Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Neuro/Brain Case Review w Dr. Francis Deng (5-5-25)

HIDE
PrevNext

0:02

Hello and welcome to Case Crunch Rapid case review

0:04

for the core exam hosted by modality.

0:07

In this rapid fire format,

0:09

faculty will show key images along

0:11

with a multiple choice question,

0:12

and you'll respond with your best answer via

0:14

the live polling feature.

0:16

After a quick answer explanation, it's onto the next case.

0:19

You'll be able to access the recording

0:21

of today's case review

0:22

and previous case reviews

0:23

by creating a free account using the

0:25

link provided in the chat.

0:27

Today we're honored to welcome Dr. Francis Dang

0:29

for a neuro brain Imaging Board prep case review.

0:33

Dr. Dang is a board certified radiologist

0:35

who completed his radiology residency

0:36

and neuroradiology fellowship at

0:38

Massachusetts General Hospital.

0:40

He's on the neuroradiology faculty at

0:42

Johns Hopkins University.

0:44

If you've got questions, please remember to use that q

0:47

and a feature to submit those.

0:48

And with that, we are ready to begin today's board review.

0:51

Dr. Dang, please take it from here.

0:54

All right, welcome everybody.

0:56

I am so glad to see

0:57

so many attendees in the webinar right now.

1:01

So over the course of this hour,

1:03

we're gonna do rapid fire questions on brain imaging,

1:06

and hopefully the topics will be high yield

1:09

for your core studying.

1:11

Now I want to get a sense for who the audience is.

1:13

Uh, I think a poll will launch right now

1:16

and let me know if you're a resident setting for the core

1:19

or an attending physician or

1:21

otherwise somebody else just here for the cases

1:24

or some other category not captured by these options.

1:31

Alright, 71% are residents here setting for the core.

1:36

All right, so let's get started.

1:38

Case number one is a 45-year-old

1:40

with breast cancer initial staging.

1:43

I'm showing you one single image.

1:46

Where is the brain metastasis in this image?

1:48

Is it the postcentral gyrus, the precentral gyrus,

1:52

the superior frontal gyrus, or the superior parietal lole?

2:02

And that's all the time we have.

2:04

So it looks like 38% of you got the answer correct,

2:07

which is postcentral gyrus.

2:08

Now, it is important to know your central sulcus localizing

2:12

signs in order to distinguish things

2:14

that are in the frontal lobe from the parietal lobe

2:16

as the peric salsi, uh,

2:18

or the peric gyri are very important, eloquent territory

2:23

for functional purposes.

2:24

Now, uh, a couple of signs

2:26

that can help you identify the precentral gyrus is look

2:29

for this inverted omega sign that, uh,

2:31

signifies the hand knob of the precentral gyrus.

2:34

In some patients, it's uh, kind of two humps, um, uh,

2:38

in an epsilon shape.

2:39

The postcentral gyrus is always bifid medially around this,

2:43

uh, little sulcus, which is the pars ali

2:46

of the cingulate sulcus,

2:48

or also known as the marginal ramus of the cingulate sulcus.

2:51

And that forms this kind of bracket, um, across the, um,

2:56

interhemispheric fissure.

2:58

And so our brain metastasis here is looking at the medial

3:01

portion of the postcentral gyrus,

3:03

and that is the correct answer here.

3:06

Case two is a 60-year-old with intracranial lesion

3:09

that was detected on whole body MRI.

3:11

Further characterization is obtained

3:13

with this dedicated brain MRI protocol.

3:16

Where is the mass?

3:18

Is it the aqueduct of Sylvia, the freeman of Luka,

3:21

the Freeman of Maja D or the Freeman of Monroe?

3:28

And may be missing some choices from this question.

3:37

All right, um, uh, it looks like a, uh, the

3:42

c and D were left off the answer choices,

3:44

but the answer is C frame of Mai.

3:48

Um, notice the enhancing lesion here at the midline, uh,

3:53

inferior fourth ventricle.

3:54

And this is the median aperture of the fourth ventricle,

3:56

also known as the frame of mai Great case.

4:00

Three is a 30-year-old person who fell

4:03

and struck their head,

4:04

and they're presenting with vomiting syncope

4:06

and right ear bleeding.

4:08

Take a look at these images.

4:10

What compartment is the hemorrhage?

4:12

Is it epidural, intraparenchymal, subarachnoid or subdural?

4:23

94% of you got the answer correct, which is epidural.

4:26

So epidural hematomas, as you all know,

4:29

are usually bi convex in shape.

4:31

They're len deformed, they're lemon shaped.

4:33

They cause more focal mass effect

4:35

because they're bound

4:37

by the dural attachments near the sutures.

4:40

And so they have this bi convex, uh, shape

4:43

that is pretty typical.

4:44

And I try to be tricky by showing a coronal image where part

4:47

of it is not quite as by convex.

4:49

But the context clues here was

4:51

that the patient's bleeding out their ear.

4:53

And how does blood from the

4:55

intracranial compartment come out to the ear?

4:56

It has to be in the epidural space, go through dehi sense

4:59

of the teman tip knee

5:01

and go through a tepa membrane

5:03

perforation to come out the ear.

5:05

And that's what happened in this case.

5:08

Case four is an 80-year-old with, um, a a one day history

5:13

of, um, some decreased level of consciousness that occurred

5:18

after having a catheter,

5:19

a transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

5:22

Take a look at these two images.

5:25

What vessel is occluded is the,

5:27

the anterior inferior cerebellar artery,

5:29

the posterior cerebral artery,

5:31

the posterior inferior cerebellar artery,

5:34

or the superior cerebellar artery.

5:42

Okay, it looks like most people got the answer correct,

5:44

which is the superior cerebral artery, 53% of you.

5:48

Now, the key here is to recognize that this area

5:51

of hypodensity is in the right superior server hemisphere,

5:54

which is obviously by its name, the territory of the SCA.

5:58

You could also see on this coronal max intensity projection,

6:02

CTA, that uh, you have lost a ification

6:06

of the right SCA normally on CTAs.

6:09

You should be able to see both posterior cerebral arteries

6:12

and superior cerebral arteries in a double T kind

6:16

of, uh, look.

6:17

This is the logo of Texas tech

6:19

and very variably in patient to patient.

6:22

You may or may not see the iica or the pica.

6:26

Now, um, the SC should be visible on, um, really all CTAs

6:30

or MRIs unless you have an occlusion, uh,

6:32

of either those branches

6:34

or the parent artery, which is the basal artery.

6:36

So look for that double T.

6:38

And in addition to supplying the superior cerebellum,

6:41

the SCS do also supply the upper pon

6:43

and the ponto mu cephalic junction.

6:45

So look for hypodensities there as well.

6:49

Case fives is a 60-year-old with imbalance

6:51

and a memory issue.

6:54

Where is the obstruction?

6:56

Is it cerebral aqueduct, the framing of Monro,

6:58

the fourth ventricular outlet or the lili quis membrane?

7:07

65% got the answer correct.

7:10

So you notice that on this sagal kiss image we have dilated

7:13

lateral and third ventricles.

7:14

We have anterior bow in the, of the, uh, laminate terminis.

7:19

And then we have this dilation of the proximal part

7:21

of the cerebral aqueduct.

7:23

And then this focal narrowing very tight stenosis.

7:25

So this is aqueduct stenosis

7:28

and, um, in kids aqueduct stenosis is the most common cause

7:32

of congenital obstructive hydrocephalus,

7:34

but in this situation, it was an adult

7:37

and aqueduct stenosis can also be acquired in adulthood such

7:40

as after infection or hemorrhage.

7:47

If you have any questions about the questions,

7:50

put them in the q and a

7:51

and we'll try to address them as they come up.

7:54

K six is a 70-year-old with altered mental status.

7:57

What is the likely cause? Is it cerebral edema?

8:00

Qre one deformity pseudotumor cerebra or spinal CSF leak?

8:11

And 82% got the correct answer, which is cerebral edema.

8:14

Now this is the typical appearance on a sagal image,

8:16

which is a little bit atypical way of depicting it.

8:19

Diffuse cerebral edema,

8:20

which appears this great white differentiation loss,

8:23

CSF space effacement and downward brain herniation.

8:26

So we see a complete effacement of the basal cisterns.

8:29

We see displacement of the cerebellar tonsils down

8:32

through frame and magnum.

8:34

We see this calcification, which is a pineal calcification,

8:37

um, inferiorly displacement,

8:38

it's usual position down into the middle

8:40

of the posterior fossa.

8:41

And this sharp angulation of, uh, the vein of galin, uh,

8:45

with the straight sinus over here.

8:48

Uh, so this is due to massive downward, um,

8:50

central herniation and, um,

8:53

and effacement of the CSF spaces in the posterior fossa.

8:59

K seven is the 50-year-old who woke with aphasia.

9:02

They were last seen well before bed 12 hours ago.

9:05

Take a look at these two images

9:07

and answer the question, what is the best

9:09

next step in management?

9:10

Is it an EEG electroencephalogram, IV to 10 connected place

9:15

lumbar puncture or a neurosurgical consult?

9:21

I'll go back to the clinical presentation

9:23

and mention that they awoke

9:26

with aphasia in their lasting well 12 hours ago,

9:34

and the correct answer chosen by half

9:36

of you was IV 10 place.

9:38

So the clinical scenario here is that, uh, by

9:42

standard criteria, they would be outside of the TPA

9:45

or ECT place window.

9:47

Uh, but they awoke meaning their last, uh, awoke

9:50

with the deficits, meaning their last known well is unknown.

9:53

It could have been an hour ago,

9:54

it could have been 12 hours ago.

9:56

And under the criteria, under the wake up trial, uh,

9:59

so-called DWI flare mismatch is when you have a DWI positive

10:04

lesion, but flare negative lesion that suggests

10:08

these patients are just a few hours out from their stroke

10:12

onset and they may benefit from thrombolysis even though

10:15

they're on, uh, time of onset was technically unknown.

10:19

So describing the fact that you have an infarct here

10:23

of the lateral aspects of the precentral gyrus

10:26

that is not significantly hyperintense on flare makes them

10:31

eligible for getting IV thrombolysis.

10:35

Dr. Daniel has a couple questions for cases

10:38

that we just covered, if you wanna

10:40

Sure. A

10:41

question on case six was why is there

10:43

hyperintensity off the tentorium?

10:45

So in cases of diffuser edema,

10:49

the brain is hypo dense,

10:51

and that gives an appearance of relative hyper density

10:55

of the vascular structures,

10:57

including the veins which are congested.

10:59

And that gives you, um, on the sagal image a kind

11:02

of appearance of hyper density of the dural venous sinuses.

11:05

Uh, and sometimes, uh, on axial images, you see engorgement

11:09

of cerebral veins in the seine fissures and basal cisterns,

11:13

and that gives you a pseudo

11:14

subarachnoid hemorrhage appearance.

11:16

This is kind of the, um, sagal counterpart

11:19

where you see hyper density of the, of the venous sinuses

11:22

that contain, you know, um, normal hematocrit.

11:25

Um, uh, but it, you know, that normal blood, uh, density is,

11:30

um, just so much more distinct than the brain, which is emus

11:33

and low density case six.

11:36

Can, uh, can this be the appearance

11:38

of intracranial hypotension was a question.

11:40

So, um, this, uh, brain sagging

11:44

by itself is an appearance of intracranial hypotension,

11:48

which is why there is the distractor D

11:49

but is not the correct answer in this case

11:51

because there's such massive brain sagging

11:55

and swelling of the entire brain,

11:57

and you cannot see any gray white distinction on any part

12:01

of the brain that is imaged here.

12:03

So, um, if you just had brain sagging

12:07

and you had pituitary engorgement

12:09

and you had, you know, venous sinus engorgement,

12:12

but you could still make out the gray white differentiation,

12:16

then intracranial hypotension would be a proper answer.

12:19

But in this case, there's an empty cell,

12:22

there's no gray white differentiation,

12:24

and there's brain sagging.

12:25

This is diffusive real edema.

12:29

So moving on to case eight,

12:31

A 75-year-old is present presenting

12:33

with amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

12:36

What is the most likely diagnosis?

12:38

Is it cerebral amyloid angiopathy, diffuse axonal injury,

12:42

familial cerebral cavernous malformations

12:44

or hypertensive small vessel disease?

12:53

Okay, and 87% of you got the answer correct,

12:55

which is cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

12:57

The mi uh, the main finding here is multiple

13:01

cerebral microbleeds in a peripheral location,

13:04

which is called a strictly low bar

13:07

or a cortical subcortical location.

13:09

There are no micro hemorrhages in the deep gray

13:12

nuclei that are imaged here.

13:14

And having that finding of multiple strictly low bar

13:19

hemorrhages is one

13:21

of the diagnostic criteria in the Boston 2.0 criteria for

13:26

probable cerebral amyloid angiopathy.

13:27

Okay, the imaging hallmark of CAA is having

13:31

multiple strictly low bar hemorrhagic lesions,

13:33

and that may be microbleeds macro hemorrhages,

13:36

superficial cirrhosis, or subarachnoid hemorrhages.

13:39

Now, there are all, there are some non hemorrhagic features

13:42

that are in the criteria, but those are less prominent, uh,

13:45

and less common case.

13:49

Nine is a 55-year-old with Horner syndrome.

13:53

Take a look at these two images. What is the diagnosis?

13:57

Is it carotid dissection, jugular, paraganglioma, petre,

14:01

apex, cholesteatoma, or wallenberg syndrome?

14:11

And the majority of you got the answer correct is

14:13

carotid dissection.

14:14

So the crescent sign

14:15

of an internal carotid artery dissection indicates

14:19

intramural hematoma within the vessel

14:21

that on routine brain imaging can be seen.

14:24

If you get an axial T one image,

14:27

this one is just a routine in axial T one without contrast.

14:31

You can see this hyperintensity, it doesn't stand out

14:33

so much because we didn't do any fat sat on this.

14:35

This is a routine brain sequence,

14:38

and you can often see it on DWI

14:40

because in the subacute phase when you have met hemoglobin

14:43

and it's T one hyperintense, you'll also have, um,

14:46

DWI hyperintensity, which appears

14:49

as this similar crescent shape at the bottom

14:52

of your routine brain DWI sequence.

14:54

So that should clue you in, uh,

14:56

when the history is Horner syndrome,

14:58

that you have a carotid dissection as the culprit

15:04

case 10 is a 60-year-old with left-sided weakness.

15:07

I have three images.

15:13

What is the stroke etiology?

15:17

Is it atheros plaque, carotid dissection,

15:19

CRD web or paraganglioma?

15:23

The, the prior image just showed a, a right

15:26

hemispheric infarct,

15:32

okay?

15:33

And the correct answer is CRD web, 74%

15:35

of you got the answer correct.

15:36

So the finding here is this, um, linear, uh,

15:41

luminal filling defect at the origin

15:43

of the cervical internal carotid artery,

15:45

which on a sagittal maximal intensity projection image

15:48

appears very shelf like it's linear.

15:50

It's not rotund like in atheros plaque,

15:53

it's not calcified like in atheros plaque,

15:56

and it's not in the distal cervical ica

15:58

like a crowded dissection.

15:59

So this is a typical appearance of a crowded web,

16:01

which is thrombogenic

16:03

because it creates this, um, kind of turbulent flow just,

16:07

um, posterior to this crowded web.

16:09

And, and that can, uh, form aus for, uh, thrombogenesis,

16:13

which then embolize to the, uh,

16:15

you know, anterior circulation.

16:17

So, uh, crowded web, important to recognize even if, uh,

16:21

this shelf of tissue doesn't cause, you know,

16:24

traditional stenosis by NASA criteria,

16:27

this is still thrombogenic

16:28

and important to flag for the, uh, STR neurologist.

16:35

So case 11 is, uh, 30 5-year-old

16:38

with hemoglobin SC disease and altered mental status.

16:47

What is the diagnosis?

16:48

Is it acute hemorrhagic encephalomyelitis,

16:51

metastatic calcification, fat embolism, or septic emboli?

17:02

Okay, we have a little bit of a spread here.

17:04

Okay, so 38% of you said, um, uh, a

17:07

and 36% of you said fat embolism.

17:09

The correct answer is fat embolism on the dwi.

17:12

I, we see diffusion restriction in the pleenum

17:14

of the corpus clom, but the really striking finding is on

17:16

the SWI as profuse microbleeds

17:20

throughout the cerebral white matter.

17:21

You can see them really everywhere, um,

17:23

with the predilection for the paraventricular white matter,

17:25

but also going all the way into

17:27

the subcortical white matter.

17:29

So this is a typical appearance of a cerebral fat embolism

17:32

or a part of the fat embolism syndrome,

17:35

and that can occur in the setting of trauma,

17:37

long bone trauma, um, especially, um,

17:40

surgeries like liposuction, as well as, uh,

17:42

sickle cell crises, especially hemoglobin SC

17:45

and hemoglobin S beta thalassemia disease where you have,

17:50

um, kind of low level chronic, uh, bone infarctions

17:53

that somehow liberate, um, fat particles into the vassi

17:57

that are then metabolized in the lungs into free fatty

18:00

acids, which have a, uh, kind

18:02

of a chemo toxic effect on the endothelium.

18:04

And results in this, uh, micro hemorrhage pattern

18:08

on SWI has been described that the profusion

18:10

of microbleeds kind of outlines all the sibal white matter

18:13

and gives a walnut kernel appearance.

18:15

And sometimes on DWI, you have scattered, uh,

18:18

punctate infarcts

18:19

that are described as the starfield pattern.

18:22

In our case, we didn't have that many, uh, DWI, uh, foci.

18:26

And so it didn't really meet the criteria

18:28

of a starfield pattern, but

18:29

that has been described classically.

18:32

Now it's not acute hemorrhagic encephalomyelitis, which, um,

18:35

a plurality you chose

18:36

because that is a hemorrhagic version of aem, uh,

18:39

which occurs in children, you know,

18:41

in the post infectious kind of setting, um,

18:44

you'd have demyelinating lesions that then hemorrhage, um,

18:47

and it, uh, it,

18:49

it wouldn't be like perfuse micro hemorrhages like this

18:55

case 12 is a 30-year-old woman with headache.

19:01

What is the most likely etiology of hemorrhage?

19:04

Is it brain arteriovenous malformation, cardio embolism,

19:07

cerebral sinal venous thrombosis,

19:09

or reversible cerebral vasal constriction syndrome?

19:18

Okay, and 79% of you got the answer correct. Great.

19:21

So the answer is cerebral sino venous thrombosis.

19:24

What we see on Theron CT image is a

19:27

small jux cortical hemorrhage.

19:29

This has been described as the cashew nut sign,

19:32

which suggests cortical venous thrombosis.

19:34

So we're gonna look for direct evidence

19:36

of cortical venous thrombosis.

19:38

We see hyperdense vessels over the cerebral convexes as well

19:41

as in the superior sagittal sinus.

19:43

It is relatively dense compared to the brain parenchyma.

19:46

Um, the surrounding, uh, brain parenchyma, uh,

19:49

around this hemorrhage is also relatively hypodense

19:51

that's due to venous congestion and edema.

19:54

And so if you see a small juxta cortical hemorrhage at the

19:57

depth of a sulcus just like this, as well

20:00

as hyperdense vessels,

20:01

think cerebral sinal venous thrombosis.

20:06

Case 13 is a 55-year-old man with several hours

20:09

of forgetfulness.

20:11

If his wife noticed when he was unable to recall

20:14

that they had sex this morning,

20:17

what is the most likely diagnosis is an anterior choroidal

20:20

artery infarct, non convulsive status epilepticus,

20:24

opioid associated amnestic syndrome,

20:26

or transient global amnesia.

20:34

All right, A plurality view 41% got the correct answer,

20:38

which is transient global amnesia.

20:39

The imaging findings are on DWI,

20:43

tiny hyperintense foci.

20:45

You may have one

20:47

or few, um, in the hippo campi.

20:51

And here we see three, uh,

20:53

one in the right hippocampal head and two in the left.

20:56

And that is the imaging hallmark

20:57

of transient global amnesia.

20:59

Now, some of the other choices that some

21:00

of y'all chose are not correct,

21:02

opioid associated amnestic syndrome is total bilateral

21:06

diffusion, uh, restriction of the hippo campi.

21:08

So the entire length

21:10

of bilateral hippo campi would be diffusion restricting, um,

21:13

anterior cordal artery infarct would, um, be unilateral

21:17

and cause diffusion restricting, uh, um, you know, tissue

21:20

outside of just the hippo campi, um, you know,

21:22

some somewhere, uh, else I would show you, um,

21:25

extra hippocampal territory that is diffusion restricting

21:29

and non convulsive status epilepticus.

21:32

So that can cause hippocampal diffusion, uh, restriction.

21:35

But, um, it would be, uh, you know, um, complete

21:39

and, uh, linear and not punctate, uh,

21:41

like we see in transient global amnesia.

21:46

Okay, so the next case is a 30 5-year-old with headache

21:50

and icoria and right-sided ptosis.

21:55

I have a single image for you.

21:56

What is the most likely cause?

21:57

Is it aneurysm herniation ischemia or neoplasm?

22:07

So 39% of you got the correct answer, which is aneurysm,

22:11

but a plurality view chose neoplasm, which is 42%.

22:15

So on the single image that I gave you, I tried

22:17

to make this a little bit difficult.

22:19

So, uh, on the single T two weighted image,

22:21

we can see these, uh,

22:23

lines which represent the third cranial nerves, um,

22:26

traversing the, um, super cell cistern and

22:29

before they dive into the ca sinuses,

22:32

and here we see a rounded, uh, flow void, um, right where

22:36

that third cranial nerve is entering.

22:38

Now you had to take the clinical context into account.

22:41

Um, somebody has a pupil involving third

22:44

cranial nerve palsy.

22:45

The most, uh, dreaded cause, uh, is a aneurysm

22:49

that is compressing the nerve from the outside.

22:51

So not only affecting the, um, uh, extraocular muscles,

22:56

but also involving the pupillary muscle.

22:59

And, um, and

23:01

because the, you know, fibers

23:02

that ated the pupillary muscle, uh, the periphery

23:04

of the nerve, so that would implicate a extrinsic

23:07

compression causing third nerve palsy as opposed

23:09

to an intrinsic lesion IE microvascular ischemia.

23:12

So when it comes to things

23:14

that compress the third cranial nerve, the, uh, as I said,

23:18

the dreaded one is aneurysm

23:20

because these are actively enlarging

23:22

and may blow, uh, the most common location of

23:25

that is the posterior communicating artery IE the ICA origin

23:29

of the posterior communicating artery

23:31

because this is right where the cranial nerve enters

23:33

the cavern sinus.

23:34

So here's just some images on the subsequent MR Angiogram

23:38

depicting that aneurysm.

23:39

And here's a coronal max intensity projection, uh,

23:42

depicting that aneurysm.

23:44

So if you're given a scan with the history of a,

23:48

of a pupil involving third nerve palsy, look very hard

23:51

for any evidence of an aneurysm.

23:56

The next case is a 30-year-old with an episode

23:58

of right gaze deviation followed by chronic body movements.

24:03

So I have a stack of T 2 8 8 images here.

24:05

What is the most likely diagnosis?

24:07

Is it a brain arterial venous malformation,

24:09

cavernous malformation, developmental venous anomaly,

24:13

or a dural arterial venous fistula?

24:21

Okay, 57% if you've got the answer correct,

24:23

which is brain arterial venous malformation.

24:25

So brain A VM most commonly appears as a compact NIUs,

24:30

which is a nest of intraparenchymal vessels

24:33

that are abnormal, right?

24:35

And so on the T two weighted image I showed you,

24:38

flow void essentially

24:39

that were located within the parenchyma here in the middle

24:41

frontal gyrus, and there's some, uh,

24:44

surrounding parenchymal signal abnormalities,

24:46

T two, uh, hyperintensity.

24:49

And, um, this is what typical brain AVMs look like.

24:52

Um, this is what they look like on time of flight, Mr.

24:54

Angiography, this is

24:55

what they look like on digital subtraction angiogram.

24:58

We have that NIUs, um, in the brain parenchyma

25:01

and early, uh, contrast filling of these draining veins

25:05

that drain into, um, cortical veins and dural sinuses.

25:09

And then on arterial spin labeling, um,

25:12

because there's not a normal capillary bed

25:14

to trap all those labeled spins, um,

25:17

you'll just have a collection of high signal intensity, uh,

25:20

within that, um, arterial venous malformation as well

25:23

as the veins that drain it.

25:25

So here we see abnormal high signal in the superior sagal

25:29

sinus, uh, because part

25:30

of this a VM drains into superior sagal sinus

25:34

because of shunting.

25:35

So the next case is a 30-year-old with seizures.

25:38

So I'm showing you four MR images.

25:41

What is the most likely pathology?

25:43

Is it astrocytoma IDH mutant cortical tuber,

25:46

focal cortical dysplasia glioblastoma or IDH wild?

25:50

Uh, or or yeah, or glioblastoma? I DH wild type.

25:58

Okay, the correct answer that was chosen by a plurality

26:01

of you is astrocytoma IDH mutant.

26:03

So this is a, a young adult who is presenting

26:06

with a expansile looking lesion

26:09

that shows the T two flare mismatch sign

26:11

where it is very bright on T two,

26:13

but the center part of it drops in signal intensity on flare

26:17

and is not contrast enhancing,

26:18

and it's not really diffusion restricting.

26:20

And so this is a typical appearance

26:22

of an astrocytoma IDH mutant.

26:24

So the T two flare mismatched sign, um, uh,

26:27

if you're presented with a lesion

26:28

that you think is a diffuse glioma,

26:29

the T two flare mismatched sign is, um, relatively specific

26:33

for astrocytoma as opposed to oligo dendri glioma.

26:37

And if you're presented in a patient who is younger,

26:39

younger than say age 40 is probably more likely

26:43

that they have an IDH mutant tumor than an IDH wild type

26:46

tumor getting a lot

26:50

of questions in the chat.

26:53

So I may defer answering them

26:58

until the end, actually, uh,

26:59

because looks like there are a lot.

27:02

K 17 is a 7-year-old with headache

27:04

and bilateral optic disc edema.

27:09

What is the most likely pathology?

27:10

Is it diffuse midline glioma, H three K 27 altered

27:15

medulloblastoma pilocytic as, uh, astrocytoma

27:18

or posterior fossa?

27:20

Appendamoma,

27:27

okay.

27:27

All right. So the correct answer here is pilocytic

27:30

astrocytoma, and the key here is to recognize

27:33

that on the a DC you have very high A DC, okay?

27:37

So medulloblastoma is a small round blue cell tumor.

27:40

It should have relatively low A DC and,

27:42

and, uh, you know, unfortunately a majority

27:44

of you pick medulloblastoma,

27:46

but it's not the correct answer here,

27:48

primarily based on the findings on the A DC.

27:50

So this is a, a diagram taken from an article in scientific

27:54

reports reporting kind of the distribution of a DC values,

27:58

um, drawn within regions of interest of, uh,

28:01

pediatric posterior FOSS tumors.

28:03

It is high yield to know for the boards

28:04

that the most common primary brain tumors

28:08

of the posterior fossa in children are medulloblastoma,

28:11

appendamoma and pilocytic astrocytoma.

28:14

And these can be somewhat distinguished by their, uh,

28:17

location as well as their, uh, diffusion, uh, properties.

28:21

Pilocytic astrocytoma I think of as microcystic, it's kind

28:24

of in the name pilocytic sounds like cystic.

28:27

And those have high a DC value somewhere in the range

28:31

of 1500 to 2000 times 10

28:34

to the minus six millimeter square per second.

28:37

Whereas medulloblastoma is a very highly cellular tumor

28:40

to a small round blue cell tumor.

28:42

And these are gonna restrict diffusion to a degree similar

28:45

to that of surrounding brain parenchyma

28:47

or even, uh, more restricting than that.

28:50

And then in poma is somewhere in between.

28:53

Um, but um, sometimes may be distinguished by the fact

28:57

that it is in the ventricle

28:58

and extruding through the ventricle.

29:00

So if you are faced with a child, uh,

29:02

with a cerebellar lesion that has enhancing components

29:06

and it has cystic components

29:08

and it has really high diffusivity,

29:10

think pilocytic astrocytoma

29:14

case 1850 5-year-old with headache, dizziness

29:17

and gait difficulty.

29:19

So an adult. Now, what is the likely pathology?

29:23

Is it he angio blasts, stoma, neuro psychosis,

29:27

pilocytic astrocytoma or pleomorphic ex anthro astrocytoma?

29:37

Okay, 85% of you got the answer correct,

29:39

which is heman osteoblast in adults

29:42

and you have a posterior fossa, uh, cerebellar mass.

29:46

Think, uh, one of two things.

29:48

Is it metastasis or gio blasts?

29:50

Stoma, I didn't give you metastasis

29:52

and choices, so I made it easy for you.

29:54

It is likely Gio Blas stoma.

29:56

What are the features of Gio Oblasts?

29:58

This is the classic appearance with a cyst

30:01

with a mural nodule that is solidly enhancing,

30:04

and this nodule is very vascular.

30:06

You can see a flow void going to it.

30:09

This is enlarged training vein.

30:10

These are very highly vascular tumors.

30:12

Sometimes hematomas are solid, um,

30:15

and don't have cystic component,

30:16

and sometimes they have cystic component

30:19

and it falls under your differential of, um, cyst

30:22

with neural nodule, uh, differential diagnosis.

30:26

The other choices here are, um, uh, not right

30:28

because cy astrocytoma happens in kids polymorphs,

30:32

antho astrocytoma happens in the sial compartment

30:35

and neurosis psychosis doesn't really have this

30:37

large enhancing component.

30:38

That's hypervascular case 19 is a

30:43

45-year-old with seizure.

30:47

What is the likely pathology?

30:48

I'm giving you CT images and T one post contrast

30:52

and T two weight images.

30:53

Is it central neuro cytoma, choroid plexus,

30:55

papillo meningioma, or subependymal giant cell astrocytoma?

31:04

So since I'm deferring questions to the end,

31:07

it would be helpful it when you type your questions to

31:11

indicate which case they are talking about.

31:13

So when I come to them at the end,

31:14

I can go back to the correct case.

31:16

Um, the correct answer here, uh, is meningioma,

31:20

which only 15% of you chose.

31:22

Okay? So the, uh,

31:25

the reason it's not choroid plexus Papillo is that is a,

31:28

a disease of children primarily,

31:30

and we're here dealing with an adult, um,

31:33

meningiomas have an in adults

31:35

and they can be intraventricular.

31:37

And, um, even in that location,

31:39

they have the typical appearances of a, uh,

31:43

dural based meningioma, uh, where, uh,

31:46

there's calcifications, there's, you know,

31:48

maybe slightly higher density than normal brain.

31:50

It's homogeneously enhancing

31:52

and, um, they're clearly extra axial tumors in

31:54

that you can see like a CSF cleft around this tumor.

31:58

And it's, um, the calcified mineralized components are low

32:01

signal intensity on T two weighted imaging.

32:03

Um, the, this is the most common site

32:06

of an intraventricular meningioma.

32:08

It's the in the atrium of the lateral ventricle.

32:10

The other choices that some of you also chose were,

32:12

you know, not really right,

32:13

because of location of sub abend giant cell astrocytoma,

32:17

which is a Sega, that is also a, um, disease of children

32:21

with tumor sclerosis.

32:22

And that happens at the Freeman of Monroe

32:24

and not in the, um, atrium of the lateral ventricle.

32:27

A central neuro cytoma is also a tumor

32:30

that primarily occurs in the Freeman of Monroe region, um,

32:33

arising from the septum halluc

32:35

and not in the atrium of the lateral ventricle.

32:37

So if you see an adult

32:39

with a homogeneously enhancing calcified mass in the atrium,

32:42

lateral ventricle than meningioma, first

32:46

case 20 is a 75-year-old with two days

32:49

of a neurologic change.

32:51

We have a non-con head CT

32:52

and a CT angiogram maximal intensity projection.

32:56

What is the most likely clinical deficit in this patient?

32:59

Is it cognitive impairment, right sided hemiparesis

33:03

left hemi oia or right hemis spatial neglect?

33:13

So the correct answer here is cognitive impairment,

33:16

which only 9% of you chose.

33:19

Um, the findings here are this hypodensity in the left

33:23

anterior thalamus, which corresponded on a later DWI

33:26

to diffusion restriction.

33:28

And on the CTA that I showed earlier, there was a cutoff

33:32

of the left PCA.

33:33

Now, the reason it's not left hemi noia,

33:35

because that's the wrong laterality.

33:37

If you have a, uh, a left sided PCA deficit,

33:41

you're gonna have a right hemopsia hoon hemopsia.

33:45

Uh, and I was trying to get you to think

33:48

what deficits could be attributed

33:50

to an anterior thalamic infarct.

33:52

Okay? And this is a good time to review the functional

33:56

and vascular anatomy of the thalamus.

33:58

So the thalamus can be divided into four quadrants.

34:02

The medial quadrant is supplied by branches of P one,

34:06

including if you have the anatomic variant,

34:08

the artery perron.

34:09

And this is responsible for arousal memory.

34:11

And so patients who have, uh, medial thalamic infarcts, uh,

34:15

like a artery perron infarct, or just like a top of the base

34:17

or infarct, they have reduced levels of consciousness.

34:21

Now, patients who have anterior thalamic infarcts,

34:23

like our patient present with impaired language

34:26

and memory, especially if this is in the dominant

34:28

hemisphere, which is the left in most individuals,

34:31

and this is due to an occlusion of the, um, P one, uh,

34:35

or the posterior communicating artery, um,

34:39

which supplies the anterior thalamus.

34:42

This is the relay station

34:43

for everything in your ipsilateral kind of frontal lobe,

34:46

which includes your, um, language centers and, um,

34:49

and also, you know, kind of relays for memory as well.

34:52

So anterior thalamus is a site for causing, um, language

34:57

and memory difficulties.

34:58

The lateral thalamus includes the ventral lateral nucleus,

35:01

the ventral posterior medial, uh,

35:04

and ventral posterior lateral nuclei, which subserve sensory

35:08

and motor functions.

35:09

And I remember this because this is right, uh, adjacent

35:11

to the posterior limb of internal capsule, which subserves,

35:14

uh, many of the same functions.

35:16

And so occlusions

35:17

of the PCA P two will infarct the lateral thalamus

35:20

and result in sensory motor deficits.

35:22

And then less well described are posterior thalamic lesions.

35:24

Um, usually, uh, uh, occlusions of,

35:27

of the posterior choroidal arteries, which are branches

35:29

of P two, will affect the posterior thalamus as well

35:31

as the lateral gen nucleus.

35:33

And that causes a visual deficit independent

35:36

of any infarction of the occipital lobe, of course.

35:39

So there's a, a concept known as strategic infarct locations

35:43

where, um, if you have, uh, large

35:45

or a little infarct, um, that can, um,

35:48

vary reliably cause cognitive impairment or other deficits.

35:52

So, uh, when we're talking about small subcortical infarct,

35:55

what location is most strategic in causing post stroke

35:59

cognitive impairment is the left anterior ery thalamus.

36:01

So here, right in the left anterior ery thalamus is, um, uh,

36:05

a high probability of causing

36:07

post stroke cognitive impairment.

36:08

This is based on a voxel by voxel meta-analysis

36:11

that was published, uh, in lance

36:13

and neurology of a bunch of, uh, stroke studies.

36:15

So the left anterior thalamus is a strategic site

36:17

for causing vascular dementia.

36:19

So look for infarcts

36:21

and raccoons in that location on your dementia

36:24

studies case.

36:27

20 ones a 65-year-old with right cranial nerve three palsy.

36:34

Okay, what is the likely cause?

36:36

Is it cardio embolic infarct, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,

36:40

glio, uh, glio, mitosis, cerebri or multiple sclerosis?

36:52

Okay, good. A plurality if you got the correct answer,

36:54

which is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

36:56

But there's a really big spread in the answers.

36:58

The key findings on the CT here is this hyperdense lesion,

37:02

the right cerebral peon call region, um,

37:05

extending into the mid, uh, you know, kind of the,

37:07

the midbrain mentum really.

37:09

And this is contrast enhancing homogeneously

37:11

and it's bright on DWI

37:13

and diffusion restricting, um, uh, is confirmed on the A DC.

37:16

And so when you faced with lesions like this, um,

37:19

this is typical of in, um, CNS lymphoma,

37:23

the most common histology

37:24

of which is diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

37:27

Now, why is it not glio mitosis cerebri?

37:30

Um, so glio mitosis doesn't restrict diffusion, um,

37:32

to the degree that lymphoma does.

37:35

Um, and it's also not gonna be

37:38

hyperdense on non-contrast ct, uh,

37:41

multiple sclerosis is not gonna be hyperdense on ct

37:44

and it's, um, more likely to gonna have, um,

37:47

a complete ring, um, uh,

37:49

or a kind of nodular contrast enhancement, not this,

37:52

uh, kind of wispy.

37:53

Um, and, and solid, uh, infiltrative enhancement

37:57

and cardio embolic infarcts, um, are not gonna be

38:00

as expansile mass like, like we have here.

38:03

Um, uh, those are gonna be, you know, small and,

38:06

and territorial kind of lesions.

38:09

So CNS lymphoma, think about that.

38:11

When you have a paral infiltrative lesion, that's expansile,

38:14

especially if it has all the markers of hyper cellularity,

38:17

like hyper density on non-con ct, as well

38:21

as marked diffusion restriction.

38:23

And, um, and, um,

38:25

and other features that are clues are having, um, uh,

38:29

a solid contrast enhancement

38:30

and a paraventricular predilection, uh, which, uh, you know,

38:34

some of our lesions were.

38:35

So this one was, uh, by the left lateral ventricle,

38:38

and you can see that it was, uh, quite diffusion.

38:40

Restricting case

38:45

22 is a 65-year-old with altered mental status

38:48

for a few weeks after having a cyto reductive surgery

38:51

for gastric cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis.

38:56

What is the likely diagnosis?

38:57

Is it dural venous sinus thrombosis, leptin meningeal,

39:01

carcinomatosis status epilepticus or wees encephalopathy?

39:12

Majority of you got the answer correct,

39:14

which is lept menal carcinomatosis.

39:15

So the key finding here are sheets

39:17

of enhancement on the surface of the brain

39:19

and cranial nerves.

39:20

We can see enhancement through, um, the surface

39:23

of the cerebellar folia, uh, on the s the medial surface

39:27

of the exci lobes and the parietal lobes.

39:30

Um, on other images we can see that as well.

39:32

Um, the key is that there are sheets of enhancement,

39:35

meaning you can see them on consecutive slices as opposed

39:37

to vessels which course in and out on a single slice.

39:41

And you can also see contrast enhancement

39:42

of the trigeminal nerves in the pre, um, in the cer uh,

39:46

cbell pontin naval cisterns here.

39:48

Um, and this represents leptin, nal carcinomatosis,

39:51

which most of you got correct?

39:52

So I won't belabor it.

39:54

The next case is a 25-year-old female with headache.

39:59

What is the pathology? Is it a dermoid cyst?

40:02

Lipoma meningioma or teratoma?

40:10

Okay, the answer is lipoma, which a majority

40:13

of you chose 56%, got the answer right.

40:16

So intracranial lipomas are, um, uh,

40:19

abnormal differentiation of the mens priva.

40:23

And, um, these are most commonly located in

40:26

midline locations.

40:27

The peric collosal cistern, the quad trigeminal cistern,

40:30

the super cell cistern,

40:31

and less commonly the rebell pontin angle cistern.

40:34

And so this is a case of quad trigeminal cistern lipoma.

40:36

You can see that it's homogeneously T one hyperintense fat

40:40

signal intensity, and this is the typical location

40:42

of quadrical cistern lipoma.

40:43

So that's the correct answer.

40:45

Um, a dermoid cyst would be more heterogeneous.

40:48

It may have some lipid, but it's not gonna be bulk fat.

40:51

Um, and it's gonna have a lot of like epidermal, um,

40:53

you know, keratinized, uh, debris, uh,

40:56

with this gonna have a more heterogeneous appearance.

40:59

Um, um, Alan Cytoma, um, uh, i i is gonna,

41:04

um, be T one hyperintense as well,

41:05

but not quite as, uh, bright as this, you know, bulk fat.

41:08

And the teratoma is a kind of a pineal region tumor, um,

41:12

uh, germ cell tumor.

41:14

And, um, it,

41:15

it also is not gonna have just fat signal intensity is gonna

41:18

have other stuff as well.

41:21

24, uh, uh, case 24 is a 30 5-year-old with a headache.

41:27

What is the pathology is an arachnoid cyst,

41:29

epidermoid cyst meningioma or schwannoma.

41:39

So the correct answer is epidermic cysts,

41:41

the vast majority you got this correct.

41:42

So the key findings here is a diffusion restricting lesion

41:46

in the cerebral ponty ankle that is not contrast enhancing.

41:50

And so it's not a meningioma, um,

41:52

it's diffusion restricting, so it's not an arachnoid cyst

41:55

and, um, it's not contrast enhancing.

41:57

So it's not stroma either.

41:58

So, okay, so diffusion,

42:00

restricting non-contrast enhancing lesion, the CP angle,

42:03

it's gonna be epidermoid cyst

42:07

case 25, a 40-year-old with dizziness and division changes.

42:14

What is the most likely diagnosis?

42:15

Is it methanol poisoning, posterior reversible

42:17

and encephalopathy syndrome,

42:19

solvent abuse or thymine deficiency?

42:28

All right, the vast majority,

42:29

you've got this answer correct.

42:30

So this is waris encephalopathy, which is thymine deficiency

42:33

or vitamin B one deficiency.

42:35

And the classic imaging appearance is T two flare

42:40

and sometimes DWI hyperintensity of three locations,

42:44

the medial thalami, um, the, um,

42:48

periaqueductal region of the midbrain, as well

42:51

as the mammary bodies.

42:52

Okay? So, uh, these locations are classic

42:56

for warkin encephalopathy,

42:57

and you can be the hero by suggesting the diagnosis if the

43:00

clinicians were not expecting it already.

43:06

Case 26, 40-year-old with altered mental status.

43:11

I'm showing you flare, D, WI

43:12

and T one pre contrast, what is the diagnosis?

43:16

Is it diabetic tripathy, hepatic encephalopathy,

43:20

hypoxic ischemic brain injury,

43:22

or West Nile virus encephalitis?

43:31

So, uh, as I was saying the, the answer here, um, uh,

43:37

I, I think it was a tie between B

43:38

and C among the respondents.

43:41

And now if you just had the, um, uh,

43:45

the T two flare

43:46

and DWI, uh, you know, c might be a reasonable response.

43:51

Um, but in the setting of having chronic liver disease

43:55

and, um, the clinical context is not like they had a cardiac

43:58

arrest, um,

44:00

the more likely diagnosis is hepatic encephalopathy.

44:02

Now, hepatic encephalopathy creates cortical diffusion

44:06

restriction, um, most classically

44:08

with the predominance involving the cingulate gyre

44:11

as well as the insula.

44:13

Whereas hypoxic ischemic brain injury, um,

44:16

can involve those areas, but is really more

44:18

diffuse than that.

44:19

Um, and uh, another clue is

44:22

that in hepatic encephalopathy there's sparing

44:24

of the occipital lobes

44:25

and the peric um, cortex, whereas those are, um,

44:29

often involved in hypoxic ischemic brain injury.

44:32

So taking into all the context clues here of a background

44:36

of chronic liver disease,

44:37

given the global palai T one hyperintensity

44:40

and the predilection for cingulate

44:42

and insula, the best answer here is acute

44:44

hepatic encephalopathy.

44:50

The next case is a 25-year-old

44:52

with uncontrolled nausea and vomiting.

44:56

What antibodies are likely present in this patient?

44:59

Is it anti aquaporin four,

45:01

anti myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein,

45:05

anti N methyl D aspartate receptor,

45:08

or antiphospholipid?

45:16

All right. And the majority of you chose the correct answer,

45:18

which is anti aquaporin four.

45:20

So the findings here are a T two hyperintensity without

45:23

contrast enhancement often, uh, in the dorsal medulla,

45:27

which is, uh, an area known as the area post rema,

45:30

which is kind of the brain's chemo receptors

45:32

and is responsible for causing nausea, vomiting,

45:35

as well as hiccups.

45:37

And, um, the core clinical features of N-M-O-S-D,

45:41

which is neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, are

45:45

as the name suggests, um, uh, optic neuritis

45:49

as well as longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis.

45:53

But the, um, uh,

45:55

a third core clinical feature is area post Remus syndrome,

45:58

which is manifest by intractable nausea

46:01

and vomiting, um, and sometimes hiccups.

46:03

And then there are other core clinical features as well

46:06

that involve brainstem dysfunction or,

46:08

or cerebral dysfunction or thalamic dysfunction.

46:11

Um, but the, the classic distinct ones are gonna be, um,

46:15

optic neuritis, uh, transverse myelitis,

46:18

and then area postma, which is,

46:20

you know, not built into the name.

46:21

You just have to remember that association.

46:23

And so it's associated with this T two hyperintensity

46:25

of the dorsal medulla.

46:27

And, um, these are most commonly caused by

46:30

or associated with aquaporin four antibodies.

46:35

Case 28 is a 50-year-old woman with right eye blurriness.

46:43

What is the likely diagnosis? Is it Bette's disease?

46:47

Multiple sclerosis, progressive multifocal leuk

46:50

encephalopathy, or Sach syndrome?

46:59

Okay. And the majority, you chose the correct answer,

47:02

which is multiple sclerosis.

47:04

The findings here are T two hyperintensity

47:07

of the optic nerve, the para ventricular white matter here

47:11

and here there's an inflator lesion here at the, um,

47:15

pons, the midbrain junction.

47:17

And if you look closely,

47:18

there's another lesion here in the spinal cord.

47:21

And, um, there are also lesions here involving the

47:24

sub portable U fibers.

47:25

These are known as juxta cortical lesions,

47:28

and they can involve the overlying cortex as well.

47:30

So that'd be intracortical.

47:31

So this is a juxta cortical lesion, periventricular

47:35

infratentorial, spinal cord and optic nerve.

47:37

These are the typical sites

47:38

that are considered key topographies

47:41

in the McDonald criteria.

47:42

Optic nerve was not traditionally in the McDonald criteria,

47:45

but in the 2024 revision to the McDonald criteria that are

47:50

yet to be formalized in a peer review setting, uh,

47:53

they're gonna add optic nerve into

47:55

one of the key topography.

47:56

It's well known that optic neuritis is well associated

47:59

with multiple sclerosis, but it had not up

48:01

to this point be considered, um, one of the sites

48:03

for the purpose of initial diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

48:07

But this is a typical appearance

48:09

of multiple sclerosis when you have, um,

48:11

dissemination in space of multiple demyelinating lesions.

48:16

And, um, features that are specific for MS

48:20

are these kinds of, um, lesions

48:22

that in the paraventricular white matter

48:23

that radiate away from the margin

48:25

of the ventricle in a perpendicular manner

48:28

because they surround veins.

48:31

Uh, there's a periannular distribution,

48:33

if you looked at it on a sagittal,

48:35

it would look like fingers.

48:36

Those are dawson's fingers.

48:38

And now if you have multiple of these sites involved,

48:41

you can confidently make a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis,

48:44

even if you don't see contrast enhancement.

48:47

Um, if you have extensive such lesions

48:50

with a clinical history that is suggestive,

48:52

then you can make the diagnosis of of multiple sclerosis.

48:55

Why is it not ssec syndrome?

48:57

A lot of people chose Ssec syndrome.

48:58

So those present with, um, snowball like, um, demyelinating,

49:03

uh, lesions of the corpus close.

49:05

Some you can have, uh, re uh, you know, retinal issues

49:08

and, um, cochlear issues causing, uh,

49:11

sensor neural hearing loss.

49:12

Um, but that is, you know, the, the appearance

49:15

of those lesions is not like that.

49:17

Uh, multiple sclerosis,

49:18

which again involve multiple of these sites.

49:23

Case 29 is a 65-year-old with lethargy history

49:27

of recent ear infection.

49:31

What diagnosis is present is an invasive o mycosis,

49:36

spontaneous intracranial, hypotension, subdural and emia

49:39

or venous infarction.

49:47

Okay? And the correct answer was chosen by a plurality

49:49

of view, which is subdural and emia.

49:51

On the CT image, we see a focus of pneumo ephalus here.

49:56

Um, it's not clear by the CT image where exactly this is,

49:59

but um, if you scroll back

50:00

and forth, you would know this is somewhere

50:02

along the tentorium.

50:05

And on subsequent MRI,

50:06

we see this curvilinear DWI hyperintensity along the

50:09

tentorium or on the under surface of the occipital lobe.

50:14

And you have to correlate that with the coronal T

50:16

one post contrast image.

50:17

There's this space here of non enhancing fluid in

50:20

between the brain and the left temporal leaflet.

50:23

In the left tentorial leaflet is thickened

50:25

and hyper enhancing.

50:27

So what does this represent?

50:28

What is a flu collection in the subdural space

50:32

that is diffusion restricting has pneumo ephalus in the

50:35

context of an ear infection that is a subdural and emia.

50:39

Now, um, why is it not some of the other choices?

50:43

Um, spontaneous intracranial hypotension would create

50:46

subdural flu collections,

50:47

but it, those would not necessarily diffusion restrict,

50:51

and I would show you sagging of the brain.

50:53

It would not cause neo ephalus is it, um, venous infarction.

50:56

You may have thought venous infarction if you thought this

50:59

diffusion restricting, um, stuff was in the brain.

51:03

But, um, you'd have to correlate

51:04

with the T one post contrast image to see

51:07

that this is outside the brain.

51:08

So this is subdural flu collection,

51:10

and so it's not related to, uh, venous infarction per se.

51:14

So forms of focal intracranial infection

51:17

with separation are brain abscess, subdural and paa

51:20

and epidural abscess.

51:21

So recognizing what the appearance of subdural

51:24

and emia is, it's basically a subdural flu collection

51:28

with diffusion restriction is very important.

51:32

Now we have the last case case, 30 60-year-old with months

51:35

of functional decline with difficulty walking.

51:40

What is the likely diagnosis?

51:42

Is it baso artery occlusion,

51:44

hypertrophic olive area degeneration,

51:47

Erwin leuk encephalopathy, or multiple system atrophy?

51:57

Great, 72% of you got the correct answer,

51:59

which is multiple system atrophy.

52:01

The key findings on this T two flare image are this

52:04

cruciform hyperintensity known as the hot cross bun sign.

52:08

This represents degeneration of the pontine median nuclei

52:12

and the ponto cerebellar tracks going

52:14

across the ponds like this.

52:16

There's also cerebellar atrophy.

52:18

You can see widening of the cerebellar fissures.

52:20

You can see atrophy, the middle cerebellar peduncles

52:23

and associated T two hyperintensity.

52:26

Um, and these are known

52:27

as the MCP signs when you have T two hyperintensity of the

52:32

cps in addition to the hot cross bun signs.

52:34

These are all signs that have been described

52:36

with multiple system atrophy.

52:38

So this is a multi-system, um, problem patients present

52:42

with autonomic dysfunction, motor problems like kind

52:44

of Parkinsonism type of things, um, uh, as well as,

52:49

uh, parametal symptoms.

52:51

And the imaging findings are cerebellar atrophy,

52:54

pontine atrophy, MCP atrophy,

52:57

and you can see T two hyperintensity in these regions

52:59

as well as the pons

53:01

and the typical hot cross bond sign, which we publish

53:04

as a case report in clinical imaging recently.

53:07

Okay, so at this point, um, thank you for participating

53:11

and I'm gonna take an opportunity to answer some questions

53:13

that you guys put in the q and a.

53:17

So, um, just going back, next question was,

53:22

do you expect the fourth ventricle to also be dilated in,

53:24

in cases of aqueduct stenosis?

53:26

No, you don't expect the cases at the fourth ventrical

53:29

to be dilated because the, uh, stenosis causes a buildup

53:33

of CSF upstream of it,

53:34

and so downstream, um, will be normal in size.

53:39

Uh, the next question is, what would be the best

53:40

approximation to ventricular dilation in CT

53:45

with the angles be comparable?

53:46

With MRI angulation this, I'm not sure

53:51

what exactly that is saying.

53:53

Um, the, uh,

53:57

you can see the ventricles quite well on CT

54:00

and, um, that would correlate exactly to

54:02

what you see on MRR, but just, you know, slightly hazier,

54:05

uh, when it comes to the, the walls of the third ventricle,

54:08

but you can see the lateral ventricles quite well

54:10

and the fourth ventricle quite well.

54:12

Um, somebody asked about the sub

54:14

subarachnoid hemorrhage sign.

54:16

So that is a sign of, uh, diffuser edema

54:20

where you have relative hyper density of, um,

54:24

venous structures that are coursing the, uh, basal cisterns

54:28

and sci and so forth that gives the, um,

54:31

mimicking appearance of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

54:33

But it's actually not subarachnoid

54:34

hemorrhage, it's venous congestion.

54:35

And the surrounding brain is just so edematous that, uh,

54:38

it, it is very low density.

54:40

So everything that is normal blood, uh, looks high density

54:43

and that gives the appearance of subarachnoid hemorrhage,

54:45

but it's not subarachnoid hemorrhage.

54:48

Can I point out Luka and Monroe on the sagal?

54:51

So f frame of Luka is not seen on the sagal image.

54:54

F of Luka would have to be seen on a para sagal image

54:56

where an axle image, because they point out laterally frame

54:59

of Luka is the lateral apertures of the fourth ventricle.

55:02

So it cannot be seen on a mid sagal image.

55:05

The framing of Monroe, um, is, um, right here.

55:09

Um, you know, again, the framing

55:11

of Monroe is just slightly off of the mid sagal image, so

55:13

that would be the connection between the lateral ventricle

55:16

and the third ventricle and just, uh, right in,

55:18

uh, this situation.

55:19

So there's some partial volume averaging effects of some,

55:23

you know, cord plexus here across pyramid of Monroe,

55:25

but that's where it would be.

55:29

Um, I had a question about in the CAA case,

55:33

what is the reason for a single dropout in the Baal ganglia?

55:36

So this is very common with age people get mineralization

55:39

of the global palatine and

55:40

that causes signal dropout on SWI in the global palate,

55:43

that's just due to deposition of some minerals.

55:46

May or may not be seen on ct.

55:48

Often it's not, but iron deposition in the global

55:50

palate occurs with age.

55:52

That happens a lot.

55:53

And these are not to be considered micro hemorrhages.

55:57

Um, someone had a question.

55:59

What was the triangular hypodensity abutting the s uh,

56:03

ss in the cortical venous thrombosis case?

56:05

Does anyone remember what case that was?

56:08

Cortical venous thrombosis. This one.

56:11

Okay, what is the hypodensity?

56:13

This hypodensity triangular hypodensity

56:16

that is normal CSF space, that is the subarachnoid space.

56:23

The next question was can we use a flare

56:25

and DWI sign for stroke for prognostication?

56:28

So they're talking about, um, what case was this?

56:34

DWI flare mismatch sign,

56:35

perhaps this case, right?

56:40

Can we use this for stroke prognostication?

56:42

I don't know that people have described this

56:44

for prognostication.

56:46

All DWI flare mismatch tells you is the relative

56:48

age of this infarct.

56:50

When you have a hyperacute infarct,

56:51

you're gonna see diffusion restriction first,

56:54

and then once you develop more and more, um, ionic edema

56:58

and eventually vasogenic edema, then you're gonna develop

57:01

flare hyperintensity, right?

57:03

That doesn't happen for several hours in most patients.

57:06

And so that's why this was used as the imaging criteria

57:09

for eligibility in the wake up trial, right?

57:11

If you can identify patients that are fla, uh,

57:14

DWI hyperintense,

57:16

but flare negative, that suggests

57:18

that you're within a couple hours of stroke onset

57:21

and there's still may be some, um, reversibly damaged tissue

57:26

that can be salvaged if you recanalize the, um,

57:30

thrombo arteries here.

57:31

The idea is that, you know, even though this is diffusion

57:35

restricting, um, you know, there may be tissue

57:37

that is still not infarcted, you know, within this region

57:40

or just around this region

57:42

that is not irreversibly infarcted

57:44

that could be saved if you apply thrombolysis soon enough.

57:50

Next question was how will a cortical tuber present?

57:54

Now, which question was a cortical tuber? A distractor?

57:58

Remind me here. Cortical tuber was a cortical tuber

58:03

will present in children with a history of tuber sclerosis

58:06

as a small area

58:08

of T two flare hyperintensity involving the cortex

58:12

and subcortical white matter in a wet shaped fashion,

58:15

usually smaller than this and maybe half the size

58:18

or a third the size of this lesion.

58:21

And you may see a radial band in the white matter,

58:25

like a T two hypertense band in the white matter

58:26

that goes towards the ventricle.

58:28

Those are cortical tubers. Uh, question 19.

58:33

Somebody had a question for case 19.

58:35

If this were a child, would you say papillo? Um, um, yes.

58:40

So if this were a child,

58:41

papilloma would be a much better option in the

58:45

differential diagnosis.

58:46

So, uh, cord plexus papillomas can occur, um,

58:50

in the lateral ventricle as well as in the fourth ventricle.

58:54

Um, they typically have a more fron like appearance,

58:57

like a cauliflower, uh, floret or a broccoli floret.

59:01

And instead of this is more like large loation

59:04

that you see in meningiomas, um, cor plex of paps, uh,

59:09

have a much more papillary architecture

59:12

and they don't really have this kind of, um, uh,

59:17

calcification pattern that is more typical of,

59:19

of meningiomas.

59:20

These kind have a, a starburst calcification pattern in

59:23

meningiomas, um, uh, due to kind of the architecture

59:27

that's kind of reading outward from the initial

59:29

neoplastic titis.

59:33

Um, someone asked for question 22,

59:37

what's the relationship of bariatric surgery

59:40

to carcinomatosis?

59:41

They did not have bariatric surgery.

59:43

They had cyto reductive surgery,

59:44

meaning they had peritoneal carcinomatosis

59:47

and they went in labaro, um, you know, uh, with a laparotomy

59:51

to, um, reduce the burden of tumor in the peritoneal cavity.

60:01

Question 21.

60:02

Somebody had a question that, uh, does

60:04

diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

60:06

or primary CNS lymphoma

60:09

normally have multiple intracranial lesions?

60:11

Yes. So I would say more often than not primary CNS lymphoma

60:15

manifests with multiple lesions, not a solitary lesion.

60:18

Yes. For question 24, someone asks,

60:23

why does it have flare bright lesion for epidermoid cyst?

60:28

So, uh, epidermoid cyst is a collection

60:31

of keratin debris due to skin where it shouldn't be,

60:36

and that is in the intracranial cavity.

60:37

And the cyst represents a collection

60:40

of basically wet keratin

60:42

and, uh, they're like sheets of keratin

60:46

and there's fluid in between these sheets.

60:48

And so you can have some areas

60:50

that are not gonna suppress totally on flare just

60:54

because of the debris

60:55

and the, you know, protein, you know, stuff there, uh,

60:59

interferes with the normal signal characteristics

61:02

of the CCSF in which it is bathing.

61:05

So it is possible that sometimes you don't have a,

61:08

a complete flare signal suppression within

61:11

an epidermoid cyst.

61:12

They're not like, they're not like arachnoid cysts,

61:14

which are pure CSF,

61:15

and those should absolutely suppress on

61:18

flare or case 26.

61:22

Somebody asks, is CJDA good choice?

61:27

So, um, CJD would be a choice

61:31

here if you did not have the context clue of, uh, background

61:36

of chronic liver disease based on the T one weighted images.

61:40

CJD yes would have diffusion restriction of cortex as well

61:45

as of basal ganglia.

61:48

Um, I would not favor, uh, favor CJD in this case

61:51

because usually it is not this bright on flare.

61:54

Um, usually the finding is limited to DWI, um,

61:58

unless you have like a really FMT case,

62:00

but I really haven't seen that.

62:02

Usually the, the findings are limited to DWI

62:05

and they're very subtle even though the patient is,

62:08

you know, very rapidly progressing, um, in terms

62:11

of their dimension functional status.

62:14

And then finally last question, question, uh, case 29

62:19

is the dural vein thrombus two.

62:23

Okay, so, um, this one turned out to be arachni granulation.

62:28

You wouldn't know that based on a single image.

62:30

If I scrolled back and forth, you would see

62:32

that this was nodular and not rope like.

62:35

And so it was not a venous thrombosis.

62:37

This was, um, uh, just for me

62:40

to trick you guys into saying it was venous thrombosis, um,

62:44

uh, or venous infarction.

62:46

Uh, but this was, this nodule filling defect was just merely

62:50

a arachnoid granulation.

62:51

These are very common at this location as well.

62:54

All right, thank you guys so much.

62:57

I think I've answered all the questions.

63:00

I think you got 'em all. Great.

63:02

Appreciate you being here

63:04

and thank you so much for everyone else for participating

63:07

and asking such great, great questions.

63:09

You can access the replay of this board review

63:12

and previous ones by creating a free account.

63:15

Be sure to join us next Monday, May 12th with Dr.

63:17

Mahesh, who will lead us in our

63:18

final case crunch of the year.

63:20

And he'll be doing a review of high yield topics pertaining

63:23

to radiation safety and diagnostic

63:25

and interventional radiology.

63:27

You can register for that at the link provided in the chat

63:29

and follow us on social media

63:30

for updates on future meetings.

63:32

Thanks again for learning with us and we'll see you soon.

Report

Faculty

Francis Deng, MD

Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Science

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Tags

Vascular Imaging

Pediatrics

Nuclear Medicine

Neuroradiology

Musculoskeletal (MSK)

Interventional

Head and Neck

Genitourinary (GU)

Gastrointestinal (GI)

Chest

Cardiac

Breast

Body