Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

1 Heart. 1 Mission. Success of a Multidisciplinary Cardiac Imaging Team Approach, Dr. Giovanni E. Lorenz and Dr. Emilio Fentanes (3-16-22)

HIDE
PrevNext

0:01

Hello and welcome to Noom conference hosted

0:04

by MRI online.

0:06

Noon conference connects the global Radiology community Through

0:09

free live educational webinars that

0:12

are accessible for all and is an opportunity to

0:15

learn alongside top Radiologists from around the world.

0:19

We encourage you to ask questions and share ideas to help the community

0:22

Learn and Grow.

0:24

You can access the recording of today's conference and previous new

0:27

conferences by creating a free MRI online account.

0:31

You can also sign up for a free trial of our premium membership to

0:34

get access to hundreds of case-based microlearning courses

0:37

across all key radiologies and Specialties today.

0:40

We are honored to welcome Dr. Giovanni Lorenz

0:43

and Dr. Emilio fentanas for a lecture

0:46

on one heart one Mission success of a

0:49

multidisciplinary cardiac imaging team approach.

0:52

Dr. Lorenz is the Deputy of an Imaging

0:55

services in the San Antonio military health system and

0:58

Dr. Defenses is a cardiologist at active dude

1:01

on active duty at Brook Army Medical Center and

1:04

director of cardiac imaging and cardiovascular research and

1:07

co-director of echo. Cardiac Rafi.

1:10

At the end of the lecture join our presenters in a Q&A session

1:13

where they will address questions you may have on today's topic.

1:17

Please remember to use the Q&A feature to submit those questions so we can

1:20

get to as many as we can before our time is up. And with

1:23

that. We're ready to begin today's lecture Dr. Lorenz and

1:26

Dr. Frendinist, please take it from here.

1:29

For that introduction. I know Dr. Fantas

1:32

and I are super excited to share this as

1:35

you may or may not know making any

1:38

change is difficult but making change

1:41

across departments across

1:44

compartments such as the Army and the air force that

1:47

takes a lot of skill and effort. So we're super excited

1:50

to share our brief journey through this

1:53

but also want to say that this is just the

1:56

beginning and hopefully we can learn from growth and

1:59

be able to support further.

2:04

For now, we're very excited about this opportunity and

2:07

the ability to to kind of share our story

2:10

before we begin Uncle Sam didn't

2:13

want to make sure that you guys were aware that we're

2:16

about to discuss is obviously our opinions. Nothing

2:19

to do with the military the location where we

2:22

work the department of the fence of the defense health agency.

2:25

So we also don't have any potential conflict of

2:28

interest as part of this presentation. So before

2:31

we started we wanted to

2:34

kind of give you guys a quick introduction to the type of

2:37

valuation of chest pain

2:40

in the in the department of the fence and our transcend

2:43

utilization. We had a request

2:46

from Congress to kind of evaluate how we

2:49

were evaluating coronary our disease for both our

2:52

service members as well as beneficiaries into trying

2:55

to on their stand as you can see from this data why

2:58

cardiac CT cardiac MRI and some of the more

3:01

newer Imaging modalities were being significantly on

3:04

their

3:04

Realized and you know the impact that covid had

3:07

on a lot of these Trends in utilization and

3:10

more importantly how these tests modalities were being

3:13

used initially once we had

3:16

this information, but we noticed was that while you

3:19

know, it was reflective of the guidelines at that time

3:22

functional non-invasive testing with it with exercise treadmill, testing

3:25

stressical cardiography or myocardial perfusion

3:29

spect Imaging then to be the, you know,

3:32

first line task for, you know, pretty large

3:35

significant majority of cases, but what

3:38

we found that even as a second line test, when did

3:41

that I was inconclusive or it needed

3:44

further validation or exploration functional testing was

3:47

always a second to modality whether

3:50

it's a repeat of the same modality or a secondary

3:53

functional modality.

3:56

So when all this information came out and

3:59

we were asked to kind of further explore the the

4:02

challenge came, you know from from Congress where

4:05

they they stated in their own words. They wanted

4:08

to see what would be a best way for us to come

4:11

up with an anatomy-guided pathway with the use of

4:14

cardiac CT as well as implementation of CTF of

4:17

far compared to the then guideline

4:20

recommended approach of mostly candidate ischemia

4:23

guided approach. They wanted to also receive an

4:26

outline of what were the necessary steps

4:29

moving forward in a plan of action to to

4:32

coming up with that but we reported to Congress

4:35

at that time was that you

4:38

know, as we had seen the the amount

4:41

of functional testing was quite prevalent

4:44

and it was marker of of a cultural

4:47

Trend and that time but we had seen an increase

4:50

although small, but an increase overall in the

4:53

utilization of cardiac CT.

4:56

Military health system. Our conclusion was

4:59

then that in order to increase this access to

5:02

coronary CT and then make Congress requests we needed

5:05

to do a better job training folks and ensuring

5:08

that the scanners were available the Technologies

5:11

for available and infrastructure was available for

5:14

our graduates from from our facilities would

5:17

be able to perform high quality CT. We

5:20

had the unique opportunities since we are the largest

5:23

training center for cardiologists and Radiologists in

5:26

the Department of Defense to really be able to provide this

5:29

service from two fronts and also kind

5:32

of make a pathway for for a collaboration

5:35

on doing this.

5:38

So our Legacy Approach at that time, you know,

5:41

what's kind of split into as you see the red line Radiology would

5:44

train their Radiology residents and fellows with

5:47

a separate. Gme Mission from Cardiology. They had

5:50

their own cardiac imaging research. They focus mostly in

5:53

the technical aspects and imaging findings at that time. And then

5:56

obviously the reports were mostly focused on anatomical findings

5:59

versus Cardiology with you

6:02

know, we had supper training from them.

6:05

We had cardiac imaging research eat from the same patients same

6:08

patient population same studies or the

6:11

focus more on clinical outcomes. And then the reports

6:14

read more of a clinical management recommendation rather than

6:17

a anatomical finding. So after we

6:20

reviewed this we decided and we were able to

6:23

have the opportunity to really create our first joint

6:26

radiology and Cardiology program where we

6:29

were able to blend The Best of Both Worlds, we had, you

6:32

know, collaboration and patient scheduling education and

6:35

access to care from both departments.

6:38

And that was something that allowed us to really help

6:41

improve access to care

6:44

as we were having contribution from our Cardiology clinic

6:47

schedulers as well as scheduler from the Department of

6:50

radiology the other important thing that came from

6:53

this course probably providing nurses and technologists from

6:56

each department kind of help improve access

6:59

and more importantly expedite the

7:02

workflows through education training.

7:05

Dating of protocols as well as ensuring that the quality

7:08

of the test and then the consistency of the

7:11

images were consistent across two sites because

7:14

we have two different sites in San Antonio the other thing that

7:17

also benefit we benefited from when this joint

7:20

program was the referrals we were able

7:23

to then tackle from both fronts, you know an education

7:26

approach from when a physician orders or

7:29

clinician orders cardiac CT. They didn't

7:32

just receive feedback on the appropriateness or the best

7:35

test for the patient from the cardiologists but also

7:38

their Radiologists or Radiology training Cardiology fellow

7:41

as well as the protocol and ensuring that

7:44

the appropriate test was done at the appropriate time for the

7:47

right patient as far as the other benefit of doing a

7:50

joint program we had

7:52

The training of fellows we were able to have now

7:55

increased taxes and more importantly better at

7:58

more rounded education to our fellows. So they

8:01

can focus on achieving a cool cats level 2 training based

8:04

on the Cardiology training guidelines, but also focus

8:07

on our Radiology residents fulfilling the ACR and

8:10

nasty training requirements for cardiovascular CT

8:14

and cardiac MRI, as far as the best benefit

8:17

from all of this is we were able to join a Cardiology

8:20

and Radiology faculty. So now we had expertise

8:23

from a really Radiology perspective but

8:26

also expertise from board certified as

8:29

well as Fellowship trained cardiologists in an

8:32

imaging department to combine their overall learning experience. So

8:35

we we often now,

8:38

you know, I get asked this. Well, how do we

8:41

do this? And how do we arrive to this? So

8:44

A lot of it had to do with you know our our

8:47

approach and the address

8:50

for collaboration and reaching out. I

8:53

think it's probably going to be the hardest part is not the most challenging

8:56

part at first, you know from A

8:59

cardiology perspective. I will tell you that you have

9:02

to have a radiology Champion it goes

9:05

without saying that without having

9:08

a radiology Champion to have you know,

9:11

an understanding for a vision share an

9:14

equal Vision more importantly but also provide the

9:17

ability to really communicate with

9:20

their Department in a way that you know

9:23

transitions division from a single

9:26

Department to a multi-departmental thing is key.

9:30

For us it became then what there

9:33

was an agreement for collaboration and what

9:36

division of that would be and you know going through

9:39

credentials ensuring that the standard operating

9:42

procedures memorandums for understanding educational

9:45

training agreements were

9:48

all in place. Then we could start focusing on the basic things.

9:51

And one of the things that we standardized was

9:54

the workflow across different sites based on the resources that

9:57

we had bamc. We have the ability of

10:00

having our patients prepared for our now patient

10:03

coronary CT with the use of a nurse and

10:06

an lbn that's provided by the department of Cardiology versus

10:09

our other side of wood for Hall. We have

10:12

the cardiology fellows and Radiology resident working

10:15

directly with their Radiology technologists to

10:18

be able to get the same workflow achieved

10:21

with the same amount of time spent preparing patients,

10:24

but also providing, you know,

10:27

the same workflow in the same approach to perform in

10:30

Sam based on the resources available. The other

10:34

thing that we also wanted to make sure is that the product with

10:37

the workload itself was simple and it was reproducible the idea

10:40

being when these graduates would

10:43

leave our sites and they go on to different places

10:46

that they would take the exact same protocol the

10:49

exact same approach the same workflow to

10:52

perform cardiac CT with two

10:55

examples of how to do it if you have a nursing support available,

10:58

but also how to do it if you don't have a

11:01

nursing support available for the administration of medications and

11:04

patient preparations.

11:06

the other part that was challenging was the cultural

11:09

change when we

11:13

Optimize patients heart rate for the type of scanners that we have available

11:16

in our Marketplace low heart rate is key. So from

11:19

A cardiology perspective, I have very little heartburn giving

11:22

somebody 200.

11:24

Milligrams of oral metoprolol and giving them

11:27

10 milligrams of IV metoprol the scanner if needed in

11:30

addition to 800 micrograms of nitroglycerin and

11:33

not be worried about hypotension or profound very

11:36

cardiacs a result the unique opportunity to

11:39

work with their Radiology residents with this is they get the same

11:42

level of comfort they get the same level of experience. They

11:45

get the same level of safety margin and

11:48

understanding and and really seeing how

11:51

this impacts the image quality but more importantly the

11:54

safety behind it which you know to this day

11:57

we have not had any Adverse Events related to medication administration

12:00

and patient preparation. The other

12:03

thing with days with standardize our protocols. We wanted to

12:06

ensure that the injection volume the injection rates

12:09

the type of dozing for kvp million

12:12

amps based on weight. All of

12:15

those things to have our planning cardiac CT

12:18

calcium score functional sentiments.

12:21

We're all done and the same

12:24

Workflow the same protocol regardless of of

12:27

the location the other thing

12:30

and probably one of the most challenging thing was the standardization of reports. We

12:33

felt that this was something that needed to occur and we had

12:36

the challenge of having the new CAD rats system come

12:39

out halfway through our Standard Station or reports

12:42

and we were able fortunate enough to have a early review

12:45

of this can't Grant document before so that

12:48

we were able to address any concerns and consistency reporting

12:51

but now our reports regardless of

12:54

who the reader is regardless of, you know, then their

12:57

style Etc intends to be unified in a standardized report

13:00

that has been agreed on by all members. The other

13:03

thing that we were able then focused on was educational curriculum whether

13:06

you know, it involved lectures

13:09

involved. Do you send team Microsoft teams to

13:12

use a channel where regardless of

13:15

the location the reality residents of the Cardiology fellow

13:18

is able to join the reading session have access to

13:21

reference cases for education.

13:24

Or experience but also has access to

13:27

resources for where to look up

13:30

certain things the protocols for refreshing a guide

13:33

on what are the expectations for the rotation, but

13:36

more importantly what are the things that we want them to

13:39

get out of during their time of their rotation?

13:42

So now Dr. Lawrence is

13:45

back. I'm gonna let him kind of talk to you guys through through the

13:48

next part of our face on how we did our second part

13:51

of the journey.

13:52

Yes, so just as a review this this is a long.

13:55

Journey, and a pathway that definitely requires the

13:58

champion on both ends. And as

14:01

Dr. Fontana said mentioned a collegial

14:04

respect for each other is at the heart of all of this

14:07

stuff and so we were lucky as you can tell

14:10

is that we've all sort of wear the same uniform and we were able to

14:13

then to work from that sort of Baseline of equality and

14:16

move forward. So our journey did not just

14:19

end there that was just the beginning of setting up appropriate Champions

14:22

on both

14:25

ends workflows and so forth.

14:28

It was now to the more difficult things and that's the day to day

14:31

and so here you can see laid out here was the patient

14:34

education and standardizing that essentially this was

14:37

ensuring that we had materials that made sense that we can

14:40

provide to our ordering providers as well as do

14:43

our patients following this examinations. And so we really try

14:46

to include what was important from the clinical standpoint as well

14:49

as opposed to Imaging and post workflow.

14:53

Yeah, we were also ran into our fair

14:56

share of challenges. Where as we

14:59

were moving on our journey. Literally we

15:03

cannot make this things up. We

15:06

had a new EMR implemented at our Marketplace that

15:09

affected our work orders our workflow orders.

15:12

They the entire

15:15

process of how to order how to perform on interpret how

15:18

to document things that change shortly after that.

15:21

We had a new packs and the training that came with the new packs

15:24

and the ensuring that images transferred over and right

15:27

after we had summarize that and overcome that

15:30

challenge we had country shortages a staff shortages

15:33

and shortly after that. Then you chest pain guidelines came

15:36

out and then we had Tysons through proponent implementation. So I

15:39

think that we've had our fair share of challenges. It's

15:42

dark forens will be able to kind of share with you

15:45

how we we face all of these

15:48

things. Well, so like many of you you either work

15:51

in large academic instit

15:56

And or even private act

15:59

groups that have imaging centers and service workflows

16:02

that just need to be efficiency based and

16:05

so sometimes items such as new emrs or

16:08

PAC systems or throwing at you without your service

16:11

line being part of that discussion. So we try

16:14

to do is ensure that individuals who made those decisions were

16:17

aware that cardiac imaging definitely need

16:20

to be part of that early on and and when we could or could not

16:23

then we just had to brace for the or the

16:26

answer. So as an example when we

16:29

overhauled a brand new electronic health

16:32

record for the entire department defense health

16:35

agency. We really try to determine

16:38

what is the best way to do this from a cardiac imaging standpoint.

16:41

So we sat on both committees there were

16:44

items in the Cardiology workflow in

16:47

those meetings that I had no idea what this talk to what

16:50

was going to be talked about but I sure I definitely

16:53

want to ensure that they knew that the Imaging

16:56

Point in my voice was being discussed and similarly when we

16:59

had meetings that were just Radiology specific that I

17:02

shared by notes or Dr. Fontana's came in on that.

17:05

Now similar to that was our

17:08

Pac system. We had probably about

17:11

two months of latency before we after

17:14

getting our new EMR on is that when

17:17

we started our packs integration and so this was

17:20

another challenge that we had to do which was moving from

17:23

something that we're used to to something that we weren't and

17:26

then being the test site for this. So we're now on an Enterprise

17:29

pack system. I think it's going to be really wonderful in the

17:32

future. But of course things didn't work correctly. And so

17:35

we immediately had to work together and have essentially pen

17:38

and paper just find out what worked on a

17:41

cardiac CT deployment what didn't and then

17:44

to make those changes with those engineers.

17:47

Like many of you contrast shortages last year were a big deal and so

17:50

we had to work together and although we're

17:53

probably five maybe ten miles apart

17:56

from each other. It was vastly different worlds as far as

17:59

ordering credit cards and and so

18:03

forth as far as getting contrast to our facilities it it

18:07

can sometimes be advantageous to

18:10

be Army in Air Force. We can apply those different

18:13

principles Air Force

18:16

tends to have Deep Pockets and army tends to

18:19

have a very loud voice. So between the two of us we were able to

18:22

really push for contrast from vendors that

18:25

we normally or individually would not be able to

18:28

get

18:29

With the chest pain guidelines, I think we've gone through these

18:32

and other workflows and webinars before is that

18:35

this really provided the the

18:38

push around the inertia to do

18:41

new things such as party xct and anatomy and

18:44

based evaluation and chest pain. So there was a lot

18:47

of Education that was required for our clinicians to order this

18:50

as a type of exam, but also was to ensure that

18:53

we had the technicians the time in the schedule and

18:56

to essentially just kind of push in and kind

18:59

of push out some of those other Radiology type of examination so

19:02

we can do the cardiac imaging.

19:04

And it it goes on and on

19:07

right? I mean there's plenty of these different types of challenges that we can continue to

19:10

talk about and we're gonna save a little bit of time at the end so we can get

19:13

some further Q&A on there, but I wanted to hit

19:16

on number 10, which is the growth area.

19:19

I have two years ago three years ago. I think when we started this we

19:22

had no idea what our endpoint was and I

19:25

think that was a good thing mainly because we really wanted to

19:28

push to see how far we can get with

19:31

this and I think the integration of

19:34

our reading programs being able

19:37

to have specific equipment for

19:40

the cardiac commission has been the first step. I

19:43

think our second step is our outline there and that's research

19:46

collaboration for instance.

19:48

I think two departments on the year IRB or

19:51

on your Z proposal has made

19:54

a huge difference in the amount of

19:57

I think at last count millions of dollars that have been

20:00

able to flow to us into our type of programs that

20:04

we want to do.

20:05

And I think that is because we can

20:08

come at it from both types of departments points of

20:11

views and imaging Innovation and in

20:14

the clinical directive. So I think that was extremely useful. We

20:17

didn't really set out with that in the beginning but that has really

20:20

been something that we both relied on.

20:22

Dedicated cardiac imaging equipment at last

20:25

count. I think we're looking at about five million dollars

20:28

worth of new equipment that could be coming through. So this

20:31

is really helped us kind of obviate some of

20:34

the new challenges such as technicians and

20:37

ensuring that we have growth even though we might

20:40

have technician shortages.

20:42

Academic opportunities abound everywhere both in

20:45

our facility and institutions as well as yours. And

20:48

so I think one of the big things has been is how do

20:51

we grow gross smart and strategically while ensure

20:54

growing with our fellows and our residents who will be

20:57

taking over our response. So at every step in the process we've been

21:00

trying to ensure that our gme is

21:03

aware of and recognizes these achievements that

21:06

we've done. We definitely a huge players in our

21:09

PI and qpi API projects. We've also

21:12

set out to ensure that our residents and

21:15

fellows are at the top of their game and

21:18

you might have seen us recently in the ACC cat and

21:22

nabbing first prize in our January challenge.

21:26

Yeah, so it's it's been a fantastic thing, but

21:29

we've learned a couple lessons and I'll tell

21:32

you this from A cardiology perspective and this kind of applies for

21:35

more just making friends and Radiology. We'll just making friends with

21:38

other places and I think the most important

21:41

characteristic as a person as a physician is to be

21:44

adaptable.

21:45

And what does it mean to be adaptable obviously becomes

21:48

teachable a lot of us are highly

21:51

trained. A lot of us have had a lot of experience bring different

21:54

things. But there's something to be said about having the humility

21:57

to to be teachable to understand your

22:00

limitations to understand that knowledge gaps

22:03

and more importantly to be appropriately, you

22:06

know, and and adequately emotionally secured to

22:09

to understand where your gaps are of the

22:12

deficiencies are and understand that, you know,

22:15

everything that's happening every every conversation that

22:18

you have every Gap that gets addressed every

22:21

deficiency or every area of growth. It's essentially made to

22:24

ultimately serve a purpose and that requires

22:27

you to be very service minded but more

22:30

importantly be intentional that everything that you're doing happens for

22:33

a reason every when you process every new

22:36

lesson every new finding every new skill

22:39

that is developed has a purpose and the purpose ultimately

22:42

becoming, you know a person that can be

22:45

collaborated on so that that's one of the key lessons

22:48

that we've learned with with collaboration the other

22:52

thing and you know that Dr. Loren Stark and this is more

22:55

like, you know bringing friends along so

22:58

Yeah, the dependability. We

23:01

really tried to

23:04

ensure that everybody had skin in the

23:07

game and what that meant is that I ensured that

23:11

our Cardiology readers managed our

23:14

imaging centers and for some

23:17

Radiologists that that's that

23:20

could be a big leap and I completely understand that because you

23:23

know, it's it's something that's new but

23:26

their clinicians their positions just like you and

23:29

so placing them in the center of a highly efficient

23:32

or fast-paced workflow

23:35

that that can sometimes be

23:38

it's scary. So I I thought that was a really wonderful

23:41

growth period for us where we're able to put some of our new

23:44

cardiologists who are cardiac images into that

23:47

space and they ran imaging centers very well this handling

23:50

all the different things that of course can hit you from,

23:53

you know on the CT side as well

23:56

as Mars time.

23:57

Another thing that I think was kind of useful is that

24:00

we really tried to ensure that everybody knew

24:03

what we were looking for as

24:06

far as threshold and Baseline expertise.

24:09

And so

24:12

that was something that if we ensured everybody knew about that

24:15

they can at least reach to that goal. There was no hidden agenda

24:18

because everybody knew that there was a certain level of readership there

24:22

was a certain level of peer review that was going to be done and all

24:25

the results from that were going to be shared equally and

24:28

openly so I think once you set that then everybody

24:31

could then rely on each other

24:34

depends on them and and be able to move forward.

24:37

We also did something which was

24:40

interesting which we did act team breeds.

24:43

That is everybody was to contributor on every read

24:46

that was done at a point of time. So we would do the Acquisitions

24:49

in the morning and then we would do a complete team-based

24:52

readout in the afternoon and for

24:55

some of our fellows and residents.

24:58

This was an opportunity for them to lead the discussion and

25:01

to go through the entire workflow. I thought that was

25:04

really interesting. I haven't seen too many places do that, but it

25:07

is something that was kind of exciting to see variable teaching

25:11

and variable interpretations based

25:14

on where you came from Cardiology and

25:17

Cardiology.

25:19

Yeah, and I think another important thing particularly

25:22

from from our transition is you know,

25:25

yes, there's education of opponent but there's obviously the

25:28

key players and nothing can be, you know,

25:31

not enough things can be said about our Technologies to nurses. But

25:34

when when we when we start engaging

25:37

with them, you know Radiology technologists Cardiology nurses

25:40

and vice versa. We've learned that in order to to really

25:43

bring that energy. You have to be enthusiastic. You know,

25:46

we we all love what we do. We are

25:49

skill that what we do and we want our technologist to

25:52

see that the reason why we go to work we work

25:55

with everybody while we focus so much and Excellence is because

25:58

we enjoy it. We're really want to get the best image

26:01

quality at the lowest possible those with the exact amount

26:04

of contrast that we need to get the best outcome for

26:07

the patient a lot of this especially

26:10

in the sense of shortages and and the

26:13

efficiency is is we've learned to do more things that

26:16

may not necessarily be seen as a role.

26:19

Physician to do but I'm willing to do you

26:22

know, I'm not very good at putting IVs. So

26:25

they told me to stop trying that but I can't give Ivy metoprolol.

26:28

I can't give IV nitroglycerin. I can't prepare the scanner

26:31

what diff is technologist is putting the EKG leads

26:34

on I can help putting the EKG leads on I can

26:37

help prepare the contrast I can help transport the

26:40

patient.

26:41

And a lot of nodes has to do with showing a source of

26:44

urgency when the technologist Pages me or calls me

26:47

because they have a question or something is concerning to

26:50

them. We have to demonstrate a sense of urgency to

26:53

be readily available because we want them to know that they

26:56

are a priority to us and how we approach them. How

26:59

do we talk to them how quickly we're respond to

27:02

things how readily available we are. You know, we move our

27:05

reading room to be literally 15 feet away from the scanner just

27:08

to ensure that we were readily available for

27:11

any potential issue and the scanner and that involved

27:14

the cardiologist moving from the third floor or officers

27:17

are located to moving to their location

27:20

in the new reading room. So we had room to be

27:23

available. And that was that was the main reason and that's, you

27:26

know, being there for the technologist to nurses and we

27:29

strive for Excellence our technologists take pride when they

27:32

come out without fantastic textbook quality CT scan

27:35

and they also have the sharing level of concern

27:38

and and you know, I don't want to say, you know,

27:41

Defeat but they really don't like having

27:44

non-diagnostic scans. So they will contact us

27:47

and be like, hey, this could be better. Can I do it again? Or I

27:50

think this patient needs more metoprolol or

27:53

perhaps we can do this better dkg leads in

27:56

there they take pride in that and it's very interesting to see

27:59

and very rewarding to see how the technologists and

28:02

the nurses really take pride when a CT scan comes out

28:05

perfect. But also how you know, they they

28:08

strive for doing better when the scam does not

28:11

turn out how it should be and there's always a conversation of making it

28:14

better and all has to do with the culture of change

28:17

and the culture of enthusiasm and and love

28:20

for what you do in in a scanning room.

28:24

I'll also add because we live in South Texas tacos.

28:28

and I don't think anybody

28:31

has ever turned down any of

28:34

our

28:36

Taco Tuesdays and stockers and

28:39

so forth and you know, it's

28:42

it's a hand placed out there

28:45

to help people and to just encourage the

28:48

friendship and the development of more than just a radiology

28:51

technician or a or Radiology nurse

28:54

or Cardiology nurse workload the team and

28:57

the team workflow. We we get through the exams together

29:00

we get through the workload together and we get to share

29:03

so I think that's also something that we've come have done

29:06

very well around here.

29:08

So education is kind of a big thing for us.

29:11

We're both geony professors and we have

29:14

a very large cohort of fellows and residents

29:17

probably the largest in the

29:20

Department of Defense. And so what we've been able to do is become process-oriented

29:23

and so we probably

29:26

plan out our cardiac imaging program

29:29

probably about a year in advance that is

29:32

to consider what kind of research we're going to attack

29:35

qipi papers and what

29:38

kind of things that we may need to do for our

29:41

individuals.

29:43

So this is something that we do together, we do set

29:46

up team meetings where we can discuss these

29:49

and in future plan out. What's going to be useful.

29:52

And we have also done a significant

29:55

amount of peer review of our prior exams. What

29:58

worked well what didn't work well workflow efficiencies and

30:01

as an example, I think

30:04

last week we actually sat through and kind of rolled up

30:07

about 10 different coronary CT cases and

30:11

we did notice that a few of

30:14

the calcium Springs had a higher dosage than

30:17

normal at one of our skin locations. And so

30:20

we reviewed that we got physics involved and we did identifying issue. There's only

30:23

because DR fintanus had noticed

30:26

noticed an issue. I then was able to confirm that

30:29

and then we were able to get Arkansas involved and

30:32

then come to an understanding of what was going on turns out

30:35

that it was a bit of technologist leaning forward.

30:38

And then also there was an issue with

30:41

the actual scanner that was immediately fixed when

30:44

we did that we were able to kind of find problems

30:47

very quickly and early and then move forward.

30:51

Planning our progress has been a big thing. Like many of you we've got

30:54

kpis and metrics that that we have to keep an eye

30:57

on as far as like turnaround time and and volumes

31:00

and RVs. And so we do try to

31:03

set minimum standards as what to we

31:06

want to exam for the month. And then what

31:09

those turnaround times are for those are those types of examinations. And

31:12

so periodically we do look at that.

31:15

I think it's kind of important to share that not just

31:18

with the staff and they interpretator interpreters but

31:21

also with your technicians and show them that this is

31:24

what ideal looks like and this is where some of the exams

31:27

that didn't quite meet that what we can do the fellows

31:30

and the residents have been immensely educated

31:33

by this and they're able

31:36

to see that they can also learn from this too. And I think

31:39

that's huge thing. I never got that as a resident fellow

31:42

that kind of service work well through evaluation. I thought

31:45

it was huge and extremely important values a

31:48

big thing. When you have a combined part department

31:51

that has ultrasound news VT Mr.

31:54

You're you have tools a

31:57

plenty. I mean you have more tools than probably

32:00

you know, or probably needed for most of your patients, but then

32:03

yeah, you have the opportunity to determine what's going to be value specific and

32:06

value or did it for your for that particular patient. But

32:09

as well as what's gonna grow the apartment

32:12

So we've noticed that we have a really great

32:15

tool in stress cardiac MRI for instance, but unfortunately, you don't

32:18

have the technicians to completely Run 10 cardiac

32:21

stress cardiac MRI, you know

32:25

per day so we have to still utilize what's sufficient

32:28

and then also what's effective for

32:31

the patient and be able to both of those needs.

32:35

Now all very important lessons and you

32:38

know with the changes come disagreements and

32:41

a lot of it has to do with how do

32:44

you approach those and you know what we

32:47

share very good relationship with everybody

32:50

in the department. We've learned that the key to this has

32:53

to do with being relational.

32:55

We have a tremendous amount of respect for each other

32:58

both professionally personally, but also as

33:01

Military Officers and I think that speaks volumes to the

33:04

type of Department that we run we trust each

33:07

other if there's a question or read if there's

33:10

a concern if there's something I can rest assured that

33:13

somebody has a question that the quality of the read

33:16

the quality of exam that was performed by Radiologists of

33:19

cardiologists is consistent because of the trust that

33:22

we've developed along the way and we've shared experiences, you

33:25

know, there's something I don't know or something. I'm not

33:28

clear with or something that clearly I need to sick

33:31

and die so, you know whether or not I'm on service or

33:34

not. I'm approachable people reach out and vice versa.

33:37

It's not uncommon for Dr. Laurence to be on

33:40

trauma calling me bothering him with the question or you know,

33:43

another one over radiologist who's on the

33:46

service with us and steps out for the minute or has another

33:49

obligation where where we have that so we

33:52

have the ability to really share a lot of the experiences.

33:55

Had but it goes beyond that working together in

33:58

research working together for presentations.

34:02

Having lunch together, you know going to Coffee. I

34:05

mean, I'm not saying go to each other's kids birthday parties.

34:08

I mean we do so, you know that helps but

34:11

you know, it's that type of like outside

34:14

of work experience. It's a really make the difference. We

34:17

enjoy going to conferences seeing our fellows and residents

34:20

perform, but also have the ability to go together as a

34:23

team and share those things to to kind

34:26

of celebrate the accomplishments for that more importantly. We're

34:29

really valued each other and this is not just like, oh we need

34:32

somebody for coverage. I think the value that each set and

34:35

member of the team has and and what they bring

34:38

to that team and and what their contribution is beyond

34:41

just an interpretation, but for patient care, I think

34:44

every one of our teammates is focused on

34:47

providing the best care for patient and that reflects on

34:50

their work their work ethic they're availability

34:53

in their availability to you know,

34:56

show value to each other it goes beyond just like

34:59

well, I'm happy to cover for you, but it's more of a

35:01

You know somebody's in need of something. We're there

35:04

for each other if somebody is sick or need something. We're

35:07

there, you know, it's not uncommon for us to have

35:10

days where there's a lot of MRIs that need to be read. But there's also

35:13

a lot of CTS if you know, I'm not busy with the

35:16

echo lab or I'm doing an administrative thing. We do go downstairs

35:19

and read together to try to help our our teammates.

35:22

Even if we're not on service and vice versa. It's not

35:25

uncommon for you know, those busy days to have one

35:28

of the actual Radiologists who was part of the team say I'm

35:31

gonna help out with this without asking so

35:34

we really show appreciation and value to each other

35:37

in many many different ways. And I think that comes with

35:40

selecting the right team what else so the teammates

35:43

thank you have even if there's disagreement. We always

35:46

have that mutual respect level trust insure experience

35:49

that allows to move, you know,

35:52

I disagreement and something academic or something, you know,

35:55

procedural turn understanding that our goals

35:58

our missions are perfectly aligned. We just sometimes

36:01

like

36:02

Deep Purple another people like to see Violet and it's the same

36:05

color but isn't.

36:06

so

36:11

challenges. Yeah, there's absolutely

36:14

no data occurs without

36:17

some sort of challenge occur.

36:20

Happening Here

36:21

I think the main thing that we

36:24

learned is that we take the emotion out of it. This is

36:27

service the service industry we try

36:30

to service our patients and we try to do that effectively and efficiently

36:33

so there is no

36:36

room for

36:38

a pain, you know and and letting that

36:41

ego get in the way there. So we take that opportunity

36:44

to learn from each other as room

36:47

for growth and I think that's really been the

36:50

start of all this.

36:52

so

36:55

I always update Forefront. In fact

36:58

just this morning. I had a patient of Dr. Fontana's

37:01

who came by for stress cardiac MRI finished

37:04

the exam late and because the images

37:07

weren't set because our internet went down so finished up

37:10

our early this morning.

37:12

And I called the patient.

37:13

Isn't any year old lady was very

37:16

concerned about the ischemia evaluation. And

37:19

so I called her and let her know the results and I told

37:22

her to follow up with Dr. Fantas as well as a further clinical concerns,

37:25

but I think when you have a good meeting a

37:28

good group at the individuals that you feel comfortable and then the

37:31

roles start to become clinical and then also become then

37:34

an exam oriented and you're able than to help the patient. And so

37:37

that was a nice thing. I felt comfortable doing that

37:40

and being able to support it within my limits of

37:43

their expertise, but then also to help the patient at the time

37:47

So that was kind of a big thing for us as I

37:50

mentioned before the right test for the right.

37:53

Page we're running into the point where we have so

37:56

many modalities available to our patients. You get to

37:59

choose you're almost like a kid in a candy store at this point. We have

38:02

beautiful equipment but not always great equipment at the same locations. So

38:05

we're able to find the right equipment for the right

38:08

patient for the right test and be able to do that. So I

38:11

think that's been really useful to know. What is the right clinical

38:14

scenario for the right exam for the right modality and

38:17

be able to do that and then be able to get that

38:20

information through protocol exam request

38:23

and then as well as interpretation,

38:28

And I think you know the next phase for us

38:31

is growth, you know, like Dr. Laurence mentioned then

38:34

the efforts of collaboration have, you

38:37

know yielded to the ability for us to start focusing more

38:40

on having dedicated cardiac imaging scanners. You

38:43

need a scanner for just cardiac.

38:46

CT you need a scanner just for cardiac MRI the clinical

38:49

expertise goes beyond

38:52

just one side, but we're focusing more now and offering

38:55

the same service.

38:57

for the entire Department of Defense Enterprise

39:00

Where if you know there's challenging cases or cases that

39:03

there's questions or concerns because of our use of

39:06

Microsoft teams in our environment. We're able to be at multiple

39:09

locations in the same time period and

39:12

assist our colleagues at remote sites that ask for

39:15

help. So that's an important aspect. We also

39:18

notice that there's been a significant increase in our volume

39:21

by simply improving access you build it. They

39:24

will come in the sense that we're getting more appropriate

39:27

test. I would go and say from a cardiologist

39:30

perspective and say that for all new hard failure

39:33

diagnosis. These are institution nearly 95 to

39:36

to 80% of patients and

39:39

our institution have a cardiac MRI at the

39:42

time of their diagnosis gonna help guide further management

39:45

further evaluation, but also importantly risk

39:48

trying to vacation. So getting that educational component

39:51

getting the access to the scanner time and

39:54

ensuring consistency quality have led

39:57

to that Improvement in there and more importantly we now have

40:00

Access to more technology for both clinical and research applications. We

40:03

have a new Vita scanner for cardiac

40:06

MRI with 3T that can do 4D flow. So

40:09

we're going to be utilizing this for our valvular patients. We

40:12

have myocardial blood flow quantification that we're getting

40:15

ready to deploy in our Marketplace for the evaluation of Anoka.

40:18

We you know, we have cardiac CT technology

40:21

that goes beyond just you know, coronary Anatomy

40:24

with you know, looking at the Avenues of black analysis

40:27

CTF a farm obviously tmdr. Appreciate

40:30

your planning as well as tab or valving

40:33

valve planning as our program continues to expand and

40:36

the demand for this pre procedural planning and

40:39

more complex cases exist. So we do that

40:42

from a research perspective.

40:44

You know machine learning algorithms Expediting

40:47

workflows clinical outcomes

40:50

research all of that opportunity to exist.

40:53

But you know, it's an opportunity for both Radiology residents

40:56

and fellows that they have to be able to do

40:59

to do things that go beyond just taking pictures

41:02

of the heart. So in summary,

41:05

you know, the best piece of advice that we can give you

41:08

this comes from coach John Wooden it would be you know

41:11

for us is being concerned more with

41:14

character than reputation because for

41:17

us, you know, our character is what matters your

41:20

character when you interact with folks your technologists

41:23

your nurses your dedication to Patient Care all of

41:26

that's really one one should matter in in

41:29

we emphasize that to our residents we have sides

41:32

into our fellows and more importantly is something that that

41:35

we see so we want to thank all of our teammates is

41:38

our cardiologists in our program. They're Radiologists and

41:41

our program, but more importantly our technologists who are the backbone of

41:44

Are Imaging Enterprise or nurses or lvns

41:47

or schedulers which we would have no scans

41:50

without them and our administrative staff of both facilities

41:53

who really allow us to to provide the care

41:56

that we provide for patients with our you know, challenging times

41:59

challenging resources and have been through all

42:02

of those obstacles along the way and and you

42:05

know allowed us to continue to collaborate and work

42:08

with them. So so we're very very grateful for that opportunities.

42:11

So now we kind of Segway into our what

42:14

can we do if you're interested in cardiac CT.

42:17

We are offering a ten week virtual course,

42:20

Dr. Lawrence and I wear, you know, we hope to have

42:23

the opportunity to kind of show you more details about our

42:26

workflows our challenging cases from our facility

42:29

and how we've approached them. We have standardized reports.

42:32

You'll have access to Tara Recon with its

42:35

full applications for detail plan analysis valve

42:38

in val simulation. We have templates reports

42:41

written so, you know if you're interested

42:44

Please reach out, you know, you can use our discount code

42:47

for 25% off as well as to.

42:50

Understand that these are cases that are hopefully

42:53

going to be able to teach you what we teach our residents and

42:56

fellows on how to approach cardiac CT and a systematic

42:59

approach and in there. So now we can transition

43:02

to questions. If anybody has any questions concerns, please

43:05

let me know. I'm gonna stop sharing this screen, but we

43:08

can we can discuss.

43:16

Feel free to put your questions in that Q&A box and

43:19

I've actually got a couple of questions for

43:22

you all. Um great. I'm curious

43:25

how you got approval to combine Imaging duties.

43:31

That's a wonderful question. So we

43:34

stirred out with our Hospital Administration determining

43:37

what is the way of

43:40

doing privileging and so we noticed that her

43:43

Imaging there are

43:46

a couple performance that take lead for this man. So Department of

43:49

radiology obviously handles most of the privileging for

43:52

Imaging interpretation, but we did notice the department of

43:55

Cardiology had Imaging interpretation responsibilities

43:58

as well. So we were able

44:01

to combine them find the right pathway and ensure

44:04

that that one or

44:07

two of us both ends were able to approve privileging

44:10

for both of for our

44:13

departments. And once we were able to review those

44:16

packets for privileging

44:19

we were able to see that we

44:22

had enormous amount of talent out there, but to

44:25

ensure quality we limited that amount of talent to

44:28

those who had met co-cats or

44:31

level two in three experiences.

44:36

familial

44:38

Yeah, you know it was one of those things where you know,

44:41

our departments were across way where we had to the way

44:44

forward was to join programs. And as you saw

44:47

from that report for congress did demand was there and you know,

44:50

I think they're really asking they were kind of making us

44:53

Find A Way Forward where we had

44:56

to train to radiologies and residents and fellows to

44:59

to do cardiac CT into

45:02

cardiacom Orion away. Then was reproducible in

45:05

the long term. So it became a solution that leadership

45:08

was able to support and understand what our

45:11

role was so that that helped.

45:15

And how did combining then in turn

45:18

help your research goals.

45:21

While funding is one of the easiest things than

45:24

you know, you've had it's when you have multidisciplinary funding

45:27

research opportunities and

45:30

projects. It adds a little certain level of certainty

45:33

and experience that comes with each, you know,

45:36

investigator and and pi and supporting staff

45:39

the ability also to

45:42

you know, having more different perspectives and

45:45

viewpoints to a research project having someone

45:48

else's expertise that expands Beyond just you know,

45:51

the clinical day to day but they, you know

45:54

daikons and their machine learning and a

45:57

lot of the additional expertise that are

46:00

Radiologists brings form like those reduction the physics

46:03

of things that are understanding of their modality that

46:06

adds certain level of of expertise

46:09

to each project that we didn't

46:12

have before and we're not able to to multiply

46:15

and reproduce but more importantly it allows

46:18

us to really apply for different.

46:21

instead are across different departments, you

46:24

know Radiology research opportunities cardiology-based research

46:27

opportunities that we otherwise wouldn't have access

46:30

to

46:32

Now add I think there's about 550 million

46:35

dollars in this last year's

46:38

worth of congressional mandated research available

46:42

to intramural and actor mural

46:45

parties when that's a ton of cash and there

46:48

are a lot of amazing technologies that in

46:51

the Imaging field I think would be perfect for

46:54

that. But if I don't have a clinical Champion to

46:57

help support, I'm never gonna get any of

47:00

that approval. It's just not going to happen. So we really

47:03

quickly notice that the only

47:06

way to

47:08

Be strategic about this was to combine

47:11

take a bind and direct towards common goals

47:14

and once we did that.

47:18

I'm gonna started to fall things started to get approved irbs

47:21

moved faster, you know things started

47:24

to really occur the way that they should and so I think at your

47:27

larger institutions, you know what I'm talking about these multidisciplinary

47:30

multi-departments sort of projects. They're

47:33

headed by individuals who are collaborators.

47:36

And so that's what we emulate

47:39

and that's what we even seeing that works very well.

47:43

Yeah, that's really interesting. And and I'm gonna pivot it

47:46

here a little bit to ask you about day to day.

47:49

A day-to-day question and how do

47:52

you handle cherry-picking with exam complexity?

47:57

So I don't think we Cherry Peak this is

48:00

we're reading all of it together, you know,

48:03

there are cases where they're simpler cases

48:06

where you know did the residents

48:09

and we're in cardiology fellows, you know,

48:12

obviously don't have a need for you know,

48:15

an extensive discussion on why this is a normal coronary CT.

48:18

So that allows us to focus more time on complex

48:21

cases, you know, when we get the valve in valves simulation

48:24

or the T and VR or Watchmen assessment

48:27

or or somebody with multivastal disease

48:30

or or unexpected findings that

48:33

then we are allowed to really collaborate on who

48:36

does this and the approach of having a

48:39

share reading session of both

48:42

experts being there. It kind of shares the low

48:45

if we if I start reading or helping

48:48

with the residents earlier and I see that it's gonna be a complex

48:51

case then we put those for for the team

48:54

to kind of discuss together so that there's an equal

48:57

And of that, so we don't we don't have a list of

49:00

15 cases. You know, somebody did the five

49:03

easiest ones and they're 10 of the hardest ones waiting for the next person to

49:06

read. It's 15 cases for everybody to to share

49:09

the load with for that afternoon and how

49:12

we get through those. How do we go through those is what

49:15

really makes our model a little

49:18

easier and more more. I completely

49:21

agree I think some and that's

49:24

a valid concern right? I mean the more quote unquote

49:27

complex cases are left for somebody with

49:30

a bit more experience or level three, you know

49:33

Fellowship training now, we don't do

49:36

that we go over all the cases together and we find that that

49:39

everybody does learn and everybody's able

49:42

to go through that. What is kind of fun and exciting

49:45

though is everybody knows.

49:46

Nobody's going home early. Unless all the cases are done.

49:49

So if we want to do them, we got to do them effectively and efficiently

49:52

and so that's a big motivator more than just

49:55

trying to find the the catarads one or two and try

49:58

to do all those first and leave everything else for for

50:01

somebody else.

50:04

What about addendums and over calling?

50:08

The tendons over calling when it comes

50:11

to a finding where there's discrepancies

50:14

in like the severity of disease or

50:17

concern of that, you know, we don't sign the report until you

50:20

know, all of those things have been addressed so that kind of

50:23

minimizes the issues if there is a let's say

50:26

that the report has been finalized somebody

50:29

won in a second opinion. They wanted to review the

50:32

case. Our default is actually address that with

50:35

the reader for that study kind of go over them with them

50:38

together see what they're findings were kind of

50:41

assess that and

50:43

If we deem as a group that this is

50:46

possible, you know that there's a discrepancy Central.

50:49

We let that reader for that report make the

50:52

addendum obviously if they find if they agree with that change,

50:55

but if we as a group say there's no change. This is the

50:58

this is what we find and we agree which often happens and

51:01

there's no need for us to kind of amend things or

51:04

change. Obviously. There's something like that got missed as part

51:07

of the peer review Etc. We do the same approach with again the

51:10

same concept that whoever read that study needs to put and get

51:13

them done for for that for that finding.

51:18

Once I think interesting is when I reviewed what was

51:21

requested for addendum, it actually

51:24

had a bit more to was more useful in determining a

51:27

better efficiency workflow. That is why we

51:30

didn't we address the clinical question. What was

51:33

missed in that clinical question and it turns out

51:36

it probably had a lot more to do with our EMR in transitioning

51:39

to a better EMR doing that. The

51:42

clinical information was presented in a

51:45

format.

51:46

Hl7 or otherwise that then populated certain

51:49

Fields. So I think that was actually

51:52

useful so I don't

51:55

see that as you know.

52:01

I think these are actually useful and we can see that so we handle them

52:04

all together. Everybody is feces on and on

52:07

the email for request for addendum. That was of course

52:10

part of it so that we can learn from it. And and I

52:13

think these are actually great opportunities for

52:16

learning and so again in our area we in our

52:19

institution, there's no worry about

52:23

an addendum. There's no concern for it. We handle

52:26

it and we evaluate it and we move on

52:31

Yeah, do you think this model could be replicated

52:34

in a private practice?

52:37

I think it depends on your organizational approach

52:40

in whose equipment and have the bill

52:43

is is made right who will charges that

52:46

depending on the insurance carrier depending

52:49

on the hospital policy the outpatient versus the inpatient

52:52

setting, you know Cardiology readers as

52:55

a whole that field of advanced cardiac imaging it's

52:58

a new field and with the new field come like, you know,

53:01

the challenges of like well, it's a cardiologists

53:04

coding as seven five five seven four for cardiac

53:07

CT gonna get reimbursed for that study by

53:10

this insurance and vice versa is you know cardiologist, you

53:14

know reading for cardiac MRI, you know

53:17

in a hospital setting where they're in an RV based model

53:20

is that time dedicated for accounted for

53:23

that RV you or is the RV you gonna

53:26

be, you know conducted by who interprets to report. I

53:29

think you kind of have to individualize to what the needs are for

53:32

your model and more importantly what the needs are for your institution

53:35

or your practice.

53:37

You know, if you own the equipment, which is something that's

53:40

happening cardiologists are starting to find some of the smaller cardiac CT

53:43

scanners and they they're able to interpret their

53:46

own images and higher, you know, that's your cardiac readings for

53:49

Radiologists and you know vice versa. There's cardio

53:52

radiologist centers and our, you know, having more

53:55

cardiologists getting involved in this because their Fellowship trained or

53:58

their poor sort of finding how the appropriate training that can

54:01

contribute to to the purpose. So I think from that perspective

54:04

that's you have to individualize at each

54:07

side.

54:08

I think the short answer is yes, and you have

54:11

advocacy groups that have laid out

54:14

very reasonable education standards in milestones.

54:18

I think you have interpretation guidelines that are

54:21

very sounds I think

54:24

there's a reality that we just don't have

54:27

enough individuals who are subject matter experts to

54:30

handle the current and the forecasted future

54:33

load of exams that I'm going to be coming through. I'm

54:36

sorry, but not all algorithms are gonna be able to handle all

54:39

that. We're still going to need, you know, flesh and blood and interpretation occurring

54:42

at the desk. So yeah with those in mind

54:45

they're absolutely will be models where private public

54:48

institutional academic and

54:51

then you know something at

54:54

the Imaging Center where this will occur and I

54:57

think it's useful to get ahead of it now and determine what

55:00

can be done in your potential environment in your

55:03

facility. To be honest. I think it's a great

55:06

model. I can along really well with cardiologists and

55:09

I think cardiologists get really well and get along really

55:12

well with Radiologists. We just think the same we act the

55:15

same. We're we're both interested in the same things, which is

55:18

Or fellow efficiencies Management's guideline based directed care

55:21

and development of cool new stuff. So it's a

55:24

win-win to be honest and I think those who

55:27

are being it as a win-win

55:30

currently will be taking probably larger market

55:33

share of that overall burden.

55:35

Yeah, we like the same toys it turns out.

55:39

Really? That's when it comes down to I'm shiny thing gets

55:42

as well. Same thing, maybe. Oh, that's nice.

55:45

Yeah, so so all that

55:48

said what what are the next areas for girlfriend?

55:53

Ending to network, you know that we're really Enterprise, you

55:56

know, if we for us really are conversation has

55:59

been you know, we have a larger volume. We have

56:02

more consistency. We want to reach Beyond just a

56:05

trainees and and you know the San Antonio Marketplace, there's

56:08

no reason why they're Radiology residents in Hawaii

56:11

or in San Diego or other sites

56:14

where they don't have access to cardio Imaging

56:17

with the shared EMR Enterprise white pack

56:20

system can contribute to to our efforts and

56:23

can be part of that educational opportunities. So

56:26

we're exploring that Avenue. It has a

56:29

lot to do more with credentials, you know, we're getting credentials. And yeah,

56:32

I think in the next two to five years will be scalability ensuring

56:35

scalability and continue operation

56:38

cardiac. Imaging care. We've got

56:41

some Mariners in San Diego. We've got you know

56:45

other

56:47

Shadowy groups and other locations of the Department of

56:50

Defense that need cardiac imaging and cardiac eval. How

56:53

do we do that? How do we Enterprise that and be able

56:56

to provide that remotely automatically be able

56:59

to give them the disposition they need to do the things

57:02

that they're wanting to do. That's one big

57:05

thing. I think the other thing area for growth is going to

57:08

be collaborative further collaboration. So

57:11

Radiology has a significant footprint

57:14

in imaging and what can

57:17

we do to support other missions that is the other holidays and

57:20

what can the other allergies neurology Cardiology opthamology

57:23

and so

57:26

forth that traditionally had been there areas of the expertise

57:29

and areas of Interest use the

57:32

Radiology departments to support Venice for instance cycle choreographed

57:35

and all the things so we're finding

57:38

that that's good new area of interest and concern we can

57:41

automate some of that stuff and so on innovating cardiac MRI

57:44

automating maybe all your sound echocardio.

57:47

Those are some really fun areas that we're looking at.

57:52

That's excellent. Yeah seems like the the name of

57:55

the game is collaboration here. So sky's the

57:58

limit.

57:59

Yep, I think that's all the questions

58:02

we have any final thoughts.

58:05

Make friends with Radiologists. If you're a cardiologist, if

58:08

you're a radiologist make friends with cardiologists and promise.

58:11

We we do get along you'll find out that

58:14

we like the same movies. Even we like

58:17

the same food. Same toys. I mean

58:20

You'll be careful. If you get too close to a radiologist

58:23

or cardiologist, you might go to each other's kids birthday party.

58:26

So and that can be a consequence in the

58:29

long term.

58:32

Just I would just add just

58:37

this optic value-based proposition and working

58:40

with somebody who's a clinician is usually going to

58:43

work in your favor.

58:47

It's it's a win-win for everybody for education and

58:50

all that that's been there.

58:53

That's how things are done in 2023. So

58:56

I would suggest looking it for nest endpoint and making sure that you come.

59:02

That's what we do it right now.

59:05

excellent

59:07

Well, thank you both for the lecture today and thanks to everybody

59:10

for participating in our new conference. You can access the

59:13

recording of today's conference and all our previous new conferences by

59:16

creating a free MRI online account.

59:19

Be sure to join us next week on Thursday, March 23rd at

59:22

12 pm.

59:24

We're featuring The Rad room in a panel of radiology Residency program

59:27

directors and assist associate program directors for

59:30

a lecture entitled matching into Radiology residency.

59:33

You can register for this free lecture at

59:36

MRI online.com and follow us on social media for

59:39

updates on future new conferences. Thanks again,

59:42

and have a great day.

Report

Faculty

Giovanni E. Lorenz, DO

Cardiothoracic Radiologist

San Antonio Military Health System (SAMHS)

Emilio Fentanes, MD

Director of Cardiac Imaging, Department of Cardiology

Brooke Army Medical Center

Tags

Cardiac