Interactive Transcript
0:00
72-year-old woman who was recalled
0:02
from her screening mammogram.
0:05
And, uh, there was, uh, a mass
0:07
and microcalcifications.
0:10
So at first, uh, this is just, um, bilateral
0:13
craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique low-energy images.
0:18
Already, here, you can see that there is
0:19
a mass in the right inner breast.
0:23
This is, uh, the recombined images of the same
0:26
breast and, uh, you can see a little different
0:28
background pattern than what we've seen, uh, so far.
0:32
It's a little tiny speckle.
0:34
So this is, uh, still mild, broad symmetric
0:39
background parenchymal enhancement.
0:41
But take a look.
0:42
Uh, so remember this is the mass in the
0:44
right and take a look on the recombined image.
0:48
There is a well-circumscribed round
0:51
dark, uniformly dark mass with a very
0:55
thin and uniform rim of enhancement.
0:59
So this is a classic sign of a benign cyst called
1:04
Eclipse Sign, and it's very pneumonic for a cyst.
1:10
This is a DBT slide showing a nicely
1:13
circumscribed mass,
1:17
and this is a close-up of that
1:20
Eclipse sign. Again, very thin.
1:22
And the inside of that cyst, it's a very dark
1:25
uniform to be representative of the Eclipse sign.
1:30
It doesn't need to be very thin and, uh, uniform,
1:33
especially the inside of that rim enhancement.
1:37
Uh, we did an ultrasound and
1:39
it's a simple cyst.
1:42
But, uh, another, uh, issue with that, uh, mammogram
1:46
was that the patient had microcalcifications
1:48
in the outer breast or central outer breast.
1:52
Uh, this is a magnification view,
1:55
so it was lower outer breast.
1:57
And you can see that there are some
1:58
suspicious microcalcifications, uh,
2:01
this is a magnification view again.
2:04
But looking back at the recombined images,
2:07
so on the right in the square, that's
2:09
the area of those microcalcifications.
2:12
Of course, we don't expect to see them well on
2:15
these, uh, monitors and, uh, on the full field view.
2:18
But even knowing that there are some
2:21
suspicious microcalcifications, there
2:23
is nothing really suspicious at all
2:25
from the enhancement standpoint. So the enhancement is
2:29
pretty uniform here and the same in the lower breast.
2:32
So the calcifications are here and there
2:35
is nothing focal or suspicious or different
2:38
in that area on the recombined images.
2:42
We ended up doing a stereotactic biopsy of that
2:45
area of calcifications, and it was benign.
2:50
So fibroadenomas associated with micro
2:52
calcifications. So in this case, it
2:54
was a true negative recombined image.
2:58
However, uh, as you probably remember from
3:01
Dr. Phillips's lecture, we are taking
3:05
the contrast-enhanced mammography as a whole.
3:07
So if there are suspicious findings on low-energy
3:10
images, if they're suspicious enough, we are
3:13
taking that seriously and we need to biopsy
3:16
it even if there is no enhancement, at least,
3:20
uh, when we're talking about calcifications.
© 2025 Medality. All Rights Reserved.