Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Pitfall: Inaccurate CPR

HIDE
PrevNext

0:00

Okay, this next case is an example of one

0:03

of the pitfalls of using CPR images.

0:07

So CPR images their curved planar reformatted

0:10

images the computer software traces what

0:13

it thinks is the center line

0:16

of the vessel and connects the

0:19

dots all along the length of the vessel and then creates these

0:22

reformatted planes that basically

0:25

are looking at the vessel and for multiple different

0:28

angles with all angles sort of moving through

0:31

the center of the vessel.

0:33

So with those cbrs and you can spin around the center of

0:36

the vessel and get all these great images that we've been looking at.

0:38

A problem that can happen is if the center line

0:41

tracking is inaccurate, then we can get pseudos to

0:44

noses.

0:45

So take a look at the RCA here.

0:48

Looks perfectly normal on this.

0:51

Angle, but then as we scroll around

0:54

you can see this.

0:57

It looks like a stenosis and if all you

1:00

had resist picture.

1:02

You would think for sure that there was a moderate stenosis in

1:05

the mid RCA look kind of fuzzy. Maybe it's from non-calify

1:08

Black.

1:09

And you know, I couldn't fault you. I say the

1:12

exact same thing.

1:14

But what should make you question is how it's so easy

1:17

to scroll in and out of it and then their areas of the perfectly normal.

1:20

And so this should raise your concern

1:23

that maybe this is a tracking problem.

1:27

And so then you go back to the raw data.

1:30

in this case we can pull over the

1:34

stack of thin images

1:36

and look at that region of the RCA, which is right here.

1:40

And I don't see anything looks perfectly

1:43

fine.

1:44

Right, and then you can also do the short axis

1:47

reconstructions.

1:49

and on these short axis reconstructions

1:52

We can also take a look at that same area.

1:56

And if we follow the right coronary from proximal.

1:59

to distal

2:01

nothing

2:03

And so what's happened is that there's a little

2:06

bit of blurring for motion proximally, but that's not the same area down

2:09

distally here. There's nothing so what happened is

2:12

again, the curve cleaner images just

2:15

sort of hopped out of the center line a

2:18

little bit and then hop back in and it can give you this pseudo

2:21

stenosis. So don't rely completely on your

2:24

CPR is always make sure to the cprs and

2:27

your Source data match.

2:29

And you know that'll prevent you from

2:32

making any mistakes. Now one of the thing which I

2:35

think you can see a little bit in the LED here that

2:38

can also happen with

2:40

curve planner images is that oftentimes it'll

2:43

have trouble with tracking when you

2:46

have a really tortuous vessel. So if you look at the

2:49

Led here see there's that little potential stenosis right

2:52

there.

2:53

What that is is it's just a curvy segment of the LED

2:56

when the LED curves a lot like this tracking as

2:59

a density to sort of cut the corner and go basically around

3:02

the edge and when it

3:05

does that if you get the correct angulation, it'll make

3:08

it look like there's a stenosis just

3:11

like that and it's not a true stenosis again. It's just a torch with

3:15

segment and this one honestly is even that tortuous but

3:18

a curved segment can sometimes result in this other

3:21

type of CPR artifact that we see here. So those

3:24

are things you need to avoid to make sure you do not accidentally

3:27

cause something positive for lesion one. You have poor tracking

3:30

the CPR.

3:32

I just notice actually one as we're going through it. Looks like the middle

3:35

idea has some tracking problems see

3:38

that.

3:39

So I don't know what was going on with the computer this day,

3:42

but it was not doing good job with the CPR and we

3:45

have another area of students in the middle ID

3:48

in this particular patient, which if we go back to the raw

3:51

data.

3:52

We can see that the mid LED is is

3:55

perfectly fine.

3:57

Especially when taking a look at that region with the myths.

4:02

So that's an example of pseudosynosis related to

4:05

poor Centerline tracking on the automated CPR

4:08

images.

Report

Faculty

Stefan Loy Zimmerman, MD

Associate Professor of Radiology and Radiological Science

Johns Hopkins Medicine Department of Radiology and Radiological Science

Tags

Vascular

Cardiac CT (SCCT Cat B1 Video Case)

Cardiac

CT