Interactive Transcript
0:01
All right, next case.
0:01
This is, uh, a high pretest risk patient.
0:04
This patient is 80 years old, um, with symptoms that might,
0:08
uh, suggest coronary atherosclerosis.
0:11
And the decision was made to start with this coronary ct,
0:14
which happens more and more these days.
0:15
Uh, and a fair amount of people
0:17
of this age actually don't have plaque.
0:19
Um, we're gonna ignore the,
0:20
the granulomas disease in the, uh, lymph nodes here.
0:23
But you can see calcium score alone tells you this is a,
0:26
a fairly, uh, atherosclerotic, uh, patient.
0:29
Uh, I will note that there's some valve calcs.
0:31
It's not this course's topic,
0:33
but something to note if you see it,
0:35
the calcium score not gonna be low.
0:38
I'll just, uh, read it out here.
0:41
Came out to 1,522.
0:44
You'll find some older literature that says, stop the scan.
0:47
The likelihood of a non evaluable segment is high.
0:49
We do not find that to be true,
0:50
and we find the yield to be high.
0:52
Um, certainly there's a higher risk of having a vessel.
0:54
You can't, uh, evaluate the same time
0:57
because the yield is higher.
0:59
If there's any positive segment, you have a next step.
1:01
By the way, it passes all image checks,
1:03
no motion artifact, good opacification.
1:05
We like to flush the right heart a little bit
1:07
so we don't get streak artifact.
1:08
And so it's, it's nice to have,
1:10
if you can have a dual phase injector.
1:13
Um, as I trace this RCAI can see ectasia, right?
1:16
It's a bigger vessel, then it's a smaller vessel
1:18
without branching.
1:19
Um, and then I have some atherosclerosis here.
1:23
I think it's mild, possibly bordering moderate, uh,
1:27
in this mid RCA.
1:28
So we did find disease, uh, as is not surprising.
1:31
I don't see any focal severe stenosis.
1:34
So there's that in the RCA.
1:36
It's a dominant, oh, down below here though, I'd think the,
1:39
uh, the RCA has a little bit of a narrowing there.
1:43
Gotta remember that probably it's
1:45
overrepresented when it's just calcified.
1:47
But right around here, it's probably still mild
1:50
'cause it's already branching into the PDA and PLV.
1:52
But, uh, it's a little bit borderline for me.
1:55
Um, second, uh, thing I'll do is go
1:57
and look at the left main,
2:00
although the left main looks fine on this axial view.
2:02
I'll just give myself one other view.
2:03
I like a vertically oriented view. All good.
2:06
Okay, so left main is fine.
2:08
That's very important because that alone should
2:10
drive management decisions.
2:12
And a lot of the trials have shown that just left main.
2:15
Um, if you use that as your prognostic factor, uh,
2:18
that gets you most of the important, uh, disease and events.
2:22
'cause medical management's very good
2:23
for the other, uh, vessels.
2:24
So I don't like what I'm seeing already in the led.
2:27
So there's a lot of disease, uh,
2:29
but nothing significant, maybe mild here, uh, until I get
2:33
to this area right
2:34
around when this diagonal's branching out.
2:36
In fact, this is the, oh, another bridge.
2:38
So, uh, we're really driving the point home.
2:40
70% of people in ct,
2:42
and these are, this one's a kind of an angled bridge,
2:44
not unlike the last one, um, but short and shallow.
2:47
So I'm not even gonna worry about the bridge segment.
2:50
So, um, but I am gonna use that to say that's my LED.
2:54
That means this is already a dag where I'm, uh,
2:56
where my eye was caught, so is not a, uh, small vessel.
3:01
Um, and it has a branch
3:02
or two, by the way, say that I see a touch
3:05
of motion if I'm lucky enough to have an acquisition
3:07
that covers multiple phases, I can just, uh, go
3:10
through in, in time here.
3:11
And so I'm changing my phase just ever so slightly
3:14
that lesion stays.
3:15
And so I'm just gonna move my, uh,
3:16
cardiac cycle phase a bit.
3:18
So there is an, a lesion that doesn't go away
3:21
with changing of phases.
3:23
So worried about the diagonal,
3:24
and it's a fairly proximal with a lot of distal branches.
3:27
I'm gonna call this our ramus, intermedius.
3:29
It's disease, but not significant.
3:30
So that's the first diagonal that I see, uh, possible
3:33
to have a tiny diagonal that the CT doesn't see
3:35
that the calf can resolve, but the first large diagonal.
3:39
Um, and then fair amount of disease in my circumflex.
3:42
Nothing's caught my eye too badly here.
3:44
So, uh, again, very similar to last case.
3:47
I'm worried about this diagonal.
3:48
And I think the whole reason that we went
3:50
to a CT first was they were trying
3:52
to avoid a calf in this patient.
3:54
I wanna show you the curved planer reformat
3:57
that we had our 3D lab do of this LED just to show you.
4:00
Really good to get the major vessels.
4:01
And they actually, I think, segmented a branch here.
4:05
But, uh, it's a good way to look at the left main if
4:07
it's done before I get to the case.
4:08
It's nice to have, um,
4:09
sometimes I beat the, the lab to the case.
4:11
Here's the circumflex.
4:13
And same story with the right coronary artery curve.
4:15
Planar reformats are, um, a bit of a double-edged sword
4:19
because if you're off center on the axis,
4:21
you can create the appearance
4:22
of a stenosis where there is none.
4:24
Um, but in this case, uh, I think it, it's helpful
4:27
to illustrate that there's plaque,
4:28
but not at least proximal disease.
4:30
So, um, let's go and send this off to the, uh, C-T-F-F-R.
4:36
Again, we have a fairly, uh, profound, uh,
4:40
drop in the vessel in question.
4:42
So this is that diag.
4:44
Um, a couple of other things that happened.
4:45
The technology is only approved for vessels,
4:47
I think over 1.5 millimeters, maybe two.
4:50
So this actually looks like it's a diag.
4:52
So maybe it's diag, sorry, om.
4:54
Um, but either way, this branch was too small.
4:56
Uh, the one that was very diseased, so they didn't
4:59
evaluate it, they just marked it as gray, too small to model
5:02
or for some other reason, there's an artifact.
5:04
Um, you can see they also only get as far
5:06
as they can in the vessels that they,
5:08
so in the LED it gets small enough here in the distal
5:11
branches, they can't evaluate them.
5:12
But we do have a very focal trans lesional gradient right
5:15
here in this diag.
5:17
Um, and then the other thing is helpful is the RCA,
5:19
just confirmatory and negative.
5:20
We saw some disease, but it
5:21
didn't pick up anything significant.
5:23
So it affirmed what the CT shows.
5:25
These tests aren't a hundred percent.
5:27
But, um, it's helpful here to select
5:29
and say we are okay to, to proceed further with this case.
5:34
Let us look at the angiogram.
5:37
Well, this patient doesn't have
5:39
specifically known coronary disease, uh, ahead of the exam.
5:42
The pretty high risk by the age profile.
5:45
One thing that I should have commented on
5:47
as reviewing is there's a lot
5:48
of tortuosity, uh, in the artery.
5:50
So probably somebody with hypertension.
5:52
Um, but that also makes interpretation of both the CT
5:55
and the angiogram a little harder.
5:56
Things come in and out a plane.
5:58
Uh, so we have to find the vessel in question.
6:01
So this is the LAD hitting the apex.
6:03
There's the, uh, circumflex
6:05
and obtuse marginal branches coming off
6:07
to the left of the image.
6:09
I see that kind of questionable stenosis.
6:12
Here's the RCA injection, just confirming, yes,
6:15
there's lumps and bumps, there's disease, uh,
6:18
but nothing significant.
6:19
And let's see what they ultimately decided to do.
6:23
So they deemed this as an intermediate
6:26
to severe stenosis in the cath lab and decided
6:30
because it's a single vessel to try some medical management.
6:33
First, they actually did do an additional test, the DFR,
6:37
and that they thought
6:38
that it was not hemodynamically significant,
6:40
even though they, um, visually thought it was significant.
6:43
And even with a positive DFR on a single vessel prognostic
6:47
data from large studies shows you could elect
6:49
to try medical management first.
6:50
So I think based on the age of the patient, the risk
6:52
of all the other medications that would come along
6:55
with a stent just to stick with conservative therapy.