Interactive Transcript
0:01
This section is on MRI safety structures and tools,
0:05
the object of which is to help identify policies
0:10
and practices, staffing structures,
0:14
communication hierarchies,
0:16
or organizations that allow the radiologists to
0:20
more effectively manage best practices for
0:25
MRI safety at the point of care.
0:28
So if you are in fact the captain of the ship, which you are,
0:33
who are your executive offices,
0:36
who do you turn to to make sure that practices
0:41
get exercised as appropriate?
0:44
So if we start with the fact that there is a radiology group
0:49
and somewhere there are a collection of Mr. Technologists,
0:55
how does that relationship between the radiologist and the technologist
0:59
performing the scans, how does that relationship work out?
1:04
We could have 20 points of contact from the radiologist to 40
1:08
or 50 points of contact with the MRI technologists,
1:12
or we could do something different.
1:16
We could essentially appoint an individual on behalf of the radiology
1:20
group who is the MR. Medical Director, Mr. Md,
1:25
and we could from the technologist,
1:27
appoint an individual or a role that is the MR.
1:31
Safety officer.
1:34
And the primary point of communication or
1:38
discussion with respect to MRI patient safety related
1:43
concerns would then be between the safety officer and the MR
1:48
Medical director. Now we can't have Mr.
1:53
Medical Director or Mr. Safety officer working 24 hour shifts,
1:56
365 days a year.
1:59
So there are going to be times when the MR Technologists
2:04
will bypass the safety officer to get to the medical director or to get
2:09
to other radiologists in the group.
2:12
But establishing the structures for clinical decision making
2:17
can go a long way to providing a higher degree of uniformity
2:23
in terms of patient care decisions.
2:25
There will also come times when there are particularly
2:30
troubling questions,
2:32
questions that can't really be effectively answered by the disclosures or
2:37
information from the implant or device manufacturer.
2:41
Maybe this patient has an entire alphabet of
2:46
different implants and devices,
2:49
and all we can find are information from individual
2:53
manufacturers about the individual device safety for one
2:58
particular
2:58
Object and nothing about how we go about assessing the safety of a patient
3:03
in whom there are multitudes of different implants or devices.
3:08
So between the MR Medical Director and the MR Safety officer,
3:13
when we are unable to fully respond to
3:18
risk assessments or questions about safety,
3:20
it may be important to bring in an MR. Safety expert,
3:25
somebody who as a consultant to the teams, the radiologists,
3:30
and the MR Technologists and their representatives,
3:33
the MR Medical Director and the MR Safety officer.
3:37
It may be appropriate to bring in the MR Safety expert a phone, a friend,
3:42
if you will,
3:43
that can bring to the discussion a higher degree of
3:48
understanding of the physical properties of MR Safety
3:53
and the interactions between the electromagnetic fields of the MRI
3:58
and various implants, devices, and foreign bodies.
4:03
One of the most essential elements for a safe operating
4:09
facility is to have documented MR Safety policies and
4:14
procedures. It is vitally important that these are documented.
4:19
We want to be able to share them between and among administration,
4:23
radiologists and Mr.
4:25
Technologists and any support staff because we want to have everybody
4:30
working from a common playbook.
4:33
If you feel as though your policies or standard
4:38
practices shouldn't be documented,
4:42
ask yourself the question, why do you feel they shouldn't be documented?
4:47
If you're representing them as best practice,
4:51
what would be the reservation against having them documented?
4:55
Your policies and procedures really should be part of a triangle, right?
5:00
Your policies and procedures need to be informed by best practices,
5:04
and they need to be reconciled against the site
5:09
practices. If your policy says, we always do this,
5:14
but the practice is eh, sometimes we do that, sometimes we don't.
5:19
Then there is disagreement between the policy and practice.
5:24
If your policy says something different than industry best
5:29
practices, then God forbid something goes wrong,
5:33
you are going to have a hard time reconciling what your policy says
5:38
against industry best practices or widely regarded safety
5:43
best practices.
5:44
So we want to form a triangle between industry best practices,
5:49
industry standard, MR Safety guidance,
5:52
your local policies and procedures and the actual
5:57
Practices at the point of care.
5:59
And all three of those need to agree to greater or
6:04
lesser extents. You need to be able to reconcile one against the other.
6:08
We wanna review those policies and reconcile policies against
6:13
best practices and practices on a regular basis.
6:18
I recommend at least annually in addition to that,
6:22
anytime there is a big change, a new MR system,
6:26
new clinical capabilities,
6:28
a new referring physician who wants you to do something you've never done before
6:33
under any of those prompts, MR.
6:37
Safety best practices and your site practices really
6:42
need to be re-reviewed and reconciled against one another given the new
6:47
equipment or new clinical demands.
6:50
One thing you may find very helpful as an element of your policies
6:56
and procedures are documented decision support tools.
7:01
Previously we discussed how training for radiologists in
7:05
MRI safety might be all over the map.
7:08
You may have radiologists within your practice who have wildly
7:13
different understandings of MRI safety based on wildly different
7:19
trainings that they might have received during their residency.
7:23
So how do we deliver a more uniform form of patient
7:27
care?
7:28
Decision support tools can be excellent tools in that they can get
7:34
practitioners who have multiple different levels of experience or expertise.
7:39
We can get them on the same page.
7:42
Decision support tools generally won't cover the the far out stuff,
7:46
the once in a blue moon stuff,
7:49
but we can pretty regularly build decision support tools that will
7:54
reliably cover 70 80% of our MR patient
7:58
population without much trouble.
8:02
When you have these decision support tools,
8:05
it can dramatically reduce the variability in care.
8:09
I've worked with sites that essentially the rad techs knew
8:14
where to shop for the answer that they were expecting or that they wanted
8:19
between and among the radiologists who were on that day that there were
8:23
radiologists who they could be guaranteed to postpone a study
8:28
because the radiologist was concerned about putting their name to going
8:32
forward and their radiologist they knew to call because that guy will approve
8:38
anything. I would argue that you don't want to be at either end of the spectrum,
8:43
either scared of your own shadow or so cavalier, you approve everything.
8:47
I think each of those are dangerous in different ways.
8:51
You wanna really move towards capturing best practices and
8:56
decision support tools can turn many of the best practices into
9:01
algorithms.
9:03
This is one example of a decision support tool.
9:08
This is one that I developed with a radiology practice and
9:13
the hospital that the practice worked with.
9:16
This essentially takes a patient with an implant, a device, a foreign body,
9:21
and runs through a series of yes no questions
9:26
to get you to a resultant answer.
9:30
And I wanna point out for you that the resultant answer doesn't have to be yes,
9:34
no, that in this case there are four possible outcomes.
9:40
There are proceed without any limitations.
9:45
There are proceed with some prescribed limitations.
9:50
In this particular case,
9:51
this hospital had both 1.5 and three T magnets.
9:55
And so the proceed with limitations is you're gonna scan this patient on the
10:00
1.5, not on the three in normal operating mode,
10:04
which is gonna limit you to two watts per kilogram sar maximum 15 minute
10:09
per pulse sequence,
10:10
unless you're doing some kind of therapeutic something or other 15 minutes per
10:14
pulse sequence is really not that much of a restriction.
10:17
So this site had yes without restriction, yes,
10:21
with radiologist imposed restriction or what we call the yellow
10:26
flags, call the radiologist for review. We're not saying no,
10:30
but we're also not saying yes, at least not without a consult.
10:35
So collect as much information as you can about the relative risks,
10:40
the implant, the device, the foreign body,
10:42
the study that we're going to hopefully proceed with and the radiologist will
10:47
direct, yes or no. There are a small number,
10:50
but there still are some conditions where it's really not
10:55
ambiguous that this patient really should not receive an MR study.
11:01
So yes, without restrictions, yes,
11:03
with radiologist defined restrictions, uh,
11:07
call us before making a decision to go forward or not,
11:12
and no, we're not scanning this patient.
11:15
So your decision support tools can be as
11:21
simplified or as complicated as you wish them to be.
11:26
I think that this is generally speaking,
11:28
a good balance between simplicity and complexity.
11:33
It covers a wide range of implants. Devices in foreign bodies,
11:37
again, doesn't cover everything.
11:40
But at this particular facility with this radiologist practice,
11:44
this decision support tool does cover probably three quarters of
11:49
the patients and their potential complications.
11:53
My apologies to the Dummies Guides folks.
11:56
This is not a real publication. I wish it were.
12:01
But I think our policies and procedures,
12:04
we need to think of them in different terms. They need to not be
12:10
a super short bullet pointed list of
12:15
do this, don't do that.
12:16
But I think we should look at our MRI safety policies and procedures
12:22
as an onboarding tool for the new radiologist, the new MRI technologist.
12:28
We should be able to sit a brand new hire down with
12:33
our policy and procedure manual and instruct them that
12:37
following just the written direction in the policy and procedure manual,
12:42
they should make determinations about the care of individual patients.
12:47
If you look through your policy and procedure manual and you don't feel
12:52
like it achieves that, in my opinion,
12:57
the reason for that is probably because it's not detailed enough.
13:00
And I would encourage you to rethink the intent behind your policies and
13:05
procedure manuals. Now,
13:07
while I am laying a lot of the responsibility for MRI safety
13:12
at the feet of radiologists,
13:15
and I expect that there is a natural reaction to say,
13:20
but MRI safety is everybody's responsibility.
13:24
I wanna share with you this story.
13:26
The woman whose picture is on the screen right now,
13:29
her name was Kitty Visi and I believe she was a nurse and works
13:34
second shift in New York City.
13:37
So she gets off shift at somewhere around midnight,
13:40
makes it home to her apartment,
13:43
a large multi-story U-shaped apartment building,
13:47
and you enter into the central courtyard and you pass the central courtyard to
13:51
go into the back of the U to enter the building.
13:55
And then you go up to your various apartments.
13:57
So there are dozens and dozens of apartments that look into the central
14:02
courtyard and dozens and dozens that look out into the rest of the city.
14:07
So Kitty Jeni comes home at,
14:11
we'll say one o'clock in the morning after her shift at the hospital,
14:16
and she encounters a mugger in the central courtyard of her apartment
14:21
building, and the mugger attacks her and she screams for help,
14:27
and the mugger silences her by beating her to death in the central courtyard
14:32
of the apartment building.
14:34
The police are not called until five o'clock in the morning when some early
14:38
risers make their way out and discover her corpse in the central courtyard
14:43
of the apartment building. The police arrive and they're just dumbfounded.
14:48
How on earth could nobody
14:50
Have called when this woman was being assaulted?
14:54
A bunch of psychology researchers are also curious about this.
14:58
And so parallel to the police investigation,
15:02
they begin a research project where they go house to house or apartment
15:07
to apartment throughout the apartment building,
15:10
identifying folks who saw or heard anything about Ms.
15:15
Genovese's attack.
15:17
Turns out that they positively identified 37
15:23
individuals who saw her being attacked and murdered.
15:27
37 people who didn't call the police.
15:32
And each and every one of them individually when
15:36
interviewed said,
15:38
there are so many apartments overlooking this central courtyard,
15:43
surely somebody else called the police.
15:46
The reason that I bring up this anecdote that on its surface has
15:51
absolutely nothing to do with MRI safety is because there is this
15:56
pervasive, I don't want to call it an excuse,
15:59
but there is this pervasive theory that MRI safety is
16:05
everyone's responsibility.
16:07
That shared sense of responsibility without
16:11
individual accountability is the exact same recipe
16:17
as the residents in Kitty Genovese's apartment complex,
16:22
right?
16:23
MRI safety is not everybody's responsibility.
16:28
It is your responsibility.
16:31
Specifically radiologists have an affirmative responsibility,
16:36
an affirmative duty to the safe delivery of MRI care.
16:41
It may seem a challenge given the time
16:46
and space that radiologists are separated from exam administration.
16:51
It may seem an impracticability given Mr
16:56
Technologists proximity to MR Studies,
17:00
and surely they should be the ones who are responsible.
17:04
And while they should have individual accountability for performing
17:09
the actions described in the policies and procedures by following the direction
17:14
of the supervising physician,
17:16
it is ultimately the captain of the ship, the supervising physician,
17:21
the radiologist in most cases for mri,
17:25
who has the ultimate responsibility for the delivery of safe
17:30
care in the MRI environment.
17:33
So if this makes you feel nervous about your responsibilities,
17:38
there's some good news.
17:40
Good news is that there are many excellent resources that can
17:45
help you manage this. One of the top,
17:48
If not the top on the list, not only just because I've listed it here first,
17:53
but in terms of its depth and breadth,
17:56
is the ACR manual on MR. Safety
18:00
for contrast related safety issues,
18:04
the ACR contrast manual also excellent,
18:07
and obviously the contrast manual includes guidance for
18:12
all different forms of contrast. And for mri,
18:15
we're particularly interested in the gadolinium contrast portion.
18:20
There are a amazing publications from the Heart Rhythm Society
18:25
and the American Society of Anesthesiology covering MRI
18:31
and interaction with active implanted cardiac devices,
18:35
pacemakers and defibrillators from the Heart Rhythm Society,
18:39
and patients undergoing heavy sedation or general anesthesia
18:43
from the asa brilliant publications, both of them.
18:48
If you're looking at a situation with a more specific question,
18:53
can I scan a patient who has this particular implant?
18:57
Can I go off label in the following manner?
19:00
There are multitudes of peer reviewed publications
19:05
on specific concerns and some on much broader related
19:10
MRI safety guidance.
19:12
All you need is Google and you can retrieve all kinds of excellent
19:17
resources that will inform your clinical decision making.
19:22
So in summary, MRI accidents,
19:26
they continue and they can have grave consequences
19:30
despite the fact that we continue to identify M R MRI as the quote
19:35
unquote safe modality.
19:37
If we are expecting licensure or accreditation or
19:42
regulation to offer some sort of acceptable floor
19:48
defining minimum best practices for safety of our patients and our caregivers.
19:54
Think again, regulation, accreditation, licensure.
19:58
These have not kept up with changes in the MRI risk
20:03
profile, and that change is not slowing down, that change is accelerating.
20:09
There are many different attributes of MRI risk from
20:14
the MRI systems,
20:15
scanners and hardware and software to the clinical changes in the way
20:20
we use MRI to operational struggles,
20:24
to questions about implants or devices and going off label or staying
20:29
on label.
20:30
Each of these require effective management to help assure the safety of
20:35
our MRI patients, and ultimately,
20:39
despite time and space separation from the administration of the MRI exam,
20:44
the radiologist has a direct
20:47
Responsibility for the safe delivery of care in the MRI environment.
20:52
With that, I would like to thank you very much for your time and attention.
20:57
I hope that this mastery course has been valuable to you and has set you on a
21:01
course to learn more about MRI safety and the role of the
21:06
radiologist.
21:08
If you have any questions outside of the context of this particular course,
21:13
I invite you to contact me.
21:15
I would also like to extend to you an invitation if you would,
21:19
would like to join the Facebook MRI Safety Group page.
21:24
This is an incredible peer-to-peer resource where many
21:29
MRI safety questions or concerns or patient care scenarios can be addressed
21:34
by peers and experts from around the world. Thank you very much.