Interactive Transcript
0:00
Moving on to the nonatherosclerotic cases in our list.
0:05
So the first we're going to talk about is Raynaud's phenomena, which is an
0:09
exaggerated vascular response to cold temperatures or emotional
0:12
stresses. It most commonly affects digits like the
0:16
fingers, but can also affect toes and knees, tips of ears and
0:20
nose. It's characterized by sudden episodes of vasoconstriction
0:24
followed by reperfusion, and is really
0:27
a transient arterial constriction that reduces blood flow.
0:31
The causes include primary causes as well as it can be seen in the setting of
0:35
connective tissue disorders such as CREST syndrome or drugs.
0:39
Now, this kind of vasospasm can be distinguished from vascular injury, A,
0:43
in the presence of clinical history, but also a repeat imaging,
0:47
particularly at 48 to 72 hours, would show a normal caliber
0:51
vessel, and so it can help differentiate thrombus or a high grade
0:54
stenosis versus vasoconstriction or Raynaud phenomena,
0:58
so that we don't over call these.
1:02
The next disease that we're going to talk about is the Buerger disease, also known
1:06
as thromboangiitis obliterans, which is a non-necrotizing
1:09
inflammatory vasculitis that affects small and medium-sized
1:13
vessels, most commonly of the extremities.
1:16
The diagnostic criteria include history of smoking, very highly
1:20
associated with that history. It occurs in young
1:23
males. Typically, the onset is below the age of 50
1:27
years, typically has an infrapopliteal involvement,
1:31
lack of traditional atherosclerotic risk factors other
1:35
than smoking. And although there are no pathognomonic imaging
1:39
features as such, segmental occlusions with normal intervening
1:43
segments, collaterals which have a corkscrew appearance.
1:47
The age and the history all can kind of point us towards the
1:51
diagnosis as being Buerger disease rather than the typical peripheral
1:55
arterial disease.
1:56
There are, however, definitely other entities that can have an
2:00
imaging overlap with these, such as peripheral arterial disease, of course,
2:04
connective tissue diseases, SLE, and scleroderma.
2:09
The next pathology in nonatherosclerotic disease is
2:13
vasculitis. Now, giant cell arteritis is really one of the most common
2:17
forms of large and medium cell vasculitis, and the most common
2:21
site of involvement is the aorta and upper extremity branches, such as the
2:25
subclavian arteries, the axillary and the brachial arteries.
2:28
And the lower extremity arteries are not that
2:31
typical to be involved. But when they are involved, the most common
2:35
vessels that are involved are the superficial femoral and the popliteal
2:39
artery. Claudication is really how these patients present,
2:43
and because lower extremity claudication is not uncommon in elderly
2:47
patients, which is also the population that gets affected by giant cell arteritis,
2:51
that can be mistakenly attributed to the same.
2:54
So imaging can certainly help play a role.
2:57
Predominant lower extremity involvement is an unusual
3:00
pattern, which is what we're going to see in our case that we're going to discuss
3:04
in a bit. And really, the aorta arch,
3:08
arch branches, and the temporal vessels are really when it's more
3:12
symptomatic and involved.
3:14
So this is looking at that same patient whose CT we just saw with the
3:18
vasculitis.
3:20
And we can see corresponding to the findings that we saw on the CT,
3:24
there is significant FDG uptake along bilateral
3:27
superficial femoral arteries. And looking at that in a more axial view, you can see
3:31
there's no uptake in that aorta iliac artery branches.
3:34
But as soon as we come to the level of the superficial femoral arteries, there's
3:38
marked FDG uptake bilaterally. All of these signs point
3:42
towards vasculitis, and this person landed
3:45
up having giant cell arteritis.
3:49
The next disease that we have in the nonatherosclerotic section is a
3:53
vasculopathy. Fibromuscular dysplasia is one of the more
3:56
common non-inflammatory vasculopathies.
3:59
It's a non-inflammatory, nonatherosclerotic disease that affects small
4:03
to medium-sized arteries, but the most common arteries being
4:06
involved are renal, carotid, and vertebral.
4:10
Characteristically, the arteries have a beaded appearance,
4:14
although reportedly, there can be a lower extremity involvement of the
4:18
arteries in up to 6% of patients.
4:22
Moving on to arteriovenous malformation, which represents an anomalous
4:26
direct arteriovenous communication that bypasses a capillary
4:30
system. Now, typically, arteries and veins are interposed by high resistance
4:34
capillary beds. And if these are absent, this results in a
4:38
high-flow system from an artery to a vein, and venous
4:42
walls are not designed to handle this arterial blood pressure.
4:45
So over time, this affects the vessel wall structure that
4:49
becomes weakened, and that's why they're at a higher propensity
4:53
for hemorrhages and ruptures, and they can present with a wide
4:57
varying form of symptoms, all the way from skin discoloration
5:01
to ischemia in distal tissues and heart failure from
5:05
arteriovenous shunting. They can be progressive and
5:08
congenital that expand into adolescence and adulthood.
5:11
They can occur sporadically, or they can be syndromic as part of Cobb
5:15
syndrome or Osler-Weber-Rendu syndrome or
5:18
hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia syndrome.
5:22
The next pathology is the cystic adventitial
5:26
disease. This is generally seen in young middle-aged men.
5:31
More commonly, it's the popliteal artery along which where we find this,
5:35
and we see these as cystic lesions that are in the wall of the
5:39
artery, which are basically mucoid cysts, and can result in
5:43
compression and even thrombosis in the vessel where they are at.
5:46
Again, the most common artery is the popliteal artery.
5:50
MRA can help identify that cystic nature, so T2
5:53
hyperintense and non-enhancing after you give contrast are all clues of
5:57
cystic adventitial disease.
5:59
The last set of cases that we have are popliteal artery
6:03
entrapment syndrome. This is an uncommon entity, commonly
6:07
seen in young athletic individuals, more common in male.
6:11
And there's repetitive popliteal artery insult, which results in
6:15
damage and aneurysm and thrombosis.
6:18
Typically, these patients present with calf claudication, and they have an
6:22
anomalous relationship of the muscle to the artery in the popliteal fossa
6:26
that causes an extrinsic compression that leads to all of the insult.
6:30
Normally, the popliteal artery is adjacent to and lateral to the medial
6:34
head of the gastrocnemius muscle.
6:37
And the gastrocnemius muscle attaches just superior to that
6:40
medial femoral condyle. And so there are different types of
6:44
popliteal artery entrapment syndrome.
6:46
Again, we're not going to be looking at all of them in detail,
6:50
but just knowing that it is important to look at
6:54
the relationship of that gastrocnemius muscle to that popliteal
6:58
artery is really important. So popliteal artery can
7:01
run medial to that medial head of gastrocnemius.
7:05
The medial head of the gastrocnemius can be more laterally attached.
7:09
That can cause mass effect on that popliteal artery.
7:12
There can be an accessory slip of the gastrocnemius muscle or just an accessory
7:16
bundle that can cause compression of the popliteal
7:19
artery. The popliteal artery itself might have an abnormal
7:23
course and pass below that popliteal muscle.
7:27
That can also involve not just that artery, but there can be venous involvement as
7:31
well, and then there can be functional entrapment as well.
7:34
Now, diagnosis for this typically involves dynamic imaging, either in the
7:38
form of ankle-brachial index, where there's a drop in
7:42
the ankle-brachial index values.
7:44
With exercise, ultrasound, where again, there can be an increase in
7:48
systolic values or significant stenosis or thrombosis
7:52
on dynamic maneuvers, which basically means we scan patients in neutral position
7:56
and then either dorsiflexion and plantar flexion,
7:59
whichever maneuver is the one that the patient complains about
8:03
and is symptomatic on.
8:05
And the same dynamic maneuvers can be done in an MR as well as a catheter
8:09
angiogram.
8:11
So this is the follow-up imaging of this patient that we just saw,
8:15
where we raised concern of popliteal artery entrapment on the CT.
8:19
We did a MR in both the neutral and the plantar flexion, and we
8:23
can see how nice and wide and patent this popliteal artery is on
8:27
the MR. This is in an axial view, whereas this is on a sagittal
8:30
view. Compare that to scanning this patient in plantar flexion, and we can see
8:34
there's a significant anteroposterior flattening and a reduction in the
8:38
caliber of that popliteal artery, nicely seen here as a tubular
8:42
area of moderate to severe stenosis of that popliteal artery on dynamic
8:45
imaging. So really, a change in caliber of popliteal artery on dynamic
8:49
imaging can be seen on both CT or MR.
8:52
MR is technically preferred because, again, these patients tend to be younger.
8:56
Looking at attachments of muscles is better on an MR compared to a
8:59
CT.