties.
7:03
So that is why a number of years ago,
7:05
my associate Christine Chung,
7:07
who's talking at this particular meeting,
7:10
she did write an article that you can refer
7:12
to on the posterior approach, um, when you're dealing with,
7:17
uh, anterior instability of the glenohumeral joint.
7:21
I have done maybe about 20
7:23
of those I have don't have a great deal of experience.
7:26
Uh, initially they're a little more difficult
7:28
and the needle tends to run medially
7:31
as you go deeper and deeper.
7:33
But once you've learned that,
7:34
and the other advantage
7:36
to it is the patient doesn't see the needle ahead of time,
7:39
which can have a, a, an advantage.
7:42
So, so I would recommend that if you're dealing
7:44
with anterior uh, problems, putting the needle
7:48
through the rotator interval, I think is the easiest.
7:50
But there are rotator interval tears
7:53
that can be clinically significant.
7:55
And once you've done the interval approach,
7:58
contrast leaking out there is fairly common following the,
8:02
uh, arthrogram or at the time of the arthrogram.
8:05
So you can't tell very well.
8:07
I, I atrogenic from a, uh, rotator interval, uh, tear.
8:13
Any tips on how to differentiate
8:15
a acromioclavicular joint capsular injury
8:18
and degeneration of the AC joint?
8:21
I sometimes find traumatic versus degenerative changes.
8:24
Tricky in some case. Appreciate any clues from the experts.
8:29
Um, well fir first of all, most people
8:31
that have chronic disease will have spurs,
8:36
arthrosis, and the ligaments are still there.
8:39
If you look, you know carefully, they may be irregular,
8:41
they may be thickened,
8:43
and you should inspect all four quadrants, anterior,
8:46
posterior, superior, and inferior.
8:49
Also, much of the time, you don't have the kind of
8:52
soft tissue swelling that you have with an AC joint, uh,
8:55
capsular injury, nor do you have the,
8:58
the signal abnormalities at the trapezius reflection or,
9:01
or at the lateral deltoid reflection.
9:04
And probably the easiest thing of all is the history.
9:07
You know, somebody that has an AC joint capsular injury,
9:09
usually, you know, they've fallen down somewhere.
9:13
They've fallen directly on one shoulder with folks,
9:16
you know, falling on top of the opposite shoulder
9:18
with the arm in abduction.
9:20
So the history is very helpful.