Interactive Transcript
0:00
So let's look at a few real-world cases demonstrating diagnostic
0:03
reasoning and potential complications and
0:06
image data biopsies of introdominal lesions.
0:09
So here we have a 66 year old female with history
0:12
of microscopic colitis presenting with 10 days of abdominal distention
0:15
pain and dark stools.
0:19
So unliker typical Colitis symptoms, the pain is
0:22
actually not a alleviated with bowel movements and she
0:25
also notes but 25 pounds of weight loss
0:28
within the last year.
0:30
Her vital signs are within the limits of normal. Her examination is
0:33
notable for some abdominal distention was shifting
0:36
downness.
0:38
Bedside ultrasound confirms societies labs are
0:41
notable for a ca-125 greater than
0:44
2000 here. We see a physician performing a paracentesis and
0:47
the fluid that is aspirated
0:50
the parasitesis yields as clear
0:53
yellow fluid.
0:55
The question for you is the patient's age and extreme
0:58
ca-125 elevation rates suspicion for
1:02
what?
1:03
tuberculosis cholangiocarcinoma
1:06
messenger lymphoma
1:08
Wolverine cancer
1:10
the patient's age in extreme ca-125
1:13
elevation Ray suspicion for ovarian cancer.
1:17
So ca-125 is a particularly strong and
1:20
though often non-specific Mark of neoplastic pathology.
1:23
That is more commonly associated with gynecologic malignancies
1:26
than other options given
1:30
so what are our next steps So the patient's paracentes is
1:33
report is submitted for fluid insideologic analysis.
1:37
Song the serum albumin site is
1:40
gradient is less than 1.1 suggesting non portal etiology
1:43
of cirrhosis.
1:46
The cytology suggests malignant cells of non-matopoietic origin
1:49
requiring further sampling for full characterization.
1:53
The patient is then sent from abdominal CT
1:56
with contrast.
1:58
So what do we see?
2:09
If you thought that there was large volume ascites, then
2:12
you would have been spot on.
2:14
So there's this a regular enhancing nodularity
2:17
around the right pelvic sidewall the
2:20
reproductive organ evaluations, although a little
2:23
limited secondary the street artifact from the bilateral hip
2:26
prosthesis, but something I'm
2:29
turning is there.
2:31
So the patient is referred for transvaginal ultrasound,
2:34
which we see to the right.
2:36
And the impression on that is similar societies with
2:40
low level internal Echoes, but then there's thought to
2:43
be this tubular echogenic soft tissue mass in the right pelvicidal with
2:46
potential thrombosis of the ovarian vein.
2:50
So the question for you, so given this patient's history of
2:53
hip arthroplasty. How would you further the
2:56
characterize the soft tissue mass in our pelvis?
2:59
Would you consider CT without contrast?
3:01
Would you consider MRI?
3:03
How about an fdg pet scan or perhaps
3:06
a contrast enhanced ultrasound?
3:09
So given the patient's history of hip arthroplasty.
3:12
Perhaps you would consider the soft tissue Mass
3:15
evaluation better supported by an MRI an MRI
3:18
of the pelvis both with and without Ivy contrast
3:21
will actually help to elucidate the soft tissue structure of
3:24
the pelvic pathology. Wow, avoiding
3:27
and mitigating the issues concerning streak artifact
3:30
associated with the patient's hip prosthesis.
3:34
So in the reading room, what do we see here?
3:44
What you would have seen?
3:45
Hopefully is this diffuse peritoneal
3:48
enhancement with areas of peritoneality here?
3:52
We see thickening in this
3:55
particular region.
3:56
And on this region as well.
3:59
markedly enhancing area nodularity particularly
4:02
concerning
4:04
There's concern for the right ovary thought to
4:07
have solid components.
4:09
And in this particular region, there's a
4:12
soft tissue deposit in the gastrocolic space that's concerning
4:15
for metastasis to the gastrocolic ligament
4:18
or Elemental caking.
4:22
Question for you. Now, what will be the next best step to confirm the
4:25
underlying cause of this patient societies?
4:27
Would you consider repeat paracentesis?
4:30
Would you submit genetic testing
4:33
of the acidic fluid?
4:35
Would you perform a biopsy of the gastricolic mass?
4:38
What would you?
4:40
Say no further testing is required.
4:43
If you thought but biops seeing the gastricolic mass was the
4:46
next best step you would have been spot on so given that
4:49
this is likely to represent metastasis labsing
4:52
of the mass within the gastricolic ligamists likely
4:55
to Lucid the underlying primary cancer.
4:59
So which intra abdominal structure is the
5:02
gastrocolic ligamental part of is it the less romantic?
5:06
Is it the Miso colon? Is it the Miso
5:09
salvings?
5:10
Or is it the greater momentum?
5:13
If you set the great omentum.
5:15
Kudos you would have been spot on.
5:18
So the ligaments of the granomentum include as we would
5:21
have mentioned previously the gastrocolic ligament gastrophenic
5:24
gastrosplenic splinterino
5:27
and frenicle Splinter
5:30
ligaments.
5:32
So what are our next steps?
5:34
So the patient undergoes a technically successful core
5:37
needle biopsy of the gastrocolic mass. The histologic
5:40
sample is fixed in formalin and sent
5:43
for pathologic analysis.
5:45
The pathology report for the patient's sample Returns
5:48
the next day.
5:50
And in conclusion, we have high grade serious carcinoma
5:53
malarian origin findings consistent with
5:56
primary ovarian cancer.
5:58
The patient is actually informed appropriately for
6:01
diagnosis and she is then connected with a
6:04
dedicated gynecologic oncologic team for further
6:07
treatment.
6:08
She scheduled for further CTE in order to State your
6:11
cancer and then plans appropriate medical
6:14
therapy targeted towards the ovarian neoplasm.