Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Protocols for Imaging and Radiation Dose Considerations

HIDE
PrevNext

0:00

Lung cancer screening CT examinations are performed

0:03

with a low radiation dose exposure.

0:06

We'll talk about why that's important

0:07

and the importance of you

0:08

as a radiologist knowing your protocol

0:11

and checking your radiation dose when you're reading exams.

0:15

So we'll look at low dose CT technique, how to verify

0:19

what the radiation dose exposure was

0:21

for the CT when you're reading the exam,

0:23

and the importance of giving feedback to the CT team

0:26

or your quality control staff when you find deviation so

0:30

that they can problem solve

0:31

and make sure that the dose is low.

0:33

If you remember the eligibility criteria

0:35

for lung cancer screening as being annually from age 50

0:39

to age 80, if patients are starting lung cancer screening

0:43

journey at 50,

0:44

they're having an annual chest CT for 30 years.

0:48

And during that timeframe, they may have an abnormal screen,

0:51

which might require interim CT examinations to assess

0:54

for shorter term nodule growth or pet CT and so on.

0:59

So it's incumbent upon us to create, use a dose protocol

1:02

that is as low as we need to be able

1:05

to get good quality imaging of the chest.

1:07

Unfortunately, the chest being a predominantly air-filled

1:11

structure, we don't need a lot of radiation exposure

1:14

to get high quality images.

1:17

The American College of Radiology, pcit Thoracic Radiology

1:21

Practice Parameter for the Performance

1:23

and reporting of lung cancer screening CT includes specific

1:26

information about elements

1:28

of your lung cancer screening protocol.

1:31

For example, they indicate

1:33

that the slice thickness should be two

1:35

and a half millimeters

1:36

or smaller with reconstruction intervals equal

1:39

or less than the slice thickness.

1:41

It says the examination may be acquired at reconstructed at

1:44

one millimeter slice thickness

1:46

or smaller to allow for better evaluation

1:49

and characterization of small nodules.

1:51

In our practice, we use 1.25 millimeter images

1:55

that are overlapped at 50% intervals or 0.625.

1:59

So we do our chest cts at low dose

2:02

with very thin slice thickness so

2:04

that off the bat we're detecting and characterizing

2:07

and we don't have any CT chest exams in our practice at

2:10

2.5 millimeters or larger.

2:12

So we're a 1.25 millimeter or thinner practice.

2:16

We know that this creates extra images,

2:18

but by using some tools that help you detect and

2:21

and measure nodules, it can mitigate against the pure volume

2:25

of images that you're looking at.

2:27

The practice parameter also talks about radiation dose

2:31

should yield a dose index volume

2:33

of three milligrams or less.

2:35

For a standard size patient.

2:37

We should use lower exposure in smaller patients,

2:40

but we don't need as much radiation dose

2:42

to get good quality images.

2:44

And when we use larger higher dose in patients

2:47

that are larger size to be able to get

2:50

through those chest wall soft tissues

2:52

and get good quality lung pictures.

2:55

So you'll see if you participate in the

2:57

ACRs lung cancer screening

2:58

Registry, you'll see that we look at dose for patients

3:01

of different size from small to average

3:05

to overweight to obese,

3:07

and we look at the radiation exposure to make sure

3:10

that not only are you delivering a low radiation protocol

3:13

to your patients, but that it is size adjusted,

3:16

and that's something you can see on your A

3:18

CR registry dashboards.

3:21

Another reference

3:22

for radiation dose in lung cancer screening is the American

3:26

Academy of Physicians in Medicine Example protocols.

3:29

If you simply Google A A PM Lung Cancer screening,

3:34

you'll quickly get to their landing page

3:36

for protocols across all makes and models

3:39

or nearly all makes and models of CT scanner vendors.

3:43

You can find your scanner vendor

3:44

and then drill down into your specific scanners for the way

3:48

that they would recommend.

3:50

You might want to acquire your low-dose CT chest exams.

3:52

In screening, they follow the a CR practice parameter in

3:57

using the thin image slice sickness and the lesser

4:00

or equal to three milligram exposure

4:02

for a standard size patient adjusting for patient size.

4:05

On the bottom here is a table of small, average

4:08

and large patients by weight category in kilograms or pounds

4:13

and A-C-T-D-I-V range.

4:15

That might be acceptable in those patients depending on

4:18

what type of scanning you have

4:19

and what type of tools you have to do as low

4:22

as reasonably achievable exams with good image quality,

4:26

I just pulled from their website to screenshots,

4:29

not specific to uh, anybody's practice in particular,

4:32

but just pulled 'em for our two CT vendors.

4:35

And you can see that the way they are formatted,

4:37

they have the scanner type across the top, the make

4:41

and model of the scanner,

4:42

and they have all the details of exam acquisition

4:46

from scan type helical mode.

4:48

For example, rotation time beam collation detector

4:52

configuration, pitch speed, KV and MA noise index and so on.

4:57

And then the planes

4:58

and slice thickness for image reconstruction.

5:00

So you can find this level of detail for almost every make

5:04

and model of CT scanner and use in the United States today,

5:07

and you can look at it and compare the protocol

5:10

that you might be using in your practice to these

5:12

to see if there's any opportunities

5:14

to reduce your radiation exposure.

5:16

You'll notice that in many

5:18

of them there will be both a reconstruction for lung tissue

5:21

and a reconstruction for soft tissue.

5:23

If you're going to use in your practice a tool that helps

5:26

to detect and measure

5:28

or characterize lung nodules, it's important

5:31

that you have a reconstruction that is appropriate

5:33

and maximize or optimized for the way those tools work.

5:38

Now, what can you do as a radiologist if you're maybe not

5:41

responsible for the protocols in your practice,

5:43

but you're reading lung cancer screening cts

5:45

or you're low dose nodule followup cts?

5:48

It's important that you can be a participant in good quality

5:51

control and patient safety by just checking

5:54

that radiation dose output that comes with

5:56

Every CT that we perform.

5:59

And if it's not in the low dose range, follow up

6:02

with your C CT team or a QC team to let them know.

6:05

It may be simply something to educate a new technologist

6:08

or remind them about how

6:10

to pick the right protocol on the CT scanner when imaging.

6:13

So good feedback is important

6:15

to help your whole team function well

6:17

and give the low radiation exposure to these exams

6:20

that is safest for our patients.

6:23

So here's an example from our practice of an exam

6:27

with an appropriate radiation dose

6:29

and one that we came across with a high radiation dose.

6:32

We have an outstanding lung cancer screening coordinator

6:35

who looks at all the radiation doses.

6:37

She enters it into our lung cancer

6:40

screening registry submission.

6:42

And so she is very adept to finding the ones

6:44

that come at a higher dose level.

6:48

So here we see one where the C-T-D-I-V was 2.47, so

6:52

that is within the range that was expected

6:54

for an average sized patient,

6:55

but here we have that one is high, it's 5.07.

6:59

It's above the threshold that we would expect

7:02

to be delivering a low dose exam for.

7:04

So what do we do? We give this feedback

7:07

to our CT uh technologist team

7:09

and our QC team to do some drill down into

7:12

what factors might have happened.

7:14

Is it related to patient size that this is what we needed

7:18

to do to get good image quality?

7:20

Are there other mitigating factors

7:22

or was there an error

7:23

that occurred in selecting the right protocol

7:25

that maybe we should figure out ways to avoid so

7:28

that our CT technologists can function at the highest

7:31

level of performance?

7:33

And in this case, the patient was unable

7:35

to elevate their arms over the head, which

7:37

of course made the width of the body a lot thicker

7:40

by having the bone and soft tissue

7:42

of the arms at each side of the patients.

7:44

The technologist noted that in their notes

7:46

to the radiologist

7:48

that we can see when we're reading the examinations.

7:50

So we could say, Hmm, higher dose than expected,

7:53

but we have a mitigating factor

7:55

that explained why we delivered that radiation exposure

7:58

for this low dose CT exam.

8:00

So if you don't have a way

8:02

of getting notes from your technologists when they deviate

8:04

from protocols, it's a good idea

8:06

because it helps us explain what we see in our examinations

8:10

and explain things like radiation exposure.

8:12

But if you don't have that feedback,

8:14

and sometimes we'll see a high dose

8:15

and we don't have a note on the exam, we will again work

8:18

with our CT team

8:19

and our quality improvement team to look into what happened,

8:23

to talk to the technologists, to identify ways to make sure

8:26

that it's easy to find the low dose protocol on the

8:29

CT scanner, for example.

8:32

So that's a little bit about knowing your low dose CT

8:35

protocol, why it's important for patients

8:37

who are undergoing lung cancer screening for as much

8:40

as 30 years of their life, if they start at age 50,

8:43

and how you as a radiologist can check the radiation dose on

8:46

your exams and give

8:47

that feedback when you see a higher than expected dose.

Report

Faculty

Ella A. Kazerooni, MD, MS

Professor of Radiology, Cardiothoracic Division

University of Michigan

Tags

Oncologic Imaging

Neoplastic

Lungs

Chest

CT