Interactive Transcript
0:02
Hello and welcome to Case Crunch Rapid case review
0:04
for the core exam hosted by modality.
0:07
In this rapid fire format,
0:09
faculty will show key images along
0:11
with a multiple choice question,
0:12
and you'll respond with your best answer via
0:14
the live polling feature.
0:16
After a quick answer explanation, it's onto the next case.
0:20
You'll be able to access a recording of today's case review
0:22
and previous case reviews
0:24
by creating a free account using the link
0:26
provided in the chat today.
0:28
We are honored to welcome Dr.
0:30
M Mahesh for a physics board review
0:31
and radiography and fluoroscopy.
0:34
Dr. Mahesh is professor of radiology
0:36
and cardiology at Johns Hopkins School
0:38
of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland.
0:41
Additionally, he's chair of the Radiation control Committee
0:43
president of a A PM board, member
0:46
of a CR subject matter expert for U-N-I-A-E-A
0:50
and an elected member of NCRP
0:52
and ICRP questions will be covered at the end
0:55
of time allows, so please remember to use the q
0:58
and a feature to submit your questions.
1:00
With that, we are ready to begin today's board review. Dr.
1:03
Mahesh, please take it from here.
1:06
Wonderful. Uh, welcome to this board review.
1:09
Um, unlike other case review, this is for physics, so every,
1:13
everything will not be images.
1:15
There'll be, um, questions
1:17
and I'm also gonna take time to explain some
1:19
of these questions, uh, in a way so
1:22
that we are also covering the physics aspect of it.
1:25
I'm not, uh, sure how much of the physics, uh,
1:29
teaching you have during your residency program,
1:31
but here at Hopkins I do teach our residents twice a month
1:36
or the whole year on different topics of, uh, physics.
1:40
So let me start with this one.
1:42
Here's my introduction
1:44
and I'm gonna talk today focus on only radiography physics
1:49
and fluoroscopy physics.
1:50
Uh, do you want to post the first question? Ashley,
1:58
this is wonderful.
2:00
So I know majority of you are preparing for your exam,
2:03
which is a good thing, and I hope also to convey that
2:07
after the exam also you'll retain some of these materials
2:11
because when you become a radiologist, you'll be exposed
2:15
to some of these concept in your practice.
2:17
It'll be nice to remember, continue to remember.
2:20
So let me start off with a very basic question.
2:24
Brain strong radiation is the predominant type
2:27
of x-rays used in radiography.
2:36
Thank you. The answer is,
2:41
answer is true and here is the way of x-ray production in,
2:45
uh, in radiography are in fluoroscopy.
2:48
So the, in these three graphs, I want to explain what, why,
2:51
what is brain strong and what characteristic x-rays are.
2:55
If you're looking as a neutral atom,
2:57
surrounded nucleus surrounded by electron, roding it out.
3:00
If there is an external radiation
3:02
or external energy passing through this atomic cloud, if
3:07
that energy does not have a capability to knock off any
3:11
of the electron, but simply get rebounded
3:13
and change the direction in the process, it loses the energy
3:18
because it has to prevent the problem.
3:20
Conservation of momentum
3:22
and also conservation of energy has to be, uh, respected.
3:25
Therefore, when these energy change the direction,
3:29
the difference in the energy comes out as a, as a radiation
3:34
and we call that as a ban, strong radiation.
3:37
And on some time these external external energy
3:41
can knock off an electron
3:44
and this electron, usually the electron held in the closest
3:48
to the nucleus are the most strongly binding,
3:52
and if the energy, the binding energy,
3:54
the energy interacting is greater than the binding energy
3:58
that can knock off an electron,
4:00
these electron are moving out of this thing environment
4:04
and electron from the adjacent shell will jump into
4:08
the occupy the space.
4:10
When they jump in, they lose an energy
4:13
between the difference between the binding energy
4:15
and we call that as a characteristic x-ray.
4:19
So if we look in here, this is a graph, we shall the energy
4:23
of the coming out of this type of interaction
4:26
and the relative output of this energy coming out.
4:29
You can see there's variety of photo energy coming out
4:33
of all different energies except the characteristic X-rays
4:38
are very unique to energy.
4:40
They don't, they come out exactly at the energy of the level
4:44
between the, the keal and the electron.
4:46
That's what it's called, the characteristic
4:48
X-ray and dressed up.
4:49
It is called prem strong radiation.
4:52
It is also called a breaking radiation brain.
4:55
Strong goes after the French physicist
4:57
who do explain the phenomena.
4:59
Let me launch the next question.
5:03
Fil increasing filtration of an x-ray beam
5:09
likely reduces exposure time, beam intensity,
5:14
average energy of half value layer.
5:23
Wonderful. So we have a variable answer here.
5:27
First of all, you need to know each of them what they are.
5:30
So here is exposure time is the amount of MA at the time
5:34
where the electrons hit the anode to create an x-ray
5:38
and we talk about beam density every day.
5:40
Let me show you what is the right answer, the right answer.
5:43
If you increase the filtration of an x-ray beam,
5:46
it likely reduces the beam intensity.
5:49
Usually the increasing filtration
5:52
reduces the x-ray tube intensity approximately, for example,
5:56
three millimeter or
5:57
so will likely reduce the x-ray tube output.
6:01
Why? Here's a situation.
6:03
So this particular graph,
6:04
I'm gonna show again for other questions.
6:06
It has, it can be explained a lot of things.
6:10
So as I said, brain stroke radiation come
6:12
with all different energies
6:14
and the maximum energy is equal
6:17
to the maximum tube voltage set.
6:19
When you're exposing a patient RNA on a protocol,
6:23
let's say a hundred KVP is the maximum tube voltage.
6:27
So the x-rays coming out have all these energies lower than
6:31
thus and they all vary like this.
6:34
Now if you put some filters, means put some material in
6:39
between aluminum, copper
6:40
or a glass, it's going to absorb some
6:43
of the low level radiation.
6:45
We don't want low energy radiation
6:47
because they do not penetrate through the body
6:50
and create a signal.
6:52
They get just surface absorbed at the surface.
6:55
Because of that, we want to filter out some
6:58
of the low energy beam.
7:00
When we do that,
7:01
what happen is the other remaining intensity will go down.
7:05
Therefore, as you can see here,
7:07
average increasing average photon energy will increase the
7:11
photon average energy, but the intensity is slower.
7:15
Let me show you this example here on this side.
7:18
These two panels are the same.
7:20
They were set at 110, a hundred, a hundred KVP
7:24
with 250 ma.
7:25
That's the tube current of the x-ray tube.
7:28
A hundred KVP is the tube potential
7:31
to attract the electron towards the
7:33
anode to create an x-ray.
7:35
If there is no filtration, this is the typical,
7:38
uh, x-rays coming out.
7:40
If you map all the x-ray beam coming out of the tube
7:43
and measure the energy and plot it, this is how it'll be.
7:46
There are some characteristic x-ray,
7:49
but rest up it is brain strong radiation.
7:51
If you add a one millimeter of aluminum
7:54
immediately you can see here the average intensity goes down
7:58
because the, the, some
8:00
of the low energies are absorbed and take it out.
8:03
Therefore, the result, the it we,
8:05
we call the term called beam hardening.
8:08
We are hardening the beam to remove the low energy photons,
8:12
which are not useful for creating an image.
8:15
That's the idea. I can go into more details later.
8:18
Um, this is,
8:19
so increasing filtration reduces x-ray tube intensity.
8:24
Um, so let me launch the next question.
8:29
What is the most likely bulky factor
8:32
in adult radiography exam?
8:41
Answer here again is all about all over the place
8:44
and the correct answer is why, which is okay, that's
8:47
what this whole LA lecture is gonna be.
8:50
So first of all, you need to know what is Bucky.
8:52
Bucky is named after a physicist called Gustav Bucky,
8:55
a German physicist who created this one who came up
8:59
with the concept, the i the correct answer is why.
9:02
And here's the explanation.
9:04
So the Bucky factor we call, is a ratio
9:07
of the entrance exposure with grid to the entrance
9:12
exposure without grid.
9:14
So therefore, what is the purpose
9:15
of adding grid to the x-ray?
9:17
Um, to the in front of the detector?
9:20
The purpose of the grid is to award scatter radiation
9:24
reaching the detector, which basically
9:26
degrades the image quality.
9:28
So that's one of the reason why we put grid in the beam.
9:31
When we put grid in the beam,
9:33
the grid is basically imagine a, a lead septum, a series
9:38
of left septum back together in a compact way.
9:41
So you can imagine, um, a straw has straws, uh,
9:45
two straws separated by a lead piece
9:48
and the same thing goes across the whole thing.
9:51
Imagine when the x-ray is coming out of the patient
9:54
hits the grid, some of it can also hit the lead area that
9:59
that uh, that x-rays would not be detected.
10:02
Therefore that is wasted because of that.
10:05
Whenever we introduce a grid,
10:07
we call it a concept called a bucky factor,
10:09
which is basically, sorry, which is basically the ratio
10:12
of the entrance exposure with grid
10:15
to the entrance exposure without grid.
10:18
Typically bucky factor range from three to five
10:20
and average bucky factor is five
10:22
and here are the typical grid ratio.
10:26
Why is this important? Because you want
10:28
to eliminate the scatter radiation reaching the detector,
10:31
which basically degrade the image quality
10:33
and then you also want
10:35
to design the grid in such a way they don't block too much
10:38
primary radiation coming off or the patient.
10:41
So that's why we have different ratios is called
10:45
eight to one.
10:46
The ratio or the weight is dis decided is eight is the
10:50
height of the septum
10:52
and one is the suppression between the septum.
10:54
So eight is to means if it is eight millimeter,
10:57
there's a one millimeter gap between the next lid.
10:59
That's the ratio. If you look in here, what I want
11:02
to show you is like the relative number of photons
11:07
mapped versus different scatter angle.
11:10
And this is for a 20 centimeter thick patient.
11:13
If the field size is 25 by 25 centimeter field of view
11:17
for a hundred KVP, this is the typical number
11:20
of X-ray reaching out the detector with no grid.
11:24
If you insert the grid, it'll block off lot of these scatter
11:28
and that will come out to lower this
11:31
because it's the relative number shrink, you may have
11:34
to increase the dose and that's
11:35
where the bucky factor comes into picture.
11:38
Again, this is basically showing the field of view
11:41
and how the scatter is impacted
11:44
or changes with respiratory patient thickness.
11:47
This is called SPR scattered to primary ratio,
11:52
scattered to primary ratio.
11:53
How much scatter is coming outta the patient compared
11:56
to the primary radiation coming out
11:57
of the coming outta the patient.
12:00
Larger the patient thickness greater the scatter
12:03
to primary ratio and that can impact the the image quality.
12:08
That's why we insert grids to block off
12:11
and make the image quality better.
12:13
There are instances where we recommend to take the grid out,
12:18
especially in a pediatric fluoroscopy case
12:21
or a pediatric uh, x-ray imaging case
12:24
where the pediatric body is so small the scatter is so less
12:28
so we don't need the GI uh, the grids
12:31
because the grids will automatically lead
12:33
to a higher radiation dose to the patient.
12:36
Therefore we select,
12:37
selectively remove the grid when we are
12:39
doing pediatric imaging.
12:40
That's the general consensus between the B factor
12:43
and the grid ratio.
12:45
If you have any question, um, please feel free
12:49
to pose it in the q
12:50
and a, I'll be happy to answer the question.
12:53
The next question, Average x-ray
12:58
energy decreases with higher beam filtration.
13:08
So the question was average decreases
13:11
with higher beam filtration.
13:16
I think some of you got the answers from the previous slide,
13:19
but the answer is false
13:24
Because it's going to increase.
13:26
Thank you. The reason is like imagine here this is the type
13:31
of x-ray coming out of the tube
13:33
and if you plot each of the energies on the,
13:36
based on the number of photon, here it is,
13:39
this is the maximum energies that you voltage.
13:42
But if you look in here, the average energy
13:45
of the upper envelope is somewhere here,
13:49
but if a beam hard on the filter,
13:51
the average energy will increase.
13:54
And that's why the question was average energy decreases
13:57
with higher beam filtration
13:59
and the correct answer was false.
14:01
No, the average energy actually increases with tube
14:06
with the beam filtering and
14:08
and one of the ways to we calculate the average energy is
14:12
as follows, whatever the tube voltage we select
14:15
that is called the peak tube voltage.
14:18
Let's say a hundred KVP.
14:21
The average energy of the x-rays coming out
14:23
of the tube voltage is usually between one third
14:26
and two third of the peak tube voltage.
14:30
If it is a hundred KVP, the one third
14:32
of the tube voltage is 33 KEV and 2 30 66 KEV.
14:37
So the average energies is in between these things
14:40
and I also want to make sure tube voltage is expressed at
14:43
KVP tube.
14:45
Energies are expressed at KEV
14:47
kilo electron ALT is the average energy, energy
14:50
of the x-rays coming out.
14:52
So one third to two third more beam filtering.
14:55
It'll be more closer towards two third.
14:57
That is 66 AAV or so for a hundred KVP beam.
15:05
Next question, Smaller the focus spot size,
15:10
greater the image unharness,
15:19
the answer is false.
15:21
I'm glad. Now you may need to answer why it is so focal.
15:25
Spot size is the size
15:27
where the x electrons are hitting the anode
15:30
and x-rays are produced
15:32
and the x-ray produced there are reaching the patient
15:35
and the detector smaller.
15:37
The point of hitting the anode greater will be the sharpness
15:42
because smaller the focal spot size,
15:44
there's a less light spread of the energy beam spread.
15:48
Because of that the images will be very sharp,
15:51
but the other is smaller.
15:54
The focal spot size greater the chance
15:56
of x-ray tube getting burnt out
15:58
because the same spa get really high tube
16:02
tube loading.
16:04
So there are chances where are situation where we prefer
16:07
to use the smaller focal spot such as um, pediatric,
16:11
such as in mammography.
16:13
We always typical to use the smallest focus spot size
16:16
because we want to have the highest
16:19
spatial resolution in the image.
16:21
But if we are doing a longer time where we are not
16:24
so much in inclined to have the sharpest spatial resolution,
16:28
we can balance a trade off
16:30
with a slightly larger focal spot site.
16:34
When I say focal spot size, the magnitude
16:36
of the focal spot site is 0.3 millimeter to 1.5 millimeter.
16:41
Not anything greater than that.
16:43
So in CT
16:45
or in intermental fluoroscopy,
16:47
the focus spot size are usually larger
16:50
and in interventional fluoroscopy size, uh, fluoroscopy,
16:53
they usually have one or two focus spots size small
16:56
and large focus spot.
16:58
The smallest focus spot size is in used in mammography in
17:02
order to get the greatest facial resolution.
17:09
Next question. Scatter radiation increases
17:14
with x-ray field size.
17:21
The answer is true. And do you know why?
17:24
Because that can I, let me explain this situation.
17:27
This is the three panels
17:29
of a fluoroscopy uh, imaging system.
17:33
If you observe here the patient is the same,
17:36
a technique is the same except the field size hitting
17:40
the patient is different.
17:42
Larger the patient,
17:44
the larger the x-ray field hit entering the patient
17:47
every instant there is some scattering happen, some
17:50
of it is scattering, some of it is passed
17:52
through the patient and a lot of it is scattered
17:55
outside the patient and that scattering is each dot.
17:59
So if you look in here, this is a half a meter block
18:02
and this is also explain why we need
18:06
to wear a lead apron when we are working around a patient is
18:10
to block off the scatter radiation.
18:12
We don't have to worry about the primary radiation.
18:15
The main thing is we want
18:16
to block ourself from scatter radiation
18:18
and that scatter radiation is directly
18:21
dependent on the field size.
18:23
So imagine here if this field size is 30 centimeter
18:27
by 30 centimeter, if this is decreased to 15 by 15
18:31
by 50% for example, if you're exposing the entire
18:35
abdomen versus you're only focusing on the spinal cord,
18:38
look in how much disa advantage you get.
18:41
You decrease the scatter radiation plus
18:44
the patient dose is also reduced by 50%
18:47
but it's also have an advantage
18:48
of decreasing the scatter radiation
18:50
and if you go further down to the column
18:52
to the exact size, you have more further.
18:55
So I'm just trying to share with you not only the exam,
18:58
answer to the exam, but I also want to know the practicality
19:02
of what this impact of scatter radiation
19:05
and what it does to the personal standing around.
19:07
And that's one of the reason why we advise our clinician
19:11
to focus to the area what they're actually doing,
19:14
the fluoroscopy when they do a long procedure
19:16
because they're not only reducing the patient to the BA dose
19:21
but they're also reducing their exposure
19:23
to scatter radiation.
19:28
Next question, a grid ratio used in typical
19:32
table bucky radiography is which one?
19:43
I'm glad majority of you got it correct.
19:45
The answer is it should be eighties to one.
19:48
So again, as I said, um, the grid ratio is the height
19:52
of the grid plate versus the space between the septum.
19:56
So this is eighties to one is what typically used
19:59
for table bucky for a mammography since the distance
20:02
between the source to the buck receptor is short,
20:06
we use a shorter phase to one and for chest radiography
20:10
and other place we sometimes use 12 to one
20:13
or one 16 is to one.
20:16
Next question, What is the dynamic range
20:21
of digital detectors?
20:31
The answer is 10, 10,000 to one.
20:33
Now the next question is what is dynamic range?
20:36
Dynamic range is the range of x-ray exposure,
20:41
which can be used in the images.
20:44
The reason is like this is in compared
20:46
to film screen system which you are not used to.
20:49
It's historically before the digital detector we had film
20:53
screen system, which means if you,
20:55
if you use too much radiation, the film will become too dark
20:59
or if you use too too less of a radiation,
21:02
the film would become too light
21:04
and you would not able to see the images.
21:07
So there in the film screen system,
21:09
the dynamic range was very limited.
21:11
About a hundred is to one.
21:13
With the digital detector,
21:14
what happens is like even though you can expose a patient
21:17
very high radiation, the images can be manipulated
21:21
and still, uh, we can chain the windows and um, window width
21:26
and processing and still the image
21:28
that see the image, the same thing.
21:30
If the radiation is too low, the images can be salvaged
21:33
by adjusting the windowing and centering.
21:36
Because of that, the digital detector gave us a wide
21:39
application of using quite a range, still able
21:43
to salvage the images.
21:45
Only one drawback is if the images were,
21:48
you would use too much radiation in the fill screen system,
21:51
radiologists would know they had used too much radiation,
21:55
but now if the technologist used too much radiation,
21:58
they would not know
21:59
because the technologies can window down in the proper way
22:03
and send the right only images which is showing up properly.
22:06
So that is a disadvantage.
22:07
That's a, that's a different thing for discussion
22:09
for radiation protection next time,
22:13
what is the most likely x-ray absorber material
22:17
used in a indirect flat panel detector?
22:26
CCI think you guys are reading the books
22:29
correctly and thank you.
22:30
This is true and the correct answer is CCMR.
22:34
The reason when you say, uh, the question here is there,
22:38
let me see, I said indirect flat
22:42
panel x-ray detector.
22:45
So indirect flat panel X-ray detector means these digital
22:49
detectors go through two PA two, two steps.
22:52
One is x-rays when they come out of the patient
22:55
don't directly create image images.
22:57
They interact with the scintillator
23:00
and the scintillator is typically CCM added crystals.
23:03
They convert the x-rays into light
23:06
and the light internal interact
23:08
with the more folic silicone detector which create an
23:12
electrical signal to create an image.
23:14
So the most common one is the CCM added crystal
23:17
because these crystals can be grown in the lab
23:20
very unilaterally,
23:22
therefore the light hit,
23:23
the light produced is not spread the they go,
23:27
they produced light and
23:28
that light enters a channeled towards the detector.
23:32
Sodium added is one
23:33
of the common common detector used in nuclear medicine.
23:36
That's where we call it a gamma camera Barium.
23:39
Fluoro is used in the in the film screen system
23:43
and selenium is a material used in a direct flat panel xray
23:47
detector, which I'll explain later in a different question.
23:52
What is the effect of narrowing the window width
23:55
in digital imaging?
24:02
That's correct. It's increases the contrast
24:05
because what I meant is na window width is like this is the
24:09
scale is expressed.
24:11
Images expressed with gray scale zero
24:13
to 2 56 level gray scale.
24:15
If it's such a wide window then the structure in the image
24:19
can all appear washed out.
24:21
That's why we narrow it down to the area of
24:23
what we interested between zero to a hundred zero to 200.
24:27
Thereby we can narrow increase the image contrast.
24:32
So let me give some questions In fluoroscopy,
24:39
fluoroscopy time is the only indicator of total dose
24:42
to patient during fluoroscopy.
24:50
False. I'm glad you answered this fall
24:53
because historically everybody thought fluoroscopy time is
24:56
the only one which indicate the total dose to patient
24:59
during fluoroscopy.
25:00
If you're observing the clinic, a lot
25:02
of the time technologists
25:03
and nurses record the fluoroscopy time
25:06
during fluoroscopy unfortunately.
25:09
Now if we don't just do fluoro,
25:12
we also do recording like the DSA like this.
25:16
Because of that the DSA
25:17
and other things can be even higher dose.
25:20
So fluoroscopy time is not the only
25:22
indicator of the total dose.
25:26
Which of the following delivers the highest radiation dose
25:29
to patient undergoing fluoroscopy, syn imaging,
25:34
fluoroscopy spot film or digital subtraction angiography?
25:44
The answer is DSA correct.
25:48
Um, majority said DSA is correct. And here's the reason.
25:52
This is a graph just to show you a given idea.
25:55
What is the typical dose required at the image receptor
26:00
for an average size patient?
26:02
What is this graph basically telling like for different mode
26:06
of fluoroscopy, how much radiation is required at the
26:10
receptor to create a good images?
26:12
This is called in micro or micro ranking per frame.
26:16
For a standard fluoro it requires one and a half to two
26:20
and a half micro R per frame.
26:22
And in fluoroscopy we don't do one frame,
26:25
we do 30 frame per second or 15 frame per second
26:28
and we do five minutes, 10 minutes
26:29
and so forth so it can add up.
26:31
However, if we look at the D-S-A-D-S-A is one
26:35
of the largest radiation, um, contributor
26:38
to the patient patient dose
26:40
because each DSA frame can be as high as 500
26:45
to thousand micro or per frame.
26:47
And in DSA we don't do one image, we always do a series
26:51
of DSA run five run tendon.
26:54
Each of them are three per three frame per second,
26:57
so it can add sub.
26:58
Therefore if we just record the fluoroscopy minute,
27:02
that is not an indicator of the two patient dose.
27:05
In fact, we had to account all of them, especially
27:08
for a intermental fluoroscopy.
27:10
If you're doing a DSA, one of our, my suggestion
27:13
for our resident is to minimize the number
27:15
of DSA run they do
27:17
because it can add to the patient dose very fast.
27:23
In fluoroscopy, which of the following image receptor
27:27
has higher penalty with magnification?
27:35
Correct. Your image I tensor has the highest
27:38
penalty and I'll tell you why.
27:41
Again, this is just to show you a trick,
27:43
this was incorrectly answered
27:45
but the correct answer is the image intensifier.
27:48
Look at this graph. When you do magnification image,
27:52
intensifier has a greater penalty compared to the uh, the
27:56
advanced technology, the flat panel detector.
27:59
What shown here is like this is a image intensifier,
28:03
this is a phantom entrance skin dose rate
28:06
milli grape per minute.
28:07
You can see here, if you go down the in the magnification
28:11
means that the field size is smaller, the penalty is more
28:15
compared to the flat panel technology.
28:17
So this is how it works.
28:19
In a typical image intensifier field,
28:21
it is usually circular.
28:23
You hardly probably,
28:24
you hardly see image intensifier these days except some uh,
28:29
crs but most of the clinic are now has flat panel detector
28:33
where the penalty with magnification is far less compared
28:37
to the penalty with the image intensifier.
28:39
Because here when you decrease, when you go
28:42
to the mag field, mag mode, the field of view decreases
28:46
because the field of view decreases the number of x-rays.
28:50
Reaching the outside of the output
28:52
of the intensifier also decreases.
28:55
In order to maintain the image brightness,
28:57
the scanner will automatically push greater
29:00
radiation to come through the patient.
29:02
Therefore magnification means it increases the radiation
29:06
dose to the radia to the patient with image intensifier.
29:09
And that's, and there's the ratio of the ratio
29:12
of the image intensifier size versus the amount of radiation
29:16
and required with magnification.
29:18
So the penalty is greater with the image intensifier
29:23
compared to the, uh, the recent advanced technology
29:25
of flat panel detector.
29:30
Most appropriate radiation dose metric to evaluate skin dose
29:35
for patient undergoing fluoroscopy.
29:45
So majority had chosen dose area product, none
29:49
of you chosen amount of curie.
29:50
I'm glad because the amount
29:52
of activity is usually for nuclear medicine.
29:54
But the answer, the correct answer is community dose. Why?
29:58
I'll tell you because generally, sorry, this is
30:02
how typically different dose metrics are measured in
30:06
fluoroscopy or radiography.
30:08
There are so many different factors which,
30:10
which results in calculating the x-ray output
30:13
and this is called the entrance skin dose amount
30:17
of x-rays entering the patient.
30:19
Medical physicist has a unique way to measure that
30:22
and it is checked on a regular basis and all those things.
30:26
This is the exit dose and this is the entrance dose.
30:30
So with respect to um, the entrance dose,
30:33
that which is also important for calculating the skin dose
30:37
to the patient because if the skin dose is very high
30:41
that can show up with skin injury.
30:43
The way the skin dose is measured is we are we,
30:47
we are two main dose descriptors in
30:49
fluoroscopy or radiography.
30:51
One is the community dose,
30:53
the other one is a dose area product for those
30:56
who chose those area product.
30:58
It is also a current dose descriptor,
31:00
but that is not use
31:01
so much useful in evaluating the skin dose.
31:04
It is useful for estimating the risk
31:06
of the whole body, which is a different area.
31:09
So the correct answer is community dose
31:11
and the way it's measured is you can actually measure on the
31:14
skin surface how much x-ray x-rays are entering.
31:17
That's one of the reason why we filter the beam
31:20
because we want x-rays.
31:21
Don't just deposit in the skin surface and not go through
31:25
and create an image, co create a signal.
31:28
And that's why we filter by putting filters in the, in the,
31:32
in the, in the output of the x-ray tube to block a lot
31:34
of the low radiation filter and so forth.
31:37
So the correct answer is cumul dose
31:39
and is expressed in milli gray.
31:42
That is the SI unit conventionally we also call it a
31:46
rad milli radiation dose absorb.
31:52
So for mammography,
31:54
what is the most common target filter combination
31:57
to image a death dense breast?
32:06
So this is all over the place and the,
32:08
and the most highest chosen is rhodium rhodium,
32:11
which is the correct answer,
32:12
but I'm gonna explain to you there's also a one question in
32:15
the question in the question area.
32:17
If air camera was an option, would
32:18
that be a correct over community dose?
32:20
You are correct as as long
32:22
as the Air Karma is expressed at milli gray, that's
32:25
how we track on the patient air karma dose,
32:28
which is explained, which is displayed on the scanner.
32:30
So that is also, that is a correct one also.
32:33
So in mammography it's it's, it's a different type
32:37
of radiation used for mammography, we generally,
32:40
we don't use brem strong radiation,
32:42
we use characteristic x-rays
32:44
and that's one of the reason why mammo
32:47
for mammography we need
32:48
to have a mammography dedicated unit.
32:50
And the correct answer here
32:52
for dense breast is rhodium rhodium, that's the target
32:55
and the filter, here's an explanation.
32:58
So generally in mammography we are working
33:01
around in the lower energy.
33:03
You may ask the question, aren't we worried about me?
33:06
The lower en radiation absorbed just on the skin surface
33:10
don't pass through the body.
33:11
That's correct. However,
33:12
you don't need too much energetic x-rays in the to to memo
33:16
to image the mammos breast,
33:18
because breast is a soft tissue, there is no bones.
33:21
So because of that we can get away
33:24
with the lower energy still able to penetrate the breast.
33:28
The, and also it is important to differentiate
33:30
between the muscle and the fatty tissue
33:33
and the glanular tissue in breast.
33:35
Therefore if you use a higher energy,
33:38
the energy just washes out the image.
33:41
So now let's look at here.
33:42
This is a typical moly, molybdenum target
33:46
with the rhodium spa molybdenum and rhodium spectra.
33:50
But now here is molybdenum target
33:53
with the moly spect filtration.
33:55
The reason we use the same filtration is to block off lot
33:59
of these um, energies, low energies
34:01
and the high energy which is not used.
34:03
So that only characteristic x-rays of molybdenum, which is
34:06
around 1819, which is, is coming out of the x-ray tube
34:10
and that is the typically the type of target used
34:14
for a general breast tissue.
34:16
But if the breast tissue is dense,
34:17
the system automatically try to go for a larger target
34:21
because you need a little bit more energetic x-ray.
34:24
With the rhodium rhodium, it's usually the characteristic is
34:27
around 20 KEV which is suitable for mammo
34:31
for imaging the dense breast.
34:36
So typical voltage two voltage used in screening mammogram.
34:41
I think this is a easy giveaway question.
34:43
Um, everybody should be able to get this correct.
34:52
I'm glad majority card but still some of you got 55 to 75.
34:57
No, we are using typically the low energy.
35:00
We are not using this energy.
35:01
This is the typical energy of a radiography 55
35:06
to 75 on an average patient.
35:08
1 25 is usually used
35:10
for chest x-ray one 20 kvp is typically used for um, a lot
35:15
of the CT exams,
35:16
which we are gonna discuss in the next lecture.
35:18
So typically is between 25 to 30 39 KP.
35:22
Remember we are using characteristic x-rays
35:25
and also we want to image the best contrast
35:28
between the fatty tissue, glandular tissue
35:30
and the breast tissue, which is only
35:33
possible if you use characteristic x-ray
35:35
and at the lower energy range, which is what it is possible.
35:41
Why is compression key in screening mammogram?
35:50
And you have chosen all of the above.
35:53
Majority of you chosen all of the above. Perfect.
35:55
That's exactly the answer. The answer is all of the above.
35:59
And the reason is as follows.
36:02
So unfortunately in mammography, breast are compressed
36:07
and in fact that's one of the very negative
36:10
of screening mammogram.
36:11
Women hardly sometime hate to come back from annual checkup
36:15
because they can remember the previous year when they had
36:18
such a painful um, compression.
36:22
But compression is essential for a number of reason.
36:25
One is it is essential to reduce the x-ray scatter,
36:28
otherwise the pressed if is not compressed,
36:31
there is lot more scatter produced
36:33
that can image image quality more than that,
36:37
even though you do a such a fast x-ray in mammography
36:40
imaging still about one second or three second exposure.
36:44
If it is not compressed, they can always reduce, um,
36:48
motion artifact.
36:49
That will also reduces the geometric unharness
36:52
because the breast, the 3D breast image is trying
36:56
to compress as much as possible to a wide overlap.
37:00
And also to have this reduce unharness
37:04
that is also important.
37:06
It also reduces the patient dose when you compress
37:08
and it also reduce the motion unharness, unfortunately, uh,
37:12
the compression is very hard.
37:14
When I teach my residents
37:15
or my physics graduate students, I take them to the clinic,
37:19
especially male students.
37:21
I want to put their hand underneath the compression
37:24
and compress 35 or 40 pounds.
37:26
They know how it, it feels the pain
37:29
and that will, I wanna convey that
37:31
because it's the pain the patient, the the tech,
37:34
the patient experiences when they're doing mammogram
37:37
and uh, that's why we want to teach
37:39
or uh, to appreciate what the patient goes
37:42
through when they go through imaging sometime.
37:45
So the next question, brainstorm radiation
37:49
interaction results in
37:54
The following,
38:01
correct?
38:03
There may be some confusion of characteristic x-rays.
38:06
Um, it usually the interaction can result in characteristic
38:11
but the bem strong radiation means it is always associated
38:14
with the poly energetic x-rays.
38:16
Of course the heat is also produced
38:18
but it takes too much x-rays to create a
38:20
to raise the temperature by one degrees of the heat.
38:23
We have done some experiment to show that it takes lot of,
38:26
so heat is the last of this one,
38:28
but the answer is brand strong radiation interaction results
38:31
in poly energetic x-rays
38:34
as I I showed you the spectrum there are poly energetic when
38:38
it interact and it create, it can interact
38:40
and produce characteristic x-ray of unique energies.
38:49
The ans the choice a good choice, the answer is four
38:53
because I also mentioned here this is the,
38:57
the x-ray tube is under the x-ray table.
39:00
That's important because
39:01
that will tell you which exactly is coming.
39:03
The x-ray is hitting the patient
39:05
through under the table here, pass through the patient
39:08
x-ray table, pass through the padding
39:11
and pass through the patient
39:13
and every interaction result in tic absorption count
39:16
and scattering and PU is transmitted
39:18
through the tissue you capture
39:20
but lot of it is scattered back also.
39:23
Some of it is called back scatter
39:25
and that's why the number four has the highest uh, um,
39:29
or scatter in this direction.
39:31
And probably I also wanna draw your attention uh,
39:34
at sometime in the airport we used
39:35
to have an airport scanner.
39:37
They use the phenomena back scatter to create a fuzzy image
39:40
of the surface and that's
39:42
how they just used in the security.
39:44
Um, these days we don't use that scanner.
39:47
We are using more of a radio frequency scan, um, uh,
39:51
type of scanner in the airport.
39:52
And again that is also used as the concept
39:55
of scatter coming out and capturing and creating an image.
39:58
That's why they ask patient travelers
40:00
to remove everything on the surface so that it,
40:03
I don't show up on the images.
40:06
So, so according to us federal regression,
40:10
what is maximum skin entrance exposure rate load
40:14
during normal fluoroscopy?
40:22
The answer is 10 r per minute. Why?
40:25
And the people are chosen different numbers
40:27
but the regulation as
40:29
of now the correct answer is 10 R per minute.
40:32
In fact, that is the only limitation we have on the
40:35
fluoroscopy system.
40:37
There are two limited. One is during normal fluoro,
40:41
no matter how much the patient sizes when we measure at a
40:44
certain point it cannot exceed 10 r per minute.
40:48
In fact, that's one of the tests medical physicists does on
40:51
a annually to make sure the x-ray tube is not
40:53
producing too much radiation.
40:55
The second one is there is when you do on a high dose fluoro
40:59
mode or a boost level, it can go up to 20 r per minute.
41:03
That's where the question was 20 r per minute was there.
41:06
Other than that for senior DSA, there is no limit.
41:10
That's why we emphasize any of the fluoroscopy system
41:13
evaluated and tested
41:15
by a qualified medical businesses on an ongoing basis
41:18
to make sure the radiation levels are within the,
41:22
within the regulatory requirement.
41:26
Which of the following setup results in the lowest skin dose
41:30
to patient during fluoroscopy?
41:39
This is a difficult question
41:40
because there is a scenario changes all over the place,
41:42
but the correct answer is four.
41:45
And now I'm gonna explain why.
41:47
And before that there is one question posed in the qa
41:50
and the question is what filter combination we use
41:53
for normal density screen mammogram
41:55
for a normal density screen mammogram typical
41:59
technique is Molly, Molly and that's what it's system
42:03
and actually most of the mammography system
42:05
pre-select it which technique to use it.
42:08
When the pressed, when you select the uh, auto auto filter
42:12
technique, the system will send, give it three milliseconds
42:16
or less than a fraction to to sense the density
42:19
of the breast and it changes the technique for a normal um,
42:23
a normal density typically is molly Molly
42:27
and if it is slightly higher than we go into molly rhodium,
42:30
so that goes that that's the choice between Molly, Molly,
42:33
molly rhodium and if the density is even more higher than it
42:37
go to molly rhodium and then switch to mo rhodium rhodium
42:41
and then it even go into rhodium aluminum.
42:43
There are all these new things are happening
42:46
with the contrast mammography coming into clinic,
42:48
we're gonna see even more higher technique used
42:51
because it has to penetrate to the contrast.
42:54
So now the question here is the answer is D, two things.
42:58
First of all, what you want
42:59
to make make sure is like the patient is as far away
43:03
as possible from the x-ray tube
43:06
because only then you'll have less
43:09
radiation reaching the patient.
43:11
That's why we advise sometime a tall, a short radiologist
43:15
who are doing a fluoroscopy to stand on top of a table
43:19
to bring the patient away from the x-ray tube because
43:22
otherwise they can be in this scenario
43:24
where the short radiologist can,
43:26
because of the height the patient is automatically very
43:30
close to the x-ray tube that can lead
43:31
to higher uh, entrance dose to the patient.
43:35
Ideally this is the best case scenario.
43:38
This is what happen if we do this one.
43:40
There's lot of these um,
43:42
wasted in a way sometimes it's helpful
43:44
but mostly this is the most idealistic where the patient is
43:49
as close as possible to the image receptor.
43:51
Otherwise in this scenario the object can get magnified
43:55
and larger and so forth.
43:57
Uh, so this is the best scenario. Question number 2 22.
44:03
Automatic brightness control in fluoroscopy attempts
44:06
to maintain what
44:14
the correct answer is image brightness.
44:17
And that is one of the greatest um, feature
44:20
of the fluoroscopy because that's the one modality.
44:23
What we use these days is truly, truly um,
44:27
automatic brightness
44:28
because when we do the fluoro moment,
44:31
you put the foot on the pedal
44:33
or you can observe the image getting adjusted the brightness
44:36
because the image receptor will sense the patient thickness.
44:40
How much of the x-ray are coming outta the patient
44:43
to create then there is a requirement on how much brightness
44:47
to maintain depending on what we have set.
44:50
So that will automatically redirect to get more radiation
44:54
to pass through to reach the same brightness.
44:57
So you can also see sometime when you're doing a fluoro,
44:59
you move from a thicker portion
45:01
to the thinner area like a arm
45:03
or a leg, immediately the brightness changes
45:06
and it automatically flow immediately adjust
45:09
by adjusting tube voltage, sorry,
45:12
adjusting tube voltage or tube current.
45:15
It automatically interplay those things
45:17
and still to in order to maintain the image brightness.
45:20
Next question. What is the single radiation dose threshold
45:25
for onset of temporary appellation?
45:33
The answer is all over the place.
45:35
I understand there is some ity, the correct answer.
45:38
What we use is three gray.
45:41
The reason is like this is the approximate trend.
45:44
We have the the table for an average side patient,
45:48
if the entrance skin dose at the same point
45:52
exceeds more than two
45:53
or three gray, three grays, 3000 milligram of dose,
45:58
you can expect temporary appellation
46:00
and the onset is less than a week.
46:03
So, and if you go higher it, if it is more than seven gray
46:08
that when it can create a permanent appellation,
46:11
most probably you're going to hear from the patient back.
46:14
And this is what happens.
46:15
Why during intermental fluoroscopy we emphasize training
46:19
of the staff and the user very much
46:21
to understand these things.
46:23
Here are an example of radiation induced car injuries
46:26
after coronary procedure.
46:28
These are a cath procedure performed by the cardiologist.
46:32
If you look in here, the size
46:34
of the injury will tell you this is a biplane system
46:38
and this dose was estimated to close to a 10 grade.
46:41
10 gram means you're talking about inro innovative fibrosis
46:46
and it's more, it's gonna be a permanent injury here is
46:49
after two months in another patient
46:52
and that the injury was trying to heal itself
46:54
and the system loses the capacity to repair
46:57
and here it came out a necrosis of the area.
47:00
So these are very rare cases,
47:02
but it's happen in interven oscopy.
47:07
What percentage of patient entrance exposure rate is scatter
47:11
exposure rate at one meter?
47:19
So again, this is has all a variety
47:23
of question, but here is the answer.
47:26
Generally this is a general, as I said,
47:29
for an average size patient undergoing fluoroscopy,
47:33
the scatter coming out of the patient
47:35
at one meter is one 1000 of what he
47:39
or she's getting that's equal to 0.1 percentage.
47:43
So if the patient is getting sir X amount,
47:46
the scatter coming out at one meter is approximately
47:49
1000 of it.
47:52
And this is important to understand
47:54
that is also impact scatter radiation exposure
47:56
to the personal working around the fluoroscopy system.
48:00
So greater the radiation dose of the patient,
48:02
greater the scatter radiation hitting the at one meter.
48:05
And this is approximately number,
48:08
I think this is the last question.
48:09
Smaller the field of view
48:11
in fluoroscopy system results in what?
48:21
And the answer is it's higher patient radiation dose.
48:24
That's where it becomes we want to decrease the um, we want
48:28
to uh, increase the magnification and so forth.
48:31
There is, there is one question posed here,
48:33
isn't there generally a lot more scattered?
48:36
I agree there's a lot more scatter,
48:38
but the weight it's related to the entrance exposure
48:41
to the patient is what I'm mentioning.
48:43
At one meter not very adjacent to the patient.
48:46
Approximately one meter is 1000th of
48:49
what the patient is getting.
48:51
That's what we have observed, measured these things.
48:54
But if you're closer to the patient, it'll be a lot more.
48:56
So at one meter is what is 1000th.
49:01
I think this is all the questions I wanted to share
49:03
with you, but I think as we still have four minutes,
49:06
if you have any questions, um, uh,
49:09
pose this question I'll try to answer.
49:11
Otherwise I wish you all the best
49:13
and I think two weeks from now I'm gonna come back
49:16
and talk about ct.
49:19
Well thank you so much Dr.
49:20
Mahesh for this wonderful case review.
49:23
We will hold for a minute.
49:24
I think there's a couple questions coming in.
49:27
Sure. Now, oh, I, I see that.
49:30
Couple more questions coming in.
49:32
Um, explain the last question. Thanks.
49:35
So the last question is, uh, is it leads
49:39
to the magnification when you're doing a smaller field
49:41
of you, you want to increase the dose
49:44
because you want to get the same image brightness.
49:47
Therefore if you make it too small
49:49
and you automatically have a penalty to increase the dose,
49:51
that's the, that's the reason why we have
49:54
this higher patient dose.
49:57
Any other question? I also
50:02
for, for, for those who are participating, I also want
50:05
to draw your attention to excellent physics
50:07
articles in Radiographics.
50:10
Um, I was part, um, and this is what if it is flat panel.
50:14
So with flat panel detector,
50:16
what is happening is like when you decrease the field
50:18
of view, there is some electronic, uh,
50:21
magnification is done,
50:23
therefore the dose is not so much penalized.
50:26
So you that part is, you're right.
50:29
So what I meant to say is like if you check the
50:31
radiographics, there is a series
50:33
of physics tutorial articles which is available for free
50:37
and you can actually download, I have about five
50:39
or six of my own article
50:41
and they are go with the very straightforward topics, ct,
50:44
cardiac CT mammography and all those things.
50:46
So I'll advise you to take a look at those things can be a
50:50
very easy study guide
50:51
because each image with that legend behind itself will,
50:55
will, so will this spatial resolution increase?
50:59
Probably yes. There is so many factors, um,
51:01
which is a trade off going all, all the places.
51:04
So we have to be careful to give a one straight answer
51:07
for this particular question.
51:08
Smaller the field of you will increase the predation dose
51:11
but there is a chances it'll increase the spa,
51:14
you'll not lower the spatial resolution. That's correct.
51:18
Great. I think you got 'em all.
51:20
Thank you very much. Thank you Dr. Mahesh.
51:23
Yes, we will see you back in a couple of weeks
51:25
for another review specifically regarding ct. Yes.
51:29
Um, Yes. Thank you all for participating.
51:31
You can access the replays of our previous reviews
51:33
by creating a free account.
51:35
You can join us next week, Monday, April 7th with uh,
51:38
Dr. Aaron Gomez.
51:39
She's gonna lead us in a GU imaging board review.
51:42
And then the following week we'll have Dr. Mahesh back on.
51:44
He'll be back from France. You can register that the link
51:47
provided in the chat and follow us on social media
51:50
for future meetings.
51:51
Thanks again for learning with us and we will see you soon.