Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Wk 3, Case 3 - Review

HIDE
PrevNext

0:04

So this patient is history who recently diagnosed

0:08

with colon cancer and, um, coming for staging.

0:13

Okay, so let's start with the primary side.

0:18

I just agree the transparency of pet

0:20

because I don't like, um, background, my background to be,

0:23

um, colorful.

0:25

I don't like that. This

0:30

so nice mass.

0:31

Look at that. See how focal connectivity look at,

0:36

even in the, in the map, that's why we,

0:39

when we see focal connectivity in the bowel, it's always,

0:41

even if I don't, we don't see mass, most of them.

0:43

We don't see a mass in the ct,

0:46

but doesn't matter, we don't have to see a in the ct.

0:48

This is extremely suspicious for cancer

0:51

and we ask for a colonoscopy all the time in this patient.

0:54

Actually I can see Ms. Look at that. How beautiful is this?

0:59

It's a large colon cancer here.

1:03

Our value is not the T classification.

1:05

This is not what we do. Our value is the n

1:07

and n classification.

1:09

This is why they send these patient to us.

1:11

And in this patient we see ver lymph node, right?

1:18

And me enteric actually also see

1:21

what about this here?

1:26

Yeah, one, two.

1:28

And in the GI system you will realize that um,

1:32

in the staging of the GI system, number

1:34

of lymph nodes is important.

1:36

They like to stage the patient

1:37

with a lymph node number, interestingly, right?

1:42

So the three and the seven is always playing a good role on,

1:45

uh, the staging.

1:47

Let me show you this. So how many can we count

1:51

with this patient

2:04

from least like maybe three at least a month?

2:08

I think more than three. Looking here in the map,

2:13

you have to make sure that none, none of this is the ureter

2:16

of course, but look at this, you have this

2:19

and you have another one above it.

2:20

So these are two, not one.

2:21

And you have like this, maybe this and this.

2:24

See all these, but also look at this and look at this.

2:28

So this is muscle of course,

2:29

nicely see shown mu muscle uptake.

2:32

But what about these two? So let's go there.

2:39

The cover is that, okay?

2:44

This is a left supraclavicular lymph node,

2:46

the vecal node, right?

2:49

This is the metastatic for sure

2:51

because we know that the GI likes to go

2:53

to the metastatic.

3:00

This is one and there's another one here. Okay?

3:03

Why is this important? This is important

3:05

because there is something called regional

3:07

and non regional lymph nodes,

3:08

nodal metastasis in any cancer.

3:11

And this is an important concept I want you guys to,

3:13

um, know about.

3:15

Let me minimize this

3:17

because I wanna bring something else in here.

3:23

This is a lecture I give to my president.

3:27

So staging in pet, our value oncology,

3:31

of course I talking about oncology,

3:33

our value is always, uh, staging, right?

3:36

T we really have a revalue in the T part of the

3:40

classification, but in the n and m we are very valuable.

3:42

So it's always important to have our eyes on the, the n

3:46

and m part of the classification.

3:48

Um, I never really sit and memorize them,

3:52

but I repeatedly bring them up and look at them.

3:55

And when you look at them multiple times,

3:56

you start remembering them important parts of them.

3:59

And this isn't the colon cancer,

4:00

the colorectal cancer classification.

4:03

Um, right?

4:04

So, and and like I told you in the,

4:07

generally in the elementary tract,

4:09

it's the number of lymph nodes, right?

4:11

So three and seven are the two numbers I remember.

4:14

So N one is 1, 2, 3, regional, you will,

4:18

you will recognize the word regional lymph nodes, right?

4:22

N one is one to three, um, regional lymph nodes, right?

4:26

And they would give you an exceptions, right?

4:28

And then in two is four, right?

4:32

Um, just into four or more regional lymph nodes.

4:36

Uh, and then they, they do put um, into A and into B. Okay?

4:41

But there's something else

4:42

that is more imp that is very important.

4:45

We're talking about regional lymph nodes, right?

4:47

But then what I want you to look at is this.

4:53

Uh, where is next one here? M1 B.

4:58

So sorry, M1 A, M1 a.

5:00

What qualifies somebody to M1 A?

5:04

Um, where did it go?

5:12

Thats it says here the star. You see the star, okay.

5:17

Non regional lymph, okay,

5:19

this is what I want you to look at.

5:21

So anytime there is metastas to non regional lymph node,

5:25

although it's still a lymph node, it becomes an M1, A M1 a,

5:29

which is stage four, right?

5:31

So what's the non-original lymph

5:32

or basically what's the regional lymph node?

5:34

So then we know what's a non here is the regional lymph node

5:37

or colorectal cancer, right?

5:40

Okay. It describes it, right?

5:42

Um, outside of the drainage area of the tumor,

5:46

which is not found along the vascular arcade

5:48

of the marginal artery preco lon per recal me rectal nodes

5:53

should be considered the stems.

5:55

Here's the, here's the, the diagram.

5:58

Just we are, we are images, we are radiologists, right?

6:01

We're more visual people.

6:03

For me, I see it, I know it keep putting like paragraphs

6:08

of of text, it just doesn't stick to my head.

6:10

Show me a picture. I know it. Here's the picture.

6:13

See here it outside of this,

6:19

it is non regional,

6:20

which makes the supraclavicular node non regional,

6:24

which brings us to our case here.

6:27

Let us go back to our case here.

6:31

So this patient, although all we see in this patient is a

6:34

primary site and metastatic lymph node, he's a stage four

6:39

just because of the scl.

6:41

See, okay, this is what I wanna make sure.

6:44

So in each cancer there are regional nodes

6:47

and there are non regional nodes.

6:48

So just keep in mind that you need to be aware of

6:51

what is regional and what's non regional nodes

6:54

to this specific cancer

6:55

because it's important

6:57

to tell them when there is metastatic node in the non

6:59

regional area, it's important

7:01

to them in the staging of the patient.

7:06

Yeah, there is absolutely, absolutely. The I agree.

7:08

The, um, I see in this,

7:10

in the said you all use the term oli metastas as referred

7:13

to in the discussion of this case

7:15

as we don't find the type No, no, it is who who, why do you,

7:19

why do you think it's not helpful oligo metastasis?

7:21

It is, it's been around for more than 10 years I think now

7:23

and we recognize the oligo metastasis

7:25

and there are patients with actually not only, no,

7:28

there are patients with distant metastasis

7:30

and we do surgical, uh, intervention to them, right?

7:33

The re what is the value of oligo metastasis?

7:35

The value of oligo metastasis previously when,

7:37

whenever we say stage four, this means this patient is non

7:41

uh, surgical, right?

7:42

Isn't this the old, um,

7:46

the old school thinking anytime a patient is stage four,

7:50

this means this patient is nonsurgical, right?

7:52

This is what we used to say this,

7:54

this patient is non-surgical, not anymore.

7:57

It's been around for a long time now.

7:59

Um, oligo metastasis means that

8:07

we yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

8:09

We do, we do see, yeah, we do see SBR lymph nodes

8:12

with no liver, with no dis mets.

8:14

Yes we do. Absolutely.

8:16

Absolutely because it's known especially for GI mes

8:19

and not only gi for other meds, this is a draining node,

8:23

a draining, uh, site, uh, lymphatic site.

8:26

So we see that often.

8:28

Um, and it doesn't mean

8:29

that this patient is on surgical, it doesn't.

8:31

Plus now there is new adjuvant therapy.

8:33

You start with the new adjuvant therapy

8:36

and then you turn a patient into a surgical picture

8:39

and there are patients with liver met with one

8:41

or two ary metastatic, metastatic lesions of the liver.

8:44

We do micro uh, we do uh, micro ablations

8:47

for example, right?

8:49

You do you we do directed therapy to the liver

8:52

and then they do, uh, debulking.

8:54

There are so many, there's a lot of patients now

8:57

that are uh, metastatic and we do, um, they go go in

9:01

and do surgery and during the surgery they do treat

9:05

directed therapy to the liver mets during the surgery.

9:10

Uh, no, this is definitely metastatic.

9:12

Do you have any doubt that this per clavicular lymph node,

9:15

you, you, you're asking would you biopsy

9:17

that rac clavicular node?

9:19

The question means that you're not sure

9:21

that the supraclavicular node is metastatic.

9:23

Am I correct? Is is, isn't this what you're asking about?

9:26

Would you biopsy it because you're not sure

9:27

it's metastatic or not correct?

9:30

This is your question, correct. Do you, do you doubt

9:33

that this RAC node is metastatic?

9:41

I would biopsy if I'm not sure, but I'm not sure.

9:43

I'm sure this is the study.

9:45

Okay, so why would you biopsy

9:46

it? What's the reason to biopsy?

9:50

Uh, high prof? Yeah, thank you so much.

9:52

Um, sometimes the oncologists, uh, might not be convinced

9:56

that, uh, we've often been caught out

9:58

with the dual pathology, especially head

10:00

and neck tumors, uh, uh,

10:05

that are sub centimeter in size,

10:07

especially squamous cell carcinoma.

10:09

Uh, and then, uh, in event of the probability

10:14

of it is keeping the livers, keeping the lung

10:16

and then finding a SEP rhythm lymph, no,

10:18

then generally the drainage of the head

10:20

and neck tumors will go there.

10:21

So sometimes they're often asked to to biopsy it.

10:24

That's the only reason why I asked that question.

10:27

And then in terms of oligo metastasis,

10:28

the oncologists don't like that term

10:31

because it just means little metastasis

10:33

and when it comes time for, for funding, um,

10:36

for a review pet, then, uh, it doesn't help,

10:40

uh, their cause. Thank you.

10:42

Alright, so two, you,

10:44

you mentioned two things, two separate things.

10:45

First, this is an expected metastas

10:47

for this, for this patient.

10:49

I agree with what you're saying when I, I myself, okay.

10:52

I have other cases where, um, the,

10:55

the pattern doesn't match, for example, interpreted, uh,

10:59

hot interpreted nodule, right?

11:01

In a patients with gynecological cancer, right?

11:04

For like, um, cervical cancer

11:07

and maybe like whether there is nodes in the pelvis or not,

11:10

and nothing that interprets me, right?

11:13

Do do you do, can you picture this right?

11:16

Uh, cervical cancer, maybe pelvic lymph nodes,

11:20

no ilia cor aortic lymph nodes, right?

11:23

Not, it's not, I'm not talking about tub clavicular even I'm

11:25

talking about intra nodes.

11:27

Cool. You did you, can you picture this?

11:31

Alright, I personally wouldn't call this

11:35

intra a metastatic.

11:37

I wouldn't, I would call this favors introverted blsm such

11:42

as polymorphic, um, adenoma.

11:46

Right? Why? Because like what you're saying,

11:48

this pattern doesn't match, it doesn't make sense that this,

11:53

that the, that the cervical cancer would jump

11:56

to the intra lymph node without tracking all the way.

12:01

I agree. We are the doctors of patterns.

12:05

I don't wait for the surgeons to tell me that

12:07

what you're saying doesn't make sense.

12:08

I make sense of my image before he says it.

12:12

I even, I'm the one who always in the tumor board tell them,

12:15

well guys, wait a minute, this doesn't make sense.

12:18

This node doesn't make sense

12:20

to be metastatic from this cancer.

12:23

When, when there is no intervening nodes, I am the one

12:26

who says that, I don't wait for him to say that,

12:29

but this node makes sense to be metastatic

12:32

because the, this is called the node.

12:34

No, this is a known drainage nodes

12:38

for the GI cancers.

12:40

It makes sense. Look at the map, right?

12:44

So this is, this is a different situation, right?

12:47

You have a colon cancer with metastatic retro al

12:51

and mesenteric nodes and the supraclavicular node.

12:53

This is absolutely a log, a logic situation.

12:59

It's different than what we're de what you're describing.

13:03

And lymphatic metastasis is a root

13:06

and hematogenous metas metastasis is a different root.

13:10

I don't need, uh, lung

13:12

and liver metastasis to see lymphatic metastasis.

13:15

These are two different root of metastasis, right?

13:17

Hematogenous versus lymphatic. These, these are not linked.

13:21

Sometimes I have a primary cancers with liver mets

13:25

and not a single lymph node.

13:28

They don't come sequential.

13:30

The patient doesn't have to have lymphatic metastasis

13:32

before he has hematogenous metastasis.

13:35

Nope, he doesn't because sometimes the primary sites start,

13:39

um, invading and um, uh, eroding capillaries

13:43

and hit the bloodstream

13:45

and boom, he goes to the, to the, you know, organs

13:50

before even he hits the lymphatics, right?

13:55

Okay, perfect. Exactly The colon cancer.

13:58

And you don't have to have lymphatic metastasis

14:00

before you have hematogenous metastasis.

14:02

You don't have to have that. I, I really do have patients

14:06

with primary side liver mets and maybe sometimes lung

14:10

or bone mets without lymphatic metastasis.

14:13

You do, you can have that because these are two separate

14:15

routes of metastasis.

14:17

They happen independently, right?

14:20

But lymphatic metastasis are predictable except in one

14:25

situation, if there is violation of the meta

14:27

of the lymphatics, meaning if this patient had uh,

14:30

lymph lymphatic dissection, they did surgery

14:34

and they did lymphatic dissection, once they do that,

14:37

they violated the lymphatic system.

14:39

Then eight, we see atypical lymphatic, uh,

14:42

metastasis happening.

14:44

Then we see like lymphatic mes going to weird locations

14:48

and you cannot say, oh, this doesn't make sense anymore

14:51

because they violated the lymphatic system.

14:53

Then it can throw mes somewhere that you don't expect.

14:56

But as long as this is a native lymphatic system

14:59

that wasn't touched, it's predictable

15:02

where it should go first before it goes next.

15:04

And the sub lab clavicular node,

15:06

node is an expected metastatic, uh, site for this cancer.

15:12

So this makes sense. It's not unpredictable.

15:15

The nobody, a GI oncologist is not gonna object to you

15:18

and say, okay, it doesn't make sense.

15:19

No, they won't ask for biopsy, I promise.

15:21

We have tumor boards too. We discuss these cases.

15:24

So they don't only, only look at our report,

15:26

plus they call us on our reading rooms

15:28

and they discuss these cases with us

15:29

and they come to our reading rooms.

15:31

So we're not hiding in, um, in rooms anymore.

15:34

They don't only see our reports, they know us

15:36

and they call us all the time we discuss these patients.

15:38

Nobody will ask for biosis for this

15:40

and this, uh, the look of this node, see

15:42

how it's surrounded, how hot it is.

15:45

There is no need for biopsy. This is assure metastatic node.

15:50

I don't need to biopsy this node. No, it doesn't matter.

15:54

Five. I don't have myself,

15:56

I don't like even when resident ask me these questions,

15:59

I don't like this threshold for SUVs, right?

16:01

Because SUVs is different. You use, if you use,

16:04

do you use body weight normalize SUV V

16:06

or do you use limb body mass?

16:07

Normalized SUV. The is the, the level

16:10

of SUV is gonna be different based on that, right?

16:12

The scanner, like how, how do you like, you know, the,

16:15

the techniques, do you weigh your patient

16:18

or do you ask the patient you shouldn't ask your patient The

16:20

weight should weigh your patient, right?

16:21

Technical. Yeah. Uh, yeah, exactly.

16:24

So I'm not asking you specifically,

16:26

but what I'm trying to say is that lean body mass,

16:29

normalized SUVs are lower than body weight

16:31

and I believe, I believe they are the better ones.

16:34

Although, although I couldn't move us to them yet.

16:37

I still, we still use the body weight

16:38

normalized, although I hate it.

16:40

Um, but lean body mass normalized, uh, SUVs are better.

16:45

Um, and we can have another session just to talk about that.

16:49

Um, but what I'm trying to say is that it's the,

16:52

it's the context, right?

16:54

SUVs just crude UV is not numbers, is not,

16:58

how big is this node?

16:59

If the node is, um,

17:02

five millimeter node, right?

17:05

But it's rounded, it's, it's in the right location

17:07

and it's, it's 2.5, right?

17:11

I might call it suspicious node. I don't care.

17:14

It didn't hit your threshold, right?

17:17

So it's, it's the context.

17:19

I don't, I'm not a big believer of a an SUV threshold

17:23

and I don't, I never give an SUV threshold to anyone.

17:26

It's a context of what are you looking at?

17:29

What type of cancer are we talking about?

17:32

What pharmaceutical are we talking about?

17:34

There's a lot of factors that feed into the SUV, right?

17:38

So you're talking about

17:43

SUV we less than five and background of previous,

17:48

what is CBNA?

17:49

I'm not previous tb.

17:53

What's cb what, what is that?

17:57

Which is prevalent in,

18:04

I'm sorry.

18:04

I'm not the best person with acronyms,

18:07

so I'm not sure what I understand.

18:08

What is this cubicle which is prevalent

18:12

in, is it Saudi Arabia?

18:14

sa South Africa? Okay. No, no, no, no, no. Please.

18:20

Um, no tuber closes is is still prevalent in many places.

18:24

Um, this is what I'm saying.

18:26

This is what I'm saying exactly.

18:28

Um, all your concerned

18:32

that this is infection just one lymph node in the sub

18:35

clavicular and the lungs is clean and nothing in the hilum

18:38

and nothing in, you know what I mean?

18:39

Again, the context, this is what I'm saying.

18:42

No calcification, nothing in the lungs,

18:45

nothing in the hilum, just one

18:48

s supraclavicular lymph node in the context of a, um,

18:50

metastatic colon cancer into the,

18:53

to the, you know what I mean?

18:55

Wouldn't this be unlikely to be tb? What do you think?

19:01

Okay. Yes. But why would be this supraclavicular node hot

19:05

from TB while everything else is called the,

19:10

the context would be this is a metastatic lymph node with

19:14

a patient with old heeled TB

19:20

or old, um, granulomatous disease.

19:23

We, what we have here in, in the states more is, um,

19:26

histoplasmosis for example, we have a lot of patients

19:29

with tr uh, granulomatous disease.

19:32

Histoplasmosis is one of them.

19:33

Sarcoidosis is more prevalent than TB here, for example.

19:37

And we have a lot of patients, I have a lot, many

19:39

of my patients have calcified, um, lung modules, uh,

19:43

I mean calcified to um, granulomas

19:46

and um, calcified, uh, lymph nodes as well.

19:49

But these are burned out lymph

19:50

nodes and they have their patterns.

19:52

Okay? Okay. We agree.

Report

Please note: Items with dashed lines (--) are information withheld as it is not relevant for you to arrive at the correct findings and impression for the report and/or it was withheld for privacy information. The items were left in to show you the typical information documented in a PET report.

Clinical Indication:
---year-old female newly diagnosed with right colon cancer on colonoscopy presenting for staging and initial treatment planning.

Technique:
Preparation: Last oral intake (except water) on --at --.
Diabetic: --.
Blood glucose at time of FDG administration: --- mg/dL.
Radiopharmaceutical: -- mCi of F-18 FDG administered IV at -- at --.
Incubation interval: -- minutes.
Oral contrast: --.
Positioning: Arms raised
PET/CT scanner: ---.
PET/CT acquisition: Vertex-to-midthigh.
PET reconstruction method: ---
Standardized uptake value (SUV): Corrected for body weight only.
CT: Low-dose, non-breath-hold, without intravenous contrast.
TOTAL DLP (Dose Length Product): -- mGy cm.

Comparison/Correlation:
--

Findings:
Technical quality: Diagnostic.
Measurements: Unless otherwise specified, all SUVs refer to maximum value in the target (mSUV) and all CT linear measurements are performed on axial images.

Reference: mean SUV liver: ----

Head and Neck:
Two moderate to intensely hypermetabolic metastatic left supraclavicular lymph nodes in the following locations:

11 x 9 mm lymph node maximum SUV 6.4
7 x 4 mm lymph node maximum SUV 4.2
Unremarkable thyroid gland.
The visualized paranasal sinuses and mastoid air cells are clear.
Cervical muscle physiologic uptake.


Chest:
No suspicious metabolically active lesions within the chest.
No suspicious metabolically active or pathologically enlarged hilar or mediastinal adenopathy.
No suspicious pulmonary nodules or masses.
Scattered tiny noncalcified clustering pulmonary nodule smaller than 5 mm showing no significant FDG uptake, below PET resolution.
Sequelae of prior granulomatous insult.
No pleural effusion, pericardial effusion or pneumothorax.
Left chest wall generator dual-chamber AICD.


Abdomen and Pelvis:
Intensely hypermetabolic approximately 32 x 31 mm mass within the hepatic flexure with associated diverticulitis and surrounding fat stranding, maximum SUV 13.9, consistent with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma.
Multiple small to borderline-enlarged hypermetabolic metastatic periaortic and mesenteric adenopathy. Index nodes are:

The dominant lymph node measures 18 x 17 mm aortocaval lymph node maximum SUV 7.8
9 x 8 mm left para-aortic lymph node maximum SUV 2.5
8 x 7 mm mesenteric node with maximum SUV 4.3
Diverticular disease most extensive within the sigmoid colon.
Calcified splenic granulomas.
Hysterectomy.
Surgical clips from prior right adrenalectomy.
Unremarkable liver, gallbladder, spleen, pancreas, kidneys and adrenals.
No ascites.


Skeleton and Soft Tissues:
No suspicious metabolically active lesions within the skeleton and soft tissues.
No aggressive lytic or sclerotic lesions.
Multilevel degenerative changes.
Thoracolumbar scoliosis.

Impression:
1. Intensely hypermetabolic hepatic flexure mass, consistent with biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma.
2. Metastatic small to borderline-enlarged hypermetabolic periaortic and mesenteric and left supraclavicular adenopathy.
3. No convincing evidence of metabolically active distant metastatic disease to visceral organs or osseous structures.

Case Discussion

Faculty

Riham El Khouli, MD

Associate Professor of Radiology, Chief, Division of Nuclear Medicine/Molecular Imaging & Radiotheranostics

University of Kentucky

Michael F. Shriver, MD

Director of Nuclear Medicine

Proscan-NCH Imaging

Tags

PET/CT FDG

PET

Nuclear Medicine

Large Bowel-Colon

CT