Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Vascular Access Planning

HIDE
PrevNext

0:00

In this next video, we're gonna talk about vascular access planning.

0:03

And so what is the role of CT in vascular assessment? Well,

0:06

the main thing is that we want to use CT to select the optimal access route,

0:10

and far and away the ileo femoral route is preferred, meaning that, that,

0:14

you know, the interventionalists want to use the, the, uh,

0:17

femoral arteries to place their catheters, uh, in order to deliver the device.

0:21

Um, and in general, if you have, uh, decent looking vessels, uh,

0:26

with diameters that are six millimeter or greater, this should not be a problem.

0:30

Uh, for all of our newest devices, however,

0:32

you often run into patients who have heavily calcified or disease vessels and

0:36

diameters that are, you know, five millimeters, uh, or less. And in those cases,

0:41

you think about different alternative approaches.

0:44

So subclavian arteries would be the next best thing. Uh,

0:46

but then there are also other approaches, carotid and radial have been used,

0:51

although honestly, you know,

0:52

now you're getting down to some pretty small diameter.

0:53

So it depends a bit on the type of device you're delivering.

0:57

Some are a little smaller delivery systems than others. Um,

1:00

and then there's direct aortic and transapical.

1:03

Direct aortic actually is going between the ribs into the as and aorta and

1:06

placing the device that way,

1:07

whereas transapical are going between the ribs and going right through the apex

1:11

of the heart, uh, and placed in the device that way.

1:13

So those are clearly much more invasive, and I obviously avoided, uh,

1:18

if at all possible. So what are our steps in vascular access evaluation?

1:22

When we're performing the CT scan,

1:25

we wanna first perform an overall assessment and look at the just general degree

1:28

of aortic calcification. If patients have cabbage grafts,

1:32

usually wanna mention them, um,

1:34

and mention whether you see that they're open or, uh, occluded. Um,

1:38

and then you talk about any other incidental findings besides the cayo grafts,

1:41

you know, aneurysms, dissections,

1:43

anything like that that you think might impact their ability to use the vessels,

1:46

um, for their catheters. Uh,

1:48

and then we go through a segmental vessel evaluation and that, uh,

1:51

segmental evaluation has three components. We talk about the diameters,

1:55

that's the most important,

1:56

and then we usually talk about tortuosity and calcification.

2:00

So we grade aortic calcification qualitatively, um, non mild, moderate severe.

2:05

And then there's this thing called the porcelain aorta, which I'll talk about.

2:08

So, um,

2:09

there's no real grade sort of guideline out there for what differentiates mild,

2:13

moderate, or severe. Here's what we use. We tend to use,

2:16

if there's a little bit of flex here and there, but not a ton. We go for mild,

2:20

um, if it's starting to get continuous,

2:22

but there's still areas that are spared here and there we call it moderate.

2:25

And then if it's pretty much there's calcification throughout,

2:27

we call it severe.

2:29

And then the porcelain aorta is this concept that there's this almost like

2:33

eggshell calcifications of the entire aorta, uh, throughout. Um,

2:38

and the reason this is important,

2:39

it's actually a little bit historical in the world, in,

2:41

in surgical aortic valve replacement, this porcelain aorta is a big no-no,

2:46

it's really hard, or, uh,

2:48

it's basically a contraindication to performing surgical aortic valve

2:51

replacement. The reason being that you can't, uh,

2:54

cross clamp the aorta in a porcelain aorta. Um, and so

2:58

These patients in the old days were ones that were preferentially sent to tavr.

3:03

Um, now that we know that TAVR is appropriate in, in both high,

3:07

middle and low risk patients, it's really less of an issue. But still,

3:11

if you see it, you certainly wanna mention it.

3:12

Here's another case of por aorta with somebody with severe tiff few aortic

3:17

calcifications.

3:18

There are no real guidelines that exist as far as like how to deal with these

3:22

other things like aneurysms or dissections or,

3:24

or what if you see a lot of nasty ulcerative plaque. Um, but you know,

3:28

we mention them, um, because, um, if it looks, you know,

3:32

concerning then the interventionalists may, um,

3:34

decide to use a different access, uh, route.

3:38

So here's an example of an incidental aneurysm that we saw in a patient that

3:41

looks like a ular aneurysm, probably from, um,

3:44

penetrating athero Chloric also doesn't look very good. You know, you,

3:47

you wouldn't necessarily want to put a catheter through here.

3:49

I suspect this wall is fairly thin and, and at risk for, um, atrogenic injury,

3:54

this was a case with the big polypoid plaque, um,

3:57

and the descending thoracic aorta. And so in this case,

3:59

they avoided going through, uh, this, you know,

4:02

you worry that you might send off an embolus or something,

4:05

and instead they went for direct aortic access. Uh,

4:09

this is a patient bunch of graphs, very, very complicated.

4:12

Certainly wanna be careful putting catheters through this patient.

4:15

So they actually went with transapical access instead. Um,

4:19

so what about the diameter measurements themselves? Well, how do we do that? Uh,

4:22

you use a three D imaging platform, um, and you know,

4:26

there are a ton of different three D imaging platforms out there. And, um,

4:29

you know, they will universally have the ability to create curve planar,

4:32

reformatted images from those.

4:34

You wanna perform short axis measurements that are perpendicular to the vessel

4:38

wall. Um, and we generally,

4:40

you want to make sure to measure the inner luminal diameter, um,

4:43

and get the minimal diameter as well as the perpendicular.

4:47

There are some occasions where the three D platform isn't really working.

4:50

Maybe you have poor contrast opacification,

4:52

or that's a really heavily diseased vessel.

4:55

You can do manual double oblique measurements as well for the vessel diameters

4:59

if you need to. We take measurements at multiple levels,

5:02

basically at each segment, abdominal aorta, common iliac, external iliac,

5:06

common femoral, and so on. Our, um,

5:10

approach is that we don't necessarily measure the subclavians if the iliacs look

5:13

good. Um, however, if there's iof femoral disease, uh,

5:17

meaning that the diameters are less than six millimeters,

5:19

then we'll go ahead and measure the subclavians as well, uh,

5:22

and provide those in our report. Ideally, like I had mentioned before,

5:26

if the diameters are six millimeter and grayer,

5:28

usually those vessels are good to go.

5:30

Five millimeter is kind of a borderline case. Sometimes that can still be used,

5:34

uh, sometimes not, depending on the degree of calcification and the size of the,

5:38

um, device that needs to go in. Here's just the example, um,

5:43

of this curve planer analysis. With this particular type of software,

5:46

we place a C point proximally and we placed a C point distally and the software

5:50

was able to connect the dots, um, and make this curve planer, uh,

5:53

stretched image of the vessel. And from that we create some short

5:56

Axis fuse and then do the vessel diameter measurements. And so this is, um,

6:01

basically the approach that you take for, um,

6:03

any of these particular types of software that you use. Um,

6:06

this is the same for the subclavians. Remember I mentioned that, uh, doing a um,

6:10

saline flush is really important to limit the amount of artifact in the adjacent

6:15

veins. Um, and that's, uh,

6:17

very helpful for getting a good curve plan or analysis of the subclavian

6:20

arteries. If you don't have that, then uh, you can run into trouble. Uh,

6:25

just be aware that oftentimes we,

6:27

we scan these patients with their arms up and oftentimes we'll get some kinking

6:30

in the subclavian arteries when the arms are up. Um,

6:33

don't measure this as the minimal area of stenosis. This is a positional thing.

6:38

Um, you know, you wanna look for the, uh, diameter elsewhere. So, uh,

6:42

other things that we mentioned. So,

6:44

so I mentioned that we always grade the diameters,

6:46

but then we also assess tortuosity and calcification.

6:49

How do we assess tortuosity? Well, um,

6:51

there's no commonly accepted method for quantification of tortuosity. Um,

6:56

and so the analysis is really qualitative.

6:58

We have kind of some rules of thumb that we use, um,

7:01

where if it's a mild bend, we'll call it a mild tortuosity,

7:06

sort of like a 90 degree ish kind of thing,

7:08

you put in the moderate category and then more of a hairpin turn we call severe.

7:13

And so here's an example of, of some cases, this hairpin turn here,

7:18

obviously that's severe.

7:19

And then somewhere around like the 90 degree ish range we consider moderate

7:23

calcification.

7:25

These are important to mention because there's greater risk of vascular injury.

7:28

Again, this is a qualitative assessment. There's no accepted grading scale.

7:33

In the literature, you might find that different scales that are, you know,

7:36

people, you know,

7:37

qualitatively use based on the degree of circumferential and circumvent of the

7:39

vessel. And here's just an example of that. So here you have calcification,

7:43

less than 50% of the vessel diameter, and then here, 50, 75 and so on.

7:48

That's a way to do it. I to say that the only problem with this is that,

7:52

you know, if you have a, a very short segment with, with the severe, you know,

7:56

circumferential calcification, but then the rest of the vessel looks good,

7:58

is that really severe calcification.

8:01

So I think you have to combine this analysis also with the total volume of

8:05

calcium throughout the vessel and, and give your best assessment.

Report

Faculty

Stefan Loy Zimmerman, MD

Associate Professor of Radiology and Radiological Science

Johns Hopkins Medicine Department of Radiology and Radiological Science

Tags

Vascular Imaging

Vascular

Idiopathic

Congenital

Cardiac valves

Cardiac

CTA

CT

Acquired/Developmental