Interactive Transcript
0:00
So when we consider acute trauma of the pelvis,
0:04
we'll gonna consider him into three main categories,
0:07
pelvic fractures, acetabular fractures,
0:10
and hip fracture dislocations.
0:14
So with regards to pelvic fractures,
0:15
there is this rigid ring concept
0:18
where there's three components.
0:20
You have the sacrum in the centered,
0:23
and then two paired lateral components which are made up
0:26
of the ileum, isum, and pubis.
0:29
In addition to the bony injuries,
0:31
we can think about the associated injuries
0:33
that involve the urinary bladder
0:35
and urethra as part of the GU structures
0:37
or genital urinary structures.
0:40
We can also think of vascular injuries,
0:42
which may be venous plus or minus arterial.
0:45
You can have life-threatening hemorrhage
0:47
that most commonly occurs from the superior glu to artery
0:51
that's associated with pelvic fractures.
0:54
So in terms of the pelvic fractures, we have fractures
0:58
of individual bones without a break.
1:01
In the pelvic ring, you can have a single break across the
1:04
pelvic ring, double breaks in the pelvic ring,
1:08
and then acetabular fractures.
1:10
And this is based on cane's adaptation of the key
1:14
and conwell classification system.
1:17
So with regards to disruption in the pelvis,
1:19
when there's a single break,
1:21
that's typically considered a stable lesion,
1:24
which may not have much displacement,
1:26
whereas double breaks now
1:28
and you have disruption in two different portions
1:30
of the pelvis allow for greater displacement
1:33
and are considered unstable lesions.
1:36
So why classify pelvic fractures while it aids in predicting
1:40
hemodynamic instability?
1:42
Vis-A-vis the vascular injuries,
1:45
it aids in predicting associated visceral
1:47
and genital urinary injuries.
1:49
It aids in predicting pelvic instability, whether
1:52
that's rotational or vertical,
1:54
and hence the need for surgical treatment.
1:57
It aids in the understanding mechanism of injury force,
2:00
vector of injury, and potential
2:03
surgical tactics for reduction.
2:06
So how do we define pelvic instability?
2:08
Well, you can have rotational instability
2:10
where there's this opening and closing of the pelvis.
2:13
So the hemi pelvis is able to rotate into either
2:16
internal external rotation
2:18
around intact posterior ligamentous structures
2:21
and vertical displacement is resisted.
2:24
You can also have vertical instability
2:26
where the vertical forces that are transmitted to the pelvis
2:29
by axial loading from the lower extremities then allow
2:33
for disruption of that posterior
2:36
sacroiliac ligament complex.
2:38
The hemi pelvis is then free to rotate internally
2:41
or externally and to potentially migrate proximally.
2:45
This is considered globally unstable
2:47
and has a higher association with neurovascular injury.
2:51
Now there are a couple
2:52
of main classification systems that are applied.
2:56
I will briefly review them and their concepts.
2:59
So in the Young Burgess classification system,
3:03
there are several key characteristics that relate
3:06
to the type of injury.
3:07
The type of injury is shown in the left column here,
3:11
and we can consider them
3:12
as whether it's lateral compression type injury
3:17
and interop posterior
3:18
or AP compression type injury, a vertical sheer injury
3:23
or some combination thereof.
3:26
So the morphologic characteristics
3:29
with lateral compression injuries,
3:31
we typically have transverse overlapping
3:34
ator ring fractures.
3:36
They may be associated with other injuries,
3:39
whether it's head injuries, vascular injuries,
3:41
or bladder injuries.
3:43
In the type one lateral compression,
3:46
you have a sacral impaction or a buccal,
3:49
and the ligaments remain intact
3:51
and that's considered stable.
3:54
In the type two injury, there's a iliac crest fracture,
3:59
and this may be rotationally unstable,
4:03
but considered vertically stable.
4:05
And then in the type three we have a lateral compression,
4:09
that's type one or type two on one side,
4:13
and then an AP compression injury
4:15
on the contralateral or opposite side.
4:18
And because of those two concomitant injuries,
4:20
it's considered globally unstable.
4:23
So now let's move into AP compression.
4:26
So this is characterized by some diastasis
4:29
of the pubic synthesis without an anterior fracture.
4:33
However, because of the diastasis, there is a risk
4:37
of substantial hemorrhage associated
4:39
with this type of injury.
4:41
So AP compression also has three types.
4:45
So in type one we have less than 2.5 centimeters
4:49
of pubic diastasis.
4:51
And so if it's under 2.5 centimeters, it's considered stable
4:56
if it's greater than 2.5 centimeters.
5:00
And often with widening of the anterior portion
5:03
of the SI joint, this is considered rotationally unstable,
5:07
but vertically stable.
5:09
And in the type three it's often massive
5:13
where you have greater than five centimeters
5:15
of pubic diastasis.
5:17
And because of that tremendous amount of separation
5:20
of the pubic synthesis, there is often concomitant widening
5:23
of both the anterior and posterior components
5:26
of the SI joints.
5:28
And that produces a situation that's globally unstable.
5:32
The next type of injury considers a vertical shear where
5:36
this has some vertical displacement component
5:39
of the hemi pelvis fractures of the pubis,
5:43
and then may have involvement of the SI joint.
5:45
These are considered unstable lesions with association
5:49
of visceral injuries.
5:51
So we reviewed the main three types
5:53
of injuries in the Young Burgess classification,
5:56
and they can be combined.
5:58
So that could produce a complex fracture
6:00
with combined elements of the AP compression,
6:03
lateral compression, and vertical shear.
6:05
And when you have any combination of those different types
6:08
of injuries, the stability will be variable depending on the
6:12
most severe injury.
6:14
So one of the reasons that the Young Burgess classification
6:17
is utilized is
6:19
because the classification of injury can have implication
6:22
for the type of treatment.
6:24
So if we go through our diagram here, starting on the left
6:28
lateral compression, type one
6:30
or anterior compression type one
6:35
have conservative treatment, anterior compression type two
6:39
may require anterior stabilization, whereas type three
6:44
lesions or ones that are variable may require both anterior
6:48
and posterior stabilization.
6:51
Now compared to the Young Burgess classification,
6:54
what's also commonly employed is the tile classification.
6:58
So the tile classification separates pelvic disruption into
7:02
three different types known as type A, B, and C.
7:06
So type A is considered stable,
7:09
whereas A one is fractures of the pelvis
7:12
but not involving the bony ring.
7:16
A two is stable fracture
7:18
with minimally displaced fractures of the ring.
7:21
The next is type B,
7:23
which is considered rotationally
7:25
unstable, but vertically stable.
7:28
So B one is our open book fracture.
7:33
B two is where you have lateral compression on a
7:36
ipsilateral side.
7:39
B three is lateral compression,
7:41
but on the contralateral side, also known
7:44
as a bucket handle lesion.
7:45
And then the third type is type C,
7:49
where you have rotationally
7:50
and vertically unstable components.
7:53
And C one is when it's unilateral, C two is bilateral.
7:58
And then C3 is when either of those are associated
8:01
with an acetabular fracture.
8:04
So here's the diagram showing what's known
8:06
as a dever fractures,
8:09
and these are isolated fractures that involving portions
8:12
of the iliac wing and these are considered stable lesions.
8:17
Here's a drawing that depicts what's known as uh,
8:21
MAGA injury, which is a complex unstable pelvic fracture
8:25
involving one side of the pelvis and both anterior
8:30
and posterior disruption of the pelvic ring.
8:33
And in this case, the lateral fragment contains the
8:36
acetabulum and this is considered an unstable lesion.
8:40
With regards to the demographics for acetabular fractures,
8:44
about 10% of pelvic fractures will involve the acetabulum.
8:48
More often in younger patients
8:50
where there's a high energy trauma
8:51
as the primary cause, moderate or minimal trauma
8:54
May be increasing the account for fractures
8:56
of the acet in patients over 35
8:59
or if they have underlying osteoporosis.
9:02
And these acet fractures, as we mentioned,
9:05
are commonly associated with other fractures,
9:07
especially fractures of the lower extremity as well
9:10
as pelvic ring disruption.
9:12
The images on the right show a radiograph
9:15
and a CT slice demonstrating a both column,
9:19
right acetabular fracture with a traumatic protrusion
9:23
that is a indentation of the joint
9:26
or medialization of the joint
9:28
and a right femoral inter enteric fracture shown here.