Interactive Transcript
0:00
Here's our first case. This is a patient who
0:03
presents with acute chest pain.
0:06
I'll have you look over these four axial
0:09
non-gated CT images for about
0:12
10 seconds or so and see
0:15
if you can identify.
0:17
the abnormality
0:20
the images are shown from top left
0:23
to bottom right in.
0:27
Superior to inferior
0:30
slice orientation
0:35
so this is a challenging case but it's an important one and
0:38
one that we want to make sure not to miss in the
0:41
emergency setting or in any setting but especially in the
0:44
setting of a patient who has acute chest pain and no
0:47
prior diagnosis and the
0:50
Imaging finding that I'll draw your attention to is
0:53
this Crescent of low density tissue that
0:56
separating
0:58
the ascending aorta from the right atrial appendage
1:03
a little bit lower we can see the crescent.
1:07
persists on more inferior slices
1:11
Right around the aortic root but is again between
1:14
the aortic root and the right atrium and I'll
1:17
make this observation that there
1:20
really should be nothing separating the ascending aorta
1:23
from the right atrial appendage. And when you see something you have
1:26
to think about aortic pathology and that's what
1:29
we have in this case.
1:30
The Lumen of the aorta looks pristine, but
1:33
this is an abnormality of the wall of
1:36
the aorta and this is an acute intramural hematoma
1:39
type A.
1:42
type A indicates that
1:45
the pathology involves the ascending aorta
1:49
And as you all probably are aware. There are three principal
1:52
types of non-traumatic acute
1:55
aortic injury and they are acute aortic
1:58
dissection.
1:59
Intramural hematoma and penetrating atherosclerotic
2:02
ulcer and these
2:05
May coexist. This is
2:09
a the intramural hematoma is probably the most difficult of
2:12
the three diagnoses to make because there's no
2:15
disruption of the intima almost by definition. We
2:18
don't see a communication between the
2:21
Moon and the wall.
2:23
and to
2:26
to remind you all of the distinction between Type
2:29
A and type B type A.
2:32
Means the ascending aorta is involved type B
2:35
is everything else. So it's really type
2:38
A or not type A. So, although it
2:41
was confusing for a long
2:44
time and and
2:46
Even in our literature the aortic
2:50
Arch is not clearly defined or sometimes is
2:53
defined as type A if the dissection starts in
2:56
the aortic Arch or an it is
2:59
a tight bee lesion not
3:02
type A to be type A. It has been involved
3:05
the ascending order.
3:08
also add a comment about
3:11
type A intramural hematomas
3:14
there are findings.
3:17
That we can see at Imaging that are associated with higher risk of
3:20
complications.
3:23
In particular if the outer wall to outer wall
3:26
diameter here characterized by this Black Arrow.
3:30
Is greater than 4.8 centimeters and we generally
3:33
just make this five centimeters for practical
3:36
application. It's greater than
3:39
five centimeters. It confers worse prognosis.
3:43
If the hematoma thickness here
3:46
shown as this double arrow orange arrow
3:49
is greater than 10 millimeters.
3:52
Then we consider that a higher risk lesion. There's
3:55
also something called luminal compression ratio,
3:58
which is the ratio of the short axis
4:01
of the Lumen here the the double-headed red
4:04
arrow.
4:05
Divided by the long axis of
4:08
the Lumen here the double arrowed blue
4:11
arrow if that's less than
4:14
point. Seven five. It indicates significant compression of
4:17
the Lumen and that's associated with worse outcome.
4:20
So sometimes cardiac surgeons
4:23
will elect not to operate on this
4:26
operative type a lesion.
4:29
If the morphology of the intramural hematoma is
4:32
favorable and they may just watch this
4:35
dissection. Very close. I'm sorry this intramural hematoma
4:38
very closely.
4:40
But these are known to heal in
4:43
some patients so important to provide some
4:46
additional information.
4:48
On the metrics of the hematoma.