Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

MSK Imaging Case Review with Dr. Navid Faraji (3-17-25)

HIDE
PrevNext

0:02

Hello and welcome to Case Crunch Rapid case review

0:04

for the core exam hosted by modality.

0:07

In this rapid fire format,

0:09

faculty will show key images along

0:11

with a multiple choice question,

0:12

and you'll respond with your best answer via

0:14

the live polling feature.

0:16

After a quick answer explanation, it's onto the next case.

0:19

You'll be able to access a recording of today's case review

0:22

and previous case reviews

0:24

by creating a free account using the

0:25

link provided in the chat.

0:27

Today. We are honored to welcome Dr.

0:29

Na Raji for an MSK Imaging Board Prep case review. Dr.

0:34

Raji is an MSK radiologist

0:35

and passionate educator at University Hospitals

0:37

and Cleveland, Ohio.

0:39

He's the Director of medical education in the Department

0:41

of Radiology and Associate Program Director

0:44

of Diagnostic Radiology Residency as well.

0:47

He's an assistant professor in the division of MSK radiology

0:50

and is heavenly involved in educating medical students

0:52

in radiologic anatomy.

0:55

Questions will be covered at the end of time, allows,

0:57

please remember to use that q

0:59

and a feature to submit your questions.

1:01

With that, we are ready to begin today's board review. Dr.

1:03

Faraji, please take it from here.

1:06

Okay? Yes. Thanks for joining.

1:08

I see a lot of familiar names in the audience,

1:12

which means I cannot repurpose this for my residents,

1:15

unfortunately, but, uh, maybe in a future year.

1:18

Um, let's get started.

1:20

Yeah, we're gonna, so we got 24 cases

1:23

and, um, you know, multiple choice in the style of the

1:27

A BR core examination, at least in my view.

1:30

I don't write any board questions or anything like that, so,

1:33

but if I did, I would test on some of these concepts.

1:37

So let's see what we got.

1:38

We've got, I've got no relevant disclosures here.

1:43

Um, and we are gonna start with this question

1:48

to see some demographic information.

1:51

So if you could share, are you a resident studying

1:56

for the core, an attending physician just here for the cases

2:00

or other

2:09

Resident studying for the core?

2:10

80%. Got it. Correct.

2:12

Um, 10% are here for the cases and, okay. Six and four.

2:17

All right, lovely. Well, um, we're gonna, yeah,

2:20

we're gonna learn together and, uh, it's gonna be great.

2:24

So let's just do a quick review of some of the content.

2:28

Uh, I re this was from 2021,

2:31

but I did do a revisit of this information, um,

2:35

using the good old Google

2:36

and I did, you know, a BR core exam, uh, breakdown for MSK

2:41

and here is what I found.

2:43

Again, it doesn't look like it has changed much.

2:45

So about 20 to 25% is gonna be trauma.

2:48

Then we're gonna have infection

2:49

and neoplasm as the next two categories.

2:52

Metabolic marrow, post-op,

2:55

congenital arthritis and patches disease.

2:59

So we're gonna, I did distribute, uh,

3:02

before we start, I did distribute these questions, uh,

3:06

relative to these percentages.

3:08

Um, here's a hint.

3:10

There will be no cases

3:11

of pageant disease, so sorry for that.

3:16

Okay. Question one.

3:17

Um, 27-year-old male presents with anterior shoulder pain

3:21

and instability following a traumatic anterior shoulder

3:24

dislocation during a football game.

3:26

What is the most likely diagnosis,

3:44

If you guys have any I image issues

3:46

or you'd like me to zoom in on anything?

3:48

You don't see anything? Well,

3:49

'cause I realize I didn't make 'em full large pictures.

3:53

Um, let me know. Okay, so good.

3:56

This was a relatively challenging question it seems.

4:00

Um, and most folks thought either a haggle

4:03

or a retracted rotator cuff tear, um, with hill sax lesion

4:08

a third place.

4:10

And I very specifically changed some of the wording

4:13

or added, uh, modified the wording for this question.

4:16

So let's look at this. There is some signal in the cuff.

4:20

I, I will give that to you.

4:21

Now, technically for a rotator cuff tear, the rules

4:25

that I learned say that there needs

4:28

to be fluid signal intensity.

4:29

However, the morphology somewhat irregular,

4:31

so you could argue that there is a tear potentially.

4:34

However, the word retracted, I think, um, kind of makes

4:38

that the less ideal answer

4:40

because if there is a tear here, it is not retracted.

4:43

Because I see tendon and tendon,

4:45

I don't see any tendon retracted to the glenohumeral joint.

4:47

So that is would not have been the choice that I selected.

4:52

Um, let's go to the answer. The answer is haggle.

4:55

Um, so humeral avulsion of the inferior g glenohumeral liga,

4:58

and we can see a positive arrow sign here.

5:00

So the IGHL inferior g glenohumeral ligament forms this

5:05

U-shaped pouch of the inferior joint capsule.

5:09

And if we're gonna talk about the anatomy,

5:11

let's talk about it a little bit more in depth.

5:13

There are anterior and posterior bands

5:15

of the inferior glenohumeral ligaments.

5:16

The glenohumeral ligaments are not really in fact ligaments,

5:19

but rather thickenings of the joint capsule.

5:23

And the IGHL is very important for the, uh, static

5:28

stability of the glenohumeral joint.

5:31

And so, um, yeah, we can see

5:33

that rather than having a U-shaped pouch here,

5:36

we have a relatively J shaped pouch or yeah, JS shaped.

5:40

We're gonna go with J and there is fluid signal intensity

5:44

disrupting the humeral attachment of this,

5:48

uh, JS shaped structure.

5:49

And fluid is extending along the medial humeral shaft.

5:53

And so that is what a humeral avulsion

5:56

of the inferior glenohumeral ligament would look like.

5:59

You can also have a gaggle

6:00

or a glenoid avulsion of the inferior glenohumeral ligament,

6:03

which would appear similar,

6:05

but the um,

6:06

the fluid signal intensity would be actually going along

6:10

the glenoid.

6:11

You know what? I decided that I'm gonna move this over here.

6:14

It wasn't working how I was hope hoping, bear

6:18

with me, bear with me people.

6:20

I'm still here. Everything's fine. Okay.

6:23

Um, we would expect fluid signal intensity go along the

6:25

glenoid if it was a gaggle.

6:27

You could also have other alphabet soups like a b hagel

6:31

or a bagel, which is a bony humeral avulsion

6:33

of the inferior glenohumeral ligament,

6:35

where you might see a little chunk of bone attached to that.

6:38

Um, bang.

6:40

Heart lesion we know is a,

6:41

is a basically anterior labral tear.

6:44

I don't see any discreet labral tears on this

6:46

exam on this image.

6:48

Hill sac lesion would be a posterior humeral

6:50

head impaction injury.

6:52

And yeah, that's all the answer choices.

6:54

So that one I would call a haggle.

6:57

And if you have any questions as we go through, feel free

6:59

to drop 'em in the box

7:00

and I can try to clarify the best of my ability.

7:04

Let's move on.

7:09

Okay. Case two, 45-year-old male with a history

7:12

of longstanding hypertension

7:13

and hyperlipidemia presents with sudden right ankle pain

7:17

after minimal activity, denies direct trauma

7:19

but reports prior episodes

7:21

of mild posterior ankle discomfort.

7:23

MRI reveals this image.

7:25

Which of the following pathophysiological mechanisms

7:27

best explains this injury?

7:36

Boom. Okay, 88% got it right.

7:39

Hopefully they throw you some softballs like this too.

7:42

Um, on the actual exam.

7:44

So the correct response is degenerative collagen changes

7:49

and relative hypo vascularity.

7:51

So I think the two choices probably that most folks are

7:54

between, if they are between any choices are C and D.

7:59

And we know that, um,

8:01

the Achilles tendon tears at the critical zone,

8:04

which is approximately six centimeters proximal

8:07

to its calcaneal insertion as we see this kind

8:09

of undulating fiber here.

8:11

Um, and that area has relative hypovascular and, and

8:16

therefore it's more prone to degeneration and and tear

8:19

because of that, you know, lack of regenerative capacity

8:23

and hypovascular in that region.

8:26

Traumatic avulsions in the calcan insertions

8:28

are much less common.

8:30

Um, much, much less common such

8:31

that it's may constitute like 1% of the ones I've ever seen.

8:36

Uh, chronic inflammatory arthritis causing synovial erosion.

8:40

Nope, that's not it.

8:42

Uh, and acute bacterial infection weakening the tendon,

8:45

it wouldn't be the infection weakening the tendon,

8:47

but there are some antibiotics that we know such

8:49

as fluoroquinolones

8:51

or corticosteroids which can exacerbate collagen dysplasia.

8:56

So, um, if this had said antibiotic, you know, effect

9:01

or there was some history here

9:03

that suggested they might have been on antibiotics,

9:05

that would've been a reasonable response,

9:06

but not in this particular instance.

9:08

Um, let's see. Make sure there's any additional information.

9:14

Okay. No, I think that's pretty much it.

9:17

So yeah, that's the main thing

9:18

to know about the achilles tendon.

9:20

Um, just while we're here some anatomy,

9:23

this is the CAGR fat pad.

9:24

It can be a question that's asked this hypo intense, uh,

9:28

on this fat suppressed image,

9:30

fat pad triangular fat pad deep to the achilles tendon.

9:34

Um, okay, we'll go to the next question.

9:39

A 14-year-old soccer player presents

9:41

with acute right groin pain

9:43

after forcefully kicking a ball during a match.

9:45

Physical exam reveals pain with resisted extension,

9:48

which are the following as the most likely diagnosis.

9:58

Okay, lovely. Um, majority got it right.

10:01

61% rectus femes tendon avulsion at the A IIS.

10:06

Um, 11% said sartorius at the

10:09

as IS hamstring at the ischial tuberosity

10:12

or ilio sous tendon at the A IIS.

10:15

And I purposely put two with a IIS to see if people know,

10:19

um, 'cause you maybe you can identify the A IIS,

10:22

but do you know what originates there?

10:24

So I mean this is a relatively basic anatomy question.

10:27

However, they can test on basic anatomy

10:30

and I think it's important to know the anatomy.

10:33

Um, you know, we'd like to learn these really, for lack

10:37

of a better term off the top of my head,

10:39

sexy disease processes.

10:41

But you know, it's really important to know the basics.

10:44

Um, and we can see here at the anterior inferior iliac spine

10:48

there is an avulsion fracture of the, uh,

10:52

rectus femoral tendon origin.

10:53

So let's just really briefly review the

10:55

origins and insertions.

10:57

So rectus femoris from the A IIS sartorius is a little bit

11:01

higher at the A SIS.

11:03

We know the iio sous tendon inserts onto lesser trs.

11:08

We know that hamstring tendons originate from the

11:11

ischial tuberosities.

11:12

We know that the adductor tendons originate from the

11:14

pubic synthesis region.

11:16

We know the gluteus minimus

11:18

and medias tendons insert onto the greater choke

11:20

caners bilaterally.

11:22

Um, the, some of the rectus abdominus muscles and or insert

11:26

or origin insert onto the iliac crest bilaterally as well.

11:30

So you're gonna wanna know those things.

11:32

Um, another question they could ask just for a two, for one,

11:36

uh, is uh, let's say they can show an UL

11:41

fracture of the lesser trocanter in a skeletally mature

11:44

patient, an adult with fused apophysis.

11:48

That would be a pathologic fracture until proven otherwise

11:51

because we know that adults one in general don't UL bone,

11:55

uh, they tear tendons.

11:56

And so, but a classic question is lesser tr avulsions in

12:00

adults should prompt some sort of inquiry

12:02

for underlying neoplasm.

12:04

So what if, I don't know if it's a bone scan or MRI

12:06

or whatever choice they give you.

12:08

Um, you're gonna wanna look for some sort

12:11

of osseous neoplasm

12:12

and a pathologic fracture if you see a lesser

12:15

trocanter avulsion in an adult.

12:17

Actually, similarly, they could say on the last question

12:19

of if you had a calcaneal avulsion

12:22

of the achilles tendon in an adult,

12:23

that might be another thing that prompts further inquiry.

12:28

Okay,

12:33

case four, A 3-year-old female presents

12:36

to the emergency department after twisting her ankle

12:38

while stepping off a curb.

12:40

She reports immediate pain and difficulty bearing weight.

12:42

The lateral radiograph of the foot is

12:44

provided based on the radiographic findings.

12:46

Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?

12:56

Um, okay, fracture of the anterior process

12:59

of the calcaneus 75%.

13:02

Um, got it right. And so let's show that finding here.

13:07

So there's some commonly missed ankle fractures

13:09

and this is also an anatomy type thing.

13:12

So we can see here that there's a linear lucency

13:14

through the anterior process of the calcaneus right there.

13:18

And that can be commonly missed if we're talking anatomy.

13:21

Let's go through the other things. So here's a Taylor neck.

13:25

The lisfranc injury,

13:26

if we were looking at a lateral foot radiograph

13:28

or a lisfranc injury, we want to look

13:30

for tarsal metatarsal mal alignment.

13:32

And sometimes you'll see that the metatarsals are a little

13:34

bit more elevated relative to the tarsal bones

13:36

or vice versa.

13:38

Any tarsal metatarsal mal alignment on the lateral view gets

13:41

my hackles up for a um, li Frank injury.

13:45

Cuboid fracture looks okay to me.

13:48

And then the lateral process of the TAUs is this triangular.

13:51

It's not really in plain as nicely as we'd like,

13:53

but this lateral triangular structure is the lateral process

13:57

of the talus, which is another commonly missed ankle

14:00

fracture and one that we're gonna wanna look for.

14:02

Make sure we don't miss that. So that is what that is.

14:06

Also, just know that an if you are presented

14:08

with ankle radiographs, the base

14:10

of the fifth metatarsal should be included

14:12

on an ankle series.

14:13

So that's something you're gonna want to clear

14:15

when you look at that.

14:23

Okay. Case five

14:27

65-year-old male emergency department.

14:29

After fall, he's holding his right arm abducted

14:32

and reports severe pain and limited range of motion.

14:35

And AP RAF of the shoulder is obtained.

14:38

Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?

14:48

Okay, great. The humeral head is located inferior

14:50

to the glenoid fossa is the correct answer.

14:54

Um, so this is an inferior glenohumeral dislocation,

14:58

inferior glenohumeral dislocation, also known as l lux.

15:03

Erecta is a very rare type of glenohumeral dislocation.

15:06

We know the anterior is the most common.

15:08

Posterior is probably the next most common in

15:11

inferior is the least common.

15:13

Uh, but it on it basically looks like the patient is raising

15:15

their hand and that's basically an abducted position

15:19

and it's kind of locked in that position.

15:22

Um, we don't really have,

15:24

and it's a very characteristic appearance

15:26

on an AP radiograph.

15:27

You don't really have a scapular y

15:29

or an axillary view to see if it's an anterior

15:32

or posterior gland humeral dislocation,

15:33

which may have been a good clue

15:34

that it's not one of those things.

15:36

Um, and bank heart lesion, we don't really have a good, um,

15:41

here's some of the other options.

15:42

Humeral has located at, uh, anterior,

15:44

we don't know posterior haggle.

15:46

You can't really tell if that's the case

15:48

because it's not a MRI and a B haggle.

15:51

You could technically look for some bony avulsion,

15:54

but we don't see anything like that.

15:55

So really it should be between these top three choices.

15:58

And given the AP view and the elevation

16:02

or abduction of the humerus, um, um, uh,

16:06

inferior humeral dislocation.

16:07

I've only seen one of these in clinical

16:09

practice and this is it.

16:11

So not very common.

16:18

Okay,

16:24

A 12-year-old boy presents with five day history of fever,

16:27

right lower leg pain and difficulty walking.

16:30

Physical examination reveals warmth, swelling, tenderness.

16:32

Proximal tip lab tests show elevated WBCs and CRP

16:37

and MRI of the right lower extremities performed,

16:39

which is the most specific

16:41

for acute osteomyelitis in this patient.

16:51

Great. Um, concordant low T one

16:54

and high T two signal in the bone

16:56

marrow is the correct answer.

17:01

Okay, so we know

17:04

that if we're talking about the most sensitive finding

17:06

for osteomyelitis, it's probably just T two hyperintensity

17:10

of the bone marrow, which is marrow edema.

17:12

But we know that marrow edema is

17:14

just swelling in the bone marrow.

17:16

That can happen for a number of reasons.

17:17

I can stub my toe, I can drop something on my toe,

17:22

I can fracture.

17:23

You know, many reasons why.

17:26

Um, bone marrow can be emer.

17:29

However, T one signal loss is more,

17:32

especially in a geographic distribution,

17:34

is much more specific for osteomyelitis,

17:37

particularly when it is associated with high T two signal.

17:41

You can have periostial reaction on T one weighted images

17:45

and the setting of osteomyelitis,

17:46

but you can have periostial reaction for stress injuries.

17:48

There's a lot of reasons one can have peri sitis

17:51

and osteomyelitis is not necessarily, uh,

17:54

the reason Soft tissue edema, again, nonspecific,

17:56

you can have cellulitis without osteomyelitis,

17:59

which is pretty common.

18:01

And so that would not be the most specific.

18:03

A joint effusion on fluid sensitive images.

18:06

Um, I mean that can indicate septic arthritis.

18:10

Um, but how, you know, you, one,

18:13

you can have septic arthritis without osteomyelitis

18:16

and two, um, just

18:18

because you have a joint effusion, you can have a joint

18:19

effusion as a reactive process from osteoarthritis

18:21

or you can have it due to inflammatory arthritis.

18:23

It's not specific. And then cortical thickening, again,

18:27

non-specific, that could be related to uh,

18:30

stress reaction osteomyelitis, any, you know, number

18:34

of things really here we can see

18:37

that within the marrow there is this relatively T two

18:39

hyperintense kind of multi likely related collection.

18:42

Uh, this could represent a brody's abscess

18:45

that's which could be seen in the setting

18:47

of chronic osteomyelitis.

18:48

So really you don't even need this image

18:49

to answer this question.

18:51

And I would encourage on the test actually, you know,

18:54

read the question stem,

18:56

see if you can answer the

18:57

question without looking at the image.

18:58

Not always is the image gonna be relevant, um,

19:00

but sometimes it will be relevant and all.

19:03

Also, also one thing I've noticed when I take, when I,

19:06

you know, just recalling my experience is that not,

19:11

I think most of the time you're gonna be able

19:12

to narrow it down to two questions

19:14

or two answer choices I should say.

19:17

And between those two it will be somewhat of a challenge

19:22

to figure out which one is the correct one.

19:24

And most of the time you'll have some piece of information

19:28

or something on the image that you can use

19:30

to delineate between those two.

19:33

They're both gonna seem appropriate an answer choices

19:35

and there's just something either in the image

19:38

or in the clinical history that makes one

19:40

of those answer choices better than the other.

19:43

And so if you're between two

19:44

and you can't figure out which one would be the best one,

19:46

just make sure you take a second look at the images

19:48

or the question stem to see if there's anything

19:51

that leans one way or the other.

19:53

Because a lot of the time I think what they're trying

19:56

to do is test our clinical reasoning, um,

19:59

and why we might choose two similar answer choices

20:01

between two similar answer choices,

20:03

why we would choose one or the other.

20:04

So see if there's anything in

20:05

those stems that might help you.

20:08

Um, I'll make sure,

20:09

just make sure there was no additional pieces

20:11

of information I wanted to share

20:12

with you guys here in my notes.

20:16

Uh, yep.

20:21

We know the MRI is most sensitive

20:22

and specific imaging modality for early diagnosis of osteo.

20:26

We can de detect bone marrow edema within three to five days

20:29

after disease onset, making it superior

20:32

to plain radiography, which may not show, uh, changes

20:36

until we have about 50% of the bone mineral density lost.

20:39

So, and that can be up to seven to 14 days even.

20:43

So, uh, all right, question seven,

20:48

A 55-year-old man with a history

20:49

of poorly controlled diabetes presents

20:53

with chronic osteo of the humerus.

20:54

MRI reveals a sequestrum indicating chronic osteomyelitis.

20:57

What is a sequestering?

21:07

Okay, piece of necrotic bone. That is correct. 78%.

21:11

Got it right. So yeah, so we have a number of findings.

21:14

Let's go to the, Ooh, look at that. That was pretty cool.

21:18

Um, alright, a piece of necrotic bone.

21:20

So let's talk about it.

21:21

Uh, kudos to radio pedia for this lovely image.

21:25

Um, but there are a number of findings for chronic osteo.

21:27

One is a sequester, which is a piece

21:29

of necrotic bone in the middle of this area of infection.

21:33

Lucrum is this dense sclerotic bone

21:35

that surrounds the sequestrum.

21:38

You can have a cloaca, which is an area of cortical defect

21:43

that allows the pus

21:45

or brody's abscess to decompress through the out of the bone

21:49

and into the soft tissues.

21:51

Um, and then a sinus tract can happen where that fluid

21:55

or pus decompresses through the skin surface.

21:58

Okay, so those are the main findings in chronic osteo, uh,

22:02

sequester and lucrum, OAK, uh, and sinus tracts.

22:06

Um, sequester is highly specific for chronic osteo

22:10

and can help differentiate from acute osteo

22:12

or other bone pathologies.

22:14

And CT not uncommonly is the best modality to kind

22:18

of visualize these findings.

22:21

Um, because you see, you know, dead pieces

22:23

of bone a lot better on CT than you would on an MRI

22:26

obviously 'cause of the contrast resolution of CT for uh,

22:31

with regard to bone and mineralization

22:33

and adjacent soft tissues.

22:38

Okay, so now we're gonna get into some que two part

22:43

questions that you'll encounter when you take the

22:45

core examination.

22:47

Um, sometimes they're fun when you get to the second part

22:50

of the question and you realize

22:51

that you got the first part correct.

22:52

Sometimes they're less fun when you get to the second part

22:54

of the question and you realize

22:56

that you unfortunately got the first part

22:58

incorrect but you can't go back.

23:00

So you know, this is just a good

23:02

to prepare for those emotions.

23:04

So let's start 14-year-old girl, right?

23:06

Clavicular pain and swelling has been gradually

23:09

worsening over the past three months.

23:11

A radiograph of the right knee is a, this is not a knee.

23:14

So let's just say the right clavicle was

23:17

obtained, followed by an MRI.

23:18

Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?

23:31

A, B, C. Okay, that is potentially a correct answer,

23:35

but that is the most common, that's the 80% of folks at a,

23:38

B, C, 8% cholangio Chad.

23:41

Okay, here's part two.

23:43

Biopsy confirms diagnosis of an A, B, C.

23:47

Which of the following treatment options is most

23:48

appropriate for this patient?

23:57

Okay, intralesional cartage

23:59

with high speed buring and bone graft.

24:01

Alright, so let's talk about this. So yes, this is an A, BC.

24:05

We can see in the distal

24:07

or mid to distal clavicle there is a relatively expansile

24:11

radiolucent lesion.

24:13

I don't see any matrix or osteo, you know, osteo matrix.

24:17

We can see that this patient is skeletally immature.

24:20

It looks like a relatively narrow zone of transition.

24:25

Um, so it has some relatively non-aggressive

24:28

characteristics, narrow zone of transition.

24:31

Um, yeah, I mean there may be a little bit

24:34

of a pathologic fracture,

24:35

but you can get that sometimes in these ABCs

24:38

on MRI we see multiple fluid, fluid levels

24:41

and we know that that can indicate an A, B,

24:44

C when the plane film also suggests an A, B, C.

24:48

However, just given an MRIA tele angio te osteosarcoma would

24:52

remain in the differential.

24:54

And um, so let's talk about this a little bit.

24:58

So ABCs, you know, typically in the first two decades

25:01

of life they're usually expanse out.

25:02

They're usually multiloculated

25:04

and have this soap bubble appearance on MRI and radiographs.

25:08

We know that MRI fluid fluid levels, uh,

25:10

are not path mnemonic but a hallmark feature

25:13

and for the purposes of your test likely, um,

25:16

gonna be present in those.

25:18

And we know that the other test the questions,

25:21

giant cell tumor is usually in skeletally mature patients

25:24

and they're usually epi aile lesions.

25:26

Chondroblast are usually also epi aile lesions.

25:31

Uh, they would be in skeletally immature patients.

25:34

Um, but they're usually really inflammatory

25:36

and can cause a lot of bone marrow edema.

25:38

And simple or unicameral bone cyst would not have the fluid

25:41

fluid levels, but you can see like a fallen fragment sign

25:44

where a little piece of bone may be

25:45

broke off in the middle of it.

25:47

Um, but it's usually just cystic in appearance without

25:50

these fluid fluid levels.

25:53

The second, um, question is that intralesional securage

25:58

with high-speed burring and bone grafting.

25:59

So usually yeah, they'll curate these out,

26:01

throw some bone grafting in there, you can't, uh,

26:05

radiation therapy obviously has adverse effects

26:07

and for a non-aggressive process

26:09

or at least, uh, not not malignant process,

26:12

you don't really need to be doing things like that,

26:15

particularly in pediatric patients.

26:17

Observation with serial imaging is not recommended

26:20

because these things can get larger

26:23

and they can have pathologic fracture, uh,

26:27

systemic denosumab therapy, it has been shown

26:31

and they do use it for some bone lesions,

26:33

however, it's a systemic therapy

26:35

and can cause hypercalcemia.

26:38

Um, and so we wouldn't recommend

26:40

that in this, in this situation.

26:43

And then amputation is obviously super extreme,

26:45

particularly for a benign process.

26:47

So, um, that is correct.

26:49

Intralesional, curtilage, high speed burring

26:51

and bone grafting.

26:56

Alright, case 10 3-year-old woman,

27:01

slowly growing, painless mass,

27:03

six centimeter soft tissue mass as seen here on Mr.

27:07

Biopsy confirms desmoid fibromatosis,

27:10

which are the followings, the most appropriate initial

27:12

approach for this patient,

27:21

right?

27:22

I did it. I was, I didn't want you guys

27:25

to get everything right, so I wanted

27:27

to make it somewhat challenging.

27:29

So, um, active surveillance is the correct answer.

27:33

40% got it right, 31% wide surgical resection

27:37

and doin based chemotherapy as a third place at 13%.

27:42

So let's talk about it.

27:44

Here's the answer, active surveillance.

27:48

Okay, so desmoid fibromatosis, what is it?

27:51

It is a benign tumor,

27:55

however, it is locally aggressive and it tends to reoccur

28:00

after resection

28:02

and it tends to extend along like the surgical plane

28:07

and the other like fascial planes.

28:09

Okay? So in general, surgical resection is avoided,

28:14

um, unless absolutely necessary.

28:18

Um, but in vast majority of cases, the first

28:21

and initial treatment, um,

28:23

or management approach is active surveillance

28:26

because some of these will burn out on their own.

28:29

Okay? They, some of them they don't just

28:30

always continue to enlarge.

28:32

A certain percentage of 'em actually get smaller

28:35

or don't enlarge.

28:36

Oh, okay. Yeah. Here is the tumor. So good question.

28:39

Thank you. In the posterior aspect of the thigh,

28:42

there's this relatively pretty pronounced hypo intense

28:46

T two mass.

28:48

They can be heterogeneous on T two, um,

28:51

but they're usually T one hypo intense due

28:53

to the fibrous nature of the mass.

28:57

Um, so there's a lot of, you know, which is the,

29:00

so people are bringing up good points.

29:02

What about intra arterial doer was

29:05

limiting systemic distribution in this case?

29:08

I guess the main thing for me is which

29:10

of the following is the most appropriate initial

29:12

management approach for this patient?

29:14

Okay, so initially for the vast majority of these,

29:17

you're just gonna do active surveillance

29:18

to see how it behaves.

29:20

Okay, is it gonna enlarge and extend along more places?

29:23

Is it gonna not enlarge? Is it gonna get smaller?

29:26

You know, these things have unpredictable behavior

29:29

and some of them will just burn out on their own

29:32

and may not need additional therapy.

29:35

All of these other options are reasonable

29:40

treatment alternatives,

29:41

but they're not the best initial management approach.

29:44

You can do drebin based chemotherapy, you can do imatinib,

29:48

um, it's a second line treatment for failure

29:52

after observation,

29:53

radiation is considered for salvage therapy.

29:55

You can even do RFA or other types of ablations.

29:59

Wide surgical resection is no longer considered first line

30:02

due to high recurrence rates between 24 and 77%

30:06

and potential morbidity, um,

30:08

and radiation is considered a salvage

30:10

therapy when other options fail.

30:11

So there are, these are not unreasonable

30:14

eventual treatment options,

30:16

but they are not the best initial

30:18

management approach for this patient.

30:21

Um, uh, there is no predilection

30:25

for a site of this tumor.

30:26

It can be in the subcutaneous soft tissues,

30:28

it can be intraperitoneal.

30:31

Um, and there's a lot of other questions we'll get to,

30:34

hopefully at some point I can come back

30:36

and try to answer those,

30:38

but the main thing is you wanna watch these, um,

30:41

and you don't really want to do anything about them

30:44

unless you really have to.

30:46

I've been to a few sarcoma tumor boards in my day

30:49

and the surgeons generally, you know,

30:52

don't wanna really ize these.

30:54

And when a surgeon doesn't wanna ize something

30:57

that's usually, you know,

30:59

means it's probably not a very fun surgery to do.

31:02

So just something to think about.

31:05

Um, okay, great case.

31:09

1120 8-year-old woman presents

31:12

with a slowly growing painless mass in the posterior aspect

31:14

of her distal femur plane radiography that knee is obtained.

31:17

Which of the following radiographic findings

31:19

as the most likely diagnosis

31:28

or osteo osteosarcoma?

31:30

69% correct. Okay, lovely.

31:32

Myositis, ossificans

31:34

and osteo kma are the next, um,

31:38

best options are most frequently given options.

31:40

So here's this mass

31:42

and I think one thing you can see here is this relative

31:46

radiolucency undermining this mass, um, that kind

31:50

of radiolucent string sign we call it.

31:52

And that is a pretty characteristic appearance of a

31:58

osteosarcoma par, uh, par osteo osteosarcoma.

32:02

We can see that there's hyper dense

32:03

or mineralization within that

32:05

that would suggest osteoid matrix.

32:08

Um, so osteo kdr, you know,

32:12

we're not definitely seeing cortical medullary continuity.

32:14

So if you see an osteo kdr, we should see

32:17

that the cortex here stops and then goes around this mass

32:21

and the cortex here stops and goes out there.

32:24

There's, there's cortex disrupting the mass from the

32:28

underlying femur.

32:29

And so there's no

32:31

demonstrated cortico medullary con continuity there.

32:34

Conventional osteo does not usually have this pedunculated

32:37

appearance at the posterior aspect of the distal femur.

32:40

Relatively characteristic location

32:42

and appearance of a, um, of a par osteosarcoma, uh,

32:47

Lange osteosarcoma, uh, we will talk about that,

32:51

but it's more of an imaging, uh, MRI type diagnosis in myo.

32:54

It's OCI hands. It's not a bad option that tends

32:58

to have peripheral mineralization

33:01

and um, kind of central lucency in some

33:04

of this mineralization here.

33:06

And it doesn't really look like bone to me.

33:09

It looks like just hyper density and matrix,

33:11

but I don't see the architecture of a bone, uh, per se

33:15

as far as cortico and, you know, trabeculation

33:19

and given its intimate location in the string sign

33:22

with the underlying femur, uh,

33:24

I think the best option here is par osteo osteosarcoma.

33:32

Okay. Which of the following statements best describes the

33:34

prognosis of par osteos osteosarcoma compared

33:37

to other osteosarcoma subtypes

33:46

generally is a better prognosis than

33:48

conventional osteosarcoma.

33:49

That is correct. Okay,

33:51

so par osteos osteosarcoma has a relatively good

33:56

prognosis compared to the other subtypes of osteosarcoma.

34:00

Um, let me see here.

34:03

Yeah, so, uh, you know, similar prognosis,

34:07

conventional high-grade osteosarcoma, which is not true,

34:09

better prognosis than conventional osteosarcoma,

34:12

which is true significantly worse

34:14

prognosis than chondroblast.

34:15

Osteosarcoma not really even, you know,

34:19

con it's not worse.

34:21

Chondroblast osteosarcoma is worse.

34:23

And I don't even think you're expected to know

34:25

what chondroblast osteosarcoma is,

34:28

is a poorer prognosis than periosteal.

34:30

It actually has a better prognosis than periosteal.

34:32

Conventional is the worst.

34:33

Periosteal is next, um, best prognosis.

34:36

And then par is the best prognosis out of all of those.

34:40

And it's not equivalent to Lange osteosarcoma

34:43

because, um, that has a,

34:46

it doesn't have a significantly different prognosis than

34:49

conventional osteosarcoma.

34:51

So most of the good prognosis is

34:53

that these lesions are usually surface lesions

34:57

and you can resect the tumor.

34:58

There's not a lot of marrow infiltration generally speaking.

35:03

So you can fl resect the pedunculated soft tissue mass

35:06

and you know, maybe do some radiation or whatnot,

35:09

but you don't really ever need to do, or not ever,

35:12

but most con most of the time there's surface lesions

35:15

and not intra, you know,

35:18

intraosseous marrow replacing lesions.

35:22

Um, so let's see if there's any additional.

35:24

So the five year disease free survival

35:26

for pareo osteo is 90%,

35:28

which is significantly higher than conventional osteos.

35:32

Um, you know,

35:34

obviously if there's in d differentiation within the thing

35:38

that can impact the prognosis,

35:40

but if we're talking broadly speaking categories,

35:43

then par osteo or coma is generally gonna have a better

35:46

prognosis than conventional.

35:48

Um, okay.

35:57

And the string sign is the classic sign for that.

36:00

Alright, I think we're getting

36:01

to some hopefully harder ones.

36:03

I'm gonna go a little bit faster. Uh, we got 11 more.

36:06

So 37-year-old female following ct, most likely diagnosis.

36:19

All right, 63% answered correctly.

36:21

Tumoral, calcinosis, myositis, sifan 29%.

36:26

Okay, this is one of those questions that I alluded

36:30

to earlier where I tried

36:31

to give you two reasonable answer choices.

36:34

I mean some of these are actually relatively reasonable,

36:36

but I think probably mo given that there's mineralization

36:40

and the soft tissues could be a reasonable option.

36:42

Tina synovial giant cell tumor usually isn't heavily

36:45

mineralized like that, so it's probably not the best option.

36:48

Telan osteosarcoma, there is a mass that is mineralized.

36:53

I guess that's not a terrible, um, choice either.

36:56

However, I think one of the keys here is these

37:00

terrible looking kidneys, right?

37:02

So my, um, tumoral calcinosis

37:05

or metastatic calcification is a disease process

37:09

that tends to happen.

37:11

Uh, it's a rare condition

37:13

by calcium character of the calcium deposition.

37:16

The peri articular soft tissues around the shoulders, hips

37:19

and elbow can be seen on CT and mr

37:22

and it's usually lobulated

37:24

and you can see fluid calcium levels distinguish it from

37:27

other soft tissue calcifications.

37:28

So you might see, um, kind of like milk

37:31

of calcium type appearance in the breasts

37:33

where you see layering mineralization.

37:36

And let's see, do I have, okay, yeah,

37:40

well damnit, what do you expect to see on MRCT?

37:44

Bet you can't get this one right.

37:52

Look at you guys. All right, fluid calcium levels.

37:55

Um, so here's that.

37:58

Okay, so similar patient,

38:00

we can see layering fluid calcium levels

38:02

and you can see how this, you may mistake this

38:04

for like a fluid, fluid level and an A BC

38:07

or tele angio osteo sar.

38:09

But in this case the main thing is the kidneys, right?

38:12

These patients, you know, these sort of disease entities,

38:15

um, in my clinical experience most commonly happen in

38:18

patients who have end stage renal disease

38:20

or so some sort of renal dysfunction

38:21

that does not allow them to metabolize the calcium salts as,

38:25

as well as they would like to.

38:27

Um, so it, it um,

38:31

it basically it presents in the soft tissues

38:34

and it can, in this case it's relatively inflammatory,

38:37

but you know, I've seen cases, you know, around the jaw

38:41

as well, but most commonly hips, shoulders

38:44

and kind of these grape like multi lobulated,

38:48

densely calcified soft tissue, perticular soft tissue masses

38:52

with these fluid, fluid levels.

38:54

And look at those kidneys,

38:55

see if there's any additional information that will lead you

38:58

to the most correct answer.

38:59

And in this case it was the appearance

39:01

of the patient's kidneys on the coronal CT

39:04

and the soft tissue windows.

39:14

Okay, what is the best diagnosis

39:16

of the patient's imaging findings?

39:26

Okay, great. I did it again.

39:29

Um, what is the best thing ask You don't ever want me being

39:31

a test question writer

39:33

because apparently I get very excited when

39:35

I make a difficult question,

39:37

but I think it's a fair, fair question.

39:39

I think brown tumor, 52% giant cell tumor

39:42

of bone, 41%.

39:45

Okay, so the best diagnosis

39:48

for this patient's imaging findings.

39:51

Um, I mean I think it would be fair

39:52

to have both giant cell tumor of bone

39:54

and brown tumor in the diff.

39:56

However, this patient has dialysis catheter,

39:59

they've got like some vascular stent here.

40:02

They're like a vascular path that has vascular path,

40:05

that has end stage green disease.

40:07

I mean I guess this is not a slam dunk that

40:09

that's why this is here,

40:11

but you know, it's not uncommon for that to be the case.

40:14

And we can see this large lytic lesion, um,

40:17

in the greater tubercle region,

40:21

which is a brown tumor in this case,

40:24

giant cell tumor of bone.

40:25

We know again, skeletally mature,

40:27

these patients are usually in their

40:29

like thirties or forties.

40:31

You know, I guess anything can happen to anybody.

40:34

Um, but this patient looks a little

40:35

bit older than that to me.

40:36

It's hard to say but you know, obviously the fey are close

40:40

so you know, it's, it's a reasonable answer choice.

40:43

A geode I would expect it's basically a

40:45

large subconscious cyst.

40:46

I would expect that to be closer

40:48

to the articular surface rather than in the

40:50

greater tuberosity.

40:52

O osteonecrosis usually has a more serpiginous curve linear

40:55

appearance rather than a well

40:57

circumscribed rounded appearance.

40:59

And a prior hill sex impaction injury should not have,

41:02

again, this well circumscribed, uh,

41:04

rounded radiolucent appearance.

41:06

So that, and for those reasons I feel that brown tumor, um,

41:10

is the best answer choice in this patient.

41:13

Um, which are osteoclastic tumors they call them.

41:19

Okay, 28-year-old female long distance runner MRI

41:23

of the knee for chronic knee pain.

41:25

The radiologist notes an unexpected pattern

41:28

of bone marrow signal in the distal femur.

41:29

Which of the following pains is most consistent

41:31

with physiologic marrow reconversion in this patient?

41:41

Okay, 49% symmetric areas of low T one signal

41:44

and e femoral metastasis sparing the epiphyses.

41:48

That is the correct answer. C. So let's talk about it.

41:52

So marrow reconversion occurs when there's increased

41:54

hematopoietic demand.

41:56

So we know adults, right?

41:58

Skeletally, mature people that are normal

42:00

have yellow marrow generally, which is fatty marrow,

42:03

which is gonna be hyperintense on a T one weighted

42:06

sequence, not uncommonly.

42:08

We see adult patients

42:09

who have a more heterogeneous appearance

42:11

of their bone marrow on T one weighted sequences

42:13

where there's some patchy islands of

42:15

what we call red marrow, um, due

42:18

to marrow reconversion most commonly clinically seen in in

42:21

like female patients who of menstrual age, um,

42:25

that may increase their knee hemoglobin demand

42:28

or replacement of the hemoglobin.

42:30

And so they can have some patchy red marrow,

42:32

however it should always spare the epiphyses in

42:34

adults like the epiphyses.

42:36

If those are involved, that's usually a bad sign

42:38

because those things are the last to reconvert.

42:41

Okay, so mar conversion occurs,

42:43

increase hematopoietic demand, high endurance athletes

42:46

that it can be seen in, uh,

42:47

it falls predictable pattern occurring in the reverse order

42:50

of normal maral conversion from central to peripheral

42:55

and from axial to appendicular skeleton, meaning

42:58

that it happens in the spine and pelvis

43:00

before it happens into the appendicular skeleton

43:03

and the long bones reconversion typically affects the

43:05

metaphysis first while sparing the epiphyses.

43:09

Um, symmetric is more common than asymmetric

43:12

and sparing the epiphyses obviously is important.

43:15

Um, yeah and usually these patterns respect the growth plate

43:21

and shows characteristic symmetry.

43:24

They may show it to you on,

43:25

so on T one it's relatively easy to figure out.

43:28

I think where it can look funny to a lot

43:30

of learners is on the T two fat suppress sequence

43:33

because it looks like there's these islands

43:36

of like T two hyperintense stuff,

43:38

but really what's happening is that those areas

43:40

of hematopoietic marrow are just not suppressing

43:43

as homogeneously as a normal fat.

43:46

So the normal marrow in those patients,

43:48

the normal yellow marrow is the dark stuff on the T two Fs

43:52

and the slightly brighter stuff is the reconverted marrow

43:56

because it doesn't have as much fat.

43:57

So it does not suppress as homogeneously as uh, normal,

44:02

you know, yellow marrow.

44:03

But this is important concept to learn, um,

44:06

and know for the test and just real life.

44:11

Okay, what is the most likely reason

44:13

for this patient's problem?

44:21

Mechanical loosening,

44:22

50% septic loosening 23% deltoid overuse 18%

44:27

and 9% Terry minor, uh, overuse.

44:29

Okay, so there, there is a reverse glo humeral arthroplasty.

44:33

Let's talk about what we know about those.

44:35

The, the clinical reasoning

44:37

for a reverse GLO humeral arthroplasty is

44:40

that the patient has a suboptimal rotator cuff muscle

44:45

bulk and tendons.

44:46

So when you rotator cuff is atrophied, um,

44:50

you know the problem here is

44:51

generally osteoarthritis, right?

44:52

You can replace the joint either

44:54

with an anatomic arthroplasty or reverse arthroplasty.

44:57

However, if in patients with cuff insufficiency,

45:00

a reverse arthroplasty allows for the deltoid

45:04

to assume the function of the normal rotator cuff as far

45:08

as abduction is concerned.

45:10

So you can also, while decreasing their pain,

45:12

you can restore some of their function.

45:15

And this may not even be a board's question,

45:17

but I thought it was a good question to put in there

45:20

because if you know the biomechanics

45:23

of why a reverse glenohumeral arthroplasty occurs, then

45:29

one can infer knowing the knowledge that one,

45:34

the origin of the deltoid is the acromion process.

45:38

And that if you have a reverse, you're using your deltoid

45:41

for abduction rather than the rotator cuff.

45:43

Then stress fractures of the acromion process are one

45:47

of the complications of a reverse glenohumeral arthroplasty,

45:50

which is a nice little fun thing to know I think.

45:53

So it has this question has many parts.

45:56

One is, you know, one is identifying

45:58

that there's a fracture of the acromion.

46:00

Two is ident knowing that the uh,

46:03

deltoid is overused in the setting of a reverse arthroplasty

46:06

or used more than it would otherwise be.

46:09

And three is knowing the anatomy

46:11

that the deltoid originates from the acromion process.

46:14

And so the answer here is deltoid overuse, um,

46:18

and a acromion stress fracture.

46:23

Okay, I'm moving on 'cause we got nine minutes.

46:26

Alright, 45-year-old man chronic knee pain, prior trauma.

46:31

Which of the following findings is most commonly associated

46:33

with this imaging appearance

46:41

Survey says meniscal root tear and loose int articular body.

46:46

53% intraarticular and 32% meniscal root tear.

46:51

The root tears are the winners.

46:53

Okay, so we see a well corticated acid density

46:57

and the region of the posterior aspect

46:59

of the medial meniscus at the posterior root region.

47:02

The proton density sagal images show that there is an area

47:07

of similar signal intensity as

47:10

to bone marrow within the medial meniscus, posterior root

47:14

or within where we would expect that thing to be.

47:17

That is the characteristic appearance of a meniscal ossicle

47:20

and meniscal ossicles are highly associated

47:23

or are associated with meniscal root tears, um,

47:27

which has been seen in up to 98% of cases

47:31

of a meniscal ossicle.

47:33

So that is, um, the test question here.

47:36

I think it just, you know, identifying

47:39

that this is this thing

47:40

and that it's bone marrow signal intensity

47:43

and knowing that a meniscal osl is an anatomic variant

47:46

and knowing that that anatomic variant can be associated

47:49

with disease and that is the test, um, taking strategy

47:54

or you know, knowledge in this particular case.

47:58

Let's just for fun while we're here, what originates here?

48:01

This is your popplet tendon origin.

48:03

If you see any erosion here, the lateral for Macondo,

48:07

you can see that in the setting of gout, if you ever

48:10

come across one of those pope origin, um,

48:14

deposits can cause erosions of that groove.

48:22

Okay, what is the most likely diagnosis?

48:26

Chronic spa, acute spa serous attribute

48:29

of the bone marrow perineural cyst or osteopenia?

48:39

Chronic spa. 97%. Yeah, I gave you guys some hard ones.

48:42

Felt bad so I threw a softball in there.

48:45

Um, so uh, the marrow we can see of the sacrum is contiguous

48:48

of the iliac bones that has a chronic

48:50

or structural manifestation.

48:52

Ankylosis of spondyloarthropathies such as ankylosing, spon,

48:57

spondylotic, ankylosing spondylitis.

49:00

Um, other structural findings.

49:01

So when we talk about um, spondyloarthropathies,

49:05

we talk about inflammatory changes

49:07

or acute inflammatory changes or structural findings.

49:10

Acute inflammatory changes would be, uh, joint effusion,

49:14

synovitis, um, capsulitis, if you see soft tissue edema,

49:18

bone marrow edema at either side of the joint

49:21

or just a few, uh,

49:22

whereas structural lesions are more like erosions or ankylos

49:26

or fat metaplasia.

49:28

If you see more fat on either focally, then

49:32

that can suggest chronic inflammatory process.

49:35

Similar in like inflammatory bowel disease

49:37

where you get like fat metaplasia

49:39

or deposition within the mucosa or submucosa.

49:42

Don't you know, I don't know exactly anymore

49:44

because it's been a while, but similar concept.

49:47

So this is, uh, okay,

49:52

I guess I didn't give an answer slide, but it's chronic spa.

49:54

That is the answer. Yep.

50:00

Okay. Can't see the images fast enough.

50:03

Mind waiting before sending the pulses,

50:06

what would you expect to see on this foot X-ray?

50:15

Okay, good. This is testing your concept.

50:18

A concept, A concept that had been very confusing to me

50:23

was the difference between marginal

50:24

and juxta articulate erosions.

50:26

Okay, so this is a gouty tophus

50:28

or at least that's why I put this here.

50:30

Um, you can see them, you know,

50:31

in the elbow obviously you can see them adjacent

50:34

to the first MTP, you can see them in the region

50:37

of the achilles tendon insertion.

50:39

Um, just to name a few.

50:41

And so this heterogeneous T two hypertense thing is a

50:45

G tophus, okay?

50:47

And whether or not you got this question right

50:49

or not, I guess it's not, doesn't matter,

50:51

it's not important today,

50:52

but it's important that we identify

50:55

and know the difference between marginal

50:57

and juxta articulate erosions.

50:59

So let's talk about that difference.

51:01

Alright, so, um, alright, so marginal erosions occur.

51:06

They're intra synovial, okay?

51:08

In the bear area where the bone is not covered by cartilage,

51:12

that's typically seen in RA and small joints in the hand

51:15

and feet and as a characteristic feature

51:17

of inflammatory arthritis, juxta articular

51:21

erosions are extra synovial.

51:22

They occur further away from the joint

51:24

outside of the joint capsule.

51:25

It's characteristic of gout.

51:27

That's why you get these punched out erosions

51:30

and like overhanging edges like the rat bite erosions.

51:33

And so if you get a like an MTP erosion

51:36

that's jugs the articular, then the, you know,

51:39

the articular surface kind of hangs out over it

51:41

and that's how you get this rat bite appearance.

51:44

So juxta articular erosions is most characteristic of gout,

51:48

whereas marginal erosions is more indicative

51:51

of inflammatory arthropathies such as rheumatoid arthritis.

51:55

Um, and the key again is their difference lies in their

51:58

location relative to the joint.

51:59

Whereas marginal erosions are at the edge

52:01

of the joint while juxta,

52:02

articular erosions are further away or outside of the joint

52:05

and can help you distinguish these two pathologies.

52:09

And here's the finding that should, um, have suggested

52:12

to me at least that it is gout that this patient has

52:17

um, negatively biore crystals under polarized light.

52:21

There's another thing that they could say, okay,

52:25

what is the cause of this patient's soft

52:26

tissue mineralization?

52:34

All right, calci tendonitis.

52:37

So the key here is differentiating calcification

52:40

versus ossification.

52:41

So I gave you two options that are ossification here.

52:44

Um, where we're ho

52:46

and mo, this to me looks like more globular calcification

52:51

rather than ossification in that there's no peripheral cor

52:54

or central trabeculation on mr.

52:57

If it was ossified it would not be really low signal

53:01

intensity, it would look like a bone, it would have intra,

53:04

you know, there would be bone marrow

53:05

generally in the middle of it.

53:07

So it should be hyper intense on this T one weighted image.

53:10

But we can see this is globular mineralization.

53:13

Um, and that is at the insertion

53:15

of the gluteus maximus tendon on the gluteal tubercle.

53:18

So just remember that you know,

53:20

if they show you calcific tendonitis,

53:22

it's probably not gonna be in a rotator cuff

53:23

because that's where everybody's

53:25

thinking calcific tendonitis.

53:26

But in real life these things can happen anywhere

53:29

that a tendon is inserting or originating.

53:32

So just keep it in mind no matter where you are.

53:35

Uh, we got two more we'll power through here.

53:38

What is the most likely cause

53:39

of the patient's wrist deformity?

53:48

Erosive osteoarthritis? Uh, 49% in pseudo gout.

53:52

35%. Okay.

53:54

The association that is being tested here is

53:57

that a slack risk deformity okay, is

54:01

commonly associated with pseudo gout

54:04

and you can see some faint mineralization here.

54:08

The triangular fibrocartilage complex which would,

54:10

which is also commonly seen in pseudo gout.

54:13

There's also some mineralization here, you know here, here

54:17

around the second MCP.

54:20

Um, so this patient has pseudo gout

54:22

or findings that would suggest CPPD

54:25

and knowing that a slack risk deformity is something

54:29

that is associated

54:30

with CPPD would be the key here against pseudo gout is

54:35

positively biore under polarized light.

54:38

Um, interestingly also treated

54:40

with colchicine in some instances

54:43

as I've learned from my rheumatology colleagues.

54:47

Okay, couple more.

54:48

25-year-old female presents with left hip pain.

54:51

What is the most likely diagnosis?

54:56

This one is kind of evil and I'm sorry for it.

55:05

Okay, great. Yeah,

55:06

so this maybe I'm just a crappy cat question writer.

55:10

That's also very realistic possibilities, so don't panic.

55:13

Um, but this is a case of marked widening

55:17

and irregularity of the left sacro iliac joint.

55:19

This patient had septic arthritis of their left SI joint.

55:23

Um, you know, hip pain people say they have hip pain all the

55:27

time doesn't necessarily mean it's from the hip.

55:30

Uh, I don't see any fractures.

55:32

This is probably just an oce tabula.

55:34

This mineralization here doesn't look like there's

55:36

really severe oa.

55:38

Um, there is CAM type F fish.

55:43

This doesn't look super cammy to me

55:45

and they're not giving us a done lateral view,

55:47

which would be the best way to see

55:49

that there's a CAM type morphology

55:51

and I don't see any linear sclerosis

55:53

or cortical thickening to suggest a stress fracture.

55:55

So just pay attention to those SI joints.

55:58

Uh, asymmetric irregularity and sclerosis

56:01

and widening of the left sacroiliac joint can, should, uh,

56:04

suggest septic arthritis until proven otherwise.

56:08

And then lastly, left and furor ramus fracture?

56:11

I don't think so. Probably projectional.

56:15

And lastly, oh, this was

56:18

that same patient just in case you didn't believe me.

56:24

Okay, 42-year-old man wrist pain.

56:28

What is the most specific positive laboratory finding?

56:38

Okay, good. Um, so the answer choice here

56:41

that is correct is anti CCP positivity.

56:44

And the main thing here for me is

56:46

that there's ulnar styloid process erosions,

56:49

obviously there's erosion or at least lucency of the lunate.

56:52

There's some erosion here of the triquetrum,

56:56

but rheumatoid arthritis loves the ulnar syl process.

57:00

And distal ulnar we can see foveal erosion.

57:03

And I guess the concept I was testing is that um,

57:09

RF positivity is relatively nonspecific.

57:12

Anti CCP positivity is relatively specific.

57:15

So, um, if you someone's anti CCCP positive

57:19

and they have ulnar style process erosion.

57:21

So this is just testing laboratory tests

57:23

and knowing what's sensitive, what's specific

57:26

HLAP 27 is non-specific

57:29

but can be seen in spondyloarthropathies.

57:31

Obviously increased serum uric acid can be seen in gout.

57:34

Leukocytosis would be indicative of septic arthritis,

57:37

but this is a pretty polyarticular process.

57:39

We can see some PIP involvement there too.

57:42

Okay, I think we had some easy ones.

57:44

We had some tougher ones. We had some good questions.

57:46

We had some, you know, not so good questions,

57:49

so I'll take the blame for some of those.

57:51

But hopefully you learned a thing or two

57:53

and, um, opened your mind to the different types

57:56

of questions you may be asked.

57:58

It's not all about imaging findings and ant minis,

58:00

but other clinical correlation as well.

58:03

So I appreciate everyone's iveness

58:05

and your attention on this lovely, uh, St.

58:08

Patrick's Day.

58:10

Dr. Raji, thank you so much for that awesome case review.

58:15

My pleasure. Thanks for everyone else for participating

58:18

and asking such great questions and being here tonight.

58:21

We really appreciate it.

58:23

You can access the replays of our previous reviews

58:25

by creating a free account.

58:27

And be sure to join us next Monday, March 24th.

58:30

Dr. Lindsay Negreti will lead us in a rapid review

58:32

of GI imaging cases.

58:34

You can register for that at the link provided in the chat.

58:37

Follow us on social media for updates on future meetings.

58:40

Thanks again for learning with us and we'll see you soon.

Report

Faculty

Navid Faraji, MD

Assistant Professor, Musculoskeletal Imaging and Anatomy

University Hospitals of Cleveland

Tags

Vascular Imaging

Pediatrics

Nuclear Medicine

Neuroradiology

Musculoskeletal (MSK)

Interventional

Head and Neck

Genitourinary (GU)

Gastrointestinal (GI)

Chest

Cardiac

Breast

Body