Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Physics - Radiography and Fluoroscopy Case Review with Dr. Mahesh (3-31-25)

HIDE
PrevNext

0:02

Hello and welcome to Case Crunch Rapid case review

0:04

for the core exam hosted by modality.

0:07

In this rapid fire format,

0:09

faculty will show key images along

0:11

with a multiple choice question,

0:12

and you'll respond with your best answer via

0:14

the live polling feature.

0:16

After a quick answer explanation, it's onto the next case.

0:20

You'll be able to access a recording of today's case review

0:22

and previous case reviews

0:24

by creating a free account using the link

0:26

provided in the chat today.

0:28

We are honored to welcome Dr.

0:30

M Mahesh for a physics board review

0:31

and radiography and fluoroscopy.

0:34

Dr. Mahesh is professor of radiology

0:36

and cardiology at Johns Hopkins School

0:38

of Medicine in Baltimore, Maryland.

0:41

Additionally, he's chair of the Radiation control Committee

0:43

president of a A PM board, member

0:46

of a CR subject matter expert for U-N-I-A-E-A

0:50

and an elected member of NCRP

0:52

and ICRP questions will be covered at the end

0:55

of time allows, so please remember to use the q

0:58

and a feature to submit your questions.

1:00

With that, we are ready to begin today's board review. Dr.

1:03

Mahesh, please take it from here.

1:06

Wonderful. Uh, welcome to this board review.

1:09

Um, unlike other case review, this is for physics, so every,

1:13

everything will not be images.

1:15

There'll be, um, questions

1:17

and I'm also gonna take time to explain some

1:19

of these questions, uh, in a way so

1:22

that we are also covering the physics aspect of it.

1:25

I'm not, uh, sure how much of the physics, uh,

1:29

teaching you have during your residency program,

1:31

but here at Hopkins I do teach our residents twice a month

1:36

or the whole year on different topics of, uh, physics.

1:40

So let me start with this one.

1:42

Here's my introduction

1:44

and I'm gonna talk today focus on only radiography physics

1:49

and fluoroscopy physics.

1:50

Uh, do you want to post the first question? Ashley,

1:58

this is wonderful.

2:00

So I know majority of you are preparing for your exam,

2:03

which is a good thing, and I hope also to convey that

2:07

after the exam also you'll retain some of these materials

2:11

because when you become a radiologist, you'll be exposed

2:15

to some of these concept in your practice.

2:17

It'll be nice to remember, continue to remember.

2:20

So let me start off with a very basic question.

2:24

Brain strong radiation is the predominant type

2:27

of x-rays used in radiography.

2:36

Thank you. The answer is,

2:41

answer is true and here is the way of x-ray production in,

2:45

uh, in radiography are in fluoroscopy.

2:48

So the, in these three graphs, I want to explain what, why,

2:51

what is brain strong and what characteristic x-rays are.

2:55

If you're looking as a neutral atom,

2:57

surrounded nucleus surrounded by electron, roding it out.

3:00

If there is an external radiation

3:02

or external energy passing through this atomic cloud, if

3:07

that energy does not have a capability to knock off any

3:11

of the electron, but simply get rebounded

3:13

and change the direction in the process, it loses the energy

3:18

because it has to prevent the problem.

3:20

Conservation of momentum

3:22

and also conservation of energy has to be, uh, respected.

3:25

Therefore, when these energy change the direction,

3:29

the difference in the energy comes out as a, as a radiation

3:34

and we call that as a ban, strong radiation.

3:37

And on some time these external external energy

3:41

can knock off an electron

3:44

and this electron, usually the electron held in the closest

3:48

to the nucleus are the most strongly binding,

3:52

and if the energy, the binding energy,

3:54

the energy interacting is greater than the binding energy

3:58

that can knock off an electron,

4:00

these electron are moving out of this thing environment

4:04

and electron from the adjacent shell will jump into

4:08

the occupy the space.

4:10

When they jump in, they lose an energy

4:13

between the difference between the binding energy

4:15

and we call that as a characteristic x-ray.

4:19

So if we look in here, this is a graph, we shall the energy

4:23

of the coming out of this type of interaction

4:26

and the relative output of this energy coming out.

4:29

You can see there's variety of photo energy coming out

4:33

of all different energies except the characteristic X-rays

4:38

are very unique to energy.

4:40

They don't, they come out exactly at the energy of the level

4:44

between the, the keal and the electron.

4:46

That's what it's called, the characteristic

4:48

X-ray and dressed up.

4:49

It is called prem strong radiation.

4:52

It is also called a breaking radiation brain.

4:55

Strong goes after the French physicist

4:57

who do explain the phenomena.

4:59

Let me launch the next question.

5:03

Fil increasing filtration of an x-ray beam

5:09

likely reduces exposure time, beam intensity,

5:14

average energy of half value layer.

5:23

Wonderful. So we have a variable answer here.

5:27

First of all, you need to know each of them what they are.

5:30

So here is exposure time is the amount of MA at the time

5:34

where the electrons hit the anode to create an x-ray

5:38

and we talk about beam density every day.

5:40

Let me show you what is the right answer, the right answer.

5:43

If you increase the filtration of an x-ray beam,

5:46

it likely reduces the beam intensity.

5:49

Usually the increasing filtration

5:52

reduces the x-ray tube intensity approximately, for example,

5:56

three millimeter or

5:57

so will likely reduce the x-ray tube output.

6:01

Why? Here's a situation.

6:03

So this particular graph,

6:04

I'm gonna show again for other questions.

6:06

It has, it can be explained a lot of things.

6:10

So as I said, brain stroke radiation come

6:12

with all different energies

6:14

and the maximum energy is equal

6:17

to the maximum tube voltage set.

6:19

When you're exposing a patient RNA on a protocol,

6:23

let's say a hundred KVP is the maximum tube voltage.

6:27

So the x-rays coming out have all these energies lower than

6:31

thus and they all vary like this.

6:34

Now if you put some filters, means put some material in

6:39

between aluminum, copper

6:40

or a glass, it's going to absorb some

6:43

of the low level radiation.

6:45

We don't want low energy radiation

6:47

because they do not penetrate through the body

6:50

and create a signal.

6:52

They get just surface absorbed at the surface.

6:55

Because of that, we want to filter out some

6:58

of the low energy beam.

7:00

When we do that,

7:01

what happen is the other remaining intensity will go down.

7:05

Therefore, as you can see here,

7:07

average increasing average photon energy will increase the

7:11

photon average energy, but the intensity is slower.

7:15

Let me show you this example here on this side.

7:18

These two panels are the same.

7:20

They were set at 110, a hundred, a hundred KVP

7:24

with 250 ma.

7:25

That's the tube current of the x-ray tube.

7:28

A hundred KVP is the tube potential

7:31

to attract the electron towards the

7:33

anode to create an x-ray.

7:35

If there is no filtration, this is the typical,

7:38

uh, x-rays coming out.

7:40

If you map all the x-ray beam coming out of the tube

7:43

and measure the energy and plot it, this is how it'll be.

7:46

There are some characteristic x-ray,

7:49

but rest up it is brain strong radiation.

7:51

If you add a one millimeter of aluminum

7:54

immediately you can see here the average intensity goes down

7:58

because the, the, some

8:00

of the low energies are absorbed and take it out.

8:03

Therefore, the result, the it we,

8:05

we call the term called beam hardening.

8:08

We are hardening the beam to remove the low energy photons,

8:12

which are not useful for creating an image.

8:15

That's the idea. I can go into more details later.

8:18

Um, this is,

8:19

so increasing filtration reduces x-ray tube intensity.

8:24

Um, so let me launch the next question.

8:29

What is the most likely bulky factor

8:32

in adult radiography exam?

8:41

Answer here again is all about all over the place

8:44

and the correct answer is why, which is okay, that's

8:47

what this whole LA lecture is gonna be.

8:50

So first of all, you need to know what is Bucky.

8:52

Bucky is named after a physicist called Gustav Bucky,

8:55

a German physicist who created this one who came up

8:59

with the concept, the i the correct answer is why.

9:02

And here's the explanation.

9:04

So the Bucky factor we call, is a ratio

9:07

of the entrance exposure with grid to the entrance

9:12

exposure without grid.

9:14

So therefore, what is the purpose

9:15

of adding grid to the x-ray?

9:17

Um, to the in front of the detector?

9:20

The purpose of the grid is to award scatter radiation

9:24

reaching the detector, which basically

9:26

degrades the image quality.

9:28

So that's one of the reason why we put grid in the beam.

9:31

When we put grid in the beam,

9:33

the grid is basically imagine a, a lead septum, a series

9:38

of left septum back together in a compact way.

9:41

So you can imagine, um, a straw has straws, uh,

9:45

two straws separated by a lead piece

9:48

and the same thing goes across the whole thing.

9:51

Imagine when the x-ray is coming out of the patient

9:54

hits the grid, some of it can also hit the lead area that

9:59

that uh, that x-rays would not be detected.

10:02

Therefore that is wasted because of that.

10:05

Whenever we introduce a grid,

10:07

we call it a concept called a bucky factor,

10:09

which is basically, sorry, which is basically the ratio

10:12

of the entrance exposure with grid

10:15

to the entrance exposure without grid.

10:18

Typically bucky factor range from three to five

10:20

and average bucky factor is five

10:22

and here are the typical grid ratio.

10:26

Why is this important? Because you want

10:28

to eliminate the scatter radiation reaching the detector,

10:31

which basically degrade the image quality

10:33

and then you also want

10:35

to design the grid in such a way they don't block too much

10:38

primary radiation coming off or the patient.

10:41

So that's why we have different ratios is called

10:45

eight to one.

10:46

The ratio or the weight is dis decided is eight is the

10:50

height of the septum

10:52

and one is the suppression between the septum.

10:54

So eight is to means if it is eight millimeter,

10:57

there's a one millimeter gap between the next lid.

10:59

That's the ratio. If you look in here, what I want

11:02

to show you is like the relative number of photons

11:07

mapped versus different scatter angle.

11:10

And this is for a 20 centimeter thick patient.

11:13

If the field size is 25 by 25 centimeter field of view

11:17

for a hundred KVP, this is the typical number

11:20

of X-ray reaching out the detector with no grid.

11:24

If you insert the grid, it'll block off lot of these scatter

11:28

and that will come out to lower this

11:31

because it's the relative number shrink, you may have

11:34

to increase the dose and that's

11:35

where the bucky factor comes into picture.

11:38

Again, this is basically showing the field of view

11:41

and how the scatter is impacted

11:44

or changes with respiratory patient thickness.

11:47

This is called SPR scattered to primary ratio,

11:52

scattered to primary ratio.

11:53

How much scatter is coming outta the patient compared

11:56

to the primary radiation coming out

11:57

of the coming outta the patient.

12:00

Larger the patient thickness greater the scatter

12:03

to primary ratio and that can impact the the image quality.

12:08

That's why we insert grids to block off

12:11

and make the image quality better.

12:13

There are instances where we recommend to take the grid out,

12:18

especially in a pediatric fluoroscopy case

12:21

or a pediatric uh, x-ray imaging case

12:24

where the pediatric body is so small the scatter is so less

12:28

so we don't need the GI uh, the grids

12:31

because the grids will automatically lead

12:33

to a higher radiation dose to the patient.

12:36

Therefore we select,

12:37

selectively remove the grid when we are

12:39

doing pediatric imaging.

12:40

That's the general consensus between the B factor

12:43

and the grid ratio.

12:45

If you have any question, um, please feel free

12:49

to pose it in the q

12:50

and a, I'll be happy to answer the question.

12:53

The next question, Average x-ray

12:58

energy decreases with higher beam filtration.

13:08

So the question was average decreases

13:11

with higher beam filtration.

13:16

I think some of you got the answers from the previous slide,

13:19

but the answer is false

13:24

Because it's going to increase.

13:26

Thank you. The reason is like imagine here this is the type

13:31

of x-ray coming out of the tube

13:33

and if you plot each of the energies on the,

13:36

based on the number of photon, here it is,

13:39

this is the maximum energies that you voltage.

13:42

But if you look in here, the average energy

13:45

of the upper envelope is somewhere here,

13:49

but if a beam hard on the filter,

13:51

the average energy will increase.

13:54

And that's why the question was average energy decreases

13:57

with higher beam filtration

13:59

and the correct answer was false.

14:01

No, the average energy actually increases with tube

14:06

with the beam filtering and

14:08

and one of the ways to we calculate the average energy is

14:12

as follows, whatever the tube voltage we select

14:15

that is called the peak tube voltage.

14:18

Let's say a hundred KVP.

14:21

The average energy of the x-rays coming out

14:23

of the tube voltage is usually between one third

14:26

and two third of the peak tube voltage.

14:30

If it is a hundred KVP, the one third

14:32

of the tube voltage is 33 KEV and 2 30 66 KEV.

14:37

So the average energies is in between these things

14:40

and I also want to make sure tube voltage is expressed at

14:43

KVP tube.

14:45

Energies are expressed at KEV

14:47

kilo electron ALT is the average energy, energy

14:50

of the x-rays coming out.

14:52

So one third to two third more beam filtering.

14:55

It'll be more closer towards two third.

14:57

That is 66 AAV or so for a hundred KVP beam.

15:05

Next question, Smaller the focus spot size,

15:10

greater the image unharness,

15:19

the answer is false.

15:21

I'm glad. Now you may need to answer why it is so focal.

15:25

Spot size is the size

15:27

where the x electrons are hitting the anode

15:30

and x-rays are produced

15:32

and the x-ray produced there are reaching the patient

15:35

and the detector smaller.

15:37

The point of hitting the anode greater will be the sharpness

15:42

because smaller the focal spot size,

15:44

there's a less light spread of the energy beam spread.

15:48

Because of that the images will be very sharp,

15:51

but the other is smaller.

15:54

The focal spot size greater the chance

15:56

of x-ray tube getting burnt out

15:58

because the same spa get really high tube

16:02

tube loading.

16:04

So there are chances where are situation where we prefer

16:07

to use the smaller focal spot such as um, pediatric,

16:11

such as in mammography.

16:13

We always typical to use the smallest focus spot size

16:16

because we want to have the highest

16:19

spatial resolution in the image.

16:21

But if we are doing a longer time where we are not

16:24

so much in inclined to have the sharpest spatial resolution,

16:28

we can balance a trade off

16:30

with a slightly larger focal spot site.

16:34

When I say focal spot size, the magnitude

16:36

of the focal spot site is 0.3 millimeter to 1.5 millimeter.

16:41

Not anything greater than that.

16:43

So in CT

16:45

or in intermental fluoroscopy,

16:47

the focus spot size are usually larger

16:50

and in interventional fluoroscopy size, uh, fluoroscopy,

16:53

they usually have one or two focus spots size small

16:56

and large focus spot.

16:58

The smallest focus spot size is in used in mammography in

17:02

order to get the greatest facial resolution.

17:09

Next question. Scatter radiation increases

17:14

with x-ray field size.

17:21

The answer is true. And do you know why?

17:24

Because that can I, let me explain this situation.

17:27

This is the three panels

17:29

of a fluoroscopy uh, imaging system.

17:33

If you observe here the patient is the same,

17:36

a technique is the same except the field size hitting

17:40

the patient is different.

17:42

Larger the patient,

17:44

the larger the x-ray field hit entering the patient

17:47

every instant there is some scattering happen, some

17:50

of it is scattering, some of it is passed

17:52

through the patient and a lot of it is scattered

17:55

outside the patient and that scattering is each dot.

17:59

So if you look in here, this is a half a meter block

18:02

and this is also explain why we need

18:06

to wear a lead apron when we are working around a patient is

18:10

to block off the scatter radiation.

18:12

We don't have to worry about the primary radiation.

18:15

The main thing is we want

18:16

to block ourself from scatter radiation

18:18

and that scatter radiation is directly

18:21

dependent on the field size.

18:23

So imagine here if this field size is 30 centimeter

18:27

by 30 centimeter, if this is decreased to 15 by 15

18:31

by 50% for example, if you're exposing the entire

18:35

abdomen versus you're only focusing on the spinal cord,

18:38

look in how much disa advantage you get.

18:41

You decrease the scatter radiation plus

18:44

the patient dose is also reduced by 50%

18:47

but it's also have an advantage

18:48

of decreasing the scatter radiation

18:50

and if you go further down to the column

18:52

to the exact size, you have more further.

18:55

So I'm just trying to share with you not only the exam,

18:58

answer to the exam, but I also want to know the practicality

19:02

of what this impact of scatter radiation

19:05

and what it does to the personal standing around.

19:07

And that's one of the reason why we advise our clinician

19:11

to focus to the area what they're actually doing,

19:14

the fluoroscopy when they do a long procedure

19:16

because they're not only reducing the patient to the BA dose

19:21

but they're also reducing their exposure

19:23

to scatter radiation.

19:28

Next question, a grid ratio used in typical

19:32

table bucky radiography is which one?

19:43

I'm glad majority of you got it correct.

19:45

The answer is it should be eighties to one.

19:48

So again, as I said, um, the grid ratio is the height

19:52

of the grid plate versus the space between the septum.

19:56

So this is eighties to one is what typically used

19:59

for table bucky for a mammography since the distance

20:02

between the source to the buck receptor is short,

20:06

we use a shorter phase to one and for chest radiography

20:10

and other place we sometimes use 12 to one

20:13

or one 16 is to one.

20:16

Next question, What is the dynamic range

20:21

of digital detectors?

20:31

The answer is 10, 10,000 to one.

20:33

Now the next question is what is dynamic range?

20:36

Dynamic range is the range of x-ray exposure,

20:41

which can be used in the images.

20:44

The reason is like this is in compared

20:46

to film screen system which you are not used to.

20:49

It's historically before the digital detector we had film

20:53

screen system, which means if you,

20:55

if you use too much radiation, the film will become too dark

20:59

or if you use too too less of a radiation,

21:02

the film would become too light

21:04

and you would not able to see the images.

21:07

So there in the film screen system,

21:09

the dynamic range was very limited.

21:11

About a hundred is to one.

21:13

With the digital detector,

21:14

what happens is like even though you can expose a patient

21:17

very high radiation, the images can be manipulated

21:21

and still, uh, we can chain the windows and um, window width

21:26

and processing and still the image

21:28

that see the image, the same thing.

21:30

If the radiation is too low, the images can be salvaged

21:33

by adjusting the windowing and centering.

21:36

Because of that, the digital detector gave us a wide

21:39

application of using quite a range, still able

21:43

to salvage the images.

21:45

Only one drawback is if the images were,

21:48

you would use too much radiation in the fill screen system,

21:51

radiologists would know they had used too much radiation,

21:55

but now if the technologist used too much radiation,

21:58

they would not know

21:59

because the technologies can window down in the proper way

22:03

and send the right only images which is showing up properly.

22:06

So that is a disadvantage.

22:07

That's a, that's a different thing for discussion

22:09

for radiation protection next time,

22:13

what is the most likely x-ray absorber material

22:17

used in a indirect flat panel detector?

22:26

CCI think you guys are reading the books

22:29

correctly and thank you.

22:30

This is true and the correct answer is CCMR.

22:34

The reason when you say, uh, the question here is there,

22:38

let me see, I said indirect flat

22:42

panel x-ray detector.

22:45

So indirect flat panel X-ray detector means these digital

22:49

detectors go through two PA two, two steps.

22:52

One is x-rays when they come out of the patient

22:55

don't directly create image images.

22:57

They interact with the scintillator

23:00

and the scintillator is typically CCM added crystals.

23:03

They convert the x-rays into light

23:06

and the light internal interact

23:08

with the more folic silicone detector which create an

23:12

electrical signal to create an image.

23:14

So the most common one is the CCM added crystal

23:17

because these crystals can be grown in the lab

23:20

very unilaterally,

23:22

therefore the light hit,

23:23

the light produced is not spread the they go,

23:27

they produced light and

23:28

that light enters a channeled towards the detector.

23:32

Sodium added is one

23:33

of the common common detector used in nuclear medicine.

23:36

That's where we call it a gamma camera Barium.

23:39

Fluoro is used in the in the film screen system

23:43

and selenium is a material used in a direct flat panel xray

23:47

detector, which I'll explain later in a different question.

23:52

What is the effect of narrowing the window width

23:55

in digital imaging?

24:02

That's correct. It's increases the contrast

24:05

because what I meant is na window width is like this is the

24:09

scale is expressed.

24:11

Images expressed with gray scale zero

24:13

to 2 56 level gray scale.

24:15

If it's such a wide window then the structure in the image

24:19

can all appear washed out.

24:21

That's why we narrow it down to the area of

24:23

what we interested between zero to a hundred zero to 200.

24:27

Thereby we can narrow increase the image contrast.

24:32

So let me give some questions In fluoroscopy,

24:39

fluoroscopy time is the only indicator of total dose

24:42

to patient during fluoroscopy.

24:50

False. I'm glad you answered this fall

24:53

because historically everybody thought fluoroscopy time is

24:56

the only one which indicate the total dose to patient

24:59

during fluoroscopy.

25:00

If you're observing the clinic, a lot

25:02

of the time technologists

25:03

and nurses record the fluoroscopy time

25:06

during fluoroscopy unfortunately.

25:09

Now if we don't just do fluoro,

25:12

we also do recording like the DSA like this.

25:16

Because of that the DSA

25:17

and other things can be even higher dose.

25:20

So fluoroscopy time is not the only

25:22

indicator of the total dose.

25:26

Which of the following delivers the highest radiation dose

25:29

to patient undergoing fluoroscopy, syn imaging,

25:34

fluoroscopy spot film or digital subtraction angiography?

25:44

The answer is DSA correct.

25:48

Um, majority said DSA is correct. And here's the reason.

25:52

This is a graph just to show you a given idea.

25:55

What is the typical dose required at the image receptor

26:00

for an average size patient?

26:02

What is this graph basically telling like for different mode

26:06

of fluoroscopy, how much radiation is required at the

26:10

receptor to create a good images?

26:12

This is called in micro or micro ranking per frame.

26:16

For a standard fluoro it requires one and a half to two

26:20

and a half micro R per frame.

26:22

And in fluoroscopy we don't do one frame,

26:25

we do 30 frame per second or 15 frame per second

26:28

and we do five minutes, 10 minutes

26:29

and so forth so it can add up.

26:31

However, if we look at the D-S-A-D-S-A is one

26:35

of the largest radiation, um, contributor

26:38

to the patient patient dose

26:40

because each DSA frame can be as high as 500

26:45

to thousand micro or per frame.

26:47

And in DSA we don't do one image, we always do a series

26:51

of DSA run five run tendon.

26:54

Each of them are three per three frame per second,

26:57

so it can add sub.

26:58

Therefore if we just record the fluoroscopy minute,

27:02

that is not an indicator of the two patient dose.

27:05

In fact, we had to account all of them, especially

27:08

for a intermental fluoroscopy.

27:10

If you're doing a DSA, one of our, my suggestion

27:13

for our resident is to minimize the number

27:15

of DSA run they do

27:17

because it can add to the patient dose very fast.

27:23

In fluoroscopy, which of the following image receptor

27:27

has higher penalty with magnification?

27:35

Correct. Your image I tensor has the highest

27:38

penalty and I'll tell you why.

27:41

Again, this is just to show you a trick,

27:43

this was incorrectly answered

27:45

but the correct answer is the image intensifier.

27:48

Look at this graph. When you do magnification image,

27:52

intensifier has a greater penalty compared to the uh, the

27:56

advanced technology, the flat panel detector.

27:59

What shown here is like this is a image intensifier,

28:03

this is a phantom entrance skin dose rate

28:06

milli grape per minute.

28:07

You can see here, if you go down the in the magnification

28:11

means that the field size is smaller, the penalty is more

28:15

compared to the flat panel technology.

28:17

So this is how it works.

28:19

In a typical image intensifier field,

28:21

it is usually circular.

28:23

You hardly probably,

28:24

you hardly see image intensifier these days except some uh,

28:29

crs but most of the clinic are now has flat panel detector

28:33

where the penalty with magnification is far less compared

28:37

to the penalty with the image intensifier.

28:39

Because here when you decrease, when you go

28:42

to the mag field, mag mode, the field of view decreases

28:46

because the field of view decreases the number of x-rays.

28:50

Reaching the outside of the output

28:52

of the intensifier also decreases.

28:55

In order to maintain the image brightness,

28:57

the scanner will automatically push greater

29:00

radiation to come through the patient.

29:02

Therefore magnification means it increases the radiation

29:06

dose to the radia to the patient with image intensifier.

29:09

And that's, and there's the ratio of the ratio

29:12

of the image intensifier size versus the amount of radiation

29:16

and required with magnification.

29:18

So the penalty is greater with the image intensifier

29:23

compared to the, uh, the recent advanced technology

29:25

of flat panel detector.

29:30

Most appropriate radiation dose metric to evaluate skin dose

29:35

for patient undergoing fluoroscopy.

29:45

So majority had chosen dose area product, none

29:49

of you chosen amount of curie.

29:50

I'm glad because the amount

29:52

of activity is usually for nuclear medicine.

29:54

But the answer, the correct answer is community dose. Why?

29:58

I'll tell you because generally, sorry, this is

30:02

how typically different dose metrics are measured in

30:06

fluoroscopy or radiography.

30:08

There are so many different factors which,

30:10

which results in calculating the x-ray output

30:13

and this is called the entrance skin dose amount

30:17

of x-rays entering the patient.

30:19

Medical physicist has a unique way to measure that

30:22

and it is checked on a regular basis and all those things.

30:26

This is the exit dose and this is the entrance dose.

30:30

So with respect to um, the entrance dose,

30:33

that which is also important for calculating the skin dose

30:37

to the patient because if the skin dose is very high

30:41

that can show up with skin injury.

30:43

The way the skin dose is measured is we are we,

30:47

we are two main dose descriptors in

30:49

fluoroscopy or radiography.

30:51

One is the community dose,

30:53

the other one is a dose area product for those

30:56

who chose those area product.

30:58

It is also a current dose descriptor,

31:00

but that is not use

31:01

so much useful in evaluating the skin dose.

31:04

It is useful for estimating the risk

31:06

of the whole body, which is a different area.

31:09

So the correct answer is community dose

31:11

and the way it's measured is you can actually measure on the

31:14

skin surface how much x-ray x-rays are entering.

31:17

That's one of the reason why we filter the beam

31:20

because we want x-rays.

31:21

Don't just deposit in the skin surface and not go through

31:25

and create an image, co create a signal.

31:28

And that's why we filter by putting filters in the, in the,

31:32

in the, in the output of the x-ray tube to block a lot

31:34

of the low radiation filter and so forth.

31:37

So the correct answer is cumul dose

31:39

and is expressed in milli gray.

31:42

That is the SI unit conventionally we also call it a

31:46

rad milli radiation dose absorb.

31:52

So for mammography,

31:54

what is the most common target filter combination

31:57

to image a death dense breast?

32:06

So this is all over the place and the,

32:08

and the most highest chosen is rhodium rhodium,

32:11

which is the correct answer,

32:12

but I'm gonna explain to you there's also a one question in

32:15

the question in the question area.

32:17

If air camera was an option, would

32:18

that be a correct over community dose?

32:20

You are correct as as long

32:22

as the Air Karma is expressed at milli gray, that's

32:25

how we track on the patient air karma dose,

32:28

which is explained, which is displayed on the scanner.

32:30

So that is also, that is a correct one also.

32:33

So in mammography it's it's, it's a different type

32:37

of radiation used for mammography, we generally,

32:40

we don't use brem strong radiation,

32:42

we use characteristic x-rays

32:44

and that's one of the reason why mammo

32:47

for mammography we need

32:48

to have a mammography dedicated unit.

32:50

And the correct answer here

32:52

for dense breast is rhodium rhodium, that's the target

32:55

and the filter, here's an explanation.

32:58

So generally in mammography we are working

33:01

around in the lower energy.

33:03

You may ask the question, aren't we worried about me?

33:06

The lower en radiation absorbed just on the skin surface

33:10

don't pass through the body.

33:11

That's correct. However,

33:12

you don't need too much energetic x-rays in the to to memo

33:16

to image the mammos breast,

33:18

because breast is a soft tissue, there is no bones.

33:21

So because of that we can get away

33:24

with the lower energy still able to penetrate the breast.

33:28

The, and also it is important to differentiate

33:30

between the muscle and the fatty tissue

33:33

and the glanular tissue in breast.

33:35

Therefore if you use a higher energy,

33:38

the energy just washes out the image.

33:41

So now let's look at here.

33:42

This is a typical moly, molybdenum target

33:46

with the rhodium spa molybdenum and rhodium spectra.

33:50

But now here is molybdenum target

33:53

with the moly spect filtration.

33:55

The reason we use the same filtration is to block off lot

33:59

of these um, energies, low energies

34:01

and the high energy which is not used.

34:03

So that only characteristic x-rays of molybdenum, which is

34:06

around 1819, which is, is coming out of the x-ray tube

34:10

and that is the typically the type of target used

34:14

for a general breast tissue.

34:16

But if the breast tissue is dense,

34:17

the system automatically try to go for a larger target

34:21

because you need a little bit more energetic x-ray.

34:24

With the rhodium rhodium, it's usually the characteristic is

34:27

around 20 KEV which is suitable for mammo

34:31

for imaging the dense breast.

34:36

So typical voltage two voltage used in screening mammogram.

34:41

I think this is a easy giveaway question.

34:43

Um, everybody should be able to get this correct.

34:52

I'm glad majority card but still some of you got 55 to 75.

34:57

No, we are using typically the low energy.

35:00

We are not using this energy.

35:01

This is the typical energy of a radiography 55

35:06

to 75 on an average patient.

35:08

1 25 is usually used

35:10

for chest x-ray one 20 kvp is typically used for um, a lot

35:15

of the CT exams,

35:16

which we are gonna discuss in the next lecture.

35:18

So typically is between 25 to 30 39 KP.

35:22

Remember we are using characteristic x-rays

35:25

and also we want to image the best contrast

35:28

between the fatty tissue, glandular tissue

35:30

and the breast tissue, which is only

35:33

possible if you use characteristic x-ray

35:35

and at the lower energy range, which is what it is possible.

35:41

Why is compression key in screening mammogram?

35:50

And you have chosen all of the above.

35:53

Majority of you chosen all of the above. Perfect.

35:55

That's exactly the answer. The answer is all of the above.

35:59

And the reason is as follows.

36:02

So unfortunately in mammography, breast are compressed

36:07

and in fact that's one of the very negative

36:10

of screening mammogram.

36:11

Women hardly sometime hate to come back from annual checkup

36:15

because they can remember the previous year when they had

36:18

such a painful um, compression.

36:22

But compression is essential for a number of reason.

36:25

One is it is essential to reduce the x-ray scatter,

36:28

otherwise the pressed if is not compressed,

36:31

there is lot more scatter produced

36:33

that can image image quality more than that,

36:37

even though you do a such a fast x-ray in mammography

36:40

imaging still about one second or three second exposure.

36:44

If it is not compressed, they can always reduce, um,

36:48

motion artifact.

36:49

That will also reduces the geometric unharness

36:52

because the breast, the 3D breast image is trying

36:56

to compress as much as possible to a wide overlap.

37:00

And also to have this reduce unharness

37:04

that is also important.

37:06

It also reduces the patient dose when you compress

37:08

and it also reduce the motion unharness, unfortunately, uh,

37:12

the compression is very hard.

37:14

When I teach my residents

37:15

or my physics graduate students, I take them to the clinic,

37:19

especially male students.

37:21

I want to put their hand underneath the compression

37:24

and compress 35 or 40 pounds.

37:26

They know how it, it feels the pain

37:29

and that will, I wanna convey that

37:31

because it's the pain the patient, the the tech,

37:34

the patient experiences when they're doing mammogram

37:37

and uh, that's why we want to teach

37:39

or uh, to appreciate what the patient goes

37:42

through when they go through imaging sometime.

37:45

So the next question, brainstorm radiation

37:49

interaction results in

37:54

The following,

38:01

correct?

38:03

There may be some confusion of characteristic x-rays.

38:06

Um, it usually the interaction can result in characteristic

38:11

but the bem strong radiation means it is always associated

38:14

with the poly energetic x-rays.

38:16

Of course the heat is also produced

38:18

but it takes too much x-rays to create a

38:20

to raise the temperature by one degrees of the heat.

38:23

We have done some experiment to show that it takes lot of,

38:26

so heat is the last of this one,

38:28

but the answer is brand strong radiation interaction results

38:31

in poly energetic x-rays

38:34

as I I showed you the spectrum there are poly energetic when

38:38

it interact and it create, it can interact

38:40

and produce characteristic x-ray of unique energies.

38:49

The ans the choice a good choice, the answer is four

38:53

because I also mentioned here this is the,

38:57

the x-ray tube is under the x-ray table.

39:00

That's important because

39:01

that will tell you which exactly is coming.

39:03

The x-ray is hitting the patient

39:05

through under the table here, pass through the patient

39:08

x-ray table, pass through the padding

39:11

and pass through the patient

39:13

and every interaction result in tic absorption count

39:16

and scattering and PU is transmitted

39:18

through the tissue you capture

39:20

but lot of it is scattered back also.

39:23

Some of it is called back scatter

39:25

and that's why the number four has the highest uh, um,

39:29

or scatter in this direction.

39:31

And probably I also wanna draw your attention uh,

39:34

at sometime in the airport we used

39:35

to have an airport scanner.

39:37

They use the phenomena back scatter to create a fuzzy image

39:40

of the surface and that's

39:42

how they just used in the security.

39:44

Um, these days we don't use that scanner.

39:47

We are using more of a radio frequency scan, um, uh,

39:51

type of scanner in the airport.

39:52

And again that is also used as the concept

39:55

of scatter coming out and capturing and creating an image.

39:58

That's why they ask patient travelers

40:00

to remove everything on the surface so that it,

40:03

I don't show up on the images.

40:06

So, so according to us federal regression,

40:10

what is maximum skin entrance exposure rate load

40:14

during normal fluoroscopy?

40:22

The answer is 10 r per minute. Why?

40:25

And the people are chosen different numbers

40:27

but the regulation as

40:29

of now the correct answer is 10 R per minute.

40:32

In fact, that is the only limitation we have on the

40:35

fluoroscopy system.

40:37

There are two limited. One is during normal fluoro,

40:41

no matter how much the patient sizes when we measure at a

40:44

certain point it cannot exceed 10 r per minute.

40:48

In fact, that's one of the tests medical physicists does on

40:51

a annually to make sure the x-ray tube is not

40:53

producing too much radiation.

40:55

The second one is there is when you do on a high dose fluoro

40:59

mode or a boost level, it can go up to 20 r per minute.

41:03

That's where the question was 20 r per minute was there.

41:06

Other than that for senior DSA, there is no limit.

41:10

That's why we emphasize any of the fluoroscopy system

41:13

evaluated and tested

41:15

by a qualified medical businesses on an ongoing basis

41:18

to make sure the radiation levels are within the,

41:22

within the regulatory requirement.

41:26

Which of the following setup results in the lowest skin dose

41:30

to patient during fluoroscopy?

41:39

This is a difficult question

41:40

because there is a scenario changes all over the place,

41:42

but the correct answer is four.

41:45

And now I'm gonna explain why.

41:47

And before that there is one question posed in the qa

41:50

and the question is what filter combination we use

41:53

for normal density screen mammogram

41:55

for a normal density screen mammogram typical

41:59

technique is Molly, Molly and that's what it's system

42:03

and actually most of the mammography system

42:05

pre-select it which technique to use it.

42:08

When the pressed, when you select the uh, auto auto filter

42:12

technique, the system will send, give it three milliseconds

42:16

or less than a fraction to to sense the density

42:19

of the breast and it changes the technique for a normal um,

42:23

a normal density typically is molly Molly

42:27

and if it is slightly higher than we go into molly rhodium,

42:30

so that goes that that's the choice between Molly, Molly,

42:33

molly rhodium and if the density is even more higher than it

42:37

go to molly rhodium and then switch to mo rhodium rhodium

42:41

and then it even go into rhodium aluminum.

42:43

There are all these new things are happening

42:46

with the contrast mammography coming into clinic,

42:48

we're gonna see even more higher technique used

42:51

because it has to penetrate to the contrast.

42:54

So now the question here is the answer is D, two things.

42:58

First of all, what you want

42:59

to make make sure is like the patient is as far away

43:03

as possible from the x-ray tube

43:06

because only then you'll have less

43:09

radiation reaching the patient.

43:11

That's why we advise sometime a tall, a short radiologist

43:15

who are doing a fluoroscopy to stand on top of a table

43:19

to bring the patient away from the x-ray tube because

43:22

otherwise they can be in this scenario

43:24

where the short radiologist can,

43:26

because of the height the patient is automatically very

43:30

close to the x-ray tube that can lead

43:31

to higher uh, entrance dose to the patient.

43:35

Ideally this is the best case scenario.

43:38

This is what happen if we do this one.

43:40

There's lot of these um,

43:42

wasted in a way sometimes it's helpful

43:44

but mostly this is the most idealistic where the patient is

43:49

as close as possible to the image receptor.

43:51

Otherwise in this scenario the object can get magnified

43:55

and larger and so forth.

43:57

Uh, so this is the best scenario. Question number 2 22.

44:03

Automatic brightness control in fluoroscopy attempts

44:06

to maintain what

44:14

the correct answer is image brightness.

44:17

And that is one of the greatest um, feature

44:20

of the fluoroscopy because that's the one modality.

44:23

What we use these days is truly, truly um,

44:27

automatic brightness

44:28

because when we do the fluoro moment,

44:31

you put the foot on the pedal

44:33

or you can observe the image getting adjusted the brightness

44:36

because the image receptor will sense the patient thickness.

44:40

How much of the x-ray are coming outta the patient

44:43

to create then there is a requirement on how much brightness

44:47

to maintain depending on what we have set.

44:50

So that will automatically redirect to get more radiation

44:54

to pass through to reach the same brightness.

44:57

So you can also see sometime when you're doing a fluoro,

44:59

you move from a thicker portion

45:01

to the thinner area like a arm

45:03

or a leg, immediately the brightness changes

45:06

and it automatically flow immediately adjust

45:09

by adjusting tube voltage, sorry,

45:12

adjusting tube voltage or tube current.

45:15

It automatically interplay those things

45:17

and still to in order to maintain the image brightness.

45:20

Next question. What is the single radiation dose threshold

45:25

for onset of temporary appellation?

45:33

The answer is all over the place.

45:35

I understand there is some ity, the correct answer.

45:38

What we use is three gray.

45:41

The reason is like this is the approximate trend.

45:44

We have the the table for an average side patient,

45:48

if the entrance skin dose at the same point

45:52

exceeds more than two

45:53

or three gray, three grays, 3000 milligram of dose,

45:58

you can expect temporary appellation

46:00

and the onset is less than a week.

46:03

So, and if you go higher it, if it is more than seven gray

46:08

that when it can create a permanent appellation,

46:11

most probably you're going to hear from the patient back.

46:14

And this is what happens.

46:15

Why during intermental fluoroscopy we emphasize training

46:19

of the staff and the user very much

46:21

to understand these things.

46:23

Here are an example of radiation induced car injuries

46:26

after coronary procedure.

46:28

These are a cath procedure performed by the cardiologist.

46:32

If you look in here, the size

46:34

of the injury will tell you this is a biplane system

46:38

and this dose was estimated to close to a 10 grade.

46:41

10 gram means you're talking about inro innovative fibrosis

46:46

and it's more, it's gonna be a permanent injury here is

46:49

after two months in another patient

46:52

and that the injury was trying to heal itself

46:54

and the system loses the capacity to repair

46:57

and here it came out a necrosis of the area.

47:00

So these are very rare cases,

47:02

but it's happen in interven oscopy.

47:07

What percentage of patient entrance exposure rate is scatter

47:11

exposure rate at one meter?

47:19

So again, this is has all a variety

47:23

of question, but here is the answer.

47:26

Generally this is a general, as I said,

47:29

for an average size patient undergoing fluoroscopy,

47:33

the scatter coming out of the patient

47:35

at one meter is one 1000 of what he

47:39

or she's getting that's equal to 0.1 percentage.

47:43

So if the patient is getting sir X amount,

47:46

the scatter coming out at one meter is approximately

47:49

1000 of it.

47:52

And this is important to understand

47:54

that is also impact scatter radiation exposure

47:56

to the personal working around the fluoroscopy system.

48:00

So greater the radiation dose of the patient,

48:02

greater the scatter radiation hitting the at one meter.

48:05

And this is approximately number,

48:08

I think this is the last question.

48:09

Smaller the field of view

48:11

in fluoroscopy system results in what?

48:21

And the answer is it's higher patient radiation dose.

48:24

That's where it becomes we want to decrease the um, we want

48:28

to uh, increase the magnification and so forth.

48:31

There is, there is one question posed here,

48:33

isn't there generally a lot more scattered?

48:36

I agree there's a lot more scatter,

48:38

but the weight it's related to the entrance exposure

48:41

to the patient is what I'm mentioning.

48:43

At one meter not very adjacent to the patient.

48:46

Approximately one meter is 1000th of

48:49

what the patient is getting.

48:51

That's what we have observed, measured these things.

48:54

But if you're closer to the patient, it'll be a lot more.

48:56

So at one meter is what is 1000th.

49:01

I think this is all the questions I wanted to share

49:03

with you, but I think as we still have four minutes,

49:06

if you have any questions, um, uh,

49:09

pose this question I'll try to answer.

49:11

Otherwise I wish you all the best

49:13

and I think two weeks from now I'm gonna come back

49:16

and talk about ct.

49:19

Well thank you so much Dr.

49:20

Mahesh for this wonderful case review.

49:23

We will hold for a minute.

49:24

I think there's a couple questions coming in.

49:27

Sure. Now, oh, I, I see that.

49:30

Couple more questions coming in.

49:32

Um, explain the last question. Thanks.

49:35

So the last question is, uh, is it leads

49:39

to the magnification when you're doing a smaller field

49:41

of you, you want to increase the dose

49:44

because you want to get the same image brightness.

49:47

Therefore if you make it too small

49:49

and you automatically have a penalty to increase the dose,

49:51

that's the, that's the reason why we have

49:54

this higher patient dose.

49:57

Any other question? I also

50:02

for, for, for those who are participating, I also want

50:05

to draw your attention to excellent physics

50:07

articles in Radiographics.

50:10

Um, I was part, um, and this is what if it is flat panel.

50:14

So with flat panel detector,

50:16

what is happening is like when you decrease the field

50:18

of view, there is some electronic, uh,

50:21

magnification is done,

50:23

therefore the dose is not so much penalized.

50:26

So you that part is, you're right.

50:29

So what I meant to say is like if you check the

50:31

radiographics, there is a series

50:33

of physics tutorial articles which is available for free

50:37

and you can actually download, I have about five

50:39

or six of my own article

50:41

and they are go with the very straightforward topics, ct,

50:44

cardiac CT mammography and all those things.

50:46

So I'll advise you to take a look at those things can be a

50:50

very easy study guide

50:51

because each image with that legend behind itself will,

50:55

will, so will this spatial resolution increase?

50:59

Probably yes. There is so many factors, um,

51:01

which is a trade off going all, all the places.

51:04

So we have to be careful to give a one straight answer

51:07

for this particular question.

51:08

Smaller the field of you will increase the predation dose

51:11

but there is a chances it'll increase the spa,

51:14

you'll not lower the spatial resolution. That's correct.

51:18

Great. I think you got 'em all.

51:20

Thank you very much. Thank you Dr. Mahesh.

51:23

Yes, we will see you back in a couple of weeks

51:25

for another review specifically regarding ct. Yes.

51:29

Um, Yes. Thank you all for participating.

51:31

You can access the replays of our previous reviews

51:33

by creating a free account.

51:35

You can join us next week, Monday, April 7th with uh,

51:38

Dr. Aaron Gomez.

51:39

She's gonna lead us in a GU imaging board review.

51:42

And then the following week we'll have Dr. Mahesh back on.

51:44

He'll be back from France. You can register that the link

51:47

provided in the chat and follow us on social media

51:50

for future meetings.

51:51

Thanks again for learning with us and we will see you soon.

Report

Faculty

Mahadevappa Mahesh, PhD, FACR, MS, FAAPM, FACMP, FSCCT, FIOMP

Professor of Radiology and Cardiology

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Tags

Vascular Imaging

Pediatrics

Nuclear Medicine

Neuroradiology

Musculoskeletal (MSK)

Interventional

Head and Neck

Genitourinary (GU)

Gastrointestinal (GI)

Chest

Cardiac

Breast

Body