Interactive Transcript
0:00
In this next video, we're gonna talk about vascular access planning.
0:03
And so what is the role of CT in vascular assessment? Well,
0:06
the main thing is that we want to use CT to select the optimal access route,
0:10
and far and away the ileo femoral route is preferred, meaning that, that,
0:14
you know, the interventionalists want to use the, the, uh,
0:17
femoral arteries to place their catheters, uh, in order to deliver the device.
0:21
Um, and in general, if you have, uh, decent looking vessels, uh,
0:26
with diameters that are six millimeter or greater, this should not be a problem.
0:30
Uh, for all of our newest devices, however,
0:32
you often run into patients who have heavily calcified or disease vessels and
0:36
diameters that are, you know, five millimeters, uh, or less. And in those cases,
0:41
you think about different alternative approaches.
0:44
So subclavian arteries would be the next best thing. Uh,
0:46
but then there are also other approaches, carotid and radial have been used,
0:51
although honestly, you know,
0:52
now you're getting down to some pretty small diameter.
0:53
So it depends a bit on the type of device you're delivering.
0:57
Some are a little smaller delivery systems than others. Um,
1:00
and then there's direct aortic and transapical.
1:03
Direct aortic actually is going between the ribs into the as and aorta and
1:06
placing the device that way,
1:07
whereas transapical are going between the ribs and going right through the apex
1:11
of the heart, uh, and placed in the device that way.
1:13
So those are clearly much more invasive, and I obviously avoided, uh,
1:18
if at all possible. So what are our steps in vascular access evaluation?
1:22
When we're performing the CT scan,
1:25
we wanna first perform an overall assessment and look at the just general degree
1:28
of aortic calcification. If patients have cabbage grafts,
1:32
usually wanna mention them, um,
1:34
and mention whether you see that they're open or, uh, occluded. Um,
1:38
and then you talk about any other incidental findings besides the cayo grafts,
1:41
you know, aneurysms, dissections,
1:43
anything like that that you think might impact their ability to use the vessels,
1:46
um, for their catheters. Uh,
1:48
and then we go through a segmental vessel evaluation and that, uh,
1:51
segmental evaluation has three components. We talk about the diameters,
1:55
that's the most important,
1:56
and then we usually talk about tortuosity and calcification.
2:00
So we grade aortic calcification qualitatively, um, non mild, moderate severe.
2:05
And then there's this thing called the porcelain aorta, which I'll talk about.
2:08
So, um,
2:09
there's no real grade sort of guideline out there for what differentiates mild,
2:13
moderate, or severe. Here's what we use. We tend to use,
2:16
if there's a little bit of flex here and there, but not a ton. We go for mild,
2:20
um, if it's starting to get continuous,
2:22
but there's still areas that are spared here and there we call it moderate.
2:25
And then if it's pretty much there's calcification throughout,
2:27
we call it severe.
2:29
And then the porcelain aorta is this concept that there's this almost like
2:33
eggshell calcifications of the entire aorta, uh, throughout. Um,
2:38
and the reason this is important,
2:39
it's actually a little bit historical in the world, in,
2:41
in surgical aortic valve replacement, this porcelain aorta is a big no-no,
2:46
it's really hard, or, uh,
2:48
it's basically a contraindication to performing surgical aortic valve
2:51
replacement. The reason being that you can't, uh,
2:54
cross clamp the aorta in a porcelain aorta. Um, and so
2:58
These patients in the old days were ones that were preferentially sent to tavr.
3:03
Um, now that we know that TAVR is appropriate in, in both high,
3:07
middle and low risk patients, it's really less of an issue. But still,
3:11
if you see it, you certainly wanna mention it.
3:12
Here's another case of por aorta with somebody with severe tiff few aortic
3:17
calcifications.
3:18
There are no real guidelines that exist as far as like how to deal with these
3:22
other things like aneurysms or dissections or,
3:24
or what if you see a lot of nasty ulcerative plaque. Um, but you know,
3:28
we mention them, um, because, um, if it looks, you know,
3:32
concerning then the interventionalists may, um,
3:34
decide to use a different access, uh, route.
3:38
So here's an example of an incidental aneurysm that we saw in a patient that
3:41
looks like a ular aneurysm, probably from, um,
3:44
penetrating athero Chloric also doesn't look very good. You know, you,
3:47
you wouldn't necessarily want to put a catheter through here.
3:49
I suspect this wall is fairly thin and, and at risk for, um, atrogenic injury,
3:54
this was a case with the big polypoid plaque, um,
3:57
and the descending thoracic aorta. And so in this case,
3:59
they avoided going through, uh, this, you know,
4:02
you worry that you might send off an embolus or something,
4:05
and instead they went for direct aortic access. Uh,
4:09
this is a patient bunch of graphs, very, very complicated.
4:12
Certainly wanna be careful putting catheters through this patient.
4:15
So they actually went with transapical access instead. Um,
4:19
so what about the diameter measurements themselves? Well, how do we do that? Uh,
4:22
you use a three D imaging platform, um, and you know,
4:26
there are a ton of different three D imaging platforms out there. And, um,
4:29
you know, they will universally have the ability to create curve planar,
4:32
reformatted images from those.
4:34
You wanna perform short axis measurements that are perpendicular to the vessel
4:38
wall. Um, and we generally,
4:40
you want to make sure to measure the inner luminal diameter, um,
4:43
and get the minimal diameter as well as the perpendicular.
4:47
There are some occasions where the three D platform isn't really working.
4:50
Maybe you have poor contrast opacification,
4:52
or that's a really heavily diseased vessel.
4:55
You can do manual double oblique measurements as well for the vessel diameters
4:59
if you need to. We take measurements at multiple levels,
5:02
basically at each segment, abdominal aorta, common iliac, external iliac,
5:06
common femoral, and so on. Our, um,
5:10
approach is that we don't necessarily measure the subclavians if the iliacs look
5:13
good. Um, however, if there's iof femoral disease, uh,
5:17
meaning that the diameters are less than six millimeters,
5:19
then we'll go ahead and measure the subclavians as well, uh,
5:22
and provide those in our report. Ideally, like I had mentioned before,
5:26
if the diameters are six millimeter and grayer,
5:28
usually those vessels are good to go.
5:30
Five millimeter is kind of a borderline case. Sometimes that can still be used,
5:34
uh, sometimes not, depending on the degree of calcification and the size of the,
5:38
um, device that needs to go in. Here's just the example, um,
5:43
of this curve planer analysis. With this particular type of software,
5:46
we place a C point proximally and we placed a C point distally and the software
5:50
was able to connect the dots, um, and make this curve planer, uh,
5:53
stretched image of the vessel. And from that we create some short
5:56
Axis fuse and then do the vessel diameter measurements. And so this is, um,
6:01
basically the approach that you take for, um,
6:03
any of these particular types of software that you use. Um,
6:06
this is the same for the subclavians. Remember I mentioned that, uh, doing a um,
6:10
saline flush is really important to limit the amount of artifact in the adjacent
6:15
veins. Um, and that's, uh,
6:17
very helpful for getting a good curve plan or analysis of the subclavian
6:20
arteries. If you don't have that, then uh, you can run into trouble. Uh,
6:25
just be aware that oftentimes we,
6:27
we scan these patients with their arms up and oftentimes we'll get some kinking
6:30
in the subclavian arteries when the arms are up. Um,
6:33
don't measure this as the minimal area of stenosis. This is a positional thing.
6:38
Um, you know, you wanna look for the, uh, diameter elsewhere. So, uh,
6:42
other things that we mentioned. So,
6:44
so I mentioned that we always grade the diameters,
6:46
but then we also assess tortuosity and calcification.
6:49
How do we assess tortuosity? Well, um,
6:51
there's no commonly accepted method for quantification of tortuosity. Um,
6:56
and so the analysis is really qualitative.
6:58
We have kind of some rules of thumb that we use, um,
7:01
where if it's a mild bend, we'll call it a mild tortuosity,
7:06
sort of like a 90 degree ish kind of thing,
7:08
you put in the moderate category and then more of a hairpin turn we call severe.
7:13
And so here's an example of, of some cases, this hairpin turn here,
7:18
obviously that's severe.
7:19
And then somewhere around like the 90 degree ish range we consider moderate
7:23
calcification.
7:25
These are important to mention because there's greater risk of vascular injury.
7:28
Again, this is a qualitative assessment. There's no accepted grading scale.
7:33
In the literature, you might find that different scales that are, you know,
7:36
people, you know,
7:37
qualitatively use based on the degree of circumferential and circumvent of the
7:39
vessel. And here's just an example of that. So here you have calcification,
7:43
less than 50% of the vessel diameter, and then here, 50, 75 and so on.
7:48
That's a way to do it. I to say that the only problem with this is that,
7:52
you know, if you have a, a very short segment with, with the severe, you know,
7:56
circumferential calcification, but then the rest of the vessel looks good,
7:58
is that really severe calcification.
8:01
So I think you have to combine this analysis also with the total volume of
8:05
calcium throughout the vessel and, and give your best assessment.