Upcoming Events
Log In
Pricing
Free Trial

Asymmetry - Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

HIDE
PrevNext

0:00

In this case, we have a 65 year old female presenting for a

0:04

screening mammogram. As usual, we look at image quality, and we see the

0:10

pectoralis muscle looks okay, a little bit less on this left MLO. CC views

0:15

look appropriate. I'll pull down the CC views to look at first.

0:21

We see scattered fibroglandular densities, normal breast tissue on both

0:26

sides, no particular lining seen on the SM views in either breast. We pull

0:34

down the MLO views. On the right side, it looks normal,

0:39

and nothing to see there. On the left side, there is some sort

0:42

of a little bit of tissue here, which might catch your eye.

0:44

You might also think it looks pretty normal on this SM view. As

0:49

we pull up the DBT stack though, however, we'll start on the lateral

0:53

side here and scroll through slowly. Focus your attention on this upper

0:58

part here. And if we stop around right here, we can see that

1:02

this area, the superior part of the breast, looks a little bit

1:06

abnormal, a little bit different compared to the rest. We can see some

1:10

suggestion of some radiating lines here, suggesting maybe there's something

1:14

there that looks a little bit more abnormal.

1:19

We scroll through the rest of the imaging slices. We don't see anything

1:22

else that looks abnormal. If we did decide this looked abnormal enough to

1:26

call back, recall for a diagnostic mammogram, we would have to say that

1:30

this falls into the category of an asymmetry. We see it in only

1:34

a single view. Despite the fact that we might see some potential spiculations

1:38

here, we'd want to call it asymmetry and do some further workup for

1:42

that case. I did want to show you, in this particular case,

1:46

just a prior exam. This prior exam is from 38 months prior.

1:52

And if we look in a similar area in this case,

1:55

we don't see that same asymmetry. Now if I bring over even a

2:00

longer ago prior exam, 73 months prior, we definitely don't see it there

2:05

either. So we would call this an asymmetry. We might wonder about developing

2:10

asymmetry based on the fact that we don't see it on the prior exams.

2:13

Of course, now we don't see it on the CC views. It doesn't

2:15

strictly fall into the category of the developing asymmetry because it's

2:18

not a focal asymmetry. However, you might consider noting in your report

2:22

that it is at least new from the prior exams.

2:26

This patient did subsequently go on to get a diagnostic mammogram at a

2:29

later time. On that diagnostic mammogram, we did eventually were able to

2:34

find this utilizing XCCL view. We scroll through the XCCL. We can see

2:43

there's a small finding here. This could either be considered a focal asymmetry

2:47

or a possible mass. There's some possible associated architectural distortion

2:50

with it. They subsequently went on to ultrasound and biopsy and it was an

2:52

invasive ductal carcinoma.

Report

Faculty

Ryan W. Woods, MD, MPH

Assistant Professor of Radiology

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Tags

Women's Health

Tomosynthesis

Oncologic Imaging

Mammography

Breast

© 2025 Medality. All Rights Reserved.

Contact UsTerms of UsePrivacy Policy