Interactive Transcript
0:04
So this patient is history who recently diagnosed
0:08
with colon cancer and, um, coming for staging.
0:13
Okay, so let's start with the primary side.
0:18
I just agree the transparency of pet
0:20
because I don't like, um, background, my background to be,
0:23
um, colorful.
0:25
I don't like that. This
0:30
so nice mass.
0:31
Look at that. See how focal connectivity look at,
0:36
even in the, in the map, that's why we,
0:39
when we see focal connectivity in the bowel, it's always,
0:41
even if I don't, we don't see mass, most of them.
0:43
We don't see a mass in the ct,
0:46
but doesn't matter, we don't have to see a in the ct.
0:48
This is extremely suspicious for cancer
0:51
and we ask for a colonoscopy all the time in this patient.
0:54
Actually I can see Ms. Look at that. How beautiful is this?
0:59
It's a large colon cancer here.
1:03
Our value is not the T classification.
1:05
This is not what we do. Our value is the n
1:07
and n classification.
1:09
This is why they send these patient to us.
1:11
And in this patient we see ver lymph node, right?
1:18
And me enteric actually also see
1:21
what about this here?
1:26
Yeah, one, two.
1:28
And in the GI system you will realize that um,
1:32
in the staging of the GI system, number
1:34
of lymph nodes is important.
1:36
They like to stage the patient
1:37
with a lymph node number, interestingly, right?
1:42
So the three and the seven is always playing a good role on,
1:45
uh, the staging.
1:47
Let me show you this. So how many can we count
1:51
with this patient
2:04
from least like maybe three at least a month?
2:08
I think more than three. Looking here in the map,
2:13
you have to make sure that none, none of this is the ureter
2:16
of course, but look at this, you have this
2:19
and you have another one above it.
2:20
So these are two, not one.
2:21
And you have like this, maybe this and this.
2:24
See all these, but also look at this and look at this.
2:28
So this is muscle of course,
2:29
nicely see shown mu muscle uptake.
2:32
But what about these two? So let's go there.
2:39
The cover is that, okay?
2:44
This is a left supraclavicular lymph node,
2:46
the vecal node, right?
2:49
This is the metastatic for sure
2:51
because we know that the GI likes to go
2:53
to the metastatic.
3:00
This is one and there's another one here. Okay?
3:03
Why is this important? This is important
3:05
because there is something called regional
3:07
and non regional lymph nodes,
3:08
nodal metastasis in any cancer.
3:11
And this is an important concept I want you guys to,
3:13
um, know about.
3:15
Let me minimize this
3:17
because I wanna bring something else in here.
3:23
This is a lecture I give to my president.
3:27
So staging in pet, our value oncology,
3:31
of course I talking about oncology,
3:33
our value is always, uh, staging, right?
3:36
T we really have a revalue in the T part of the
3:40
classification, but in the n and m we are very valuable.
3:42
So it's always important to have our eyes on the, the n
3:46
and m part of the classification.
3:48
Um, I never really sit and memorize them,
3:52
but I repeatedly bring them up and look at them.
3:55
And when you look at them multiple times,
3:56
you start remembering them important parts of them.
3:59
And this isn't the colon cancer,
4:00
the colorectal cancer classification.
4:03
Um, right?
4:04
So, and and like I told you in the,
4:07
generally in the elementary tract,
4:09
it's the number of lymph nodes, right?
4:11
So three and seven are the two numbers I remember.
4:14
So N one is 1, 2, 3, regional, you will,
4:18
you will recognize the word regional lymph nodes, right?
4:22
N one is one to three, um, regional lymph nodes, right?
4:26
And they would give you an exceptions, right?
4:28
And then in two is four, right?
4:32
Um, just into four or more regional lymph nodes.
4:36
Uh, and then they, they do put um, into A and into B. Okay?
4:41
But there's something else
4:42
that is more imp that is very important.
4:45
We're talking about regional lymph nodes, right?
4:47
But then what I want you to look at is this.
4:53
Uh, where is next one here? M1 B.
4:58
So sorry, M1 A, M1 a.
5:00
What qualifies somebody to M1 A?
5:04
Um, where did it go?
5:12
Thats it says here the star. You see the star, okay.
5:17
Non regional lymph, okay,
5:19
this is what I want you to look at.
5:21
So anytime there is metastas to non regional lymph node,
5:25
although it's still a lymph node, it becomes an M1, A M1 a,
5:29
which is stage four, right?
5:31
So what's the non-original lymph
5:32
or basically what's the regional lymph node?
5:34
So then we know what's a non here is the regional lymph node
5:37
or colorectal cancer, right?
5:40
Okay. It describes it, right?
5:42
Um, outside of the drainage area of the tumor,
5:46
which is not found along the vascular arcade
5:48
of the marginal artery preco lon per recal me rectal nodes
5:53
should be considered the stems.
5:55
Here's the, here's the, the diagram.
5:58
Just we are, we are images, we are radiologists, right?
6:01
We're more visual people.
6:03
For me, I see it, I know it keep putting like paragraphs
6:08
of of text, it just doesn't stick to my head.
6:10
Show me a picture. I know it. Here's the picture.
6:13
See here it outside of this,
6:19
it is non regional,
6:20
which makes the supraclavicular node non regional,
6:24
which brings us to our case here.
6:27
Let us go back to our case here.
6:31
So this patient, although all we see in this patient is a
6:34
primary site and metastatic lymph node, he's a stage four
6:39
just because of the scl.
6:41
See, okay, this is what I wanna make sure.
6:44
So in each cancer there are regional nodes
6:47
and there are non regional nodes.
6:48
So just keep in mind that you need to be aware of
6:51
what is regional and what's non regional nodes
6:54
to this specific cancer
6:55
because it's important
6:57
to tell them when there is metastatic node in the non
6:59
regional area, it's important
7:01
to them in the staging of the patient.
7:06
Yeah, there is absolutely, absolutely. The I agree.
7:08
The, um, I see in this,
7:10
in the said you all use the term oli metastas as referred
7:13
to in the discussion of this case
7:15
as we don't find the type No, no, it is who who, why do you,
7:19
why do you think it's not helpful oligo metastasis?
7:21
It is, it's been around for more than 10 years I think now
7:23
and we recognize the oligo metastasis
7:25
and there are patients with actually not only, no,
7:28
there are patients with distant metastasis
7:30
and we do surgical, uh, intervention to them, right?
7:33
The re what is the value of oligo metastasis?
7:35
The value of oligo metastasis previously when,
7:37
whenever we say stage four, this means this patient is non
7:41
uh, surgical, right?
7:42
Isn't this the old, um,
7:46
the old school thinking anytime a patient is stage four,
7:50
this means this patient is nonsurgical, right?
7:52
This is what we used to say this,
7:54
this patient is non-surgical, not anymore.
7:57
It's been around for a long time now.
7:59
Um, oligo metastasis means that
8:07
we yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
8:09
We do, we do see, yeah, we do see SBR lymph nodes
8:12
with no liver, with no dis mets.
8:14
Yes we do. Absolutely.
8:16
Absolutely because it's known especially for GI mes
8:19
and not only gi for other meds, this is a draining node,
8:23
a draining, uh, site, uh, lymphatic site.
8:26
So we see that often.
8:28
Um, and it doesn't mean
8:29
that this patient is on surgical, it doesn't.
8:31
Plus now there is new adjuvant therapy.
8:33
You start with the new adjuvant therapy
8:36
and then you turn a patient into a surgical picture
8:39
and there are patients with liver met with one
8:41
or two ary metastatic, metastatic lesions of the liver.
8:44
We do micro uh, we do uh, micro ablations
8:47
for example, right?
8:49
You do you we do directed therapy to the liver
8:52
and then they do, uh, debulking.
8:54
There are so many, there's a lot of patients now
8:57
that are uh, metastatic and we do, um, they go go in
9:01
and do surgery and during the surgery they do treat
9:05
directed therapy to the liver mets during the surgery.
9:10
Uh, no, this is definitely metastatic.
9:12
Do you have any doubt that this per clavicular lymph node,
9:15
you, you, you're asking would you biopsy
9:17
that rac clavicular node?
9:19
The question means that you're not sure
9:21
that the supraclavicular node is metastatic.
9:23
Am I correct? Is is, isn't this what you're asking about?
9:26
Would you biopsy it because you're not sure
9:27
it's metastatic or not correct?
9:30
This is your question, correct. Do you, do you doubt
9:33
that this RAC node is metastatic?
9:41
I would biopsy if I'm not sure, but I'm not sure.
9:43
I'm sure this is the study.
9:45
Okay, so why would you biopsy
9:46
it? What's the reason to biopsy?
9:50
Uh, high prof? Yeah, thank you so much.
9:52
Um, sometimes the oncologists, uh, might not be convinced
9:56
that, uh, we've often been caught out
9:58
with the dual pathology, especially head
10:00
and neck tumors, uh, uh,
10:05
that are sub centimeter in size,
10:07
especially squamous cell carcinoma.
10:09
Uh, and then, uh, in event of the probability
10:14
of it is keeping the livers, keeping the lung
10:16
and then finding a SEP rhythm lymph, no,
10:18
then generally the drainage of the head
10:20
and neck tumors will go there.
10:21
So sometimes they're often asked to to biopsy it.
10:24
That's the only reason why I asked that question.
10:27
And then in terms of oligo metastasis,
10:28
the oncologists don't like that term
10:31
because it just means little metastasis
10:33
and when it comes time for, for funding, um,
10:36
for a review pet, then, uh, it doesn't help,
10:40
uh, their cause. Thank you.
10:42
Alright, so two, you,
10:44
you mentioned two things, two separate things.
10:45
First, this is an expected metastas
10:47
for this, for this patient.
10:49
I agree with what you're saying when I, I myself, okay.
10:52
I have other cases where, um, the,
10:55
the pattern doesn't match, for example, interpreted, uh,
10:59
hot interpreted nodule, right?
11:01
In a patients with gynecological cancer, right?
11:04
For like, um, cervical cancer
11:07
and maybe like whether there is nodes in the pelvis or not,
11:10
and nothing that interprets me, right?
11:13
Do do you do, can you picture this right?
11:16
Uh, cervical cancer, maybe pelvic lymph nodes,
11:20
no ilia cor aortic lymph nodes, right?
11:23
Not, it's not, I'm not talking about tub clavicular even I'm
11:25
talking about intra nodes.
11:27
Cool. You did you, can you picture this?
11:31
Alright, I personally wouldn't call this
11:35
intra a metastatic.
11:37
I wouldn't, I would call this favors introverted blsm such
11:42
as polymorphic, um, adenoma.
11:46
Right? Why? Because like what you're saying,
11:48
this pattern doesn't match, it doesn't make sense that this,
11:53
that the, that the cervical cancer would jump
11:56
to the intra lymph node without tracking all the way.
12:01
I agree. We are the doctors of patterns.
12:05
I don't wait for the surgeons to tell me that
12:07
what you're saying doesn't make sense.
12:08
I make sense of my image before he says it.
12:12
I even, I'm the one who always in the tumor board tell them,
12:15
well guys, wait a minute, this doesn't make sense.
12:18
This node doesn't make sense
12:20
to be metastatic from this cancer.
12:23
When, when there is no intervening nodes, I am the one
12:26
who says that, I don't wait for him to say that,
12:29
but this node makes sense to be metastatic
12:32
because the, this is called the node.
12:34
No, this is a known drainage nodes
12:38
for the GI cancers.
12:40
It makes sense. Look at the map, right?
12:44
So this is, this is a different situation, right?
12:47
You have a colon cancer with metastatic retro al
12:51
and mesenteric nodes and the supraclavicular node.
12:53
This is absolutely a log, a logic situation.
12:59
It's different than what we're de what you're describing.
13:03
And lymphatic metastasis is a root
13:06
and hematogenous metas metastasis is a different root.
13:10
I don't need, uh, lung
13:12
and liver metastasis to see lymphatic metastasis.
13:15
These are two different root of metastasis, right?
13:17
Hematogenous versus lymphatic. These, these are not linked.
13:21
Sometimes I have a primary cancers with liver mets
13:25
and not a single lymph node.
13:28
They don't come sequential.
13:30
The patient doesn't have to have lymphatic metastasis
13:32
before he has hematogenous metastasis.
13:35
Nope, he doesn't because sometimes the primary sites start,
13:39
um, invading and um, uh, eroding capillaries
13:43
and hit the bloodstream
13:45
and boom, he goes to the, to the, you know, organs
13:50
before even he hits the lymphatics, right?
13:55
Okay, perfect. Exactly The colon cancer.
13:58
And you don't have to have lymphatic metastasis
14:00
before you have hematogenous metastasis.
14:02
You don't have to have that. I, I really do have patients
14:06
with primary side liver mets and maybe sometimes lung
14:10
or bone mets without lymphatic metastasis.
14:13
You do, you can have that because these are two separate
14:15
routes of metastasis.
14:17
They happen independently, right?
14:20
But lymphatic metastasis are predictable except in one
14:25
situation, if there is violation of the meta
14:27
of the lymphatics, meaning if this patient had uh,
14:30
lymph lymphatic dissection, they did surgery
14:34
and they did lymphatic dissection, once they do that,
14:37
they violated the lymphatic system.
14:39
Then eight, we see atypical lymphatic, uh,
14:42
metastasis happening.
14:44
Then we see like lymphatic mes going to weird locations
14:48
and you cannot say, oh, this doesn't make sense anymore
14:51
because they violated the lymphatic system.
14:53
Then it can throw mes somewhere that you don't expect.
14:56
But as long as this is a native lymphatic system
14:59
that wasn't touched, it's predictable
15:02
where it should go first before it goes next.
15:04
And the sub lab clavicular node,
15:06
node is an expected metastatic, uh, site for this cancer.
15:12
So this makes sense. It's not unpredictable.
15:15
The nobody, a GI oncologist is not gonna object to you
15:18
and say, okay, it doesn't make sense.
15:19
No, they won't ask for biopsy, I promise.
15:21
We have tumor boards too. We discuss these cases.
15:24
So they don't only, only look at our report,
15:26
plus they call us on our reading rooms
15:28
and they discuss these cases with us
15:29
and they come to our reading rooms.
15:31
So we're not hiding in, um, in rooms anymore.
15:34
They don't only see our reports, they know us
15:36
and they call us all the time we discuss these patients.
15:38
Nobody will ask for biosis for this
15:40
and this, uh, the look of this node, see
15:42
how it's surrounded, how hot it is.
15:45
There is no need for biopsy. This is assure metastatic node.
15:50
I don't need to biopsy this node. No, it doesn't matter.
15:54
Five. I don't have myself,
15:56
I don't like even when resident ask me these questions,
15:59
I don't like this threshold for SUVs, right?
16:01
Because SUVs is different. You use, if you use,
16:04
do you use body weight normalize SUV V
16:06
or do you use limb body mass?
16:07
Normalized SUV. The is the, the level
16:10
of SUV is gonna be different based on that, right?
16:12
The scanner, like how, how do you like, you know, the,
16:15
the techniques, do you weigh your patient
16:18
or do you ask the patient you shouldn't ask your patient The
16:20
weight should weigh your patient, right?
16:21
Technical. Yeah. Uh, yeah, exactly.
16:24
So I'm not asking you specifically,
16:26
but what I'm trying to say is that lean body mass,
16:29
normalized SUVs are lower than body weight
16:31
and I believe, I believe they are the better ones.
16:34
Although, although I couldn't move us to them yet.
16:37
I still, we still use the body weight
16:38
normalized, although I hate it.
16:40
Um, but lean body mass normalized, uh, SUVs are better.
16:45
Um, and we can have another session just to talk about that.
16:49
Um, but what I'm trying to say is that it's the,
16:52
it's the context, right?
16:54
SUVs just crude UV is not numbers, is not,
16:58
how big is this node?
16:59
If the node is, um,
17:02
five millimeter node, right?
17:05
But it's rounded, it's, it's in the right location
17:07
and it's, it's 2.5, right?
17:11
I might call it suspicious node. I don't care.
17:14
It didn't hit your threshold, right?
17:17
So it's, it's the context.
17:19
I don't, I'm not a big believer of a an SUV threshold
17:23
and I don't, I never give an SUV threshold to anyone.
17:26
It's a context of what are you looking at?
17:29
What type of cancer are we talking about?
17:32
What pharmaceutical are we talking about?
17:34
There's a lot of factors that feed into the SUV, right?
17:38
So you're talking about
17:43
SUV we less than five and background of previous,
17:48
what is CBNA?
17:49
I'm not previous tb.
17:53
What's cb what, what is that?
17:57
Which is prevalent in,
18:04
I'm sorry.
18:04
I'm not the best person with acronyms,
18:07
so I'm not sure what I understand.
18:08
What is this cubicle which is prevalent
18:12
in, is it Saudi Arabia?
18:14
sa South Africa? Okay. No, no, no, no, no. Please.
18:20
Um, no tuber closes is is still prevalent in many places.
18:24
Um, this is what I'm saying.
18:26
This is what I'm saying exactly.
18:28
Um, all your concerned
18:32
that this is infection just one lymph node in the sub
18:35
clavicular and the lungs is clean and nothing in the hilum
18:38
and nothing in, you know what I mean?
18:39
Again, the context, this is what I'm saying.
18:42
No calcification, nothing in the lungs,
18:45
nothing in the hilum, just one
18:48
s supraclavicular lymph node in the context of a, um,
18:50
metastatic colon cancer into the,
18:53
to the, you know what I mean?
18:55
Wouldn't this be unlikely to be tb? What do you think?
19:01
Okay. Yes. But why would be this supraclavicular node hot
19:05
from TB while everything else is called the,
19:10
the context would be this is a metastatic lymph node with
19:14
a patient with old heeled TB
19:20
or old, um, granulomatous disease.
19:23
We, what we have here in, in the states more is, um,
19:26
histoplasmosis for example, we have a lot of patients
19:29
with tr uh, granulomatous disease.
19:32
Histoplasmosis is one of them.
19:33
Sarcoidosis is more prevalent than TB here, for example.
19:37
And we have a lot of patients, I have a lot, many
19:39
of my patients have calcified, um, lung modules, uh,
19:43
I mean calcified to um, granulomas
19:46
and um, calcified, uh, lymph nodes as well.
19:49
But these are burned out lymph
19:50
nodes and they have their patterns.
19:52
Okay? Okay. We agree.