Interactive Transcript
0:00
What are the factors affecting X-ray emission?
0:03
Let's examine the factors affecting the X-ray emission.
0:08
First and foremost,
0:10
we want a high-quality X-ray because that will describe the
0:14
penetrability. The quality of the X-rays will
0:17
determine how good it is to penetrate through the material,
0:22
and this quality is determined by the tube voltage.
0:26
I'm talking about the tube voltage set between the anode and cathode, which
0:30
will accelerate the electron at certain speed.
0:33
So higher the speed of the electron hitting the anode
0:37
will result in the X-rays of a greater energy.
0:42
Higher energy X-ray photon have higher quality,
0:45
means they can penetrate much thicker.
0:50
The second factor is the quantity.
0:53
The number of photon, X-ray photons, produced is
0:57
determined by the quantity of X-rays,
1:00
and that's determined by the tube current.
1:04
And it means this tube current is the tube current you set on the
1:07
cathode, where you results in the electron emitting out,
1:11
which are then results in X-ray production.
1:14
Therefore, the quality is defined by the tube voltage.
1:18
The quantity is kind of defined, determined by the tube current.
1:22
Then we have the intensity. Intensity is how
1:25
the X-ray intensity coming out and reaching the patient.
1:30
There are different factors which affect X-ray tube emission.
1:34
First and foremost is the target material.
1:36
What type of target material? The common target material is
1:40
tungsten. We also use molybdenum and rhodium,
1:44
which are used specifically more so in mammography
1:48
X-ray tube. The other factors are the tube voltage,
1:53
the tube current,
1:55
and then the generator X waveform.
1:57
That's a generator of the X-ray generator.
1:59
To a large extent, that is negated now because most of them are constant
2:03
potential generator.
2:06
Then the other factor which affect X-ray emission is the exposure time
2:10
and the beam filtration.
2:13
This is one of the few equations I'm going to show.
2:17
The intensity of the X-ray emission is given by this formula,
2:22
which is a combination of the atomic number of the target,
2:25
that is a Z target, multiplied by the kV square,
2:30
that is applied tube potential,
2:32
and the tube current. And then there is also called as a B,
2:36
attenuation factor, which is the self-absorption of the
2:40
X-rays by the anode itself and any of the
2:44
filtration we're going to insert it, and then multiplied by the K,
2:48
which is a waveform factor.
2:50
Nowadays, K is almost one, so which is more of a factor of the
2:54
Z target, kV square, mA, and the B.
2:59
So here is what is called the relative intensity.
3:02
On the Y-axis is called the relative photon
3:06
fluence,
3:07
and on the X-axis is the energy.
3:10
If we notice, the X-ray energies go anywhere from zero to 100 kV,
3:14
120 kV, not beyond that.
3:18
So you can see here the X-ray spectrum in different levels.
3:22
And here, this is the relative intensity is
3:25
proportional to the square of the kV in a
3:29
diagnostic energy range,
3:31
which means the intensity is proportional to kV square.
3:36
So if we have set the intensity voltage at 80 kV,
3:40
the next one is 160 kV. The ratio is the
3:44
80 kV X-rays have almost a higher intensity, almost 80%
3:48
higher in intensity.
3:50
So you can see here, these are different-- They are all the same tube
3:54
current, but different tube voltage, 60, 80, 100, and
3:58
120. You can see the intensity changing.
4:01
The quantity of the X-ray produced is proportional to Z
4:05
target,
4:07
kV square, and the product of mA
4:11
times time. That is mAs.
4:15
What I want to show here is the relative intensity to show you how
4:19
different factors used in the imaging can
4:23
change the intensities.
4:25
On this particular spectrum, between A and B, the
4:29
target is the same tungsten target,
4:32
and the only difference between these two is the tube current.
4:37
If you look in here, this is a 65.
4:39
This is also 65 tube voltage. That's why you see the end of the photon
4:43
producing the maximum tube voltage is few of them, and it
4:47
ends here.
4:49
The intensity, the number of photon produced increases with the
4:53
tube current here.
4:55
On the other side, the difference between these two, it is done at
4:59
100 kV,
5:01
and now there is 250 mA, and this is 500 mA.
5:05
The spectrum is exactly the same. Now it is moved towards the right side,
5:09
towards the maximum is 100 kV.
5:11
Because the tungsten target has filter, you can see the
5:14
characteristic also showing up here.
5:18
When you talk about X-ray absorption, we also talk about
5:21
attenuation.
5:23
Attenuation is a way to think about how many of the X-rays
5:27
interacting with matter is removed or absorbed.
5:32
It's called as removal of photons from beam of X-ray or
5:35
gamma rays as it passes through matter.
5:40
In this attenuation, the absorption and
5:43
scattering will contribute towards the attenuation.
5:47
Especially in soft tissue,
5:50
the photoelectric absorption dominates at low energy, as we
5:54
discussed earlier.
5:56
For in soft tissue, Compton scattering dominates at higher energy.
6:01
The Rayleigh scatter occurs so low probability it is hardly we discuss it.
6:05
Approximately 10% interaction in mammography and 5%
6:09
in just radiography.
6:11
At very high photon energy, greater than
6:14
1.02 MeV, we see pair production which
6:18
contribute to attenuation, and that's typically discussed in nuclear
6:22
medicine and PET imaging and so forth.
6:27
We define a term called linear attenuation coefficient,
6:31
and also a mass attenuation coefficient.
6:35
What's the difference between the two?
6:37
The linear attenuation coefficient divided by the density of the
6:40
material will give you what is called as a mass attenuation coefficient.
6:45
What is linear attenuation coefficient?
6:48
It is the fraction of the photons removed from
6:52
monoenergetic beam of X-ray or gamma
6:55
rays per unit thickness of material.
6:59
For most of the image radiography, we don't use a
7:02
monoenergetic, we use a Bremsstrahlung radiation, but still,
7:06
some of the concept really still holds.
7:08
So the linear attenuation coefficient is defined as
7:12
mu and the unit is how much X-rays absorbed per
7:15
centimeter of the material it's interacting.
7:18
And if you want to normalize to the density, if you divide this by the
7:22
gram, the density, then the unit will become mass attenuation
7:26
coefficient. Unit is centimeter squared by gram.
7:31
So let's examine here the attenuation through multiple material.
7:35
If there is only one material of certain thickness, and if you're able
7:39
to measure the intensity of the X-rays before it hit the
7:43
material and after it came out of the material, we can
7:46
approximately write a mathematical equation as follows: I
7:50
equals I naught e to the power of minus mu x,
7:54
where I naught is the incident intensity of the incident X-rays,
7:58
and there is what is an attenuation factor.
8:01
That is an exponential factor which depends on the linear
8:05
attenuation coefficient and the thickness of the material.
8:10
If you have a multiple material, you can write similarly the same equation,
8:14
and that's also the principle behind CT, and that's also
8:18
why in CT, we need collection around the object of
8:21
multiple times.
8:24
We also what is called as a 400 kV photon
8:28
transversing through the soft tissue, the attenuation coefficient is
8:32
0.016 per centimeter.
8:35
For every millimeter, about 0.16 is
8:39
absorbed. That means if there are 100
8:42
monoenergetic photon interact with one millimeter thick
8:46
of tissue, approximately 16 will be removed
8:50
from beam due to absorption and scattering.
8:53
That's the reason why it is important to mitigate the scatter.
8:58
Similarly, we can write equation, the same mathematical expression.
9:01
We can calculate the number of photon produced, and then by the
9:05
attenuation coefficient.
9:07
Shown here is a table of linear attenuation
9:11
coefficient of different material of interest in radiography and in
9:15
medical X-ray imaging.
9:17
You can see that the difference in the attenuation is quite
9:21
small between this fatty and ice or water.
9:25
Whereas compact bone,
9:27
water, and air, you can see a dramatic difference.
9:31
That's why you can easily see the difference in the image of these three
9:35
different material.
9:37
We also introduce a concept called half value layer.
9:41
What it means is like it is the amount of material you need to put
9:46
to reduce the intensity of the X-rays by one half.
9:50
Why is this important? We're going to see because object will
9:54
block, the patient will absorb
9:57
certain amount of X-rays as it passes through, and that's defined by
10:01
the half value layer.
10:03
It is an indirect measure of the photon energies of the beam
10:08
when measured in a narrow beam. If we can measure in a narrow beam,
10:12
it'll tell you how much of it is absorbed per centimeter or per millimeter.
10:17
Here is an example of the effective energy with respect to half
10:21
value layer.
10:23
Since X-ray beam are polyenergetic,
10:25
finding half value layer is a way to characterize the
10:29
penetratability of the X-rays. Effective energy is
10:33
estimated by the penetration of power of X-rays.
10:37
Typically, you can see here
10:39
the effective energy is one third to one half of the
10:43
maximum value.