Interactive Transcript
0:02
Hello and welcome to Noon Conference, hosted by MRI Online
0:05
Noon Conference connects the global radiology community
0:08
through free live educational webinars that are accessible
0:11
for all and is an opportunity
0:13
to learn alongside top radiologists from around the world.
0:16
We encourage you to ask questions
0:17
and share ideas to help the community learn and grow.
0:21
You can access the recording of today's conference
0:23
and previous noon conferences
0:25
by creating a free MRI online account today.
0:29
We are excited to replay a lecture held in November, 2020
0:32
from Dr. Scott Schiffman, entitled MSK Case Review, followed
0:36
by a live question and answer session with Dr.
0:39
Schiffman. Dr.
0:41
Schiffman completed residency
0:42
and fellowship training at the University of Rochester
0:45
with specialization in MSK imaging.
0:48
Dr. Schiffman is an associate professor at the University
0:51
of Rochester, where his main interests include
0:53
tumor and hip imaging.
0:55
As mentioned, Dr.
0:56
Schiffman will field your questions following the replay.
0:59
Please remember to use the q
1:01
and a feature to submit your questions so we can get to
1:03
as many as we can before our time is up.
1:06
Without further ado, please enjoy this replay
1:08
of MSK case review.
1:11
Alright, um, hello everyone.
1:14
Um, my name is Scott Schiffman
1:16
and, um, an assistant professor of musculoskeletal imaging,
1:19
also fellowship director at the, uh,
1:21
university of Rochester.
1:23
And, uh, today I'm gonna give a presentation on
1:25
MSK case review.
1:27
Here's the first case and, um,
1:29
we'll have a multiple choice question, uh, come up for this.
1:32
Um, so the question is, what is the most likely diagnosis?
1:36
All right, great. So, um, all, all, all
1:38
of the audience members chose ankylosing spondylitis.
1:41
Um, this case is kind of an n mini
1:43
or a slam dunk type of case, um, to show some
1:46
of the imaging findings.
1:47
Um, we have a fusion of the sacroiliac joints bilaterally,
1:51
um, as a sequelae of chronic sacroiliitis.
1:54
Um, we have fusion of the facet joints, um,
1:57
involving the lumbar spine, um, which is producing, um,
2:00
on the AP view, this appearance
2:02
of almost like a tram track abnormality.
2:05
Um, we have, uh, ossification spanning the posterior, um,
2:08
spinous ligaments, um, interspinous ligaments, um,
2:11
which when we see it in the AP view, is, uh,
2:14
producing what's referred to as the dagger sign.
2:16
Um, you know, almost looking like a knife, uh,
2:18
pointed towards the sacrum.
2:20
Um, and we also see, um, a delicate, um,
2:23
bridging CDEs macrophytes, uh, spanning multiple levels
2:26
of the lumbar spine and thoracic spine, um,
2:30
and also squaring of the vertebral bodies.
2:32
You know, normally when you see a lumbar radiograph,
2:34
the vertebral body has a concavity to it,
2:36
and when you wind up with ankylosing spondylitis, um,
2:39
with the syndemic bytes, um,
2:41
and the bridging, it kind
2:42
of squares out the vertebral bodies, um,
2:44
res resulting in an overall appearance,
2:46
which has been described as a, uh, bamboo spine.
2:49
Um, so an important thing to realize about patients
2:52
with this, uh, type of condition, um, is
2:54
that the spine becomes a rigid thing, like a, like a stick
2:57
and a minor trauma,
2:59
whether they might get into a car accident like 20 miles an
3:02
hour, and you have to be aware of the, the possibility
3:05
that they could wind up with a a three column fracture,
3:08
you know, maybe a fracture that goes through the disc
3:10
and also pops out the,
3:11
the spinous process on the other side.
3:13
Um, this type of fracture pattern is a referred to
3:16
as a a chance fracture.
3:20
Um, here's kind of a corollary case to the last one here.
3:23
Um, these are, uh, radiographic findings of sacroiliitis
3:26
where we, um, we see sclerosis on the,
3:29
the sacroiliac joints,
3:31
and we see, um, small erosive changes involving both the
3:34
sacral and iliac sides of, uh,
3:35
bilateral s sacroiliac joints.
3:37
Um, these erosions have been described as looking, um, kind
3:40
of like the edges of a, of a postal stamp, um, when you,
3:44
when you catch multiple of these, uh, small,
3:45
tiny erosions at the joint.
3:47
Um, to give you an idea of
3:48
what this looks like on a CT image, um, you could see that,
3:51
you could see the sclerosis
3:52
and the erosive changes, um,
3:54
centered at the sacroiliac joints.
3:56
Um, so I'll call your attention to the following mnemonic
3:59
of, uh, diseases that could, um, result in sacroiliitis.
4:03
And, um, the important thing to remember of this mnemonic is
4:06
that the, the inner letters, um, for ankylosing spondylitis
4:09
and, um, IBD arthropathy, um,
4:12
these are usually bilateral and symmetric.
4:16
Um, whereas the outer letters of this mnemonic for psoriasis
4:19
and reactive arthritis, um,
4:21
usually are more pronounced on one side than the other.
4:25
Um, so they're somewhat asymmetric,
4:27
although if you let people go long enough
4:28
with the sacroiliitis, they all eventually, uh, start
4:31
to blend together after a while.
4:33
Um, so this is just a useful mnemonic in the,
4:35
in the earlier stages of the sacroiliitis.
4:39
All right. So, um, so moving on to, uh, case number two.
4:42
Um, we have this, uh, hand radiograph
4:44
and also a cropped in, uh, zoomed in version of the finger.
4:47
Um, so we'll have a question that comes up for this case.
4:50
Um, what is the most likely diagnosis? Very great.
4:54
So, um, we've got an audience response.
4:56
The, the majority of people are choosing gout.
4:58
Um, second most popular answer was psoriatic arthritis.
5:01
Um, looking at this case, um, the, the joint
5:04
that we were focusing in on was this, uh, middle finger,
5:06
PIP joint, and you get the sense
5:08
that this might be a monoarticular arthritis in this case,
5:12
um, on the zoomed in version, um, of this joint.
5:15
Um, the key takeaway findings that, um, I wanted you
5:17
to notice is that the, the joint erosion,
5:20
rather than being a marginal joint erosion, um,
5:22
meaning occurring at the, the bare areas.
5:24
So if I draw on the joint capsule right here, um,
5:27
marginal erosions would be occurring at the bare areas
5:29
of the bone at the corners.
5:31
Um, th this erosion is more a para articular, meaning
5:35
that it's just off of the joint level.
5:37
Um, a para articular erosion, um, is more typical
5:40
of a disease like gout.
5:42
Um, the, the other imaging feature
5:44
that's a somewhat pathognomonic is this idea
5:46
of an overhanging edge.
5:48
Um, so when you see an erosion that's para articular,
5:51
and I'm having this overhanging edge,
5:52
like almost looking like a, like a wave is breaking, um,
5:56
this overhanging edge of imaging appearance is also very,
5:59
um, typical of gout.
6:01
Um, the other takeaway is that, um, in,
6:03
in the soft tissue swelling surrounding the joint,
6:05
you could kind of make out faint, uh, calcification, um,
6:08
within the soft tissues, um, suggesting
6:10
that this might be a calcified tophus at this level.
6:13
Um, so, um, I was trying to get ag out with this case.
6:17
Um, and I think, um, fair enough, like when you take, um,
6:20
like maintenance of certification exams
6:22
or board exams, um, obviously they have
6:24
to give you a multiple choice test
6:25
that could include every inflammatory arthritis.
6:27
Um, so the idea is to try to design a question that, um,
6:30
only fits really best with one answer.
6:33
And, you know, that's what I was trying to do
6:35
by highlighting these, these findings.
6:36
Another finding that's, uh,
6:38
somewhat interesting on this patient is this, uh, um,
6:40
SCA illuminate widening compatible with, you know,
6:42
SCA illuminate association in this patient.
6:45
Um, and when you have SCA illuminate association,
6:47
you wind up with a, a volar tilt of the scaphoid
6:50
and dorsal tilted illuminate.
6:52
Um, and you could kind of make that out with,
6:54
with the scaphoid kind of producing this,
6:56
uh, signet ring sign.
6:57
Um, so that's, uh, something to be aware of
6:59
with s scates association.
7:01
You could wind up with a rotary subluxation of the scaphoid.
7:05
Right. I'll, I'll move on to, uh, case number three.
7:08
Um, so we'll, we'll have a question pop up
7:10
for case number three and, you know, try
7:12
to take into account all of the images that are shown.
7:15
Um, for this one, we are also asking
7:17
what is the most likely diagnosis.
7:20
All right, great. So, um, we have, uh, um, the majority
7:23
of the audience has, uh, chosen renal osteo dystrophy
7:26
and, um, that otherwise known
7:27
as secondary hyper parathyroidism.
7:29
And, uh, that is the correct answer.
7:32
Um, the imaging findings that we're showing is, um, the,
7:34
the Ruger jersey spine, um,
7:38
and the other findings
7:39
that would help you put this together, um,
7:40
because, uh, dense, uh, bands of sclerosis at the upper
7:43
and lower end plates of the vertebral bodies can also be
7:45
seen, um, with diseases like osteoporosis.
7:49
Um, so the other findings, uh, to synthesize, um,
7:52
was this idea that you're winding up
7:54
with a sub ligamentous resorption
7:55
of bone at the pubic synthesis
7:58
and sub ligamentous resorption
7:59
of bone at the sacroiliac joint, um, resulting in widening
8:03
of this, uh, sacroiliac joint here.
8:04
You could see some of the erosive changes, um, as we,
8:08
as we go through some of the imaging in this patient, um,
8:11
you know, so here's, um, here's the CT scan.
8:14
Um, we could see the, the rugger jersey spine.
8:17
Um, we could see the, um, erosive changes, um,
8:20
or widening sub ligamentous resorption at
8:22
the sacroiliac joint.
8:24
We could see it occurring at the pubic synthesis.
8:27
And then it shouldn't surprise you
8:28
that this patient's kidneys are completely atrophic.
8:32
Um, this patient was on dialysis.
8:34
Um, so oftentimes if you see a patient with this, uh, severe
8:37
of a rugged jersey spine,
8:38
you'd be expecting their creatinine to be, you know,
8:41
somewhere in the neighborhood of like five to seven, um,
8:43
and A GFR lower than 15 or so.
8:46
Um, so when you see this, this, uh, this amount of, uh, um,
8:50
abnormality here, um, I've also, for this patient, um, just
8:53
to emphasize another point, um, I've also loaded up, uh, one
8:57
of their chest x-rays, um, just to show an area, um,
9:01
where you also get sub ligamentous resorption of bone, um,
9:04
at the caracal clavicular ligament assertion sites
9:07
and at the acromial clavicular ligament, um, um,
9:09
sites you might wind up with widening
9:11
of bilateral acromial clavicular joints.
9:14
Um, this is not post-surgical,
9:15
it's not from like a distal clavicle resection
9:18
and, um, you know, it's not, um, in this case from trauma.
9:22
Um, in this case it's from a resorption of bone related
9:25
to the secondary hyperparathyroidism.
9:27
Um, and similarly, you wind up
9:28
with sub ligamentous resorption
9:29
of bone at the caracal clavicular ligament insertion site,
9:33
um, resulting in kind of like this undersurface scalloping
9:36
of the, uh, distal clavicle.
9:38
Um, so, um, so that's another nice, uh, finding,
9:41
demonstrating, um, findings of, um, renal osteo dystrophy.
9:46
Um, all right, so, um, I'll move on to the next case.
9:50
Um, so we have a, uh, pediatric, uh, pelvis x-ray,
9:55
and I'll also, um, kind of, uh,
9:57
pump in a three dimensional images, uh,
10:00
from the CT scan on this patient.
10:02
And, um, the question is, um,
10:06
what tendon group is responsible for the avulsion fracture?
10:10
So, all great.
10:12
So, um, the, the, the majority of the audience has responded
10:15
with the, uh, hamstringing tendon group, um, which,
10:18
uh, was the correct answer.
10:19
Um, this, uh, this all comes back to the idea of like, uh,
10:23
avulsion fractures of the, uh, pediatric pelvis and hip.
10:26
Um, and, uh, really this comes down to just knowing, um,
10:28
the anatomy of where the tendons are arising
10:30
and when they're, where they're inserting.
10:32
Um, so, um, for the, for the ischial tuberosity, avulsion,
10:36
here's the avulsion fracture right here from
10:37
the ischial tuberosity.
10:39
Um, this is the origin of your,
10:41
of your common hamstring tendon, uh, group.
10:43
Um, so that's the hamstringing tendons.
10:45
Um, the lesser trocanter is the insertion site
10:48
of your ilio os tendon.
10:51
Um, so that would be, if, if this was a vols,
10:53
that would be your ilio os.
10:55
Um, the greater trocanter is where your gluteus mi minimus
10:58
and gluteus medias are inserting.
11:00
Um, so this would be, if your greater trocanter was AULs,
11:03
this would be your, your gluteal tendons.
11:06
Um, and then the two sites on the pelvis
11:07
that are most commonly injured, um,
11:09
one would be your anterior inferior iliac spine.
11:13
Um, this is, uh, where the rectus femoris is arising from,
11:16
um, and then your anterior superior iliac spine, um,
11:20
which is where your sartorius is arising from.
11:23
Um, so just having a nice, uh, um, ability of remembering
11:27
where these tendons are arising
11:28
or where they're inserting, um, will help you, um, with,
11:31
with regards to what might be causing the evulsion fracture.
11:35
Um, uh, here's an example of this patient's, uh, CT scan.
11:39
Um, so you'll notice that when I get
11:41
to the ischial tuberosity right here, um, you'll notice
11:44
that this piece of bone is completely pulled off of, um, um,
11:48
of the, uh, hypothesis.
11:49
It's distracted. Um,
11:51
and if we had an MRI, we would see
11:53
that this is still attached to the, uh,
11:55
to the hamstring tendons.
11:57
Um, so this is just, uh,
11:58
basically an avulsion fracture at this location.
12:01
All right. So, um, I'll, I'll advance the slide one more
12:04
and we'll move on to, uh, case number five, right.
12:07
So, um, ca case number five, um, I have the question.
12:11
Um, so look at the images, try to figure out
12:13
what the diagnosis might be,
12:15
and then try to figure out
12:16
what relevant clinical history would support the diagnosis.
12:20
Um, what relevant clinical history would help
12:22
support the diagnosis?
12:24
All right, great. Um, again, the, the majority
12:26
of the audience has gone with a longstanding bisphosphonate
12:30
treatment for osteoporosis.
12:32
Um, and that is the correct answer.
12:35
Um, what I was trying to get at in this case is, um,
12:37
we have an abnormality, um,
12:39
which is centered at the subter region
12:41
of the proximal femur,
12:43
and the abnormality is basically an insufficiency fracture.
12:46
Um, we see, um, end osteo marrow edema on this side,
12:50
and we see periosteal edema on this side.
12:53
And then the intervening cortex, um, is showing, um, um,
12:56
you can't make it out on this, uh,
12:58
T two weighted image, uh, with fats out.
13:00
Um, but this would've been an intracortical fracture, um,
13:03
a similar patient on the plane film.
13:05
Um, you could kind of make that linear lucency
13:07
that's running through the cortex, um, oriented in,
13:10
in a horizontal direction, um, forming
13:12
what looks almost like a volcano, um, in this direction.
13:15
You can imagine magma kind of like spewing out
13:18
of the volcano in this direction.
13:20
Um, and the reason that it looks like a volcano is
13:22
because not only do you have this fracture,
13:23
but you have this periosteal thickening, um,
13:25
which helps produce kind of this, uh,
13:27
volcano, uh, type of look.
13:29
Um, so when you have an insufficiency fracture
13:32
of your lateral subter femur, um, this has been noticed
13:36
to be occurring in patients that are taking medications such
13:39
as bisphosphonates, um,
13:41
or even, um, medications, uh, um, like X-G-E-V-A, um,
13:46
like medications that are used to try
13:48
to increase boney density.
13:49
Um, and it leads to altered, um, biomechanics
13:53
and altered, um, weak points of the bone
13:55
or str strong points of the bone.
13:57
And instead of, uh, you know, the
13:58
nor normal sites of stress fractures might be at the femoral
14:01
neck, um,
14:02
but when these patients are on this medication
14:04
for a long time, they develop new weak points of the bone.
14:07
And, and this is a, this is what's referred to
14:09
as an atypical femur fracture.
14:11
Um, so if this progresses through the shaft of the femur
14:13
and the patient came into the ed,
14:15
this would be an atypical femur fracture, not your usual run
14:18
of the mill femur fracture.
14:19
Um, and that has been noticed to be associated with, uh,
14:22
bisphosphonates, um, the,
14:26
the MRI in this patient.
14:27
Um, um, to give you an idea of what this looks like,
14:32
um, here's a coronal view of the, of the pelvis.
14:36
Um, you can see that it's, at the moment, it's isolated to,
14:38
um, to this left hip.
14:40
Um, and when I go to an axial projection, you could kind
14:45
of make out, um, the findings of a stress fracture
14:48
that you would encounter elsewhere, um, in the body, um,
14:51
which is, um,
14:52
and these are graded based on, um,
14:54
if you're seeing end osteo edema, periosteal edema.
14:58
Um, any signs of a cortical fracture
15:00
or any marrow edema, um, would help you kind of, uh, um,
15:04
classify what stage, um, of a,
15:06
of a stress injury you're dealing with
15:08
or insufficiency fracture in this, uh, in this case.
15:11
Um, and then the most common way
15:13
that these have been treated is, uh,
15:15
with a prophylactic fixation.
15:17
Um, so they might put an intramedullary, um, nail
15:20
or celo medullary nail to kind of stabilize the hip
15:23
and prevent this from progressing, um,
15:25
or they might have the patient try
15:26
to do a non-weight bearing,
15:28
or they might stop the medication.
15:29
Um, but something to keep in mind about the hip, which is,
15:32
uh, somewhat unique is, um,
15:34
because the hip is, uh, somewhat curved like, like a cane,
15:37
um, it produces a side of, uh, compressive forces
15:40
and a side of tensile forces.
15:42
And in general, um, stress fractures tend to occur,
15:47
um, on this, uh, compressive side
15:49
of the femoral neck in which it's held in compression.
15:51
And you imagine that with enough non-weightbearing,
15:54
the stress fracture might heal.
15:56
The problem with this stress fracture is it's more on the
15:58
tensile side of the hip,
16:00
and when you're on the tensile side of the hip,
16:01
then you have more difficulty with healing.
16:04
Um, so maybe that's the rationale behind, uh,
16:06
doing the prophylactic fixation.
16:09
Um, all right, so, um, we'll move on to,
16:11
uh, case number six.
16:13
Um, um, case number six.
16:15
Uh, here's the, uh, pelvis image on, on a patient.
16:19
Um, and I'm, I'm gonna have a mystery image pop up in the
16:22
future and, uh, you know, try
16:24
to synthesize all the information in
16:26
this, uh, in this study.
16:27
Um, even parts of the lumbar spine are in there, um,
16:30
but I wanna see if you could make the most likely diagnosis
16:33
based on this, uh, pelvis, uh, radiograph.
16:36
All right, great. So, um, the majority of, uh, um,
16:39
answers went with a sickle cell disease.
16:41
That is the correct answer.
16:43
Um, uh, the, the things to realize on this, uh, pelvis, uh,
16:46
radiograph is that, um, there's multiple areas
16:48
of osteonecrosis, um, including avascular necrosis
16:52
of this hip with flattening of the femoral head
16:54
and severe degenerative disease.
16:56
Um, you have, uh, you know, serpiginous areas
16:58
of sclerosis involving the femoral heads, um,
17:01
which could be areas of either bone infarcts or AAV n
17:04
and similar findings in the pelvis.
17:06
Um, the findings in the spine that I was trying
17:08
to highlight, um,
17:09
and I'll bring it in on, on this next image, uh, here, um,
17:13
is this idea, um, and this is the patient's, a CT
17:15
of their thoracic spine, is this idea of these, uh,
17:18
h shaped, uh, vertebral bodies
17:20
or fish mouth shaped vertebral bodies, where
17:22
because of the, uh, chronic ischemia, you wind up
17:25
with depression of the superior
17:27
and inferior end plates, um, in patients
17:29
with sickle cell disease,
17:31
and you wind up with these vertebral bodies that are, um,
17:33
having this, uh, h uh, shaped to them.
17:35
Um, you might be able to make out some subtle abnormalities
17:38
on this, on this plain film right here.
17:40
Um, to give you an idea of what this looked like on,
17:42
on the patient's CT scan, um, as we're panning through,
17:46
you can see all the bones are sclerotic.
17:48
And then when you get to like your midsagittal aspect,
17:51
you can see, um, you know, the, the typical hha uh,
17:55
vertebral bodies throughout basically the
17:57
entire thoracic spine.
17:59
Um, another finding that this patient had that goes nicely
18:01
with the sickle cell disease, um, was, uh, included on this,
18:05
uh, um, thoracic spine CT was kind of a small spleen.
18:10
Um, so that would also go with the idea
18:11
of sickle cell disease.
18:13
Um, so the musculoskeletal manifestations in sickle cell is
18:16
usually, um, osteonecrosis of multiple bones, um,
18:20
but another manifestation might be osteomyelitis.
18:23
And then it's just important to remember this idea that,
18:26
you know, most common is still staph aureus,
18:28
but, um, people with sickle cell disease can also get, um,
18:32
um, um, osteomyelitis from, um, um,
18:36
from other organisms that are, um, unusual in normal people,
18:40
um, such as salmonella.
18:42
All right. So, um, moving on to, um,
18:45
moving on to case number seven.
18:47
Um, so case number seven, the question is,
18:50
what is the most likely diagnosis?
18:53
All right, so, um, a hundred percent of the people
18:56
that responded, uh, landed with the right diagnosis,
18:58
which was erosive osteoarthritis.
19:00
Um, this is like one
19:01
of the best examples I could find of this.
19:04
Um, but the idea with, uh, erosive osteoarthritis is
19:07
that it takes on the same joints that normally get involved
19:10
by osteoarthritis.
19:12
Um, that means that the DIP joints are affected,
19:14
the PIP joints are affected,
19:16
and the basal joint is affected.
19:18
Um, but to distinguish it from osteoarthritis, um,
19:21
the finding that we're looking
19:22
for is what's called central erosions.
19:24
Um, so to, to demonstrate what this looks like, um,
19:27
I'm gonna demonstrate it on this more normal looking joint,
19:30
a central erosion, um, of this, uh, base
19:32
of the phalanx here would be, um,
19:35
a a central erosion occurring right here,
19:38
a central erosion occurring right here,
19:40
and a central erosion involving the head looking like this.
19:43
And when you, when you combine these three central erosions,
19:46
you wind up producing what's referred to
19:48
as a seagull deformity, um, where the base
19:50
of the di the distal phalanx in this case, um,
19:53
if I outlined it, it kinda looks like, like a seagull, um,
19:56
you know, doing its, uh, flying motion.
19:59
Um, so this is what's meant by the, the gull wing deformity,
20:02
and this is what's meant by the central erosive changes, um,
20:05
of erosive osteoarthritis.
20:09
Um, so, um, yeah, very good response rate
20:11
by the audience on this question.
20:13
And, um, the way to distinguish this from other arthritis
20:15
is, um, you know, you know,
20:16
rheumatoid arthritis more typically involving the proximal
20:19
joints like CPS
20:20
and the wrist, um, usually with marginal erosions.
20:23
Um, and I think psoriasis is a good alternative
20:26
diagnosis in a case like this.
20:28
Um, but this is so classic of erosive osteoarthritis
20:30
with the osteophytes, um,
20:32
and also the central erosions joints based narrowing.
20:34
It just, uh, fits too well with erosive osteoarthritis.
20:38
Psoriasis, you will get some marginal erosions,
20:40
and you'll get also a peros titis
20:43
and sometimes even a sausage finger.
20:45
Um, so those are some, uh, pearls for, uh, psoriasis.
20:49
All right. Um, next case.
20:52
Um, so we have an MRI of the shoulder, um,
20:55
and the case is, the question is
20:58
what is the most likely etiology of this imaging finding?
21:01
All right, great. Um, the, the majority of the audience, uh,
21:03
landed on infection or inflammation,
21:06
and, uh, that is the, that is the correct answer.
21:10
Um, what we're looking at actually is, uh, the term
21:13
of this is called rice bodies, um,
21:16
and, uh, rice bodies, um,
21:18
so we have basically subacromial subdeltoid bursitis,
21:21
and it's filled with all of these, uh, these small, um,
21:24
synovial fragments that are shaped like grains of rice.
21:27
Um, basically the rice bodies is from either chronic
21:30
inflammation or chronic infection.
21:32
Um, the most typical candidates is rheumatoid arthritis
21:35
or even tuberculosis.
21:37
Those are the most common,
21:38
or even something like synovial chondro mitosis.
21:41
Um, you wind up with pieces of synovium infarct
21:44
and falling off into the joint.
21:45
Um, and then when they fall off into the joint, they kind
21:47
of produce all these little grains of rice, um,
21:50
within this case, the bursa.
21:52
Um, what this patient looked like, if you were to, um,
21:55
look at this on an MRI, um, here as I'm, as I'm scrolling
21:59
through, um, you could see that this,
22:02
this bursa is just filled with numerous, uh, small bodies.
22:06
Um, when I, when I kind of do it on the sagittal plane here,
22:09
um, you can see that it's filled with numerous tiny, uh,
22:11
small, uh, bodies within the bursal fluid collection, um,
22:14
compatible with those rice bodies.
22:17
Um, one way to distinguish this from, say,
22:18
like lipoma AEs essence is on a T one weighted sequence,
22:22
you'd expect the lipoma AEs essence to have, um,
22:25
fat signal intensity.
22:27
Um, so it, it, these,
22:29
these nodules should be bright on a T one sequence if there
22:31
were really frons of fat.
22:33
Um, so yeah, just to have in the back of your mind this idea
22:36
of rice bodies, and probably the two most important
22:39
differentials to know is rheumatoid arthritis
22:41
and tuberculosis,
22:42
but this could be seen with any longstanding inflammatory
22:45
or infectious arthritis, um, given the right circumstances.
22:49
Um, all right, so I'm going to move on
22:51
to question number nine.
22:53
Um, and you'll notice that, um, um,
22:56
even though the patient does have a scaphoid fracture,
22:58
you'll notice that that is not one
23:00
of the choices, uh, for this question.
23:02
Um, so you want to go a little bit bit beyond that.
23:05
Um, question number nine is, what is the primary diagnosis?
23:10
All right, great. Um, the majority
23:11
of the audience also got the answer right?
23:12
It, the answer was a peri lunate dislocation.
23:15
Um, this gets down to the crux of, um, the orientation
23:19
of the, of the bones on the lateral projection.
23:22
Um, so here we could tell that the position
23:24
of the lunate on this AP view is just completely abnormal.
23:27
It's even overlapping the capitate and the hammit.
23:29
I'm not quite producing that pie in the sky appearance.
23:32
That's very, very typical.
23:33
But we could tell that this appearance
23:35
is just completely abnormal.
23:37
Um, when we go to the lateral view, um, we could see, um,
23:40
the distal radius right here.
23:43
We could see the lunate, um, right here,
23:46
and we can see that, um, the alignment of the radius
23:48
with the lunate is still maintained.
23:50
Um, so if I draw the line down the radius
23:52
through the lunate, um, the, the orientation
23:55
of these two bones is still maintained.
23:57
Um, however, if we try to find the capitate in this case,
24:00
um, the capitate may be,
24:01
and it might be the shadow, um, back here, um, we can tell
24:05
that the capitate is basically dorsally
24:07
dislocated relative to the lunate.
24:10
Um, so when the dislocation happens at the joint
24:12
between the lunate and the capitate, and the radius
24:14
and the lunate are still aligned, um,
24:16
this is what's referred to as a peri lunate dislocation.
24:20
If the radius was still aligned with the capitate
24:23
and the lunate was dislocated,
24:24
and there's no more alignment with the radius
24:26
and the lunate, um, that's what's referred to
24:28
as a lunate dislocation.
24:30
Um, when this, uh, when this peri lunate dislocation occurs,
24:33
um, oftentimes it occurs wi with additional fractures,
24:36
sometimes involving the scaphoid,
24:38
sometimes involving the triquetrum.
24:41
And then the most appropriate terminology for this type
24:43
of a pattern, um, would be
24:45
that this is a trans scaphoid per illuminate
24:48
dis dislocation.
24:50
Um, so that would be the most accurate way of, uh,
24:52
of wording such a report, um, possibly even trans scaphoid,
24:56
trans triquetral, um, per illuminate dislocation.
25:00
Um, here's a corollary case, not to come with questions,
25:03
but, um, here we could see
25:05
that the distal radius is right here.
25:07
Um, we could see that the capitate is right here.
25:10
Um, so we could see that the orientation of the radius
25:12
and the capitate is maintained.
25:14
Um, but in this case, we could see that the lunate, um, um,
25:17
is, uh, no longer in the patient's wrist anymore.
25:21
Um, basically a significant amount
25:22
of forces popped this lunate out vol, you could see it kind
25:26
of even super projecting over the radius in this view, um,
25:29
producing this strange looking, uh, empty space right here.
25:32
Um, and, uh, one point I wanna make,
25:34
and this is true for most dislocations, um,
25:36
throughout the M mss K system, um, for the lunate
25:39
to get this far away from where it should be, um, you have
25:42
to know that the sca of lunate ligament
25:44
and the lunar triquetral ligament, um, both have to be torn.
25:47
Um, they can no longer still be attached to the lunate
25:49
for the lunate to basically dislocate like this.
25:52
And, you know, think about this,
25:53
when you're seeing other dislocations around the body,
25:56
you know, if you had like a posterior knee dislocation
25:58
that would tell you that probably, um,
26:01
your posterior cruciate ligament can no longer be intact,
26:04
you know, et cetera.
26:06
Um, so just always think that, you know,
26:08
ligaments are kind of holding the joint together.
26:10
Um, so to get such a massive dislocation,
26:12
ligaments do have to be damaged.
26:14
All right, so, um, moving on to, uh, case number 10.
26:17
So case number 10, we're asking what is the diagnosis?
26:21
All right, so I'm just checking the audience responses.
26:24
All right, great. So the audience was torn between the, uh,
26:26
Taylor Calcan Coalition
26:28
and the Calcan Navicular Coalition with Oh, I see
26:31
with the majority going with the Calcan Navicular Coalition,
26:34
except, uh, um, I, I had a, uh,
26:36
a spelling error in my, in my question.
26:38
So it accidentally said, tale Navicular Coalition.
26:41
Sorry about that. Um,
26:42
but yeah, the answer in this question was Calcan
26:44
Navicular Coalition.
26:46
Um, and the, the key takeaway is that the,
26:48
the anterior process of the calcaneus here, um, is kind
26:51
of blending in, um, towards the direction of the navicular.
26:54
You can't really make out where it's ending.
26:56
Um, this phenomenon
26:57
where you get this stretched out appearance
26:59
of the anterior process of the calcaneus is what's referred
27:02
to as an anteater sign.
27:03
Um, 'cause it kind of looks like an anteater's nose.
27:06
Um, then when you look at this oblique view of the foot,
27:09
you could kind of make out this, uh,
27:10
bony connection that's occurring.
27:12
Um, between, here's the, here's the outline of
27:14
what I would think is the navicular bone right here.
27:16
Um, and you see this bony bridge forming
27:18
between the calcaneus and the navicular.
27:21
Um, this patient, uh, to show you what this looks like on a,
27:24
on a CT image, um,
27:26
here's a 3D reconstruction from the patient's, uh, CT scan.
27:30
And you see as I kind of march around
27:32
and, uh, rotate this patient's foot, um,
27:35
you could see this bony bridge
27:36
that's completely fused the anterior process
27:38
of the calcaneus with the navicular.
27:40
Um, um, so this is, uh,
27:42
what a calcan navicular coalition will look like
27:45
on, on radiographs.
27:47
Um, now the Taylor Calcan Coalition,
27:49
which I'll show on the next slide as the corollary case, um,
27:52
something to focus on is, um, this, this medial aspect
27:56
of the calcaneus referred to
27:57
as the Sust tenaculum tail eye is located at this location,
28:02
and then the medial poster medial aspect
28:04
of the tails is located at this location looking like this.
28:07
Um, if you have this space that's in between these, uh,
28:10
two bones, um, this, this is, this is the space
28:14
that will let you know that most likely there's not
28:16
a coalition occurring.
28:17
If this space gets lost, um, then that's a sign
28:20
that tells you to look for a Talo calcaneal coalition.
28:23
Um, so for example, when I move to this next case, um,
28:26
we could see that that space
28:27
that I previously showed is just completely obliterated, um,
28:30
and the bones look completely fused.
28:33
And the sign for this finding
28:35
is what's referred to as a C sign.
28:38
So if I outline the Alis
28:40
and I kind of extended, um,
28:41
towards the sustin talum tail eye,
28:44
it forms a continuous c uh, on the lateral view, um,
28:48
because the bones have, uh, fused
28:49
and not produced that gap that we were seeing before.
28:52
Um, so this is what's referred to
28:53
as a Telo Calcan Coalition on MRI.
28:56
It looks like this. Um,
28:58
here's your suta tail eye right here.
29:00
Um, normally there's a gap between that and the ali,
29:03
and here we see just complete, uh, bony continuity across,
29:06
across this side of the Telo Calcaneal Coalition.
29:10
Um, something to keep in mind is like, what,
29:12
what would be the indication for such a study like this?
29:15
Um, usually these people, um, have what's referred to
29:18
as a rigid pest planus, um, meaning that whether
29:21
or not they're weightbearing or non-weight-bearing, um,
29:24
in general, they have, uh, some form of a pest planus.
29:27
Um, whereas, uh, adult patients that don't have a coalition,
29:30
you know, the most common cause
29:31
of pess planus might be a posterior tibial tendon tear.
29:34
Um, but in those adult patients,
29:36
it's no longer a rigid pess planus.
29:38
It's what's referred to as a flexible pess planus
29:40
where it's worse on weight bearing than
29:42
it is on non-weight bearing.
29:44
Um, so is that something
29:45
to keep in mind if an orthopedic surgeon, you know,
29:48
if they're thinking that the patient might have a rigid hind
29:50
foot, um, you know, they might do some advanced imaging
29:53
to look for these coalitions
29:55
and the relative distribution between these two, you know,
29:58
they're more or less equal.
29:59
I think it's almost like 49%, 49%, 49, 40 8%.
30:03
It's almost like the presidential election or something.
30:06
Um, so I think it would be unfair to,
30:08
to ask a question like,
30:09
what's the most common Hein foot coalition?
30:11
I think that that would be a little bit mean. Um, all right.
30:15
So, um, moving on to, uh, case number 11.
30:19
Um, so case number 11, the question is
30:22
what soft tissue injury is commonly associated
30:25
with this imaging finding?
30:27
All right, great. So, um, the majority
30:28
of the audience has responded that the answer was, uh,
30:30
anterior cruciate ligament tear,
30:32
and, uh, that is the correct answer.
30:35
Um, what we're showing here is what's referred to
30:37
as a sigon fracture.
30:39
Um, so a sigon fracture, you know, has an EpiPen.
30:42
Um, and this is basically an avulsion fracture
30:44
of the lateral rim of the, of the, uh,
30:47
lateral tibial plateau.
30:49
Um, and there's all sorts of debates as to
30:51
what causes this avulsion fracture.
30:53
Um, the avulsion is actually occurring between, um, between
30:57
where the iliotibial band is inserting on the, on the,
31:00
on the proximal tibia and in between the level of the LCL.
31:04
Um, so it's occurring somewhere
31:05
between the anterior mid aspects
31:07
and some anatomists feel like they've discovered a new
31:09
ligament of the knee, which they've, uh, called the, um,
31:12
anterolateral ligament, the a LL, um,
31:16
and they think that this might be the culprit for
31:18
what produces the segun fracture.
31:20
Um, but needless to say, if you,
31:21
if you saw this come up on a test, I think probably the,
31:25
the appropriate answer is still to call it like a lateral,
31:27
um, capsular avulsion, um, if you wanted to go that way.
31:32
Um, this patient's, uh, knee MRI, um, so here, I'll,
31:36
I'll advance the image one, um,
31:38
and then I'll, I'll open up the,
31:40
the knee MRI in this, in this patient's case.
31:42
Um, so the thing
31:43
to realize about the segun fracture is has a very strong
31:46
association with an ACL tear.
31:48
Um, probably seen in like 70
31:50
or 80% of cases that have the sigon fracture
31:53
and that that's the most common association.
31:56
Um, so you could tell that this patient,
31:57
while we do make out the distal tibial insertion of the ACL,
32:00
um, the mid portion of the ACL looks like
32:02
an explosion has occurred.
32:04
And if there was any question about whether
32:05
or not this represented an ACL tear, um, you could kind
32:08
of go off midline
32:10
and see these, uh, kissing contusion pattern, um,
32:13
with the contusion involving the posterolateral tibial
32:15
plateau and this anterior to mid aspect
32:18
of the lateral femoral condyle.
32:20
Um, the idea being is that when you, when you tear your ACL,
32:24
you temporarily have kind of like a pivot shift
32:26
or buckling type of injury
32:27
where your tibial will slide forward, um, impact
32:30
with this portion of the femoral condyle
32:32
and then kind of reset itself.
32:34
Um, so, um, so that's, uh, how to explain these, uh,
32:37
kissing contusions, um, with the,
32:39
with the ACL, um, fracture pattern.
32:42
And then of course, when you see a segun fracture, you know,
32:44
you're dealing with injury to the
32:45
lateral aspect of the knee.
32:47
Um, so that means that you should pay more attention
32:49
to the posterolateral corner of the knee.
32:51
Um, I just wanna show some idea, an idea of what, um,
32:56
when you have an avulsion fracture in the M MSS K system,
32:58
sometimes these can be difficult to identify on an MRI
33:01
because the bony fragment is so small that, um,
33:05
when you get a fat saturated sequence, not all
33:08
of the time will you see something emus like this.
33:10
Um, um, a lot of the time it'll be fat saturated
33:13
and you won't be able to make out the avulsion fracture.
33:15
Um, so my recommendation is this is the area
33:18
to use your T one sequences, um,
33:20
to make out this small bony fragment that is vols.
33:23
Um, all right, so, um, that being said, I, I'll move on
33:27
to the next case, um, so that we could kind
33:29
of maximize the amount of cases you get to see.
33:32
Um, so, um, this is a case number 12,
33:37
and the question is, what is the most likely diagnosis?
33:41
All right, great. Um, we, we have a very strong response
33:43
from the audience with a hundred percent of people choosing
33:46
aneurysmal bone cyst.
33:47
Um, luckily I didn't put like a differential including
33:50
telan, ticos osteosarcoma in the question,
33:52
which would've been mean I think.
33:54
Um, but we could see on this radiograph,
33:55
we have a loosen lesion in the, um, intr enteric region
33:59
of the proximal femur.
34:00
We can make out some subtle, uh,
34:02
internal trabeculation within the lesion
34:04
and maybe a geographic one, a border around the lesion.
34:08
Um, when we get the MRI on the patient,
34:10
we see multiple blood blood levels
34:12
or fluid fluid levels within the lesion, um, separated by,
34:15
um, these internal trabeculation.
34:18
And when we give contrast, we could see the only things
34:20
that are enhancing in this lesion is the periphery
34:23
of the lesion and also the periphery of all these little,
34:25
um, pockets of the lesion that's created
34:27
by the internal trabeculations.
34:30
Um, the, the differential when you see multiple fluid,
34:33
fluid levels involving a bony lesion is basically primary
34:37
or secondary aneurysmal bone cyst or telan osteosarcoma.
34:42
Um, so you'd wanna really scrutinize this radiograph
34:45
to see if there's any areas of osteoid deposition, you
34:48
or osteoid matrix,
34:50
and you'd really wanna scrutinize the MRI image
34:52
to see if there's any areas of nodular enhancement
34:55
or mass like enhancement, which might tell you
34:57
that you're dealing with a secondary A, B, C or lant.
35:01
Osteosarcoma. Um, th this patient, uh, did have some, uh,
35:05
edema surrounding the bone, which may have been related
35:07
to like a stress.
35:09
Um, there may have been like a non-displaced, uh,
35:11
insufficiency fracture associated with this lesion.
35:14
Um, also this patient has a, a finding,
35:17
which you might encounter on some hip MRIs, um,
35:20
where you have kind of this, uh, adventitial bursitis, uh,
35:23
occurring between the lesser trocanter in the, uh,
35:25
ischial tuberosity.
35:27
And you have narrowing of this, uh, interval
35:29
between the ischial tuberosity and the lesser tro canter.
35:32
Um, so if you see this in a, in a sports medicine type case,
35:35
um, this would be referred to
35:37
as a ischial femoral impingement, um, where you wind up
35:40
with the edema involving your quadratus, uh, femoral muscle,
35:43
um, or you wind up with this adventitial
35:45
bursitis at this location.
35:47
Um, to give you an idea of what this, uh,
35:49
patient's imaging looked like on, on the MRI, um,
35:52
although I think it's fairly covered already, um, um,
35:55
in this case, but what, what I like about these cases
35:57
with the aneurysmal bone cyst is the, the way that these,
36:00
uh, blood fluid levels
36:01
or fluid fluid levels, um, precipitate, um,
36:04
tells you the direction that the
36:05
patient was laying on the table.
36:07
Um, so the patient was laying on the table, you know,
36:09
with gravity, pulling things down in this direction.
36:11
You know, if you were to somehow be able
36:13
to scan someone sideways, you know,
36:15
where they were laying on the lateral aspect of their hip,
36:17
then you'd expect these fluid levels, um,
36:19
to occur in the other direction.
36:21
Um, and you can make out this nice, uh,
36:23
geographic one a margin of the lesion, um, which, uh,
36:27
points out that it's, uh, more likely
36:28
to be a benign etiology.
36:30
Um, and then when we go to our, um, pre
36:33
and post contrast images, uh, I'll point out, uh, here's
36:36
what it looks like on the pre contrast
36:38
and on the post contrast.
36:39
Again, um, just this thin peripheral enhancement on all
36:43
these LOEs, um, which were re, uh, separated
36:46
by those internal trabeculations, um,
36:48
but no areas where we're seeing nodular mass
36:51
like enhancement in this case.
36:53
Um, one, one pearl, if you want any pearls for, um,
36:57
for these, uh, findings when you have internal trabeculation
36:59
with an lytic lesion like this, um, a mnemonic that I like
37:02
to use is, is, is this idea of, uh, a change.
37:06
Um, so, um, changed like this.
37:09
Um, so if you see these, uh, internal trabeculations, um,
37:13
you wind up with things like chondro mix site fibroma, um,
37:17
aneurysmal bone cyst, non ossifying fibroma,
37:19
giant cell tumor, et cetera, desmoplastic fibroma.
37:22
Um, but when you wind up
37:23
with this plus these fluid fluid levels,
37:25
you've basically narrowed down your differential two either
37:27
A, B, C or maybe something causing a secondary A, B, C.
37:31
Um, so you're basically narrowed down your differential
37:33
to these, to these middle, uh, categories here.
37:37
Um, this, this is a corollary case.
37:39
Um, this is a pediatric patient.
37:41
They also have a loosened lesion involving the proximal
37:44
humerus with a pathologic fracture.
37:46
And this is an on mini
37:47
because, um, we, we could see the, we have what's referred
37:50
to as the fallen fragment sign.
37:52
Um, what a fallen fragment sign is, is a piece of cortex
37:55
that is broken off from the fracture
37:57
and has gone into the cyst
37:58
and fallen into the, uh, dependent portion of the cyst.
38:02
Um, so when you,
38:04
when you see a fallen fragment sign within a,
38:06
a loosened bone lesion, um,
38:08
the number one thing you're gonna be thinking
38:10
of is what's referred to as a unicameral bone cyst.
38:13
And the way that you could confirm this, if you had to,
38:15
if you do an MRI, you'd expect this
38:17
to look like a cyst anywhere else in the body
38:20
where you just have a thin peripheral rim of en
38:22
of enhancement, and the rest of it would be filled
38:24
with either fluid or maybe even blood
38:26
because of the fracture.
38:28
Um, but you wouldn't expect like our aneurysmal bone cyst
38:30
to have multiple fluid, fluid levels.
38:33
All right, um, moving on to, uh, case number 13.
38:36
Um, we have an elbow radiograph on a pediatric patient,
38:40
and the question is, what is the diagnosis?
38:43
Very great. So, um, the majority
38:45
of the audience did get the answer correct.
38:47
The answer is, um,
38:48
that this case is showing an osteochondral defect
38:50
involving the capal.
38:52
Um, so you could see it on this view really nicely as this,
38:55
uh, as this lucency involving the Capella.
38:58
Um, you might be able to make it out on the sagittal view,
39:00
but the, the, uh, the lateral view was really shown to just
39:03
demonstrate a large joint effusion.
39:06
Um, I will show the MRI on this patient also.
39:08
Um, but one, one mechanism of injury that I wanted
39:11
to play up is this idea of a valgus overload.
39:14
Um, so in the throwing athlete, like, uh, pa patients
39:17
that play baseball or even, uh, gymnasts, um,
39:21
your elbow is co connected basically by, um,
39:24
your ulnar collateral ligament on the ulnar side
39:27
and your, uh, radial collateral ligament on the
39:29
radial side of the elbow.
39:31
And in people that do throwing athletics, um,
39:33
they're constantly putting tension on, on the, um,
39:37
ulnar aspect of the elbow,
39:38
and they're constantly putting repetitive compression
39:41
on the lateral side of the elbow.
39:43
Um, so this repetitive tension on the ulnar side
39:45
of the elbow eventually leads
39:47
to ulnar collateral ligament terrace, you know,
39:49
maybe a partial tear of the UCL or even sprains of the UCL.
39:53
And this constant repetitive collision on the lateral side
39:56
of the elbow, um,
39:57
sometimes can produce these osteochondral defects
40:00
of the Capella, or you might wind up
40:02
with cartilage loss on the, on the,
40:04
or even fractures on the on or,
40:06
or osteoarthritis on the lateral side of the elbow.
40:09
Um, so this familiarity with this idea
40:11
of a valgus overload is important, um, for some of the,
40:14
the athletes, um, that you'll be seeing that play, uh,
40:17
you know, throwing athletics, um, here's some
40:21
of the MRI images and I'll actually just load up the,
40:23
the MRI, um, uh, so we could see it live.
40:27
Um, so you see as I'm panning around on the coronal view,
40:32
you could see the nice cartilage that's, uh, coating, um,
40:35
the, the ulna and the troia right here.
40:37
And then as I kind of march my way around,
40:39
you could see the cartilage on the radial head,
40:41
but then I'm encountering this, uh, defect
40:42
that's involving both the bone
40:44
and the articular cartilage, um, on the Capella
40:47
and, uh, deep to the side of the osteochondral defect.
40:50
There's some cystic changes involving the, the Capella.
40:53
Um, on the sagittal, um, projection, um, we could see
40:57
where this osteochondral defect has occurred on the Capella.
41:01
Um, it's, uh, it's along the articular aspect
41:04
of the capal right here.
41:06
And even nicely, you could see this loose body within the
41:08
posterior aspect of the joint, um, which is likely composed
41:11
of, uh, the, uh, cartilage, um, uh,
41:14
overlying a tiny sliver of a bony fragment.
41:17
Um, um, so that's, uh, that's an example of
41:20
what these look like on MRI.
41:21
Here's that, uh, interarticular fragment right here.
41:24
Um, you imagine that if this,
41:26
if this was still somewhat vitalized, the bone
41:28
and cartilage, you can imagine maybe the surgeons could kind
41:31
of plug it back into place
41:33
and then maybe put a screw across it or something,
41:35
and maybe the bone fragment will heal.
41:37
Um, so bones could potentially heal,
41:39
but cartilage really can't.
41:41
Um, so it might be the sense
41:42
that maybe they can't find a way to get this to heal.
41:44
So, you know, maybe you remove this fragment
41:46
so you don't wind up with locking sensation of the elbow.
41:49
And then maybe you drill a few holes into the bone here, um,
41:53
called microfracture surgery, um,
41:55
to try to stimulate healing.
41:57
Or another thing you could do is basically put a graft,
41:59
like take a cadaver, um, piece of bone and cartilage
42:02
and plug a bunch of a cadaver bone
42:04
and cartilage into this defect, um,
42:06
where maybe once the bone heals together, you'll wind up
42:08
with at least, at least some cartilaginous surface.
42:11
Um, 'cause without the cartilaginous surface,
42:13
you could imagine that, um, this patient, you know,
42:16
they might only be, um,
42:18
they might only be like 13 years old.
42:19
You can imagine by the time that they're 50 years old,
42:21
they're gonna have a really bad osteoarthritis of the elbow,
42:24
um, because of this injury.
42:27
Right. Um, moving on to case 14.
42:30
Um, so the question here will be
42:32
what is the most likely diagnosis?
42:34
All right, great. Um, a bit more split
42:37
on the audience, uh, here.
42:38
Um, still the majority chose a Ewing sarcoma,
42:41
which is the correct answer.
42:42
And the, um, um, the real, uh, um, um, I guess the one
42:46
to really confuse people is the idea of osteosarcoma.
42:49
'cause those are the, the two big
42:50
differentials at this location.
42:52
And also some people recognize this large soft tissue mass.
42:55
Um, so some people even chose the soft tissue sarcoma.
42:58
Um, the, the takeaway findings on this case is, uh,
43:01
we're dealing with a pediatric, uh, patient.
43:03
You could kind of make out their sacrum indicating
43:05
that it's a pediatric patient.
43:07
Um, we've got, um, involvement of the pelvis.
43:10
We can see that there's permeated involvement
43:12
of the iliac bone.
43:14
Um, however, you really can't make it out that much, um,
43:16
on this, on this bone filter.
43:18
But what we are seeing is, uh, what's referred to
43:20
as onion skin periosteal reaction.
43:23
So we see, basically the body is responding to this, uh,
43:26
infiltrative tumor involving the pelvis,
43:28
which is expanding out into the soft tissues, um,
43:31
by first trying to prevent it from
43:32
getting to the soft tissues.
43:34
So the body first laid down a layer of periosteal reaction,
43:37
then the tumor broke through that, um, the body tried
43:39
to lay down another layer of periosteal reaction,
43:42
then the tumor broke through that.
43:43
Then the body tried to lay down another layer
43:45
of periosteal reaction, and eventually the tumor won
43:48
and broke out, um, of the bone
43:50
and extended into the soft tissues.
43:52
Um, so one pearl is this onion skin periosteal reaction
43:55
indicating you're dealing with an aggressive, uh, tumor, um,
43:58
and most typically Ewing sarcoma.
44:01
But another pearl to this case is, um,
44:03
if you have a large soft tissue component of a mass, um,
44:06
asymmetrically proportion to the amount of bony involvement,
44:10
um, you wanna be thinking of small round blue cell tumors,
44:13
um, you know, tumors that might be able to kind of seep
44:15
through the crevices of the bone without completely just
44:17
destroying the cortex.
44:19
Um, and I think that's, uh,
44:20
what we have going on in this case
44:22
where the tumor might be slowly, um, seeping through some
44:24
of these, uh, verian canals in the bone.
44:27
Um, so when you wind up with this large soft tissue mass,
44:29
um, with relative lack of like cortical destruction, um,
44:33
think about small round blue cell tumors that'll take you in
44:35
the direction, in this case of either Ewing
44:38
sarcoma or lymphoma.
44:39
Um, and then obviously you realize once, uh,
44:43
a lymphoma typically occurring in people that are
44:44
between like 20 and 60 years old, um,
44:47
or even older, um,
44:49
whereas this was occurring in a pediatric patient.
44:51
So that would be the giveaway on this case.
44:53
Um, here's an example of
44:54
what their CT looked like in case you wanna
44:56
to see the images live.
44:58
Um, this is that large soft tissue mass look,
45:00
it's completely out of proportion, um,
45:02
to the ilio SOAs on, on this side of the pelvis.
45:04
And you could see it even kind
45:05
of tracks down along the ilio.
45:07
So as this mass, um,
45:09
and you could see when I switched
45:10
to these, uh, bone filters.
45:12
Um, the, the, while we do have all these, uh, nice sheets
45:15
of, uh, laminated
45:17
or onion skin perote reaction, the degree
45:19
of boney destruction compared to the soft tissue mass, um,
45:22
is somewhat out of proportion.
45:24
Um, we have less, less, uh,
45:26
cortical destruction as compared to this.
45:28
Like you'd imagine that if there was a large cortical,
45:30
a large mass like this, you'd expect this
45:31
to completely be destroyed if this was, uh, any other tumor.
45:35
Um, all right, so I'll, I'll kind of navigate out
45:38
of this case and we'll, um, so this will be the,
45:40
the last case with a question.
45:42
Um, so case number 15.
45:44
Um, and the, the question is, uh,
45:46
what is the most likely diagnosis?
45:49
Very great and, uh, interesting.
45:50
Um, we have kind of a split between the audience,
45:52
between osteomyelitis
45:54
and, uh, osteosarcoma as the two, uh, leading answers.
45:58
Um, so I'm assuming that most people realize
46:00
that we have a infiltrative lesion involving the proximal
46:03
humerus here, um, with a kind
46:05
of a dense sclerosis involving the lesion, um,
46:08
which you might think of as a osteo matrix.
46:11
And then we have this, uh, very aggressive appearing, uh,
46:13
periosteal reaction, um, on both sides of the humerus here.
46:17
Um, so we're thinking of something aggressive
46:19
and, you know, chronic osteomyelitis can have sclerosis, um,
46:23
and osteosarcoma can have this, uh, osteoid matrix
46:27
or cloud-like matrix.
46:28
Um, one of the giveaways in this case is, um, um, kind
46:32
of hidden in the corner right here is
46:34
that we have a ossified axillary lymph node.
46:36
Um, and then also on the ct we have ossified pulmonary
46:39
metastases and ossified pleural metastasis, um,
46:43
with a large pleural effusion.
46:45
Um, and this is all in a pediatric, uh, patient.
46:47
Um, so the, the diagnosis that I was, uh, trying
46:50
to get at was a metastatic osteosarcoma, um,
46:53
where we have this aggressive periosteal reaction, um,
46:56
and we have this osteoid matrix, uh, infiltrative lesion,
46:59
um, with metastatic disease to even in the lymph node
47:02
and also to the lungs.
47:03
Um, here's this, uh, patient's, uh, chest ct.
47:06
Um, so you could get a better perspective of
47:08
what this is looking like,
47:09
and I'll even put it in bone filters.
47:11
Um, you can see these, uh, ossified, um,
47:14
pulmonary metastases, even hilar metastases, um,
47:18
and ossified, um, even in the pleural space.
47:21
Um, one random question that you might encounter.
47:24
Um, um, osteosarcoma metastases can cause a
47:27
pneumothorax in the lung.
47:28
Um, this case doesn't demonstrate that,
47:30
but you know, they're kinda like you're forming these
47:32
nodules that are forming bone
47:33
and they might kind of, uh, puncture the lung.
47:36
Um, another thing
47:37
to realize is if you did a nuclear medicine bone scan on
47:40
this patient, all of these metastatic deposits will light up
47:43
because, uh, they have the osteoid matrix.
47:45
Um, here's that axial layer lymph node
47:47
with the osteoid deposits.
47:49
Um, and, and here's the appearance of the humerus with this,
47:51
uh, periosteal extent.
47:53
Um, um, here's an image of what their MRI looks like.
47:58
Um, and the MRI has this, uh, surrounding area.
48:00
This, this black line that kind of circumferentially goes,
48:03
um, about the humerus here is basically the periosteal, um,
48:07
uh, the periosteum trying to retain the tumor.
48:10
And all of this material that's in between the periosteum
48:13
and the bone is actually tumor
48:14
that's spread deep to the periosteum.
48:16
And you imagine in this case, it probably even broke
48:18
through the periosteum somewhere.
48:20
Um, and, you know, basically got a vascular invasion, um,
48:23
which led to the metastatic disease.
48:26
We hope you enjoyed that replay.
48:28
Dr. Scott Schiffman is with us for a live q
48:31
and a, so if you've got any questions, please go ahead
48:34
and submit those into the q
48:35
and a feature so we can get to as many questions as we can
48:38
before we say goodbye.
48:41
Dr. Schiffman, thank you so much for being here today.
48:44
Awesome. We've got one question right now
48:45
in the q and a feature.
48:47
I'm not sure if you can see it, but I did chat it
48:48
to you if you want to check that out.
48:52
Sure. Um, I think the question was what's the youngest age
48:54
that I've ever seen renal osteo dystrophy?
48:57
Mm-Hmm. Um, and I, I have seen it quite young.
49:00
Um, I don't, I don't know it off had,
49:02
but I, I imagine probably someone even in their thirties,
49:05
um, ba basically you just need a patient
49:07
to have, uh, renal failure.
49:09
Um, you know, sometimes they have, uh, you know,
49:11
say like lupus or,
49:12
or disease that might lead to like early renal failure.
49:15
Um, and that could set them up
49:17
for secondary hyperparathyroidism, so, you know,
49:20
you could wind up with patients on
49:21
dialysis that are pretty young.
49:23
Got it. Great. Thank you so much.
49:25
Go ahead and ask your questions using that q and a feature.
49:29
And, um, I got one.
49:31
Um, and what is the pathophysiology
49:34
of the regular jersey spine?
49:36
Oh, okay. Um, I think I got asked this the last time
49:38
that I gave this lecture.
49:40
Um, BBB basically, um, uh, patients that have, uh,
49:44
chronic renal disease, um, they go on
49:47
to get what's called secondary hyperparathyroidism.
49:50
Um, so they wind up with a increasing, uh, PTH levels.
49:53
Um, the, the PTH uh,
49:55
hormone will stimulate osteoclastic activity, um,
49:59
and then the osteoclast will, um, result in bony resorption
50:03
and re releasing calcium into the bloodstream.
50:05
So you wind up with elevated calcium
50:07
and decreased, uh, phosphorus in, in those patients.
50:11
Um, so th this is a process that's occurring that
50:15
for whatever reason at the interface of cartilage ligaments,
50:19
um, um, um, locations,
50:24
um, and that's what's producing these areas
50:26
of bone erosive changes as well as sclerosis.
50:29
Um, so where this occurs in the vertebral bodies is at the
50:32
vertebral body end plates.
50:33
Um, sometimes you could see it as like kind
50:35
of like s small SMLs notes,
50:37
and sometimes you could see it more inflammatory
50:39
where it's more like sclerotic, uh,
50:41
laying down on the upper and lower end plates.
50:44
There was another question
50:45
that got asked the last time you did this lecture that, um,
50:50
we could revisit, um, are rice bodies attached to
50:53
or originating from the synovial membrane,
50:55
and then do they shed into the arterial cavity?
50:58
Yeah, so, um, so the cases of rice bodies, uh, basically
51:03
the synovium becomes necrotic
51:05
and sloughs off, um, from,
51:07
from the synovial lining into the, either into the joint
51:10
or in the case that I showed into the bursal, uh, cavity.
51:13
Um, and then you wind up with multiple,
51:15
like sloughed off pieces of synovium
51:17
that are now intraarticular
51:19
and then, um, kind of similar to like rocks at the beach,
51:22
um, where they're repetitively kind of pounded by waves.
51:25
Um, you wind up with like kind
51:27
of all these like smooth surface, almost equal in size, uh,
51:30
bodies, um, that are kind
51:32
of well polished from them all kind
51:34
of rubbing against each other.
51:36
Um, so that, that's what gives the appearance
51:38
of rice bodies on, on imaging
51:39
and pathology is that you wind up with just numerous
51:42
of these, um, kind of necrotic synovial bodies
51:47
that have fallen off from the necrotic, uh, synovium.
51:50
Um, and as we discussed in the lecture, the,
51:53
the most typical causes is rheumatoid arthritis, um,
51:57
tuberculosis or synovial chondro mitosis.
52:01
Got it. Thank you. We've got another question in
52:03
the q and a feature.
52:04
If you wanna pop that open?
52:06
Why doesn't such a pattern come in
52:08
primary hyperparathyroidism?
52:12
Oh, um, that, that's an interesting question.
52:16
Um, I, I don't know the answer off had, I would have
52:20
to look it up, but I, I think it's possible
52:21
that you might get the same pattern.
52:25
Alright, well it seems like we don't have a lot
52:27
of questions, which means your case review was very
52:29
comprehensive and in depth.
52:31
Thank you so much for doing that. Again, Dr.
52:32
Schiffman, and thank you so much for joining us live today.
52:35
We really appreciate it.
52:38
All right, uh, thank you. I hope everyone enjoyed it.
52:41
Absolutely. Thank you so much. And thanks
52:42
for everyone else for participating in our NOOM conference.
52:45
You can access the recording of today's conference
52:48
and all our previous noom conferences
52:49
by creating a free MRI online account.
52:52
And be sure to join us next week on Thursday,
52:54
January 11th at 12:00 PM Eastern
52:57
for a live Noom conference featuring Dr.
52:59
Mary Salvato for a lecture entitled The Role
53:02
of the Radiologist in Multidisciplinary Management
53:05
of Bronchiectasis.
53:07
You can register for this free lecture@mrionline.com
53:10
and follow us on social media for updates
53:11
for future NOOM conferences.
53:13
Thanks again and have a great day.