Interactive Transcript
0:02
Hello, and welcome to Noon Conference hosted by Modality.
0:05
Noon Conference connects the global radiology community through free live
0:08
educational webinars that are accessible for all and is an opportunity to
0:12
learn alongside top radiologists from around the world.
0:16
Today, we are honored to welcome Dr.
0:17
Siddhartha Gattamangu for a lecture entitled Imaging of Meningeal
0:21
Pathology. Dr. Gattamangu completed his radiology
0:25
residency at Nizams Institute of Medical Sciences and went on to complete
0:28
fellowship training in neuroradiology and nuclear medicine at University of
0:32
Alabama in Birmingham. He previously worked at the Birmingham VA
0:36
Medical Center, where he served as residency site director and is currently an
0:39
associate professor in the Department of Radiology at UAB and serves as
0:43
fellowship director of the neuroradiology program.
0:46
At the end of his lecture, please join him in a Q&A session where he will address
0:49
questions that you may have on today's topic.
0:52
Please remember to use that Q&A feature to submit your questions so we can get to
0:55
as many as we can before our time is up.
0:58
With that, we are ready to begin today's lecture. Dr.
1:01
Gattamangu, please take it from here.
1:03
Thank you, Ashley.
1:05
Today, I will be talking on imaging of
1:09
meningeal pathology.
1:11
I have no disclosures. And
1:15
so I'll give a brief outline
1:19
about on this presentation. We will start with
1:22
anatomy of the meninges and techniques to
1:26
identify meningeal pathology.
1:28
We will focus on the differential diagnosis of different
1:32
patterns of meningeal enhancement.
1:34
As you all know, what is pachymeningeal,
1:38
leptomeningeal, and within the focus of
1:41
pachymeningeal, focal meningeal enhancement, and some diagnostic
1:45
traps when we see
1:49
meningeal enhancement or meningeal pathology.
1:53
So I'm going to start with
1:56
the anatomy. And as you all know,
1:59
we're just going to have a review of the anatomy.
2:02
And
2:03
this is the calvarium, and
2:07
attached to the inner margins of the calvarium, you see the dura
2:11
mater. And the dura mater, as you all know, has an outer and inner
2:15
layer. And the outer and inner layer actually
2:18
separate at certain areas just to enclose
2:22
the dural venous sinuses. And the dural venous sinuses are
2:26
obviously outpouched, or there's an outpouching within the dural venous
2:30
sinuses right here, which are the arachnoid granulations.
2:33
Now, the arachnoid matter is much thinner layer,
2:37
which also parallels the calvarium, but it actually also parallels
2:41
the inner
2:42
dural layer. The outer dural layer remains confined to the
2:46
margins of the periosteum, but the inner dural layer, along with the arachnoid,
2:50
actually will go into the
2:53
fissura and form the tentorial leaflets and the
2:57
falx.
2:58
And inner to the arachnoid matter
3:02
is what we call as the fourth layer, which we'll not be discussing, but
3:06
recently, a fourth layer has been discovered in the meninges.
3:10
And this fourth layer is called the subarachnoid lymphatic-like membrane, and these
3:13
are nothing but those tiny septations or partitions which you
3:17
see in the subarachnoid space, which is below the arachnoid.
3:21
And this is not visible on imaging, but it has now
3:25
been known to play a pivotal role in the glial
3:28
lymphatic system, which is actually
3:33
faulty in many neurodegenerative conditions and neuroinflammatory conditions.
3:37
And lastly, the innermost layer is the pia mater, which is closely invested
3:41
along the surface of the brain.
3:44
So the
3:46
pachymeninges are considered to be
3:50
the dura arachnoid. So that is the
3:54
pachymeninges.
3:56
Whereas the leptomeninges are considered to be the
3:59
pia mater and the subarachnoid space.
4:02
So that is the leptomeninges. The subarachnoid space and the pia mater are
4:06
considered to be leptomeninges, whereas the pachymeninges are
4:09
the outer inner layers of dura, along with the
4:13
arachnoid. Now, there's some confusion over here.
4:15
When we talk about pachymeninges, sometimes they refer only to the dura
4:19
mater.
4:21
And when it comes to leptomeninges, its lepto is more thin or leaf-like, and they
4:24
consider that to be the pia mater and the arachnoid.
4:27
So the arachnoid is kind of a controversy which side it goes.
4:30
But when it comes to meningeal enhancement, when we talk about
4:34
meningeal enhancement, it is the dura arachnoid.
4:36
We're talking about the dura and the arachnoid together.
4:39
And when we come to leptomeningeal enhancement, we're talking about
4:43
enhancement of the pia mater and the subarachnoid space.
4:48
So let's look at this image. And
4:52
for example,
4:54
normally you can see some degree of pachymeningeal
4:58
enhancement, and this is
5:00
some normal pachymeningeal enhancement you actually will normally see,
5:04
and it's actually common to see some degree of pachymeningeal
5:08
enhancement.
5:10
So
5:11
just outlining what are the dural layers.
5:14
So, this is the,
5:17
what is the outer dural layer, and the outer dural layer parallels the
5:21
calvarium or the periosteum. And this is the
5:25
inner dural layer, which forms reflection. It goes into the falx.
5:30
And this is the thinner arachnoid membrane, which is paralleling
5:34
the inner dural layer.
5:36
And this wavy membrane is the pia mater.
5:40
So what is normal versus abnormal meningeal enhancement?
5:44
And that's sometimes tricky, and it is important to know that normal
5:48
meningeal enhancement is best seen when you actually do thinner slices,
5:52
especially when you do 3D T1 thin slices.
5:56
And usually it is discontinuous and linear.
5:59
Sometimes it can be continuous.You see it better on the coronal
6:03
views. And remember that it's only the pachymeninges, which is
6:07
the dual layers, which enhance. The arachnoid and the pia
6:11
mater do not normally enhance.
6:15
So some technical parameters. Again, you can see
6:18
pachymeningeal enhancement normally with CT and post-contrast
6:22
MRI. The higher the magnet strength, the 3D
6:26
acquisition, and the thinner slices, the more likely you're going to see
6:30
normal meningeal enhancement. I have had better success with gradient
6:33
echo images as opposed to spin-echo images.
6:37
Gradient echo images, which you see on the far right, actually
6:41
show pachymeningeal enhancement much better
6:45
than spin-echo images.
6:49
Now, role of contrast-enhanced FLAIR.
6:51
I want to be upfront that we are currently not
6:55
doing contrast-enhanced FLAIR in our institute, but we are actually
6:59
going to adopt that pretty quickly.
7:01
We're going to implement that
7:05
for all our tumor protocol patients
7:09
in the next six months. And
7:12
contrast-enhanced FLAIR is much more sensitive
7:16
to both pachymeningeal and leptomeningeal enhancement,
7:20
and its sensitivity has a higher negative
7:23
predictive value and also increases the confidence to
7:27
diagnose meningeal pathology. The
7:31
reason why is when you do a T1
7:34
post-contrast, sometimes vascular enhancement
7:38
can mimic leptomeningeal enhancement, and
7:42
the vascular enhancement is actually not seen in
7:46
FLAIR post-contrast. So it actually increases your
7:49
specificity and confidence to identify
7:55
meningeal enhancement. It is also sensitive to look at in concentration.
7:59
The recommendation is actually do this study
8:02
sequence four to five minutes after post-contrast.
8:05
So if you give contrast, start with your T1 post-contrast
8:10
and while terminating the study, do the post-contrast
8:13
FLAIR just prior to termination.
8:18
So let's go and look at some cases. So we have a case over here.
8:22
On a CT, this patient seems to have some
8:26
subdural effusion. And on this FLAIR, and this is not
8:30
a post-contrast, it's a pre-contrast FLAIR,
8:33
we see a bright signal in the central space.
8:36
So it looks like a subdural effusion or like a subacute
8:40
subdural hematoma. However, on the post-contrast, there is diffuse
8:43
pachymeningeal enhancement. So this can look like a subdural
8:47
effusion on pre-contrast FLAIR and
8:51
CT. However, now we know this is diffuse
8:54
pachymeningeal enhancement. So
8:58
if you look on the SAS tool image, you can see the
9:02
call mark findings of intracranial hypertension where you have an
9:06
enlarged sella, decreased suprasellar cistern,
9:10
mamillary peduncle angle being narrow.
9:12
So this is the classic
9:14
spontaneous intracranial hypertension.
9:17
Again, this patient has a very high BONES score, and one of the
9:21
major indices of a BONES score is pachymeningeal enhancement, venous
9:25
engorgement, and suprasellar cistern, which is small.
9:28
So these findings prove that this patient actually has intracranial
9:32
hypertension, which is one of the most common causes of
9:36
pachymeningeal enhancement.
9:39
So smooth pachymeningeal enhancement.
9:41
So let's divide pachymeningeal enhancement into
9:45
smooth and nodular.
9:47
The most common cause of smooth pachymeningeal enhancement remains
9:51
intracranial hypertension, as you see over here.
9:54
It is resulting from CSF loss.
9:58
Usually, the CSF loss in idiopathic, or I shouldn't use the term idiopathic, it's
10:02
spontaneous intracranial hypertension, is actually a CSF leak
10:06
in the lower thoracic spine.
10:08
And the CSF loss results in
10:12
meningeal hyperemia and thickening, and there is smooth dural thickening that's
10:15
sometimes associated with a subdural effusion.
10:19
The combination of a subdural effusion and pachymeningeal thickening
10:23
raises the BONES index and also raises the
10:27
likelihood that this is due to intracranial hypertension.
10:30
However, smooth pachymeningeal thickening can also be seen in other conditions, and
10:34
this is the patient with leukemia, this patient had acute
10:38
lymphoblastic leukemia. Again, looks very similar, so you
10:42
want to look for the engorged venous sinuses.
10:45
You want to look for other findings to suggest
10:48
intracranial hypertension. But this was a case of
10:51
leukemia.
10:53
So moving on to smooth pachymeningeal thickening.
10:58
This is a patient who has,
11:00
again, very smooth pachymeningeal thickening.
11:02
However, it's noted by its predominance on one side,
11:06
which is atypical for intracranial hypertension.
11:09
If you look on the coronal T2, notice how the pachymeningeal thickening is dark.
11:13
And typically when you see that, you think of a fibrous condition, a condition
11:17
which results in fibrosis and resulting in
11:20
due to dark signal, and that is seen in granulomatous conditions.
11:24
And if you look at the coronal post-contrast, there
11:28
is this central hypointensity within the pachymeningeal thickening.
11:31
I know it's not that very conspicuous, but
11:34
these are the central hypointensity, and that creates the Eiffel by night sign,
11:39
which has been described in granulomatous polyangiitis.
11:42
And granulomatous polyangiitis is one of the ANCA.
11:46
It is one of the subtypes of antineutrophil cytoplasmic
11:49
antibody diseases, and we know that there are three subtypes.
11:53
One is granulomatous polyangiitis, the other one is microscopic
11:56
polyangiitis, another one is
12:00
granulomatosis with eosinophilic syndrome.
12:03
AndIt is typically granulomatous polyangiitis
12:07
which actually causes
12:10
the pachymeningeal enhancement in the T2 dark signal.
12:14
Now, smooth pachymeningeal enhancement can also be caused by other
12:18
conditions and this, again,
12:21
very non-specific pachymeningeal enhancement, but there is actually a venous
12:25
sinus thrombosis. And venous sinus thrombosis can also
12:29
cause hyperemia of the overlying pachymeninges and cause
12:33
smooth pachymeningeal enhancement.
12:35
So whenever there is smooth pachymeningeal enhancement, you look for venous
12:38
engorgement, but you also want to look for a venous sinus thrombosis, and you may
12:42
want to do an MR venogram if you're also very suspicious.
12:45
But that is one cause of smooth pachymeningeal enhancement.
12:52
So
12:53
now let's go to the other subtype of pachymeningeal
12:57
thickening, which is irregular and nodular.
13:01
And while this is a patient with intracranial hypotension in which
13:05
there is smooth pachymeningeal enhancement, but later
13:08
on, this patient developed superimposed nodularity.
13:11
For example, there's one nodule here overlying the left frontal lobe and
13:15
a poorly enhancing nodule overlying the left parietal lobe.
13:19
And this patient actually developed dural metastases.
13:22
So this is a patient with underlying intracranial hypotension who developed
13:26
focal nodularity in the dura,
13:29
and this is characteristic of dural metastasis typically seen in prostate and
13:33
breast cancer.
13:34
And
13:36
so that's one cause of nodular pachymeningeal thickening.
13:40
As we move on, this is a patient who has diffuse pachymeningeal thickening, but
13:44
there is some nodularity and again, very fibrous
13:48
T2 dark signal. We talked about this occurring in granulomatous
13:51
polyangiitis, but it can occur in other granulomatous conditions.
13:55
And by far the most common granulomatous condition, which
13:58
involves the dura in the Western world, in particular the United
14:02
States, is neurosarcoidosis. And that is
14:06
something you always want to
14:10
suggest that in a differential whenever you see nodular irregular
14:14
pachymeningeal thickenings. Apart
14:18
from pachymeningeal thickening, patients with neurosarcoid can also have cranial
14:21
nerve and leptomeningeal involvement.
14:23
And actually, leptomeningeal involvement is actually more common than
14:27
pachymeningeal involvement in neurosarcoid.
14:29
So the other inflammatory conditions such as SLE, rheumatoid,
14:34
granulomatous polyangiitis, they typically cause a
14:37
pachymeningeal enhancement or pachymeningeal pathology, whereas
14:40
neurosarcoid is one of the inflammatory or unknown conditions
14:44
which actually causes
14:47
involvement of both pachymeningeal and
14:50
leptomeningeal disease with T2 hyperintense thickened dura.
14:57
So other causes. For example, this is another patient who has
15:01
extensive pachymeningeal disease, and it is smooth at certain
15:05
locations, but then it develops nodularity.
15:07
It also develops significant nodularity and mass-like thickening
15:11
involves the cavernous sinus skull base.
15:14
And this was a path proven case of Rosai-Dorfman disease,
15:18
which is a sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy.
15:22
It involves lymph nodes, but it can involve other areas of soft tissue.
15:26
It can involve the paranasal sinuses, it can involve the deep soft tissues of neck,
15:30
but when it involves intracranial compartment, it usually mimics a
15:34
meningioma. It's like focal, solitary or
15:37
multiple dural-based masses, typically along the skull base.
15:41
And this was a case of Rosai-Dorfman disease.
15:45
It's not very common, but something...
15:48
One of the histiocytosis syndromes which actually can
15:52
cause focal dural mass-like thickening.
15:56
Now, if you look at the osseous changes, because the dura is
15:59
intimately associated, intimately connected to the
16:03
bone, and it's very close. So this is a patient who actually
16:07
has dural thickening, which is heterogeneous.
16:09
The dural thickening extends into the orbit, causing proptosis, and there's
16:13
also some bony expansion with soft tissue
16:17
in the temporalis muscle. And if you look on the corresponding CT, there is
16:20
extensive dural hyperostosis, and this is a straightforward case of an
16:24
N-plaque meningioma. So whenever there is bony changes, you don't want to think of
16:28
inflammatory conditions. You really want to think about an N-plaque meningioma.
16:33
You have to remember this subtype of meningioma.
16:35
Usually, most meningiomas are focal dural based, but sometimes
16:39
meningiomas can be diffuse, linear and cause bony changes, and
16:43
that's an N-plaque meningioma. The differential for this is bone
16:47
sarcomas. Especially in younger children age group, you need to think of
16:50
osteosarcomas, fibrosarcomas or metastatic neuroblastoma.
16:54
So if it's actually someone who's below two years of age, so metastatic
16:58
neuroblastoma. So remember, primary bone diseases
17:02
can result in secondary infiltrative
17:05
dural
17:08
thickening. We can also see this sometimes in metastatic disease.
17:13
Now let's move on to focal dural masses.
17:16
And
17:17
I just want to talk about the dural tail.
17:20
The dural tail, which you see in meningioma.
17:23
This case on my right side is an invasive meningioma
17:27
that it's embedded the adjacent frontal bone.
17:31
Notice how the enhancement pattern is very similar to the extra-axial component.
17:34
You have a hyperenhancing dural tail.
17:37
When the dural tail is biopsied, in most situations, it
17:41
is a reactive thickening containing no tumor cells.
17:45
And the dural tail is usually more hyperenhancing compared to
17:49
the tumor itself. Now, the dural tail is not typical
17:53
for meningiomas. You can also see the dural tail in
17:56
patients with
17:58
lymphoma or any other extra-axial lesions, or even in
18:03
tumors which infiltrate the cortical gyrus.
18:07
And this is a B-cell lymphoma with dural tail.
18:11
It taps again a finding of dural tail is atapers
18:15
away from the lesion, becomes more thinner as you go more farther
18:19
or further from the primary lesion.
18:23
So focal dural masses, we always think of lymphoma, but there are many
18:27
conditions which may mimic a meningioma.
18:29
I just want you all to be aware of that.
18:31
For example, breast metastasis or prostate metastasis
18:35
can present as a dural mass.
18:38
A solitary fibrous tumor, AKA hemangiopericytoma, can look
18:42
very similar to a meningioma.
18:46
GBM, multicentric GBM, primary GBM, especially
18:50
when GBM is multicentric in different locations, can secondarily
18:54
involve the dura. This is a patient with multicentric glioblastoma.
18:58
And lastly, also lymphoma can present as solitary or
19:02
multifocal dural-based masses, and
19:05
the only way we can know the exact diagnosis is the
19:09
presence of a known malignancy, like breast cancer, prostate cancer would
19:13
suggest that these are dural-based mets.
19:15
Otherwise, we require biopsy to confirm the
19:19
diagnosis.
19:22
So now let's move on to the second part of the topic, which is
19:26
leptomeningeal enhancement.
19:31
So
19:32
again, as we discussed, leptomeningeal enhancement is enhancement in the
19:36
subarachnoid space and pia mater.
19:38
It's
19:40
enhancement of the pia mater or subarachnoid space.
19:44
Or you can also say in the subarachnoid lymphatic system, or
19:48
the subarachnoid lymphatic space
19:51
system also.
19:54
One of the most common causes is infection.
19:57
So we talked a lot about pachymeningeal enhancement, and while certain
20:00
infections like TB and fungus can cause
20:04
pachymeningeal enhancement, most often infection
20:08
involves the leptomeningeal space.
20:11
And
20:12
this is a case with very diffuse cortical
20:16
subarachnoid space enhancement, and this is a bacterial meningitis.
20:20
On my right, I have a more basal
20:23
subarachnoid space enhancement involving the basal cisterns.
20:27
And the enhancement is also very modular and not
20:31
smooth like the one on the left side.
20:33
And this was a case of coccidioidomycosis, which is
20:37
very prevalent, especially in the southeast where I am located in
20:41
southeast United States. It is an irregular and nodular
20:45
basal leptomeningeal enhancement.
20:50
I want to reiterate again that the arachnoid matter is a very
20:53
avascular area. It does not enhance usually, normally or in pathological
20:56
conditions. So when you're talking about pachymeningeal enhancement, it is the dura
21:00
which is enhancing. When you're talking about leptomeningeal enhancement, it's the
21:03
subarachnoid space and the pia mater which is enhancing.
21:08
Typically, for diagnosing a leptomeningeal disease, you
21:11
do a lumbar puncture. For pachymeningeal disease,
21:15
the diagnosis needs to be known by biopsy, you do a dural
21:19
biopsy
21:20
or a meningeal biopsy.
21:23
Now, continuing on nodular leptomeningeal enhancement,
21:27
neurosarcoidosis can be thin linear or nodular.
21:31
I've seen different, the same neurosarcoidosis doing everything.
21:35
It can cause both thin and nodular enhancement.
21:40
Then we have leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from systemic
21:43
malignancies, which can cause thin and nodular enhancement, as in this case
21:47
with lung disease, lung cancer. And on my
21:51
extreme right is a patient with a spine pleocytic astrocytoma who had
21:55
upstream, I wouldn't say drop metastasis, but
21:58
upstream metastasis into the leptomeningeal spaces of the posterior
22:02
fossa. Quite a rare case. We typically see a
22:06
posterior fossa pleocytic astrocytoma,
22:09
but this was a case of spine astrocytoma, pleocytic astrocytoma, which
22:13
caused leptomeningeal disease in the posterior fossa.
22:16
That can be spontaneous or can occur after surgery due to spillage
22:20
of tumor.
22:23
Now, what are the accompaniments of leptomeningeal enhancement?
22:27
So
22:28
the leptomeningeal or the subarachnoid space is contiguous with the
22:32
ventricles and is also contiguous with the cranial
22:36
nerves, which traverse the subarachnoid space.
22:40
So on my left, we have this patient who has leptomeningeal
22:44
enhancement but also has
22:47
ependymal enhancement. And on my right, we have this patient
22:51
with bilateral fifth nerve enhancement.
22:54
So cranial nerve enhancement is frequently seen when patients have
22:57
extensive leptomeningeal disease.
22:59
I've seen that in patients with neurosarcoid who have a high instance of
23:03
facial nerve palsy, and even tuberculosis or
23:07
any
23:09
granulomatous leptomeningeal enhancement or
23:12
any leptomeningeal enhancement which frequently resides in the
23:16
skull-based cisterns can cause cranial nerve enhancement.
23:22
So what are the complications of leptomeningitis?
23:25
So there are two main complications which you need to be aware of.
23:29
One is the presence of hydrocephalus, because these leptomeningeal exudates
23:33
block the CSF outflow, so it can cause a communicating
23:37
obstructive hydrocephalus. And I've seen it very fairly
23:41
common in tuberculosis meningitis
23:43
or fungal meningitis, cryptococcal meningitis.
23:47
Another one is
23:49
infarcts, which are usually around the
23:53
distribution of the perforator arteries of the anterior cerebral arteries and
23:57
the middle cerebral arteries. It is actually, infarcts are
24:01
very commonly seen in patients who actually have a
24:04
streptococcal meningitis in children.
24:08
But I've seen them in different types of bacterial and fungal
24:11
and TB meningitis. But in children, it has been well described in
24:15
patients with streptococcal
24:17
meningitis.So
24:21
this is another patient who had some degree of
24:25
leptomeningeal enhancement in the left temporal
24:29
and parietal lobe. And this patient also gets an MR venogram, which shows
24:33
that the superior sagittal sinus and the transverse sinus are occluded, or the
24:37
left transverse sinus and superior sagittal sinus are occluded due to deep venous
24:41
sinus thrombosis. And in the presence of deep venous sinus thrombosis, as we
24:45
discussed, you can get a pachymeningeal enhancement, but you also can get
24:49
hyperemia or congestion in the draining veins because of obstruction, and
24:53
that can mimic leptomeningeal enhancement.
24:55
And this is why contrast enhanced FLAIR is very useful.
24:58
It actually omits signal from congested vessels, and it
25:02
actually depicts pure leptomeningeal enhancement.
25:07
Propofol for sedation in children can also cause leptomeningeal enhancement.
25:10
I don't know the exact mechanism, and I'm not sure if post-contrast
25:14
FLAIR can actually alleviate this problem.
25:17
But that has been described, especially in children who receive anesthetics for an
25:20
MRI. Be aware of propofol, which can cause
25:23
vascular engorgement mimicking leptomeningeal enhancement.
25:29
So what are some other
25:33
differentials for leptomeningeal enhancement, meaning conditions which can mimic
25:36
leptomeningeal enhancement? Gyriform enhancement.
25:39
So gyriform enhancement is not considered to be in the meninges.
25:43
It's in the cortical gyri. And this is a patient with gyriform
25:47
enhancement, and I don't know exactly what the cause is.
25:49
But gyriform enhancement can be seen in patients with strokes, it can be seen
25:53
in patients with encephalitis. So those are some
25:57
conditions. And again, as we discussed, normal vessels,
26:02
vascular enhancement can be misinterpreted as a leptomeningeal enhancement,
26:06
and that is where contrast FLAIR can be useful.
26:10
So
26:12
another cause of gyriform enhancement can be
26:15
post-reversible encephalopathy.
26:19
So this was an interesting case who actually had a squamous
26:23
cell cancer of the skin who... and this patient actually
26:27
had
26:28
erosion of the skin and ulceration and had
26:32
very thick dural enhancement. So many times,
26:36
when tumors erode the table or erode the
26:40
calvarium, there is dural enhancement, and it's important to distinguish what
26:43
is reactive
26:45
dural enhancement from true malignant infiltration.
26:49
Whenever there is a focal nodular dural enhancement, we call that tumor
26:52
infiltration. And if the dural thickening is more than five millimeters, we
26:56
call it dural invasion. If there is just smooth pachymeningeal
27:00
enhancement like this adjoining a tumor which has eroded the
27:04
calvarium, we usually call it reactive.
27:06
So this is probably a reactive
27:08
dural enhancement. But this area is much more than five millimeter thick, and that
27:12
is probably nodular. This nodular pachymeningeal
27:16
enhancement is likely tumor. So this patient actually had
27:19
biopsy-proven squamous cell cancer involving dura. This was resected.
27:23
This patient got a graft, and he comes back later after the
27:26
graft with edema in the right parietal region
27:30
with very irregular
27:33
nodular leptomeningeal enhancement.
27:36
And even MR perfusion shows some degree of
27:40
increased perfusion right here in the leptomeningeal enhancement.
27:44
So
27:45
this question is actually key for several reasons.
27:50
In this case, if you look carefully, the venous sinus or the superior
27:54
sinus is thrombosed, and that can potentially cause edema
27:58
and congestion of the vessels. And this patient was also
28:02
on immunotherapy. And patients who are on
28:06
immunotherapy can actually show leptomeningeal congestion, and the
28:10
time period is so variable, it can start immediately from one week and can last for
28:14
several weeks. So we were not sure if this patient was getting
28:17
leptomeningeal enhancement from immunotherapy, venous sinus thrombosis.
28:21
However, when they cultured
28:23
this area,
28:24
all Pseudomonas was grown and this patient was put on long-term antibiotics.
28:27
So this patient was actually presumed to have infection
28:31
from the surgery. And this was considered to be a
28:35
leptomeningitis from surgery. So you need to think of alternative
28:39
conditions
28:41
when you actually have leptomeningeal enhancement, immunotherapy, and
28:45
infection, even when you have a patient with known skin
28:49
malignancy.
28:51
What are some other atypical meningeal enhancements?
28:54
So this is a patient with subdural empyema, and I just want to show the rare
28:58
enhancement of the arachnoid membrane. So this is the subdural empyema.
29:02
And on the outer margin of the subdural space are the dura.
29:04
So this is the enhancement dural margin, and this enhancement is of the
29:09
arachnoid membrane, so the arachnoid margin.
29:12
So you have both leptomeningeal and pachymeningeal enhancement.
29:15
And
29:16
again,
29:18
we don't actually, as I discussed, the arachnoid matter
29:22
is part of the...
29:24
the arachnoid matter is considered lepto because it is thin.
29:28
But when we talk about pachymeningeal enhancement, we actually talk about dura
29:31
arachnoid. So it's a bit confusing, but I really want to showcase this as a
29:35
case with both arachnoid matter enhancement and dural
29:38
enhancement.
29:41
So to summarize, what are the cause of pachymeningeal enhancement?
29:45
Intracranial hypotension remains the most common cause.
29:48
Look for venous engorgement. Look for enlarged pituitary
29:52
gland. Look for the bone score. Post-operative, which we have not discussed, but is
29:55
self-explanatory.
29:57
Inflammatory conditions apart from neurosarcoid, IgG4 related Granulomatous
30:01
with polyangiitis, rheumatoid, SLE, all cause pachymeningeal enhancement.
30:06
Prostate and
30:09
breast mets, lymphoma, leukemia, certain infections such as TB and
30:13
fungal and dural venous sinus thrombosis.
30:16
Leptomeningeal enhancement, on the other hand, is predominantly caused by
30:18
infections, systemic malignancies, where it is known as leptomeningeal
30:22
carcinomatosis, lymphoma and leukemia, neurosarcoid, which
30:26
can fit into both categoriesAnd always remember
30:29
immunotherapy.
30:31
You can get pseudoleptomeningeal enhancement in patients with dural venous sinus
30:35
thrombosis and anesthetic medications.
30:39
So that concludes my lecture. So I'm
30:43
ready to answer any questions you all have.
30:51
Thank you so much for that lecture.
30:53
We are open for questions.
30:57
We've got one in that Q&A box right now. I'll go ahead and read it to you.
31:01
Can you distinguish the pachymeningeal thickening
31:05
of IG4 disease from other causes?
31:09
Yeah. So,
31:10
not really.
31:12
IG4 related will look very similar to neurosarcoid and
31:16
granulomatous with polyangiitis.
31:19
The only thing is it doesn't really cause much leptomeningeal enhancement, but the
31:22
pachymeningeal enhancement will appear very similar to
31:26
granulomatous with polyangiitis and
31:29
neurosarcoid.
31:35
Does lung cancer cause smooth pachymeningeal enhancement in one hemisphere?
31:40
I have never seen that.
31:43
Lung cancer typically is known to cause leptomeningeal
31:46
enhancement. Again, we do have very rare,
31:50
bizarre cases which don't follow the rules.
31:53
But
31:54
when you have smooth pachymeningeal enhancement, even if the patient has no lung
31:57
cancer, that's not typically what we
32:01
think as a first cause. I have, on the other hand, actually seen breast cancer
32:05
actually cause smooth pachymeningeal enhancement rather than nodular.
32:09
I do have one case of breast cancer with smooth pachymeningeal enhancement.
32:12
So I've seen that with breast, but not lung.
32:18
How to DD from thickening of the tentorium.
32:23
So
32:25
the differential diagnosis with thickening of the tentorium, again, it
32:29
all depends whether it's accompanied by diffuse pachymeningeal thickening
32:32
elsewhere. If it is accompanied by diffuse pachymeningeal thickening
32:36
elsewhere, I would first think of intracranial hypotension.
32:40
However, if the thickening is focally in the tentorium,
32:44
then my differential diagnosis would be dural Mets lymphoma
32:48
or neurosarcoid or other granulomatous conditions.
32:54
Is leptomeningeal enhancement in children due to supplemental oxygen and
32:58
anesthesia or propofol itself?
33:01
So yeah, that's a great question. So, I don't think supplemental
33:05
oxygen actually causes leptomeningeal enhancement.
33:07
It usually is a flare phenomenon, and we've seen
33:11
that, and I don't really have much experience with kids, but I've seen that so
33:15
common in adults when patients are on supplemental oxygen.
33:18
They actually have flare hyperintense signal, but they lack the
33:22
leptomeningeal enhancement. So the answer to that question is it's probably due
33:26
to propofol, not due to supplemental oxygen.
33:33
Which cortical primary tumor infiltrates meninges?
33:37
Yeah. So GBM, when it infiltrates the meningeal cortex,
33:41
is the most common tumor which can
33:45
actually cause meningeal or thickening and cause a dural tail.
33:49
So I've seen that with GBM and metastasis.
33:52
When they infiltrate the cortex, they cause
33:55
dural tail. When GBM is confined to the deep white
33:59
matter, you won't expect to see a dural tail.
34:03
But when the GBM involves the cortex, yes, you can see a dural tail.
34:07
The same thing is true for metastasis.
34:12
What about post-lumbar puncture meningeal thickening?
34:17
Yeah. So,
34:19
post lumbar puncture causes, again, a smooth,
34:23
what do you say, the pachymeningeal thickening.
34:25
It can mimic intracranial hypotension.
34:29
I don't think I have actually seen a very high bone score.
34:32
But yes, it can cause a smooth pachymeningeal enhancement,
34:37
mimicking
34:38
other conditions. So it's very, very important to know if the patients have had
34:42
a prior history of lumbar puncture.
34:45
I typically ask my fellow clinicians to perform a
34:49
lumbar puncture after they get the MRI and if they're
34:53
suspecting any inflammatory condition or any
34:58
condition which they want further diagnosis.
35:01
We first do an MRI and then do a lumbar puncture, because lumbar puncture
35:05
can cause a diffuse pachymeningeal enhancement from a
35:08
temporary CSF leak.
35:12
If hyperdensity is seen in tentorium or falx in trauma cases, is it
35:15
subdural or subarachnoid?
35:18
Oh, that is actually subdural. And that's a good
35:22
question because sometimes you see a focal area of hyperdensity in the
35:26
intermsic fissure, and when it's so focal, it's actually very
35:30
difficult to actually tell if that focal
35:33
hyperdensity adjacent to the falx is subarachnoid or subdural.
35:37
But the more linear and the more
35:40
sulci it traverses, it is subdural.
35:42
So the answer is, if it is a long segment, it is definitely
35:46
subdural. But if the focal hyperdensity is very
35:50
short along the tentorium or along the
35:54
falx, you cannot actually say whether it's subdural or subarachnoid, and we usually
35:58
tend to call it subdural most of the time.
36:03
Okay. We'll do a couple more. What is the minimum protocol details, slice
36:06
thickness, and other settings in the evaluation of cranial meninges?
36:10
Yes. So we have
36:14
a very universal protocol where
36:18
our post-contrastOur T1 postcontrast on our
36:22
FLAIR both. We are not doing a postcontrast FLAIR,
36:25
but in future, we are going to replace our precontrast FLAIR with a postcontrast
36:29
FLAIR.
36:31
Ideally, I would like to have both, but because we want to minimize our
36:35
scan times, we are going to replace the precontrast FLAIR with a postcontrast
36:38
FLAIR. The slice thickness is we do a one millimeter slice thickness,
36:42
and that increases your sensitivity for identifying meningeal disease.
36:47
Our T2 weighted sequences, because those are less sensitive for diagnosing
36:51
meningeal pathology, we actually retain them at four to five
36:54
millimeter thin slices. We do a
36:58
routine DWI, which has limited utility in
37:03
leptomeningeal disease or pachymeningeal disease.
37:06
SWI is great to look for leptomeningeal siderosis,
37:09
and
37:12
we incorporate that in all our
37:15
sequences.
37:17
But the most important sequences for meningeal pathology remains
37:21
FLAIR and T1, which we do at one millimeter 3D slices, and these are
37:25
isotropic 3D slices, which we reformat in multiple orthogonal
37:28
planes.
37:31
Okay. And- What is the best MRI sequence to evaluate the
37:35
cause of leptomeningeal thinking?
37:38
B.
37:39
I would say it's a postcontrast FLAIR.
37:41
If you want to single out one, it's a postcontrast FLAIR.
37:45
So it is. Okay. I think we got
37:49
them all.
37:50
I think we got all the questions. Thank you so much for your lecture and for
37:54
staying on to answer those questions. We really appreciate it.
37:57
And I think,
37:59
just reading out some more.
38:01
So in suspected meningeal pathology, do you always perform postcontrast FLAIR
38:04
sequences? Do you also acquire postcontrast T1, or
38:08
do you sometimes omit them, and why?
38:11
So the answer to that is,
38:15
it is best to do both. And
38:19
you want to do both postcontrast T1 and postcontrast FLAIR.
38:21
The reason why you want to do a postcontrast T1 also is because
38:26
you want to look for parenchymal enhancement also.
38:29
And I think,
38:30
so you want to look for other areas which enhance.
38:33
So,
38:34
you want to do a postcontrast T1 to look for brain enhancement and postcontrast
38:38
FLAIR to look for meningeal enhancement.
38:40
And so inversion recovery sequences,
38:44
we don't do that. I know it's very great to look for demyelination.
38:49
My best experience with inversion recovery is to look for
38:53
areas of demyelination in the brain in multiple sclerosis, but I really don't know
38:56
if that's particularly useful for looking for meningeal pathology.
39:00
And the last question I see is, which one is more involved in AIDS,
39:04
lepto or pachymeningeal enhancement?
39:09
So if you're in
39:12
AIDS, the most common
39:14
meningeal disease is Cryptococcus, which typically causes leptomeningitis.
39:18
So the answer to that is leptomeningeal enhancement.
39:21
Any more-
39:21
Fantastic.
39:23
Yeah.
39:23
Thank you so much.
39:24
Thank you. Thank you, everyone. Thanks for joining. Have a great day.
39:28
Of course, of course. Yes, thanks for everyone for participating in today's new
39:31
conference and asking such great questions.
39:33
You can access the recording of today's conference and all our previous new
39:36
conferences by creating a free account.
39:38
We'll also email out a link to the replay later today.
39:41
Be sure to join us next week on Thursday, June 4th at 12:00 PM Eastern, where Dr.
39:45
Brian Midkiff will deliver a lecture entitled Renal Transplants and
39:48
Complications. You can register for that at the modality.com and follow us on
39:52
social media for updates on future new conferences.
39:55
Thanks again for learning with us, and have a great day.